No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 26, 2026.
Genomic Diversity among Drug Sensitive and Multidrug Resistant Isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with Identical DNA Fingerprints
Stefan Niemann, Claudio U. Köser, Sebastien Gagneux and 15 more
PLoS ONE · 2009
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007407
Abstract
Background. Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC), the causative agent of tuberculosis (TB), is characterized by low sequence diversity making this bacterium one of the classical examples of a genetically monomorphic pathogen. Because of this limited DNA sequence variation, routine genotyping of clinical MTBC isolates for epidemiological purposes relies on highly discriminatory DNA fingerprinting methods based on mobile and repetitive genetic elements. According to the standard view, isolates exhibiting the same fingerprinting pattern are considered direct progeny of the same bacterial clone, and most likely reflect ongoing transmission or disease relapse within individual patients.
Methodology/Principal Findings. Here we further investigated this assumption and used massively parallel whole-genome sequencing to compare one drug-susceptible (K-1) and one multidrug resistant (MDR) isolate (K-2) of a rapidly spreading M. tuberculosis Beijing genotype clone from a high incidence region (Karakalpakstan, Uzbekistan). Both isolates shared the same IS6110 RFLP pattern and the same allele at 23 out of 24 MIRU-VNTR loci. We generated 23.9 million (K-1) and 33.0 million (K-2) paired 50 bp purity filtered reads corresponding to a mean coverage of 483.5 fold and 656.1 fold respectively. Compared with the laboratory strain H37Rv both Beijing isolates shared 1,209 SNPs. The two Beijing isolates differed by 130 SNPs and one large deletion. The susceptible isolate had 55 specific SNPs, while the MDR variant had 75 specific SNPs, including the five known resistance-conferring mutations.
Conclusions. Our results suggest that M. tuberculosis isolates exhibiting identical DNA fingerprinting patterns can harbour substantial genomic diversity. Because this heterogeneity is not captured by traditional genotyping of MTBC, some aspects of the transmission dynamics of tuberculosis could be missed or misinterpreted. Furthermore, a valid differentiation between disease relapse and exogenous reinfection might be impossible using standard genotyping tools if the overall diversity of circulating clones is limited. These findings have important implications for clinical trials of new anti-tuberculosis drugs.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 26, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Introduction
Tuberculosis (TB) is primarily a symptom of poverty and inequality,, which accounts for its uninterrupted prevalence in most parts of the world. This disparity in TB burden is further exacerbated by the widespread emergence of antibiotic resistance. In Eastern Europe, all of these factors coincide. In Karakalpakstan (Uzbekistan) multi-drug resistant (MDR) Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (Mtb) strains infect up to 22% of patients never treated and up to 60% of those previously treated,,. Therefore the most effective antibiotics with the fewest side-effects, isoniazid (INH) and rifampicin (RMP), must, in MDR TB, be replaced by less-effective, more expensive, and more toxic substitutes.
In addition to the socio-economic, environmental, and host genetic determinants, strain genetic diversity in Mtb appears to play a more important role than previously believed,,,. Mtb comprises several phylogenetic lineages, some of which have been shown to significantly impact progression from infection to active tuberculosis as well as disease manifestation,,. In Karakalpakstan and other parts of Eastern Europe, the so-called Beijing lineage of Mtb is mostly responsible for the ongoing MDR epidemic. Some members of this strain lineage have been reported to be hypervirulent in animal models, and others have been associated with large outbreaks and extensive transmission of MDR TB in various regions of the world,,. These findings contradict previous assumptions that resistant Mtb strains in general have a reduced fitness. The fact that MDR variants can even have an enhanced fitness when compared with susceptible progenitor strains, points to the phenomenon of compensatory evolution that can reverse adverse effects on bacterial fitness,.
Even though genetic diversity appears to influence virulence and immunogenicity of strain of different phylogenetic lineages, the overall level of sequence variation in Mtb is low and Mtb is considered to represent the “upper limit of what might be considered genetically monomorphic”. Whole genome comparisons of M. tuberculosis and M. bovis, another species of the M. tuberculosis complex, revealed a maximum diversity of just 2,500 SNPs. M. tuberculosis isolates of the same clone or strain (e.g. characterised by IS6110 genotyping) are generally considered to be identical and belong to the same outbreak or recent chain of transmission. However, the real level of genomic diversity in rapidly expanding clones from high incidence settings has not been assessed.
