Exploring the Free Energy Landscape: From Dynamics to Networks and Back

Abstract

Knowledge of the Free Energy Landscape topology is the essential key to understanding many biochemical processes. The determination of the conformers of a protein and their basins of attraction takes a central role for studying molecular isomerization reactions. In this work, we present a novel framework to unveil the features of a Free Energy Landscape answering questions such as how many meta-stable conformers there are, what the hierarchical relationship among them is, or what the structure and kinetics of the transition paths are. Exploring the landscape by molecular dynamics simulations, the microscopic data of the trajectory are encoded into a Conformational Markov Network. The structure of this graph reveals the regions of the conformational space corresponding to the basins of attraction. In addition, handling the Conformational Markov Network, relevant kinetic magnitudes as dwell times and rate constants, or hierarchical relationships among basins, completes the global picture of the landscape. We show the power of the analysis studying a toy model of a funnel-like potential and computing efficiently the conformers of a short peptide, dialanine, paving the way to a systematic study of the Free Energy Landscape in large peptides.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

References 47

1. 1.

   Oltvai ZN, Barabási AL. Systems biology. Life's complexity pyramid. Science. 2002;298:763-764.

   Not in our library10.1126/science.1078563

2. 2.

   Parisi G. Complexity in biology: the point of view of a physicist. 1994.

   Not in our library

3. 3.

   Krivov SV, Karplus M. Free energy disconnectivity graphs: application to peptide models. J Chem Phys. 2002;117:10894-10903.

   Not in our library

4. 4.

   Krivov SV, Karplus M. Hidden complexity of free energy surfaces for peptide (protein) folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:14766-14770.

   Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0406234101

5. 5.

   Ottino JM. Complex systems. AIChE J. 2003;49:292-299.

   Not in our library

6. 6.

   Amaral LAN, Ottino JM. Complex systems and networks: challenges and opportunities for chemical and biological engineers. Chem Eng Sci. 2004;59:1653-1666.

   Not in our library

7. 7.

   Newman MEJ. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. 2003;45:167-256.

   Not in our library

8. 8.

   Boccaletti S, Latora V, Moreno Y, Chavez M, Hwang DU. Complex networks: structure and dynamics. Phys Rep. 2006;424:175-308.

   Not in our library

9. 9.

   Noé F, Horenko I, Schütte C, Smith JC. Hierarchical analysis of conformational dynamics in biomolecules: transition networks of metastable states. J Chem Phys. 2007;126:155102.

   Not in our library10.1063/1.2714539

10. 10.

    Rao F, Caflisch A. The protein folding network. J Mol Biol. 2004;342:299-306.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmb.2004.06.063

11. 11.

    Caflisch A. Network and graph analyses of folding free energy surfaces. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2006;16:71-78.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sbi.2006.01.002

12. 12.

    Noé F, Fischer S. Transition networks for modeling the kinetics of conformational change in macromolecules. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2008;18:154-162.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sbi.2008.01.008

13. 13.

    Scala A, Amaral LAN, Barthélémy M. Small-world networks and the conformation space of a short lattice polymer chain. Europhys Lett. 2001;55:594-600.

    Not in our library

14. 14.

    Gfeller D, De Lachapelle DM, De los Rios P, Caldarelli G, Rao F. Uncovering the topology of configuration space networks. Phys Rev E. 2007;76:026113.

    Not in our library10.1103/physreve.76.026113

15. 15.

    Gfeller D, De Los Rios P, Caflisch A, Rao F. From the cover: Complex network analysis of free-energy landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:1817-1822.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0608099104

16. 16.

    Chodera JD, Singhal N, Pande VS, Dill KA, Swope WC. Automatic discovery of metastable states for the construction of Markov models of macromolecular conformational dynamics. J Chem Phys. 2007;126:155101.

    Not in our library10.1063/1.2714538

17. 17.

    Buchete NV, Hummer G. Coarse master equations for peptide folding dynamics. J Phys Chem B. 2008;112:6057-6069.

    Not in our library10.1021/jp0761665

18. 18.

