Assessing Vaccination Sentiments with Online Social Media: Implications for Infectious Disease Dynamics and Control

Abstract

There is great interest in the dynamics of health behaviors in social networks and how they affect collective public health outcomes, but measuring population health behaviors over time and space requires substantial resources. Here, we use publicly available data from 101,853 users of online social media collected over a time period of almost six months to measure the spatio-temporal sentiment towards a new vaccine. We validated our approach by identifying a strong correlation between sentiments expressed online and CDC-estimated vaccination rates by region. Analysis of the network of opinionated users showed that information flows more often between users who share the same sentiments - and less often between users who do not share the same sentiments - than expected by chance alone. We also found that most communities are dominated by either positive or negative sentiments towards the novel vaccine. Simulations of infectious disease transmission show that if clusters of negative vaccine sentiments lead to clusters of unprotected individuals, the likelihood of disease outbreaks is greatly increased. Online social media provide unprecedented access to data allowing for inexpensive and efficient tools to identify target areas for intervention efforts and to evaluate their effectiveness.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

References 26

1. 1.

   Jansen VAA, Stollenwerk N, Jensen HJ, Ramsay ME, Edmunds WJ, et al. Measles outbreaks in a population with declining vaccine uptake. Science. 2003;301:804.

   Not in our library10.1126/science.1086726

2. 2.

   Salathé M, Bonhoeffer S. The effect of opinion clustering on disease outbreaks. J R Soc Interface. 2008;5:1505-1508.

   Not in our library10.1098/rsif.2008.0271

3. 3.

   Omer SB, Salmon DA, Orenstein WA, deHart MP, Halsey N. Vaccine refusal, mandatory immunization, and the risks of vaccine-preventable diseases. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1981-1988.

   Not in our library10.1056/nejmsa0806477

4. 4.

   Christakis NA, Fowler JH. The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:370-379.

   Not in our library10.1056/nejmsa066082

5. 5.

   Christakis NA, Fowler JH. The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2249-2258.

   Not in our library10.1056/nejmsa0706154

6. 6.

   Centola D. The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science. 2010;329:1194-1197.

   Not in our library10.1126/science.1185231

7. 7.

   Mokdad AH, Remington PL. Measuring health behaviors in populations. Prev Chronic Dis. 2010;7:A75.

   Not in our library

8. 8.

   Eysenbach G, Powell J, Englesakis M, Rizo C, Stern A. Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions. BMJ. 2004;328:1166.

   Not in our library10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1166

9. 9.
   Infodemiology and Infoveillance: Framework for an Emerging Set of Public Health Informatics Methods to Analyze Search, Communication and Publication Behavior on the Internet · 2009

   No notice
10. 10.

    Ginsberg J, Mohebbi MH, Patel RS, Brammer L, Smolinski MS, et al. Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data. Nature. 2009;457:1012-1014.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature07634

11. 11.
    The Use of Twitter to Track Levels of Disease Activity and Public Concern in the U.S. during the Influenza A H1N1 Pandemic · 2011

    No notice
12. 12.

    Interim results: state-specific influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccination coverage - United States, October 2009-January 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59:363-368.

    Not in our library

13. 13.

    Newman M. Mixing patterns in networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2003;67:026126.

    Not in our library10.1103/physreve.67.026126

14. 14.

    Reichardt J, Bornholdt S. Statistical mechanics of community detection. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2006;74:016110.

    Not in our library10.1103/physreve.74.016110

15. 15.

    Salathé M, Kazandjieva M, Lee JW, Levis P, Feldman MW, et al. A high-resolution human contact network for infectious disease transmission. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:22020-22025.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1009094108

16. 16.

    Ten great public health achievements--United States, 1900-1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999;48:241-243.

    Not in our library

17. 17.

    Ash C. Summun bonum. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2:61ed8.

    Not in our library10.1126/scitranslmed.3001924

18. 18.

    Anderson RM, May RM, Anderson B. Infectious Diseases of Humans: Dynamics and Control (Oxford Science Publications). 1992.

    Not in our library

19. 19.

    Feikin DR, Lezotte DC, Hamman RF, Salmon DA, Chen RT, et al. Individual and community risks of measles and pertussis associated with personal exemptions to immunization. JAMA. 2000;284:3145-3150.

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.284.24.3145

20. 20.

    May T, Silverman RD. “Clustering of exemptions” as a collective action threat to herd immunity. Vaccine. 2003;21:1048-1051.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0264-410x(02)00627-8

21. 21.

    Sugerman DE, Barskey AE, Delea MG, Ortega-Sanchez IR, Bi D, et al. Measles Outbreak in a Highly Vaccinated Population, San Diego, 2008: Role of the Intentionally Undervaccinated. Pediatrics. 2010;125:747-755.

    Not in our library10.1542/peds.2009-1653

22. 22.

    Lazer D, Pentland A, Adamic L, Aral S, Barabasi A, et al. Computational social science. Science. 2009;323:721-723.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1167742

23. 23.

    Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, Gerberding JL. Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA. 2004;291:1238-1245.

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.291.10.1238

24. 24.

    Bird S, Klein E, Loper E. Natural Language Processing with Python. 1st ed. O'Reilly Media. 2009;512.

    Not in our library

25. 25.

    Ferguson N, Cummings D, Cauchemez S. Strategies for containing an emerging influenza pandemic in Southeast Asia. Nature. 2005;437:209-14.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature04017

26. 26.

    Lessler J, Reich N. Outbreak of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) at a New York City school. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2628-2636.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa0906089

Cited by papers we hold 15

• Modelling anti-vaccine sentiment as a cultural pathogen · 2020
  Not checked
• Instagram use is linked to increased symptoms of orthorexia nervosa · 2017
  No notice
• Seasonal influenza vaccination coverage and its determinants among nursing homes personnel in western France · 2017
  Not checked
• Behavioural change models for infectious disease transmission: a systematic review (2010–2015) · 2016
  No notice
• Results from the centers for disease control and prevention’s predict the 2013–2014 Influenza Season Challenge · 2016
  No notice
• Ethical Challenges of Big Data in Public Health · 2015
  No notice
• Associations Between Exposure to and Expression of Negative Opinions About Human Papillomavirus Vaccines on Social Media: An Observational Study · 2015
  No notice
• Using Social Media for Actionable Disease Surveillance and Outbreak Management: A Systematic Literature Review · 2015
  No notice
• Crowdsourcing dialect characterization through Twitter. · 2014
  Not checked
• Twitter Improves Influenza Forecasting · 2014
  No notice
• What have we learned about communication inequalities during the H1N1 pandemic: a systematic review of the literature · 2014
  No notice
• National and Local Influenza Surveillance through Twitter: An Analysis of the 2012-2013 Influenza Epidemic · 2013
  No notice
• A New Dimension of Health Care: Systematic Review of the Uses, Benefits, and Limitations of Social Media for Health Communication · 2013
  No notice
• Balanced Codon Usage Optimizes Eukaryotic Translational Efficiency · 2012
  No notice
• Digital Epidemiology · 2012
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.