To address this question, we have applied massively paralleled whole-genome sequencing to two clinical isolates from Karakalpakstan. These isolates were virtually identical with respect to all standard TB genotyping markers, including IS6110 RFLP, which is the most discriminating test of all standard molecular TB typing tools in use today (Figure 1). The two isolates, K-1 and K-2, differed in only 1 of 24 Mycobacterial Interspersed Repetitive Units. However, whilst K-1 was fully drug-susceptible, K-2 was resistant to all first line drugs (INH, RMP, ethambutol (EMB), pyrazinamide (PZA) and streptomycin (SM)). Both isolates were part of a large cluster of closely related organisms termed the Beijing K-family that encompasses the dominant, expanding Mtb variant in the region [unpublished results,14].
Genome coverage
We generated 23.9 million (K-1) and 33.0 million (K-2) paired 50 bp purity filtered reads corresponding to a mean coverage of 483.5 fold and 656.1 fold respectively which we compared to the genome of the M. tuberculosis reference strain H37Rv (ATCC 27294). To differentiate true differences from sequencing errors in the original H37Rv reference sequence (File S1), we also generated 2.7 Gb of sequence data from strain H37Rv (26.7 million paired 50 bp reads, 538.5-fold coverage). The fraction of the H37Rv genome that could not be covered (approximately 2.0%) comprised DNA with a GC content >80% and repeat regions (such as IS6110 elements) whose sequence could not be uniquely aligned to the reference. This fraction increased to 4.8% for K-1 and 3.4% for K-2 to exclude any areas for which no valid base was called due to insertion or deletions. All the genetic changes we identified are correlated with the existing scientific literature and listed in detail in the Supplementary Information (File S1). In addition to a tabular output of our results (File S2) a flexible, graphical representation using Artemis is provided (Files S3-S6) to allow an exploration of these changes in their genomic context.
Errors in reference genome
Re-sequencing of H37Rv uncovered 80 SNPs with respect to the published reference genome. 74 SNPs were shared with the Beijing isolates sequenced in this study (Figure 2A), all of which were also detected in one or more studies of H37Ra, the avirulent form of H37 (File S1), by the following different experimental methodologies: a microarray-based comparative approach, re-sequencing and a complete genome sequence (CP000611.1) from a shotgun library. In contrast, the 6 H37Rv specific SNPs did not feature in any of these studies. Re-examination of the electropherograms of the original H37Rv sequence revealed that 44 of these SNPs were errors in the reference strain H37Rv data (File S1). The remaining differences might represent micro-evolutionary events that occurred while culturing of the different H37 variants in separate laboratories.
Genomic diversity
Next, we compared K-1 and K-2 to H37Rv. Both Beijing isolates shared a common pool of 1,209 single-nucleotide-polymorphisms (SNPs) (Figure 2A) and five large scale deletions compared to H37Rv (Table 1). These Beijing-specific differences were congruent with a set of variants reported previously (File S1). An overview about all previously described SNPs is given in File S1. We found that the majority of the SNPs in K-1 and K-2 were non-synonymous (57% in both cases), which confirms previous findings and is consistent with reduced purifying selection acting on Mtb (Figure 2B).
In addition to this common backbone of Beijing specific variation, we identified 130 SNPs and one deletion that differentiated K-1 and K-2 (Figure 2A and Figure 3), although both isolates were identical with respect to IS6110 typing (Figure 1). Compared to H37Rv, the susceptible isolate K-1 encoded 55 specific SNPs and one specific deletion, while the MDR variant K-2 had 75 specific SNPs, including the five resistance-conferring mutations in the katG, rpoB, embB, pncA, and rpsL genes that are known to be altered in resistance to INH, RIF, EMB, PZA, and SM, respectively (Table 2, Figure 2C). Importantly, the observed level of diversity was independent of the MDR phenotype of K-2, as we detected comparable numbers of SNPs in both the drug-susceptible K-1 and the MDR K-2.
We then investigated the diversity between different lineages. Despite the fact that the total number of differences we observed between the Beijing isolates K-1/K-2 and the laboratory strain H37Rv was in the same range of the DNA variation described earlier between H37Rv and the clinical strain CDC1551, a comparison to the whole genome sequences of CDC1551 (AE000516.2), F11 (CP000717.1) and M. bovis (BX248333.1) revealed that more than half of the SNPs in K-1 were in fact unique to the Beijing genotype (Figure 4).
