No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 16, 2026.
The Marine Microbial Eukaryote Transcriptome Sequencing Project (MMETSP): Illuminating the Functional Diversity of Eukaryotic Life in the Oceans through Transcriptome Sequencing
Patrick J. Keeling, Fabien Burki, Heather M. Wilcox and 78 more
PLoS Biology · 2014
doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001889
Abstract
Microbial ecology is plagued by problems of an abstract nature. Cell sizes are so small and population sizes so large that both are virtually incomprehensible. Niches are so far from our everyday experience as to make their very definition elusive. Organisms that may be abundant and critical to our survival are little understood, seldom described and/or cultured, and sometimes yet to be even seen. One way to confront these problems is to use data of an even more abstract nature: molecular sequence data. Massive environmental nucleic acid sequencing, such as metagenomics or metatranscriptomics, promises functional analysis of microbial communities as a whole, without prior knowledge of which organisms are in the environment or exactly how they are interacting. But sequence-based ecological studies nearly always use a comparative approach, and that requires relevant reference sequences, which are an extremely limited resource when it comes to microbial eukaryotes [1]. In practice, this means sequence databases need to be populated with enormous quantities of data for which we have some certainties about the source. Most important is the taxonomic identity of the organism from which a sequence is derived and as much functional identification of the encoded proteins as possible. In an ideal world, such information would be available as a large set of complete, well-curated, and annotated genomes for all the major organisms from the environment in question. Reality substantially diverges from this ideal, but at least for bacterial molecular ecology, there is a database consisting of thousands of complete genomes from a wide range of taxa, supplemented by a phylogeny-driven approach to diversifying genomics [2]. For eukaryotes, the number of available genomes is far, far fewer, and we have relied much more heavily on random growth of sequence databases [3],[4], raising the question as to whether this is fit for purpose.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 16, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Microbial ecology is plagued by problems of an abstract nature. Cell sizes are so small and population sizes so large that both are virtually incomprehensible. Niches are so far from our everyday experience as to make their very definition elusive. Organisms that may be abundant and critical to our survival are little understood, seldom described and/or cultured, and sometimes yet to be even seen. One way to confront these problems is to use data of an even more abstract nature: molecular sequence data. Massive environmental nucleic acid sequencing, such as metagenomics or metatranscriptomics, promises functional analysis of microbial communities as a whole, without prior knowledge of which organisms are in the environment or exactly how they are interacting. But sequence-based ecological studies nearly always use a comparative approach, and that requires relevant reference sequences, which are an extremely limited resource when it comes to microbial eukaryotes.
In practice, this means sequence databases need to be populated with enormous quantities of data for which we have some certainties about the source. Most important is the taxonomic identity of the organism from which a sequence is derived and as much functional identification of the encoded proteins as possible. In an ideal world, such information would be available as a large set of complete, well-curated, and annotated genomes for all the major organisms from the environment in question. Reality substantially diverges from this ideal, but at least for bacterial molecular ecology, there is a database consisting of thousands of complete genomes from a wide range of taxa, supplemented by a phylogeny-driven approach to diversifying genomics. For eukaryotes, the number of available genomes is far, far fewer, and we have relied much more heavily on random growth of sequence databases,, raising the question as to whether this is fit for purpose.
The Wrong Biases
Compared with those of prokaryotes, nuclear genomes are large and disproportionately difficult to analyze, and this means that eukaryotic genomics have been even more strongly affected by “prioritization.” This results in acute taxonomic biases in the nuclear genomes chosen for sequencing, with a large proportion of them being derived from organisms of particular biomedical or biotechnological significance. Specifically, the great majority of nuclear genomes come from animals, fungi, and plants, and from parasites that infect animals,. For marine systems, this makes for a weak reference database, because these organisms are collectively a poor representation of eukaryotic life in the seas. Indeed, the marine organisms that maintain Earth's atmosphere, fuel the world's fisheries, and sustain the historical (pre-anthropogenic) global carbon cycle, as well as major chemical and nutrient cycles in the ocean, fall outside these groups. The lack of appropriate reference sequences risks erroneous conclusions as we compare marine ecological sequence data to references too phylogenetically distant and, therefore, too biologically different.
