The First Steps of Adaptation of Escherichia coli to the Gut Are Dominated by Soft Sweeps

Abstract

The accumulation of adaptive mutations is essential for survival in novel environments. However, in clonal populations with a high mutational supply, the power of natural selection is expected to be limited. This is due to clonal interference--the competition of clones carrying different beneficial mutations--which leads to the loss of many small effect mutations and fixation of large effect ones. If interference is abundant, then mechanisms for horizontal transfer of genes, which allow the immediate combination of beneficial alleles in a single background, are expected to evolve. However, the relevance of interference in natural complex environments, such as the gut, is poorly known. To address this issue, we have developed an experimental system which allows to uncover the nature of the adaptive process as Escherichia coli adapts to the mouse gut. This system shows the invasion of beneficial mutations in the bacterial populations and demonstrates the pervasiveness of clonal interference. The observed dynamics of change in frequency of beneficial mutations are consistent with soft sweeps, where different adaptive mutations with similar phenotypes, arise repeatedly on different haplotypes without reaching fixation. Despite the complexity of this ecosystem, the genetic basis of the adaptive mutations revealed a striking parallelism in independently evolving populations. This was mainly characterized by the insertion of transposable elements in both coding and regulatory regions of a few genes. Interestingly, in most populations we observed a complete phenotypic sweep without loss of genetic variation. The intense clonal interference during adaptation to the gut environment, here demonstrated, may be important for our understanding of the levels of strain diversity of E. coli inhabiting the human gut microbiota and of its recombination rate.

References 63

1. 1.

   Atwood KC, Schneider LK, Ryan FJ (1951 ) Periodic selection in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 37: 146–155.

   Not in our library10.1073/pnas.37.3.146

2. 2.

   Hegreness M, Shoresh N, Hartl D, Kishony R (2006 ) An equivalence principle for the incorporation of favorable mutations in asexual populations. Science 311: 1615–1617 doi:311/5767/1615

   Not in our library10.1126/science.1122469

3. 3.

   Kao KC, Sherlock G (2008 ) Molecular characterization of clonal interference during adaptive evolution in asexual populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature Genet 40: 1499–1504 doi:ng.280

   Not in our library10.1038/ng.280

4. 4.

   Maharjan R, Seeto S, Notley-McRobb L, Ferenci T (2006 ) Clonal adaptive radiation in a constant environment. Science 313: 514–517 doi:10.1126/science.1129865

   Not in our library10.1126/science.1129865

5. 5.

   Perfeito L, Fernandes L, Mota C, Gordo I (2007 ) Adaptive mutations in bacteria: high rate and small effects. Science 317: 813–815 doi:317/5839/813

   Not in our library10.1126/science.1142284

6. 6.

   Woods RJ, Barrick JE, Cooper TF, Shrestha U, Kauth MR, et al (2011 ) Second-order selection for evolvability in a large Escherichia coli population. Science 331: 1433–1436 doi:10.1126/science.1198914

   Not in our library10.1126/science.1198914

7. 7.

   Hill WG, Robertson A (1966 ) The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet Res 8: 269–294.

   Not in our library

8. 8.

   Sniegowski PD, Gerrish PJ (2010 ) Beneficial mutations and the dynamics of adaptation in asexual populations. Philos Trans R Soc London B Biol Sci 365: 1255–1263 doi:365/1544/1255

   Not in our library10.1098/rstb.2009.0290

9. 9.

   Barton N, Partridge L (2000 ) Limits to natural selection. Bioessays 22: 1075–1084 doi:;10.1002/1521-1878(200012)22:12<1075::AID-BIES5>3.0.CO;2-M

   Not in our library10.1002/1521-1878(200012)22:12<1075::aid-bies5>3.0.co;2-m

10. 10.

    Gordo I, Perfeito L, Sousa A (2011 ) Fitness effects of mutations in bacteria. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 21: 20–35 doi:000332747

    Not in our library10.1159/000332747

11. 11.