Discussion
Early sequencing studies of M. tuberculosis showed an extremely high level of clonality and conservation,. As a consequence, standard molecular markers that are based on mobile or repetitive elements (IS6110 RFLP, spoligotyping and MIRU-VNTR typing) are presumed to provide a high enough discriminatory power to accurately reconstruct transmission chains as part of epidemiological studies. Based on these standard criteria, our isolates K-1 and K-2 that exhibit the same molecular fingerprint can be considered as belonging to the same “outbreak clone” that is rapidly expanding in the study area by extensive transmission. Therefore, we expected to find a low amount of genetic diversity.
By contrast, we observed a strikingly high genomic diversity among two isolates sharing the same DNA fingerprint. These findings challenge the “identical fingerprints – same strain” dogma and have important implications for the investigation of disease dynamics, especially in high incidence regions such as Eastern Europe where the Beijing genotype is dominant and the population diversity (e.g. among MDR strains) is significantly reduced [unpublished results,14,33]. The fact that strains with identical genotyping patterns can accumulate significant amounts of genetic diversity indicates that epidemiological links between isolates with identical genotyping data can be more remote and are likely to represent older transmission events rather than cases of recent transmission among patients in one RFLP cluster. Under these circumstances, a valid differentiation of relapse and re-infection, that can occur in significant numbers in TB patients undergoing standard treatment in areas with high rates of MDR, might not be possible by applying traditional genotyping.
One of the key objectives of molecular epidemiology in TB is to distinguish treatment failure/relapse with the same strain from exogenous reinfection with a second strain. This is particularly important given the emergence of MDR and extensively-drug resistant (XDR) TB in many parts of the world,,. If a TB patient fails treatment, this indicates that the infecting strain might have become drug-resistant, or that the treatment is not effective, for example because of a lack of patient compliance. In the case of clinical trials where new TB drugs are being evaluated, treatment failure may suggest poor drug performance. Large amounts of resources are now being invested into the development of new drugs against TB. Some of these new drug candidates are entering human trials. If during these trials treatment failures are not adequately differentiated from cases of exogenous re-infection, promising new drug candidates may be abandoned erroneously.
A large genetic diversity among closely related isolates of Mtb has also implications for our understanding of the evolution of drug resistance. A recent report detected only few differences when comparing the genomes of MDR and XDR Mtb strains from KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa to an isogenic drug-susceptible isolate (11 unique SNPs in the MDR and 15 in the DS and XDR, respectively),; the authors concluded that the evolution of drug resistance might be relatively easy to study. We have previously shown that the fitness of drug-resistant Mtb depends both on the specific drug-resistance-conferring mutations and strain genetic backgrounds, and that compensatory mutations might mitigate the potential deleterious effects of drug resistance on bacterial fitness,. Some of the strain specific mutations in K-2 might represent mutations which are compensating for putative fitness effects of the drug resistance-conferring mutations. However, more work is needed to explore this possibility.
Finally, the high number of novel SNPs that are unique to the Beijing lineage confirmed that previously sequenced genomes only sampled a small part of the global diversity of Mtb. These findings highlight the importance of current sequencing efforts to capture the full global diversity of Mtb to ensure that both antibiotics and vaccines that are currently undergoing clinical trials are efficacious against all strains.
In conclusion, our results showed that genomic diversity in closely related strains of Mtb may be greater than anticipated. Clonal variants can accumulate high levels of genomic diversity, which can lead to different pathogenic properties undetectable by standard genotyping. Methods to accurately index strain diversity are essential for TB control, especially for the evaluation of new drugs, diagnostics and vaccines. Whole genome sequencing is likely to become available soon for routine molecular epidemiology at comparable costs to traditional typing techniques. Instead of having to rely on molecular surrogates with a limited resolution, such an approach would be highly informative both by giving a more accurate picture of ongoing tuberculosis transmission and related epidemiological outcomes such as re-infection and mixed infections, as well as by shedding light on the microevolutionary processes occurring in M. tuberculosis during spread. In clinical settings, such an approach could allow for rapid detection of drug-resistant TB and enhanced disease surveillance.
Methods
K-1 was isolated from sputum in 11/2001 and K-2 in 09/2004. IS6110 RFLP fingerprints, spoligotype patterns and MIRU-VNTR profiles were determined as previously described,,,. Antibiotic resistance was determined with the BACTEC MGIT 960,.