Each sequenced genome of an aquatic unicellular eukaryote has provided a bevy of new and unexpected insights (e.g., –). However, because nuclear genomes can be difficult to sequence and assemble, and gene modeling is not always straightforward, our immediate needs require an alternative way to generate a reference database, the most obvious being transcriptomics. Large-scale sequencing of an organism's mRNA allows the rapid and efficient characterization of expressed genes without spending sequencing resources on the large intergenic regions, introns, and repetitive DNA so common to eukaryotes, while at the same time eliminating many problems with assembly as well as gene prediction and modeling. As a first step, transcriptomes from pure cultures are suitable building blocks to begin to assemble reference databases for eukaryotic microbial ecology. This approach generates a large number of coding sequences (in the form of assembled contigs) from a known organism.
The availability of transcriptomic data from an organism should not be viewed, however, as a substitute for sequencing its genome. The two approaches have different strengths and weaknesses and are better viewed as complementary rather than “either/or.” Indeed, nuclear genome sequencing generally requires substantial transcript sequencing to inform gene prediction algorithms. As sequencing and computational methods grow increasingly powerful, many of the challenges to genome sequencing are being reduced. Nevertheless, until more genomes are available, transcriptomes from a sufficient number of representative species from a given environment could provide a valuable benchmark against which environmental data can be analyzed.
MMETSP—The Right Stuff
The Marine Microbial Eukaryotic Transcriptome Sequencing Project, or MMETSP, aims to provide a significant foothold for integrating microbial eukaryotes into marine ecology by creating over 650 assembled, functionally annotated, and publicly available transcriptomes. These transcriptomes largely come from some of the more abundant and ecologically significant microbial eukaryotes in the oceans. The choice of species, strain, and physiological condition was based on a grassroots nomination process, where researchers working in the field nominated projects based on phylogeny, environmental and ecological importance, physiological impact, and other diverse criteria. The data have been assembled and annotated by homology with existing databases (see Text S1), providing baseline information on gene function. Because the majority of transcriptomes were sequenced from cultured species, they are also taxonomically well defined. Most organisms are available from public culture collections and, therefore, can be further investigated based on hypotheses derived from the transcriptome data. The project as a whole will go a substantial distance towards fulfilling the two criteria for relevant reference sequences noted above. This is not to say these data solve all our problems: new biases have been introduced (see below), and Illumina-based transcriptomes can be challenging to assemble and work with. In addition, there is an apparently universal problem of low levels of contamination—some from other species living with the target organism in culture, others possibly from the process of library construction and sequencing. Importantly, however, the taxa from which these data are derived on aggregate conform much more closely to our understanding of marine eukaryotic diversity from sequence surveys than do the current reference databases, which are the result of ad hoc sequencing priorities that do not fit those of marine ecology (Figure 1A–1C). Indeed, digging deeper into the taxonomy of the more abundant and generally better-studied groups such as prasinophytes and dinoflagellates, shows this to be true at multiple levels (Figure 1D).
For the MMETSP data to achieve maximum impact, the transcriptomes have been made readily available through the CAMERA Data Distribution Center (http://camera.crbs.ucsd.edu/mmetsp/), in which all MMETSP data have been automatically deposited. In addition, all data is in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject PRJNA231566, giving access to the raw trace data through GenBank. Given that library construction is not as robustly consistent as one might hope and that Illumina RNAseq assembly (in the absence of a sequenced genome) is not a completely solved problem, it is helpful that all of this work occurred at a single sequencing center where the protocols used for the >650 transcriptomes were similar (see Text S1 for a full description of methods). This approach not only broadened the types of participating labs (i.e., not just those with experience in genomics) but also maximized comparability of the datasets without the user feeling obliged to reassemble contigs, or to re-predict protein sequences for consistency. At the same time, the availability through the SRA allows for re-analysis of particular datasets.
