The Protein Cost of Metabolic Fluxes: Prediction from Enzymatic Rate Laws and Cost Minimization

Abstract

Bacterial growth depends crucially on metabolic fluxes, which are limited by the cell's capacity to maintain metabolic enzymes. The necessary enzyme amount per unit flux is a major determinant of metabolic strategies both in evolution and bioengineering. It depends on enzyme parameters (such as kcat and KM constants), but also on metabolite concentrations. Moreover, similar amounts of different enzymes might incur different costs for the cell, depending on enzyme-specific properties such as protein size and half-life. Here, we developed enzyme cost minimization (ECM), a scalable method for computing enzyme amounts that support a given metabolic flux at a minimal protein cost. The complex interplay of enzyme and metabolite concentrations, e.g. through thermodynamic driving forces and enzyme saturation, would make it hard to solve this optimization problem directly. By treating enzyme cost as a function of metabolite levels, we formulated ECM as a numerically tractable, convex optimization problem. Its tiered approach allows for building models at different levels of detail, depending on the amount of available data. Validating our method with measured metabolite and protein levels in E. coli central metabolism, we found typical prediction fold errors of 4.1 and 2.6, respectively, for the two kinds of data. This result from the cost-optimized metabolic state is significantly better than randomly sampled metabolite profiles, supporting the hypothesis that enzyme cost is important for the fitness of E. coli. ECM can be used to predict enzyme levels and protein cost in natural and engineered pathways, and could be a valuable computational tool to assist metabolic engineering projects. Furthermore, it establishes a direct connection between protein cost and thermodynamics, and provides a physically plausible and computationally tractable way to include enzyme kinetics into constraint-based metabolic models, where kinetics have usually been ignored or oversimplified.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

References 70

1. 1.

   Schuetz R, Zamboni N, Zampieri M, Heinemann M, Sauer U. Multidimensional Optimality of Microbial Metabolism. Science. 2012;336(6081):601–604.

   Not in our library10.1126/science.1216882

2. 2.

   Bar-Even A, Noor E, Lewis NE, Milo R. Design and analysis of synthetic carbon fixation pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(19):8889–8894.

   Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0907176107

3. 3.

   Warburg O, Posener K, Negelein E. Ueber den Stoffwechsel der Tumoren. Biochemische Zeitschrift. 1924;152:319–344.

   Not in our library

4. 4.

   Flamholz A, Noor E, Bar-Even A, Liebermeister W, Milo R. Glycolytic strategy as a tradeoff between energy yield and protein cost. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(24):10039–10044.

   Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1215283110

5. 5.

   Basan M, Hui S, Okano H, Zhang Z, Shen Y, Williamson JR, et al Overflow metabolism in Escherichia coli results from efficient proteome allocation. Nature. 2015;528:99

   Not in our library10.1038/nature15765

6. 6.

   Liebermeister W, Noor E, Flamholz A, Davidi D, Bernhardt J, Milo R. Visual account of protein investment in cellular functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(23):8488–8493.

   Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1314810111

7. 7.

   Schuetz R, Kuepfer L, Sauer U. Systematic evaluation of objective functions for predicting intracellular fluxes in Escherichia coli. Molecular Systems Biology. 2007;3:119

   Not in our library10.1038/msb4100162

8. 8.

   Beard DA, Liang S, Qian H. Energy Balance for Analysis of Complex Metabolic Networks. Biophysical Journal. 2002;83(1):79–86.

   Not in our library10.1016/s0006-3495(02)75150-3

9. 9.

   Beard DA, Babson E, Curtis E, Qian H. Thermodynamic constraints for biochemical networks. J Theor Biol. 2004;228(3):327–333.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.01.008

10. 10.

    Yang F, Qian H, Beard DA. Ab initio prediction of thermodynamically feasible reaction directions from biochemical network stoichiometry. Metabolic Engineering. 2005;7(4):251–259.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ymben.2005.03.002

11. 11.

