Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 25, 2026.

Impact of Network Structure and Cellular Response on Spike Time Correlations

James Trousdale, Yu Hu, Eric Shea-Brown and 1 more

PLoS Computational Biology · 2012

doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002408

Abstract

Novel experimental techniques reveal the simultaneous activity of larger and larger numbers of neurons. As a result there is increasing interest in the structure of cooperative--or correlated--activity in neural populations, and in the possible impact of such correlations on the neural code. A fundamental theoretical challenge is to understand how the architecture of network connectivity along with the dynamical properties of single cells shape the magnitude and timescale of correlations. We provide a general approach to this problem by extending prior techniques based on linear response theory. We consider networks of general integrate-and-fire cells with arbitrary architecture, and provide explicit expressions for the approximate cross-correlation between constituent cells. These correlations depend strongly on the operating point (input mean and variance) of the neurons, even when connectivity is fixed. Moreover, the approximations admit an expansion in powers of the matrices that describe the network architecture. This expansion can be readily interpreted in terms of paths between different cells. We apply our results to large excitatory-inhibitory networks, and demonstrate first how precise balance--or lack thereof--between the strengths and timescales of excitatory and inhibitory synapses is reflected in the overall correlation structure of the network. We then derive explicit expressions for the average correlation structure in randomly connected networks. These expressions help to identify the important factors that shape coordinated neural activity in such networks.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

Read at PubMed Central

References 69

  1. 1.

    Cohen M, Kohn A. Measuring and interpreting neuronal correlations. Nat Neurosci. 2011;14:811-819.

    Not in our library10.1038/nn.2842

  2. 2.

    Ohki K, Chung S, Ch'ng Y, Kara P, Reid R. Functional imaging with cellular resolution reveals precise micro-architecture in visual cortex. Nature. 2005;433:597-603.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature03274

  3. 3.

    Field G, Gauthier J, Sher A, Greschner M, Machado T, et al. Functional connectivity in the retina at the resolution of photoreceptors. Nature. 2010;467:673-677.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature09424

  4. 4.

    Jia H, Rochefort N, Chen X, Konnerth A. In vivo two-photon imaging of sensory-evoked dendritic calcium signals in cortical neurons. Nat Protoc. 2010;6:28-35.

    Not in our library10.1038/nprot.2010.169

  5. 5.

    Brown EN, Kass RE, Mitra P. Multiple neural spike train data analysis: state-of-the-art and future challenges. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7:456-61.

    Not in our library10.1038/nn1228

  6. 6.

    Averbeck B, Latham P, Pouget A. Neural correlations, population coding and computation. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7:358-366.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrn1888

  7. 7.

    Shadlen M, Newsome W. The variable discharge of cortical neurons: implications for connectivity, computation, and information coding. J Neurosci. 1998;18:3870-3896.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.18-10-03870.1998

  8. 8.

    Panzeri S, Schultz S, Treves A, Rolls E. Correlations and encoding of information in the nervous system. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio. 1999;266:1001-1012.

    Not in our library10.1098/rspb.1999.0736

  9. 9.

    Zohary E, Shadlen MN, Newsome WT. Correlated neuronal discharge rate and its implication for psychophysical performance. Nature. 1994;370:140-143.

    Not in our library10.1038/370140a0

  10. 10.

    Abbott LF, Dayan P. The effect of correlated variability on the accuracy of a population code. Neural Comput. 1999;11:91-101.

    Not in our library10.1162/089976699300016827

  11. 11.

    Sompolinsky H, Yoon H, Kang K, Shamir M. Population coding in neuronal systems with correlated noise. Phys Rev E. 2001;64:051904.

    Not in our library10.1103/physreve.64.051904

  12. 12.

    Panzeri S, Petersen R, Schultz S, Lebedev M, Diamond M. The role of spike timing in the coding of stimulus location in rat somatosensory cortex. Neuron. 2001;29:769-777.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00251-3

  13. 13.

    Beck J, Bejjanki V, Pouget A. Insights from a simple expression for linear fisher information in a recurrently connected population of spiking neurons. Neural Comput. 2011;23:1484-1502.

    Not in our library10.1162/neco_a_00125

  14. 14.

    Josić K, Shea-Brown E, Doiron B, de La Rocha J. Stimulus-dependent correlations and population codes. Neural Comput. 2009;21:2774-2804.

    Not in our library10.1162/neco.2009.10-08-879

  15. 15.

    Schneidman E, Bialek W, Berry M. Synergy, Redundancy, and Independence in Population Codes. J Neurosci. 2003;23:11539-11553.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.23-37-11539.2003

  16. 16.

    Latham PE, Nirenberg S. Synergy, Redundancy, and Independence in Population Codes, Revisited. J Neurosci. 2005;25:5195-5206.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.5319-04.2005

  17. 17.