    Schiffels S, Szollosi G, Mustonen V, Lassig M (2011 ) Emergent neutrality in adaptive asexual evolution. Genetics 189: 1361–1375 doi:genetics.111.132027

    Not in our library10.1534/genetics.111.132027

12. 12.
    Parallel Evolutionary Dynamics of Adaptive Diversification in Escherichia coli · 2013

    No notice
13. 13.

    Desai MM, Fisher DS, Murray AW (2007 ) The speed of evolution and maintenance of variation in asexual populations. Curr Biol 17: 385–394 doi:S0960-9822(07)00984-0

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2007.01.072

14. 14.

    Strelkowa N, Lässig M (2012 ) Clonal interference in the evolution of influenza. Genetics 192: 671–682 doi:10.1534/genetics.112.143396

    Not in our library10.1534/genetics.112.143396

15. 15.

    Messer PW, Petrov DA (2013 ) Population genomics of rapid adaptation by soft selective sweeps. Trends Ecol Evol 28: 659–669 doi:10.1016/j.tree.2013.08.003

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tree.2013.08.003

16. 16.

    Desai MM, Fisher DS (2007 ) Beneficial mutation selection balance and the effect of linkage on positive selection. Genetics 176: 1759–1798 doi:genetics.106.067678

    Not in our library10.1534/genetics.106.067678

17. 17.

    Good BH, Rouzine IM, Balick DJ, Hallatschek O, Desai MM (2012 ) Distribution of fixed beneficial mutations and the rate of adaptation in asexual populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109: 4950–4955 doi:10.1073/pnas.1119910109

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1119910109

18. 18.

    Lassig M (2012 ) Chance and risk in adaptive evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 4719–4720.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1203012109

19. 19.

    Lederberg J (2004 ) E. coli K-12. Microbiol Today 31: 116.

    Not in our library

20. 20.

    Fabich AJ, Leatham MP, Grissom JE, Wiley G, Lai H, et al (2011 ) Genotype and phenotypes of an intestine-adapted Escherichia coli K-12 mutant selected by animal passage for superior colonization. Infect Immun 79: 2430–2439 doi:10.1128/IAI.01199-10

    Not in our library10.1128/iai.01199-10

21. 21.

    Leatham MP, Stevenson SJ, Gauger EJ, Krogfelt KA, Lins JJ, et al (2005 ) Mouse intestine selects nonmotile flhDC mutants of Escherichia coli MG1655 with increased colonizing ability and better utilization of carbon sources. Infect Immun 73: 8039–8049 doi:10.1128/IAI.73.12.8039

    Not in our library10.1128/iai.73.12.8039-8049.2005

22. 22.

    De Paepe M, Gaboriau-Routhiau V, Rainteau D, Rakotobe S, Taddei F, et al (2011 ) Trade-off between bile resistance and nutritional competence drives Escherichia coli diversification in the mouse gut. PLoS Genet 7: e1002107 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002107 PGENETICS-D-11-00191

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pgen.1002107

23. 23.

    Lee MC, Marx CJ (2013 ) Synchronous waves of failed soft sweeps in the laboratory: remarkably rampant clonal interference of alleles at a single locus. Genetics 193: 943–952 doi:10.1534/genetics.112.148502

    Not in our library10.1534/genetics.112.148502

24. 24.

    Poulsen LK, Licht TR, Rang C, Krogfelt KA, Molin S (1995 ) Physiological state of Escherichia coli BJ4 growing in the large intestines of streptomycin-treated mice. J Bacteriol 177: 5840–5845.

    Not in our library10.1128/jb.177.20.5840-5845.1995

25. 25.

    Barrick JE, Kauth MR, Strelioff CC, Lenski RE (2010 ) Escherichia coli rpoB mutants have increased evolvability in proportion to their fitness defects. Mol Biol Evol 27: 1338–1347 doi:10.1093/molbev/msq024

    Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msq024

26. 26.