    Fleming RMT, Maes CM, Saunders MA, Ye Y, Palsson BO. A variational principle for computing nonequilibrium fluxes and potentials in genome-scale biochemical networks. J Theor Biol. 2012;292:71–77.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.09.029

12. 12.

    Henry CS, Jankowski MD, Broadbelt LJ, Hatzimanikatis V. Genome-scale thermodynamic analysis of E. coli metabolism. Biophys J. 2006;90:1453–1461.

    Not in our library10.1529/biophysj.105.071720

13. 13.

    Henry CS, Broadbelt LJ, Hatzimanikatis V. Thermodynamics-Based Metabolic Flux Analysis. Biophys J. 2007;92(5):1792–1805.

    Not in our library10.1529/biophysj.106.093138

14. 14.

    Hoppe A, Hoffmann S, Holzhütter HG. Including metabolite concentrations into flux balance analysis: thermodynamic realizability as a constraint on flux distributions in metabolic networks. BMC Systems Biology. 2007;1(1):1–12.

    Not in our library10.1186/1752-0509-1-23

15. 15.
    Pathway Thermodynamics Highlights Kinetic Obstacles in Central Metabolism · 2014

    No notice
16. 16.

    Shlomi T, Cabili M, Herrgard M, Palsson BO, Ruppin E. Network-based Prediction of Human Tissue-specific Metabolism. Nature Biotechnology. 2008;26(9):1003

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt.1487

17. 17.

    Holzhütter HG. The principle of flux minimization and its application to estimate stationary fluxes in metabolic networks. Eur J Biochem. 2004;271(14):2905–2922.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1432-1033.2004.04213.x

18. 18.

    Lewis NE, Hixson KK, Conrad TM, Lerman JA, Charusanti P, Polpitiya AD, et al Omic data from evolved E. coli are consistent with computed optimal growth from genome-scale models. Mol Syst Biol. 2010;6:390

    Not in our library10.1038/msb.2010.47

19. 19.

    Beg QK, Vazquez A, Ernst J, de Menezes MA, Bar-Joseph Z, Barabási AL, et al Intracellular crowding defines the mode and sequence of substrate uptake by Escherichia coli and constrains its metabolic activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(31):12663–12668.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0609845104

20. 20.

    Hoppe A, Richter C, Holzhütter HG. Enzyme maintenance effort as criterion for the characterization of alternative pathways and length distribution of isofunctional enzymes. Biosystems. 2011;105(2):122–129.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biosystems.2011.05.006

21. 21.

    Liebermeister W, Uhlendorf J, Klipp E. Modular rate laws for enzymatic reactions: thermodynamics, elasticities, and implementation. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(12):1528–1534.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btq141

22. 22.

    Noor E, Flamholz A, Liebermeister W, Bar-Even A, Milo R. A note on the kinetics of enzyme action: a decomposition that highlights thermodynamic effects. FEBS Letters. 2013;587(17):2772–2777.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.febslet.2013.07.028

23. 23.

    Tepper N, Noor E, Amador-Noguez D, Haraldsdóttir HS, Milo R, Rabinowitz J, et al Steady-state metabolite concentrations reflect a balance between maximizing enzyme efficiency and minimizing total metabolite load. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(9):e75370

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0075370

24. 24.

    Schuster S, Heinrich R. Minimization of intermediate concentrations as a suggested optimality principle for biochemical networks. Journal of Mathematical Biology. 1991;29(5):425–442.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf00160471

25. 25.

    Bar-Even A, Noor E, Savir Y, Liebermeister W, Davidi D, Tawfik DS, et al The moderately efficient enzyme: evolutionary and physicochemical trends shaping enzyme parameters. Biochemistry. 2011;21:4402–4410.

    Not in our library10.1021/bi2002289

26. 26.

    van Eunen K, Bouwman J, Daran-Lapujade P, Postmus J, Canelas AB, Mensonides FI, et al Measuring enzyme activities under standardized in vivo-like conditions for systems biology. FEBS Journal. 2010;277:749–760.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07524.x

27. 27.