∼200 bp paired read fragment libraries were prepared from 1 µg of DNA, and sequenced using the Illumina Genome Analyzer as described previously. SNPs were mapped by paired short read alignment of individual reads to their cognate positions in the M. tuberculosis H37Rv genome (AL123456.2) and called at threshold ≥100 with the Illumina Genome Analyzer Pipeline. Where more than one base was called, only the majority call was accepted when the ratio between the two calls was ≥3. Only positions for which valid base calls were available in all genomes were considered for our assessment of the diversity. The validity of the SNP calls was confirmed by 40 kb of dideoxy chain terminator sequencing (ABI 3130xl) of each isolate. Deletions ≥250 bp were detected using combined paired read data and localised homology mapping across the deletion boundary.
Details of the annotation used for the SNP analysis and the graphical representation of the tabular results (File S2) with Artemis (Files S3-6) can be found in the Supplementary Methods (File S1).
References 57
- 1.
- 2.
Keshavjee S, Gelmanova IY, Pasechnikov AD, Mishustin SP, Andreev YG, et al. Treating multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Tomsk, Russia: developing programs that address the linkage between poverty and disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1136:1-11.
Not in our library10.1196/annals.1425.009
- 3.
WHO Report 2007: Global Tuberculosis Control - Surveillance, Planning, Financing. 2007.
Not in our library
- 4.
Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Resistance In the World. 2008.
Not in our library
- 5.
Cox HS, Orozco JD, Male R, Ruesch-Gerdes S, Falzon D, et al. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in central Asia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:865-872.
Not in our library10.3201/eid1005.030718
- 6.
Hill AV. Aspects of genetic susceptibility to human infectious diseases. Annu Rev Genet. 2006;40:469-486.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090546
- 7.
- 8.
Gagneux S, DeRiemer K, Van T, Kato-Maeda M, de Jong BC, et al. Variable host-pathogen compatibility in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:2869-2873.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0511240103
- 9.
Gagneux S, Small PM. Global phylogeography of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and implications for tuberculosis product development. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007;7:328-337.
Not in our library10.1016/s1473-3099(07)70108-1
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
de Jong BC, Hill PC, Aiken A, Awine T, Antonio M, et al. Progression to active tuberculosis, but not transmission, varies by Mycobacterium tuberculosis lineage in The Gambia. J Infect Dis. 2008;198:1037-1043.
Not in our library10.1086/591504
- 13.
Thwaites G, Caws M, Chau TT, D'Sa A, Lan NT, et al. Relationship between Mycobacterium tuberculosis genotype and the clinical phenotype of pulmonary and meningeal tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:1363-1368.
Not in our library10.1128/jcm.02180-07
- 14.
Cox HS, Kubica T, Doshetov D, Kebede Y, Rusch-Gerdess S, et al. The Beijing genotype and drug resistant tuberculosis in the Aral Sea region of Central Asia. Respir Res. 2005;6:134.
Not in our library10.1186/1465-9921-6-134
- 15.
Reed MB, Domenech P, Manca C, Su H, Barczak AK, et al. A glycolipid of hypervirulent tuberculosis strains that inhibits the innate immune response. Nature. 2004;431:84-87.
Not in our library10.1038/nature02837
- 16.
Cowley D, Govender D, February B, Wolfe M, Steyn L, et al. Recent and rapid emergence of W-Beijing strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Cape Town, South Africa. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47:1252-1259.
Not in our library10.1086/592575
- 17.
- 18.
Gagneux S, Long CD, Small PM, Van T, Schoolnik GK, et al. The competitive cost of antibiotic resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science. 2006;312:1944-1946.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1124410
- 19.
Maisnier-Patin S, Andersson D. Adaptation to the deleterious effects of antimicrobial drug resistance mutations by compensatory evolution. Res Microbiol. 2004;155:360-369.
Not in our library10.1016/j.resmic.2004.01.019
- 20.
Achtman M. Evolution, population structure, and phylogeography of genetically monomorphic bacterial pathogens. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2008;62:53-70.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162832
- 21.
Garnier T, Eiglmeier K, Camus J, Medina N, Mansoor H, et al. The complete genome sequence of Mycobacterium bovis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:7877-7882.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1130426100
- 22.
Van Soolingen D, Kremer K, Vynycky E, Kaufmann S, Hahn H. New perspectives in the molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis. Mycobacteria and TB. 2003;17-45.
Not in our library
- 23.
