A Statistical Framework for Joint eQTL Analysis in Multiple Tissues

Abstract

Mapping expression Quantitative Trait Loci (eQTLs) represents a powerful and widely adopted approach to identifying putative regulatory variants and linking them to specific genes. Up to now eQTL studies have been conducted in a relatively narrow range of tissues or cell types. However, understanding the biology of organismal phenotypes will involve understanding regulation in multiple tissues, and ongoing studies are collecting eQTL data in dozens of cell types. Here we present a statistical framework for powerfully detecting eQTLs in multiple tissues or cell types (or, more generally, multiple subgroups). The framework explicitly models the potential for each eQTL to be active in some tissues and inactive in others. By modeling the sharing of active eQTLs among tissues, this framework increases power to detect eQTLs that are present in more than one tissue compared with "tissue-by-tissue" analyses that examine each tissue separately. Conversely, by modeling the inactivity of eQTLs in some tissues, the framework allows the proportion of eQTLs shared across different tissues to be formally estimated as parameters of a model, addressing the difficulties of accounting for incomplete power when comparing overlaps of eQTLs identified by tissue-by-tissue analyses. Applying our framework to re-analyze data from transformed B cells, T cells, and fibroblasts, we find that it substantially increases power compared with tissue-by-tissue analysis, identifying 63% more genes with eQTLs (at FDR = 0.05). Further, the results suggest that, in contrast to previous analyses of the same data, the majority of eQTLs detectable in these data are shared among all three tissues.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

References 40

1. 1.

   Frazer KA, Murray SS, Schork NJ, Topol EJ (2009 ) Human genetic variation and its contribution to complex traits. Nat Rev Genet 10: 241–251.

   Not in our library10.1038/nrg2554

2. 2.

   Montgomery SB, Dermitzakis ET (2011 ) From expression QTLs to personalized transcriptomics. Nature reviews Genetics 12: 277–282.

   Not in our library10.1038/nrg2969

3. 3.

   Wray GA (2007 ) The evolutionary significance of cis-regulatory mutations. Nature Reviews Genetics 8: 206–216.

   Not in our library10.1038/nrg2063

4. 4.

   Cheung VG, Conlin LK, Weber TM, Arcaro M, Jen KY, et al (2003 ) Natural variation in human gene expression assessed in lymphoblastoid cells. Nature Genetics 33: 422–425.

   Not in our library10.1038/ng1094

5. 5.

   Stranger BE, Nica AC, Forrest MS, Dimas A, Bird CP, et al (2007 ) Population genomics of human gene expression. Nature Genetics 39: 1217–1224.

   Not in our library10.1038/ng2142

6. 6.

   Gilad Y, Rifkin SA, Pritchard JK (2008 ) Revealing the architecture of gene regulation: the promise of eQTL studies. Trends in genetics: TIG 24: 408–415.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.tig.2008.06.001

7. 7.
   Candidate Causal Regulatory Effects by Integration of Expression QTLs with Complex Trait Genetic Associations · 2010

   No notice
8. 8.
   Trait-Associated SNPs Are More Likely to Be eQTLs: Annotation to Enhance Discovery from GWAS · 2010

   No notice
9. 9.

   Cookson W, Liang L, Abecasis G, Moffatt M, Lathrop M (2009 ) Mapping complex disease traits with global gene expression. Nat Rev Genet 10: 184–194.

   Not in our library10.1038/nrg2537

10. 10.

    Greenawalt DM, Dobrin R, Chudin E, Hatoum IJ, Suver C, et al (2011 ) A survey of the genetics of stomach, liver, and adipose gene expression from a morbidly obese cohort. Genome Research 21: 1008–1016.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.112821.110

11. 11.

    Stegle O, Parts L, Piipari M, Winn J, Durbin R (2012 ) Using probabilistic estimation of expression residuals (PEER) to obtain increased power and interpretability of gene expression analyses. Nat Protocols 7: 500–507.

    Not in our library10.1038/nprot.2011.457

12. 12.

    Dimas AS, Deutsch S, Stranger BE, Montgomery SB, Borel C, et al (2009 ) Common regulatory variation impacts gene expression in a cell type-dependent manner. Science 325: 1246–1250.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1174148

13. 13.
    The Architecture of Gene Regulatory Variation across Multiple Human Tissues: The MuTHER Study · 2011

    No notice
14. 14.

    Ding J, Gudjonsson JE, Liang L, Stuart PE, Li Y, et al (2010 ) Gene expression in skin and lymphoblastoid cells: Refined statistical method reveals extensive overlap in cis-eQTL signals. American Journal of Human Genetics 87: 779–789.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.10.024

15. 15.

    Gerrits A, Li Y, Tesson BM, Bystrykh LV, Weersing E, et al (2009 ) Expression Quantitative Trait Loci Are Highly Sensitive to Cellular Differentiation State. PLoS Genet 5: e1000692 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000692.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pgen.1000692

16. 16.
    Unraveling the Regulatory Mechanisms Underlying Tissue-Dependent Genetic Variation of Gene Expression · 2012

    No notice
17. 17.

    Petretto E, Bottolo L, Langley SR, Heinig M, McDermott-Roe C, et al (2010 ) New insights into the genetic control of gene expression using a bayesian multi-tissue approach. PLoS Comput Biol 6: e1000737 doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000737.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000737

18. 18.

    Li J, Tseng GC (2011 ) An adaptively weighted statistic for detecting differential gene expression when combining multiple transcriptomic studies. The Annals of Applied Statistics 5: 994–1019.

    Not in our library

19. 19.

