Not checked for notices yet.

Integrating tuberculosis and noncommunicable diseases care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): A systematic review.

Chuan De Foo, Pami Shrestha, Leiting Wang and 4 more

PLoS Medicine · 2022

doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003899

References 80

1.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
2.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
3.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
4.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
5.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
6.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
7.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
8.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
9.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
10.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
11.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
12.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
13.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
14.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
15.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
16.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
17.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
18.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
19.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
20.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
21.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
22.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
23.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
24.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
25.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
26.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
27.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
28.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
29.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
30.
Newcastle-Ottawa Scale: comparing reviewers’ to authors’ assessments · 2014
No notice
31.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
32.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
33.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
34.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
35.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
36.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
37.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
38.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
39.
Feasibility of achieving the 2025 WHO global tuberculosis targets in South Africa, China, and India: a combined analysis of 11 mathematical models · 2016
No notice
40.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
41.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
42.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
43.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
44.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
45.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
46.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
47.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
48.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
49.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
50.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
51.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
52.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
53.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
54.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
55.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
56.
Community health volunteers could help improve access to and use of essential health services by communities in LMICs: an umbrella review · 2018
No notice
57.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
58.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
59.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
60.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
61.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
62.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
63.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
64.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
65.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
66.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
67.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
68.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
69.
Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? · 2020
No notice
70.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
71.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
72.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
73.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
74.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
75.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
76.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
77.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
78.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
79.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
80.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.