Bentley DR, Balasubramanian S, Swerdlow HP, Smith GP, Milton J, et al. Accurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistry. Nature. 2008;456:53-59.
Not in our library10.1038/nature07517
- 24.
Cole ST, Barrell BG. Analysis of the genome of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv. Novartis Found Symp. 1998;217:160-172; discussion 172–167.
Not in our library
- 25.
Rutherford K, Parkhill J, Crook J, Horsnell T, Rice P, et al. Artemis: sequence visualization and annotation. Bioinformatics. 2000;16:944-945.
Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/16.10.944
- 26.
- 27.
Lee JS, Krause R, Schreiber J, Mollenkopf HJ, Kowall J, et al. Mutation in the transcriptional regulator PhoP contributes to avirulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Ra strain. Cell Host Microbe. 2008;3:97-103.
Not in our library10.1016/j.chom.2008.01.002
- 28.
- 29.
Fleischmann RD, Alland D, Eisen JA, Carpenter L, White O, et al. Whole-genome comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical and laboratory strains. J Bacteriol. 2002;184:5479-5490.
Not in our library10.1128/jb.184.19.5479-5490.2002
- 30.
Zhang Y, Jacobs WRJ, Kaufmann SH, Rubin E. Mechanisms of drug action, drug resistance and drug tolerance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Expected phenotypes from evolutionary pressures from a highly successful pathogen. Handbook of tuberculosis. 2008.
Not in our library
- 31.
Sreevatsan S, Pan X, Stockbauer K, Connell N, Kreiswirth B, et al. Restricted structural gene polymorphism in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex indicates evolutionarily recent global dissemination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:9869-9874.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.94.18.9869
- 32.
Musser J, Amin A, Ramaswamy S. Negligible genetic diversity of mycobacterium tuberculosis host immune system protein targets: evidence of limited selective pressure. Genetics. 2000;155:7-16.
Not in our library10.1093/genetics/155.1.7
- 33.
Pardini M, Niemann S, Varaine F, Iona E, Meacci F, et al. Characteristics of drug-resistant tuberculosis in Abkhazia (Georgia), a high-prevalence area in Eastern Europe. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2009;89:317-324.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tube.2009.04.002
- 34.
Cox H, Sibilia K, Feuerriegel S, Kalon S, Polonsky J, et al. Emergence of extensive drug resistance during treatment for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2398-2400.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmc0805644
- 35.
- 36.
Zignol M, Hosseini MS, Wright A, Weezenbeek CL, Nunn P, et al. Global incidence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. J Infect Dis. 2006;194:479-485.
Not in our library10.1086/505877
- 37.
Jassal M, Bishai W. Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9:19-30.
Not in our library10.1016/s1473-3099(08)70260-3
- 38.
Koenig R. Tuberculosis. Few mutations divide some drug-resistant TB strains. Science. 2007;318:901-902.
Not in our library10.1126/science.318.5852.901a
- 39.
Service RF. Gene sequencing. The race for the ░ 1000 genome. Science. 2006;311:1544-1546.
Not in our library10.1126/science.311.5767.1544
- 40.
van Embden JD, Cave MD, Crawford JT, Dale JW, Eisenach KD, et al. Strain identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by DNA fingerprinting: recommendations for a standardized methodology. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:406-409.
Not in our library10.1128/jcm.31.2.406-409.1993
Cited by papers we hold 8
- Whole-genome sequencing to control antimicrobial resistance · 2014No notice
- Whole-genome sequencing to establish relapse or re-infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a retrospective observational study · 2013No notice
- Whole-genome sequencing to delineate Mycobacterium tuberculosis outbreaks: a retrospective observational study · 2013No notice
- Whole Genome Sequencing versus Traditional Genotyping for Investigation of a Mycobacterium tuberculosis Outbreak: A Longitudinal Molecular Epidemiological Study · 2013No notice
- Inferring patient to patient transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosisfrom whole genome sequencing data · 2013No notice
- Routine Use of Microbial Whole Genome Sequencing in Diagnostic and Public Health Microbiology · 2012No notice
- Functional Genetic Diversity among Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Clinical Isolates: Delineation of Conserved Core and Lineage-Specific Transcriptomes during Intracellular Survival · 2010No notice
- Genotyping of Genetically Monomorphic Bacteria: DNA Sequencing in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Highlights the Limitations of Current Methodologies · 2009No notice
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.