    Nirenberg S, Carcieri SM, Jacobs AL, Latham PE. Retinal ganglion cells act largely as independent encoders. Nature. 2001;411:698-701.

    Not in our library10.1038/35079612

  18. 18.

    Cohen M, Newsome W. Estimates of the contribution of single neurons to perception depend on timescale and noise correlation. J Neurosci. 2009;29:6635-6648.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.5179-08.2009

  19. 19.

    Romo R, Hernandez A, Zainos A, Salinas E. Correlated neuronal discharges that increase coding efficiency during perceptual discrimination. Neuron. 2003;38:649-657.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00287-3

  20. 20.

    Renart A, de la Rocha J, Bartho P, Hollender L, Parga N, et al. The asynchronous state in cortical circuits. Science. 2010;327:587-590.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1179850

  21. 21.

    Ecker A, Berens P, Keliris G, Bethge M, Logothetis N, et al. Decorrelated neuronal firing in cortical microcircuits. Science. 2010;327:584-587.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1179867

  22. 22.

    Paninski L, Ahmadian Y, Ferreira D, Koyama S, Rahnama Rad K, et al. A new look at state-space models for neural data. J Comput Neurosci. 2010;29:107-126.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10827-009-0179-x

  23. 23.

    Nykamp D. A mathematical framework for inferring connectivity in probabilistic neuronal networks. Math Biosci. 2007;205:204-251.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mbs.2006.08.020

  24. 24.

    Ostojic S, Brunel N, Hakim V. How connectivity, background activity, and synaptic properties shape the cross-correlation between spike trains. J Neurosci. 2009;29:10234-10253.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.1275-09.2009

  25. 25.

    Fourcaud-Trocmé N, Hansel D, Van Vreeswijk C, Brunel N. How spike generation mechanisms determine the neuronal response to uctuating inputs. J Neurosci. 2003;23:11628-11640.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.23-37-11628.2003

  26. 26.

    Lindner B, Doiron B, Longtin A. Theory of oscillatory firing induced by spatially correlated noise and delayed inhibitory feedback. Phys Rev E. 2005;72:061919.

    Not in our library10.1103/physreve.72.061919

  27. 27.

    Brunel N, Hakim V. Fast global oscillations in networks of integrate-and-fire neurons with low firing rates. Neural Comput. 1999;11:1621-1671.

    Not in our library10.1162/089976699300016179

  28. 28.

    Lindner B, Schimansky-Geier L. Transmission of noise coded versus additive signals through a neuronal ensemble. Phys Rev Lett. 2001;86:2934-2937.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.86.2934

  29. 29.

    Richardson M. Firing-rate response of linear and nonlinear integrate-and-fire neurons to modulated current-based and conductance-based synaptic drive. Phys Rev E. 2007;76:021919.

    Not in our library10.1103/physreve.76.021919

  30. 30.

    Gabbiani F, Koch C, Segev I, Koch C. Principles of spike train analysis. Methods in Neuronal Modeling. 1998;313-360.

    Not in our library

  31. 31.
  32. 32.

    Rangan A. Diagrammatic expansion of pulse-coupled network dynamics. Phys Rev Lett. 2009;102:158101.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.102.158101

  33. 33.

    Rangan A. Diagrammatic expansion of pulse-coupled network dynamics in terms of subnetworks. Phys Rev E. 2009;80:036101.

    Not in our library10.1103/physreve.80.036101

  34. 34.

    Risken H. The Fokker-Planck equation: Methods of solution and applications. 1996.

    Not in our library

  35. 35.

    Brunel N, Chance F, Fourcaud N, Abbott L. Effects of synaptic noise and filtering on the frequency response of spiking neurons. Phys Rev Lett. 2001;86:2186-2189.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.86.2186

  36. 36.

    White JA, Rubinstein JT, Kay AR. Channel noise in neurons. Trends Neurosci. 2000;23:131-137.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0166-2236(99)01521-0

  37. 37.

    Renart A, Brunel N, Wang X, Feng J. Mean-field theory of irregularly spiking neuronal populations and working memory in recurrent cortical networks. Computational Neuroscience: A Comprehensive Approach. 2004;431-490.

    Not in our library

  38. 38.

    Burkitt A. A review of the integrate-and-fire neuron model: I. homogeneous synaptic input. Biol Cybern. 2006;95:1-19.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00422-006-0068-6

  39. 39.

    Gabbiani F, Cox S. Mathematics for Neuroscientists. 2010.

    Not in our library

  40. 40.

    Barreiro A, Shea-Brown E, Thilo E. Time scales of spike-train correlation for neural oscillators with common drive. Phys Rev E. 2010;81:011916.

    Not in our library10.1103/physreve.81.011916

All 69 references

Cited by papers we hold 9

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.