The Walking Behaviour of Pedestrian Social Groups and Its Impact on Crowd Dynamics

Abstract

Human crowd motion is mainly driven by self-organized processes based on local interactions among pedestrians. While most studies of crowd behaviour consider only interactions among isolated individuals, it turns out that up to 70% of people in a crowd are actually moving in groups, such as friends, couples, or families walking together. These groups constitute medium-scale aggregated structures and their impact on crowd dynamics is still largely unknown. In this work, we analyze the motion of approximately 1500 pedestrian groups under natural condition, and show that social interactions among group members generate typical group walking patterns that influence crowd dynamics. At low density, group members tend to walk side by side, forming a line perpendicular to the walking direction. As the density increases, however, the linear walking formation is bent forward, turning it into a V-like pattern. These spatial patterns can be well described by a model based on social communication between group members. We show that the V-like walking pattern facilitates social interactions within the group, but reduces the flow because of its "non-aerodynamic" shape. Therefore, when crowd density increases, the group organization results from a trade-off between walking faster and facilitating social exchange. These insights demonstrate that crowd dynamics is not only determined by physical constraints induced by other pedestrians and the environment, but also significantly by communicative, social interactions among individuals.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

References 31

1. 1.

   Helbing D, Molnar P, Farkas IJ, Bolay K. Self-organizing pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 2001;28:361-383.

   Not in our library

2. 2.

   Ball P. Critical Mass: How One Thing Leads to Another. 2004.

   Not in our library

3. 3.

   Couzin I, Krause J. Self-organization and collective behavior in vertebrates. Advances in the Study of Behavior. 2003;32:1-75.

   Not in our library

4. 4.

   Sumpter D. The principles of collective animal behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2006;361:5-22.

   Not in our library10.1098/rstb.2005.1733

5. 5.

   Daamen W, Hoogendoorn S. Controlled experiments to derive walking behaviour. Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research. 2002;3:39-59.

   Not in our library

6. 6.

   Hoogendoorn S, Daamen W. Pedestrian Behavior at Bottlenecks. Transportation Science. 2005;39:147-159.

   Not in our library

7. 7.

   Kretz T, Grünebohm A, Schreckenberg M. Experimental study of pedestrian flow through a bottleneck. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiments P10014. 2006.

   Not in our library

8. 8.

   Kretz T, Grünebohm A, Kaufman M, Mazur F, Schreckenberg M. Experimental study of pedestrian counterflow in a corridor. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiments P10001. 2006.

   Not in our library

9. 9.

   Moussaïd M, Helbing D, Garnier S, Johansson A, Combe M, et al. Experimental study of the behavioural mechanisms underlying self-organization in human crowds. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2009;276:2755-2762.

   Not in our library10.1098/rspb.2009.0405

10. 10.

    Helbing D, Molnar P. Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Physical Review E. 1995;51:4282-4286.

    Not in our library10.1103/physreve.51.4282

11. 11.

    Helbing D, Johansson A, Al-Abideen H. The Dynamics of crowd disasters: an empirical study. Physical Review E. 2007;75:046109.

    Not in our library10.1103/physreve.75.046109

12. 12.

    Yu W, Johansson A. Modeling crowd turbulence by many-particle simulations. Physical Review E. 2007;76:046105.

    Not in our library10.1103/physreve.76.046105

13. 13.

    Johansson A, Helbing D, Shukla P. Specification of the social force pedestrian model by evolutionary adjustment to video tracking data. Advances in Complex Systems. 2007;10:271-288.

    Not in our library

14. 14.

    Antonini G, Bierlaire M, Weber M. Discrete choice models of pedestrian walking behavior. Transportation Research Part B. 2006;40:667-687.

    Not in our library

15. 15.

    Coleman JS, James J. The equilibrium size distribution of freely-forming groups. Sociometry. 1961;24:36-45.

    Not in our library

16. 16.

    Aveni A. The Not-So-Lonely Crowd: Friendship Groups in Collective Behavior. Sociometry. 1977;40:96-99.

    Not in our library

17. 17.

    James J. The Distribution of Free-Forming Small Group Size. American Sociological Review. 1953;18:569-570.

    Not in our library

18. 18.

    Hare AP. Handbook of small group research. 1962.

    Not in our library

19. 19.

    Singh H, Arter R, Dodd L, Langston P, Lester E, et al. Modelling Subgroup Behaviour in Crowd Dynamics DEM Simulation. Applied Mathematical Modelling. 2009;33:4408-4423.

    Not in our library

20. 20.

    Seyfried A, Steffen B, Klingsch W, Boltes M. The Fundamental Diagram of Pedestrian Movement Revisited. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment P10002. 2005.

    Not in our library

21. 21.

    Mori M, Tsukaguchi H. A new method for evaluation of level of service in pedestrian facilities. Transportation Research A. 1987;21:223-234.

    Not in our library

22. 22.

    Weidmann U. Transporttechnik der Fussganger: ETH Zürich, SchriftenreiheIVT-Berichte 90. 1993.

    Not in our library

23. 23.

    Argyle M, Dean J. Eye-Contact, Distance and Affiliation. Sociometry. 1965;28:289-304.

    Not in our library

24. 24.

    Kendon A. Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1967;26:22-63.

    Not in our library10.1016/0001-6918(67)90005-4

25. 25.

    Ballerini M, Cabibbo N, Candelier R, Cavagna A, Cisbani E, et al. Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2008;105:1232.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0711437105

26. 26.

    Lissaman PBS, Shollenberger C. Formation Flight of Birds. Science. 1970;168:1003-1005.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.168.3934.1003

27. 27.

    Heppner F. Avian Flight Formations. Bird-Banding. 1974;45:160-169.

    Not in our library

28. 28.

    Helbing D, Buzna L, Johansson A, Werner T. Self-Organized Pedestrian Crowd Dynamics: Experiments, Simulations, and Design Solutions. Transportation Science. 2005;39:1-24.

    Not in our library

29. 29.

    Stephan F, Mishler E. The Distribution of Participation in Small Groups: An Exponential Approximation. American Sociological Review. 1952;17:598-608.

    Not in our library

30. 30.

    Horvath W. A mathematical model of participation in small group discussions. Behavioral Science. 1965;10:164-166.

    Not in our library10.1002/bs.3830100206

31. 31.

    Collins RD, Tourtellot MK, Bell WJ. Defining stops in search pathways. Journal of neuroscience methods. 1995;60:95-98.

    Not in our library10.1016/0165-0270(94)00224-5

Cited by papers we hold 2

• Intracellular invasion and survival of Brucella neotomae, another possible zoonotic Brucella species. · 2019
  Not checked
• Walking together: behavioural signatures of psychological crowds · 2018
  Not checked

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.