Predicting Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury: Development and International Validation of Prognostic Scores Based on Admission Characteristics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability. A reliable prediction of outcome on admission is of great clinical relevance. We aimed to develop prognostic models with readily available traditional and novel predictors. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Prospectively collected individual patient data were analyzed from 11 studies. We considered predictors available at admission in logistic regression models to predict mortality and unfavorable outcome according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale at 6 mo after injury. Prognostic models were developed in 8,509 patients with severe or moderate TBI, with cross-validation by omission of each of the 11 studies in turn. External validation was on 6,681 patients from the recent Medical Research Council Corticosteroid Randomisation after Significant Head Injury (MRC CRASH) trial. We found that the strongest predictors of outcome were age, motor score, pupillary reactivity, and CT characteristics, including the presence of traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. A prognostic model that combined age, motor score, and pupillary reactivity had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) between 0.66 and 0.84 at cross-validation. This performance could be improved (AUC increased by approximately 0.05) by considering CT characteristics, secondary insults (hypotension and hypoxia), and laboratory parameters (glucose and hemoglobin). External validation confirmed that the discriminative ability of the model was adequate (AUC 0.80). Outcomes were systematically worse than predicted, but less so in 1,588 patients who were from high-income countries in the CRASH trial. CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic models using baseline characteristics provide adequate discrimination between patients with good and poor 6 mo outcomes after TBI, especially if CT and laboratory findings are considered in addition to traditional predictors. The model predictions may support clinical practice and research, including the design and analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Cited by papers we hold 17

• TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods · 2024
  Corrected
• Hospital-level intracranial pressure monitoring utilization and functional outcome in severe traumatic brain injury: a post hoc analysis of prospective multicenter observational study · 2021
  Not checked
• Contribution of CT-Scan Analysis by Artificial Intelligence to the Clinical Care of TBI Patients · 2021
  Not checked
• A Manual for the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended Interview · 2021
  No notice
• Blood Biomarkers for Traumatic Brain Injury: A Quantitative Assessment of Diagnostic and Prognostic Accuracy · 2019
  No notice
• Methodological standards for the development and evaluation of clinical prediction rules: a review of the literature · 2019
  No notice
• A Serum Protein Biomarker Panel Improves Outcome Prediction in Human Traumatic Brain Injury · 2019
  No notice
• External validation of clinical prediction models using big datasets from e-health records or IPD meta-analysis: opportunities and challenges · 2016
  Corrected
• Regulation of the cerebral circulation: bedside assessment and clinical implications · 2016
  No notice
• Serum neurofilament light protein predicts clinical outcome in traumatic brain injury · 2016
  No notice
• Utility of neuron-specific enolase in traumatic brain injury; relations to S100B levels, outcome, and extracranial injury severity · 2016
  No notice
• Comparative Assessment of the Prognostic Value of Biomarkers in Traumatic Brain Injury Reveals an Independent Role for Serum Levels of Neurofilament Light · 2015
  No notice
• Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 2: Prognostic Factor Research · 2013
  No notice
• Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: Prognostic Model Research · 2013
  No notice
• The Role of Markers of Inflammation in Traumatic Brain Injury · 2013
  No notice
• Serum IL-6: a candidate biomarker for intracranial pressure elevation following isolated traumatic brain injury · 2010
  No notice
• Intracranial bleeding in patients with traumatic brain injury: A prognostic study · 2009
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.