    Deuflhard P, Huisinga W, Fischer A, Schütte C. Identification of almost invariant aggregates in reversible nearly uncoupled Markov chains. Linear Algebra Appl. 2000;315:39-59.

    Not in our library

19. 19.

    Wales DJ. Energy landscapes: calculating pathways and rates. Int Rev Phys Chem. 2006;25:237-282.

    Not in our library

20. 20.

    Evans DA, Wales DJ. The free energy landscape and dynamics of met-enkephalin. J Chem Phys. 2003;119:9947-9955.

    Not in our library

21. 21.

    Wales DJ, Doye JPK, Miller MA, Mortenson PN, Walsh TR. Energy landscapes: from clusters to biomolecules. Adv Chem Phys. 2000;115:1-111.

    Not in our library

22. 22.

    Hänggi P, Talkner P, Borkovec M. Reaction-rate theory: fifty years after Kramers. Rev Mod Phys. 1990;62:251-342.

    Not in our library

23. 23.

    van Kampen NG. Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry. 2007.

    Not in our library

24. 24.

    van Kampen NG. Remarks on non-Markov processes. Braz J Phys. 1998;28:90-96.

    Not in our library

25. 25.

    Zwanzig R. Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics. 2001.

    Not in our library

26. 26.

    Jernigan RW, Baran RH. Testing lumpability in Markov chains. Stat Probab Lett. 2003;64:17-23.

    Not in our library

27. 27.

    Swope WC, Pitera JW, Suits F. Describing protein folding kinetics by molecular dynamics simulations. 1. Theory. J Phys Chem B. 2004;108:6571-6581.

    Not in our library

28. 28.

    Zwanzig R. From classical dynamics to continuous time random walks. J Stat Phys. 1983;30:255-262.

    Not in our library

29. 29.

    Park S, Pande VS. Validation of Markov state models using Shannon's entropy. J Chem Phys. 2006;124:054118-1-054118-5.

    Not in our library10.1063/1.2166393

30. 30.

    Wolynes PG, Onuchic JN, Thirumalai D. Navigating the folding routes. Science. 1995;267:1619-1620.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.7886447

31. 31.

    Onuchic JN, Wolynes PG. Theory of protein folding. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2004;14:70-75.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.sbi.2004.01.009

32. 32.

    Greenside HS, Helfand E. Numerical integration of stochastic differential equations.2. Bell Syst Tech J. 1981;60:1927-1940.

    Not in our library

33. 33.

    Danon L, Díaz-Guilera A, Duch J, Arenas A. Comparing community structure identification. J Stat Mech. 2005;9:P09008.

    Not in our library

34. 34.

    Trygubenko SA, Wales DJ. Graph transformation method for calculating waiting times in Markov chains. J Chem Phys. 2006;124:234110-1-234110-16.

    Not in our library10.1063/1.2198806

35. 35.

    Hoshen J, Kopelman R. Percolation and cluster distribution. 1. Cluster multiple labeling technique and critical concentration algorithm. Phys Rev B. 1976;14:3438-3445.

    Not in our library

36. 36.

    Lyman E, Zuckerman DM. On the structural convergence of biomolecular simulations by determination of the effective sample size. J Phys Chem B. 2007;111:12876-12882.

    Not in our library10.1021/jp073061t

37. 37.

    Rossky PJ, Karplus M. Solvation - molecular dynamics study of a dipeptide in water. J Am Chem Soc. 1979;101:1913-1937.

    Not in our library

38. 38.

    Smith PE. The alanine dipeptide free energy surface in solution. J Chem Phys. 1999;111:5568-5579.

    Not in our library

39. 39.

    Apostolakis J, Ferrara P, Caflisch A. Calculation of conformational transitions and barriers in solvated systems: application to the alanine dipeptide in water. J Chem Phys. 1999;110:2099-2108.

    Not in our library

40. 40.

    Chekmarev DS, Ishida T, Levy RM. Long-time conformational transitions of alanine dipeptide in aqueous solution: Continuous and discrete-state kinetic models. J Phys Chem B. 2004;108:19487-19495.

    Not in our library

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.