    Smallbone K, Messiha HL, Carroll KM, Winder CL, Malys N, Dunn WB, et al A model of yeast glycolysis based on a consistent kinetic characterisation of all its enzymes. FEBS Letters. 2013;587:2832–2841.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.febslet.2013.06.043

28. 28.

    Hoffmann S, Hoppe A, Holzhütter HG. Composition of metabolic flux distributions by functionally interpretable minimal flux modes (inModes). Genome Informatics. 2006;17(1):195–207.

    Not in our library

29. 29.

    Yizhak K, Benyamini T, Liebermeister W, Ruppin E, Shlomi T. Integrating quantitative proteomics and metabolomics with a genome-scale metabolic network model. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(12):i255–i260.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btq183

30. 30.

    Zhuang K, Vemuri GN, Mahadevan R. Economics of membrane occupancy and respiro-fermentation. MSB. 2011;7:500

    Not in our library10.1038/msb.2011.34

31. 31.

    Reich JG. Zur Ökonomie im Proteinhaushalt der lebenden Zelle. Biomed Biochim Acta. 1983;42(7/8):839–848.

    Not in our library

32. 32.

    Klipp E, Heinrich R. Competition for enzymes in metabolic pathways: implications for optimal distributions of enzyme concentrations and for the distribution of flux control. BioSystems. 1999;54:1–14.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0303-2647(99)00059-3

33. 33.

    Klipp E, Heinrich R, Holzhütter HG. Prediction of temporal gene expression. Metabolic optimization by re-distribution of enzyme activities. Eur J Biochem. 2002;269:1–8.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.03223.x

34. 34.

    Liebermeister W, Klipp E, Schuster S, Heinrich R. A theory of optimal differential gene expression. BioSystems. 2004;76:261–278.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biosystems.2004.05.022

35. 35.

    Molenaar D, van Berlo R, de Ridder D, Teusink B. Shifts in growth strategies reflect tradeoffs in cellular economics. Molecular Systems Biology. 2009;5:323

    Not in our library10.1038/msb.2009.82

36. 36.

    Zelcbuch L, Antonovsky N, Bar-Even A, Levin-Karp A, Barenholz U, Dayagi M, et al Spanning high-dimensional expression space using ribosome-binding site combinatorics. Nucleic Acids Research. 2013;41(9):e98

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkt151

37. 37.

    Lee ME, Aswani A, Han AS, Tomlin CJ, Dueber JE. Expression-level optimization of a multi-enzyme pathway in the absence of a high-throughput assay. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(22):10668–10678.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkt809

38. 38.
    Relationship between Thermodynamic Driving Force and One-Way Fluxes in Reversible Processes · 2007

    No notice
39. 39.

    Goldberg RN, Tewari YB, Bhat TN. Thermodynamics of enzyme-catalyzed reactions—a database for quantitative biochemistry. Bioinformatics. 2004;20(16):2874–2877.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/bth314

40. 40.

    Schomburg I, Chang A, Ebeling C, Gremse M, Heldt C, Huhn G, et al BRENDA, the enzyme database: updates and major new developments. Nucleic Acids Research. 2004;32:Database issue:D431–433.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkh081

Cited by papers we hold 6

• A Standardized Brain Molecular Atlas: A Resource for Systems Modeling and Simulation · 2021
  Not checked
• eQuilibrator 3.0: a database solution for thermodynamic constant estimation · 2021
  No notice
• Modeling genome-wide enzyme evolution predicts strong epistasis underlying catalytic turnover rates · 2018
  Not checked
• Machine learning applied to enzyme turnover numbers reveals protein structural correlates and improves metabolic models · 2018
  No notice
• Thermal proteome profiling in bacteria: probing protein state in vivo · 2018
  No notice
• Improving the phenotype predictions of a yeast genome‐scale metabolic model by incorporating enzymatic constraints · 2017
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.