    Illingworth CJR, Mustonen V (2012 ) A method to infer positive selection from marker dynamics in an asexual population. Bioinformatics 28: 831–837 doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr722

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btr722

27. 27.

    Sousa JAM de, Campos PRA, Gordo I (2013 ) An ABC method for estimating the rte and distribution of effects of beneficial mutations. Genome Biol Evol 5: 794–806 doi:10.1093/gbe/evt045

    Not in our library10.1093/gbe/evt045

28. 28.

    Nobelmann B, Lengeler JW (1996 ) Molecular analysis of the gat genes from Escherichia coli and of their roles in galactitol transport and metabolism. J Bacteriol 178: 6790–6795.

    Not in our library10.1128/jb.178.23.6790-6795.1996

29. 29.

    Yamada M, Saier MH Jr (1987 ) Physical and genetic characterization of the glucitol operon in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 169: 2990–2994.

    Not in our library10.1128/jb.169.7.2990-2994.1987

30. 30.

    Chang DE, Smalley DJ, Tucker DL, Leatham MP, Norris WE, et al (2004 ) Carbon nutrition of Escherichia coli in the mouse intestine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 7427–7432 doi:10.1073/pnas.0307888101

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0307888101

31. 31.

    Gauger EJ, Leatham MP, Mercado-Lubo R, Laux DC, Conway T, et al (2007 ) Role of motility and the flhDC operon in Escherichia coli MG1655 colonization of the mouse intestine. Infect Immun 75: 3315–3324 doi:10.1128/IAI.00052-07

    Not in our library10.1128/iai.00052-07

32. 32.

    Engel P, Krämer R, Unden G (1994 ) Transport of C4-dicarboxylates by anaerobically grown Escherichia coli. Energetics and mechanism of exchange, uptake and efflux. Eur J Biochem 222: 605–614.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb18903.x

33. 33.

    Jones SA, Gibson T, Maltby RC, Chowdhury FZ, Stewart V, et al (2011 ) Anaerobic respiration of Escherichia coli in the mouse intestine. Infect Immun 79: 4218–4226 doi:10.1128/IAI.05395-11

    Not in our library10.1128/iai.05395-11

34. 34.

    Suppmann B, Sawers G (1994 ) Isolation and characterization of hypophosphite-resistant mutants of Escherichia coli: identification of the FocA protein, encoded by the pfl operon, as a putative formate transporter. Mol Microbiol 11: 965–982.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00375.x

35. 35.

    Leonhartsberger S, Korsa I, Böck A (2002 ) The molecular biology of formate metabolism in enterobacteria. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 4: 269–276.

    Not in our library

36. 36.

    Macy J, Kulla H, Gottschalk G (1976 ) H2-dependent anaerobic growth of Escherichia coli on L-malate: succinate formation. J Bacteriol 125: 423–428.

    Not in our library10.1128/jb.125.2.423-428.1976

37. 37.

    Wimpenny JW, Cole JA (1967 ) The regulation of metabolism in facultative bacteria. 3. The effect of nitrate. Biochim Biophys Acta 148: 233–242.

    Not in our library10.1016/0304-4165(67)90298-x

38. 38.

    Jones SA, Chowdhury FZ, Fabich AJ, Anderson A, Schreiner DM, et al (2007 ) Respiration of Escherichia coli in the mouse intestine. Infect Immun 75: 4891–4899 doi:10.1128/IAI.00484-07

    Not in our library10.1128/iai.00484-07

39. 39.

    Giraud A, Arous S, De Paepe M, Gaboriau-Routhiau V, Bambou JC, et al (2008 ) Dissecting the genetic components of adaptation of Escherichia coli to the mouse gut. PLoS Genet 4: e2 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0040002

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pgen.0040002

40. 40.

    Carroll SB (2008 ) Evo-devo and an expanding evolutionary synthesis: a genetic theory of morphological evolution. Cell 134: 25–36 doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.030

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.030

Cited by papers we hold 1

• Evolutionary dynamics of bacteria in the gut microbiome within and across hosts · 2019
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.