    Lebrec JJ, Stijnen T, van Houwelingen HC (2010 ) Dealing with heterogeneity between cohorts in genomewide SNP association studies. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 9.

    Not in our library10.2202/1544-6115.1503

20. 20.

    Han B, Eskin E (2011 ) Random-Effects Model Aimed at Discovering Associations in Meta-Analysis of Genome-wide Association Studies. The American Journal of Human Genetics 88: 586–598.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.04.014

21. 21.

    Wen X, Stephens M (2011). Bayesian Methods for Genetic Association Analysis with Heterogeneous Subgroups: from Meta-Analyses to Gene-Environment Interactions. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.1210. 1111.1210.

    Not in our library10.1214/13-aoas695

22. 22.

    Bhattacharjee S, Rajaraman P, Jacobs KB, Wheeler WA, Melin BS, et al (2012 ) A subset-based approach improves power and interpretation for the combined analysis of genetic association studies of heterogeneous traits. American journal of human genetics 90: 821–835.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.03.015

23. 23.
    Interpreting Meta-Analyses of Genome-Wide Association Studies · 2012

    No notice
24. 24.
    High-Resolution Mapping of Expression-QTLs Yields Insight into Human Gene Regulation · 2008

    No notice
25. 25.

    Maranville JC, Luca F, Richards AL, Wen X, Witonsky DB, et al (2011 ) Interactions between glucocorticoid treatment and cis-regulatory polymorphisms contribute to cellular response phenotypes. PLoS Genet 7: e1002162 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002162.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pgen.1002162

26. 26.

    Ferguson JP, Cho JH, Zhao H (2012 ) A new approach for the joint analysis of multiple ChIP-seq libraries with application to histone modification. Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology 11.

    Not in our library10.1515/1544-6115.1660

27. 27.

    Kass RE, Raftery AE (1995 ) Bayes Factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90: 773–795.

    Not in our library

28. 28.
    Imputation-Based Analysis of Association Studies: Candidate Regions and Quantitative Traits · 2007

    No notice
29. 29.

    Good IJ (1992 ) The Bayes/Non-bayes compromise: A brief review. Journal of the American Statistical Association 87: 597–606.

    Not in our library

30. 30.

    Gelman A, Hill J (2006) Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge University Press, 1 edition. URL http://www.worldcat.org/isbn/0521867061.

    Not in our library

31. 31.

    Storey JD, Tibshirani R (2003 ) Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100: 9440–9445.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1530509100

32. 32.

    Pickrell JK, Marioni JC, Pai AA, Degner JF, Engelhardt BE, et al (2010 ) Understanding mechanisms underlying human gene expression variation with RNA sequencing. Nature 464: 768–772.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature08872

33. 33.

    Sun W (2012 ) A statistical framework for eQTL mapping using RNA-seq data. Biometrics 68: 1–11.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01654.x

34. 34.
    Single-Tissue and Cross-Tissue Heritability of Gene Expression Via Identity-by-Descent in Related or Unrelated Individuals · 2011

    No notice
35. 35.

    Powell JE, Henders AK, McRae AF, Wright MJ, Martin NG, et al (2012 ) Genetic control of gene expression in whole blood and lymphoblastoid cell lines is largely independent. Genome Research 22: 456–466.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.126540.111

36. 36.

    Wen X (2012). Bayesian Analysis of Multiway Tables in Association Studies: A Model Comparison Approach. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.4621. 1208.4621.

    Not in our library

37. 37.

    Li H, Durbin R (2009 ) Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 25: 1754–1760.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324

38. 38.

    Hinrichs AS, Karolchik D, Baertsch R, Barber GP, Bejerano G, et al (2006 ) The UCSC Genome Browser Database: update 2006. Nucleic acids research 34: D590–D598.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkj144

39. 39.

    Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, Weinblatt ME, Shadick NA, et al (2006 ) Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nature genetics 38: 904–909.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng1847

40. 40.

    Leek JT, Scharpf RB, Bravo HAC, Simcha D, Langmead B, et al (2010 ) Tackling the widespread and critical impact of batch effects in high-throughput data. Nature Reviews Genetics 11: 733–739.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrg2825

Cited by papers we hold 13

• Application of Bayesian genomic prediction methods to genome-wide association analyses · 2022
  Not checked
• From GWAS to Gene: Transcriptome-Wide Association Studies and Other Methods to Functionally Understand GWAS Discoveries · 2021
  No notice
• A compendium of uniformly processed human gene expression and splicing quantitative trait loci · 2021
  No notice
• Power, false discovery rate and Winner’s Curse in eQTL studies · 2018
  No notice
• Genetic effects on gene expression across human tissues · 2017
  Corrected
• Quantifying the regulatory effect size of cis -acting genetic variation using allelic fold change · 2017
  No notice
• Pathogenic implications for autoimmune mechanisms derived by comparative eQTL analysis of CD4+ versus CD8+ T cells · 2017
  No notice
• Integrating molecular QTL data into genome-wide genetic association analysis: Probabilistic assessment of enrichment and colocalization · 2017
  No notice
• Survey of the Heritability and Sparse Architecture of Gene Expression Traits across Human Tissues · 2016
  No notice
• Fast and efficient QTL mapper for thousands of molecular phenotypes · 2015
  No notice
• Integration of disease association and eQTL data using a Bayesian colocalisation approach highlights six candidate causal genes in immune-mediated diseases · 2015
  No notice
• Bayesian Test for Colocalisation between Pairs of Genetic Association Studies Using Summary Statistics · 2014
  No notice
• Integrative Modeling of eQTLs and Cis-Regulatory Elements Suggests Mechanisms Underlying Cell Type Specificity of eQTLs · 2013
  Corrected

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.