More Than a Reference Database
The more than 650 transcriptomes will have far-reaching impact beyond the field of marine science. The diversity of taxa represented in the database is impressive, even when held up to the enormous diversity of microbial eukaryotes as a whole (Figure 2). In some cases, these data provide the first glimpse of the genome of an important group of microbial eukaryotes, such as parasitic haplosporidia, several amoebozoans, and the enigmatic heterotrophic flagellate Palpitomonas. In other cases, they provide genomic data from a diverse selection of taxa within a lineage where only sparse genomic data previously existed from a few distant relatives (such as the ciliates –). Experience has shown that such data can transform our understanding of the basic biology and function of these organisms. In the past, we have described a protistan lineage for which there is a single genome sequence as being “well studied.” Thus, even for those that are comparatively “well studied,” the MMETSP data facilitates new directions. It opens the door to comparative genomics within lineages and between related lineages in major protistan groups, including foraminifera, cryptophytes, and several groups of red algae and stramenopiles. Digging further, other cases will allow us to ask population genomic-level questions by providing data from multiple strains of a single species (or even asking whether the “multiple strains” do indeed belong to the same species!). Examining the diversity between sister species or members of the same species can help identify functionally important genes, genes under selection, recent gene family expansions and contractions, or other significant changes like horizontal gene transfer—of course, with recognition that absence from a given transcriptome assembly does not necessarily represent absence from the genome. In other cases, the same isolate has been analyzed under different physiological conditions to develop testable hypotheses on environmental controls. For example, it should be possible to gain first molecular insights into how photosynthetic algae alter their immediate surroundings, the so-called phycosphere, by comparing sequences from the luminescent dinoflagellate Lingulodinium polyedrum that is co-cultured with different bacteria, or cultured on its own. Likewise, growth controls and aspects of niche differentiation should become clearer for many major phytoplankton groups.
A Fast Start and a Long Way to Go
The MMETSP is a significant step in recognizing that purpose-built reference databases from ecologically key biomes are essential for all domains of life. Nevertheless, it is only the beginning, and important biases remain that should be addressed. The MMETSP relies primarily on cultured organisms, and this introduces a different set of biases, most obviously, favoring organisms that are photosynthetic. Eukaryotic heterotrophs have critical ecological roles but are under-represented. Indeed, the natural diversity of eukaryotic heterotrophs is huge in general (Figure 1A), and the four most commonly recovered sequences retrieved in environmental surveys of marine samples worldwide correspond to lineages for which most members are uncultivated (e.g.,Marine Stramenopiles (MAST) and Marine Alveolates (MALV) –). These are probably heterotrophs, but we lack a solid biological definition for most of these cells and have become adroit at ignoring heterotrophs in general. Similarly, organisms from the open ocean are underrepresented. Culture-independent methods for generating transcriptomes and genomes and, in some cases, transcriptomes and genomes from single cells will be essential to moving beyond this problem. Methodologies for population – and single-cell genomics and transcriptomics are advancing rapidly,–, transitioning from technological feats to something we should expect to work routinely. This transition holds great promise for filling the rather substantial gap in our knowledge imposed by uncultivated protists, as well as allowing us to carry out condition-specific analyses of expressed genes in difficult-to-work-with systems. The MMETSP program foreshadows this development by sequencing a small set of culture-independent samples.
The MMETSP dataset serves as an example of how purpose-built reference databases focused on a particular niche or environment can be established relatively quickly and efficiently. This database will allow us to address eukaryotic sequences from nature in a robust manner for the first time. Because the strength of the MMETSP project is precisely its focus on the marine environment, it will not serve as a universal database of eukaryotic diversity that can be easily applied to other environments. While the taxonomic diversity included in the project is amazing (Figure 2), it is also immediately clear that many major groups of eukaryotes are not covered by MMETSP transcriptomes. In some cases, this is because these lineages are not abundant in the oceans (e.g., many excavates), but in others it is simply because members of the lineage are difficult to cultivate and are generally poorly represented in molecular data (e.g., most rhizarians), even if they are abundant and important in the ocean. For other major environments (e.g., freshwater, soil) similar databases could be developed in a focused manner, but all such efforts rely on a detailed knowledge of what lives in that environment, which is not always adequate. To remedy these gaps in our knowledge, we advocate a taxonomy-based approach similar to the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea (www.jgi.doe.gov/programs/GEBA/),. This undertaking will require a focus on developing the necessary tools for gaining access to the transcriptomes and genomes of uncultivated organisms and would represent a major advance for all aspects of the study of microbial eukaryotes. We look forward to the many creative analyses and results enabled by the MMETSP and the minds of the broader scientific community; the new insights to be gained in ecology, physiology, and evolution of unicellular eukaryotes will significantly advance understanding of marine ecosystems and eukaryotic microbial biology as a whole. The MMETSP illustrates the power behind such a community activity and bodes well for a future Genomic Encyclopedia of Microbial Eukaryotes.
References 32
- 1.
Worden AZ, Allen AE (2010 ) The voyage of the microbial eukaryote. Curr Opin Microbiol 13: 652–660.
Not in our library10.1016/j.mib.2010.08.001
- 2.
Wu D, Hugenholtz P, Mavromatis K, Pukall R, Dalin E, et al (2009 ) A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea. Nature 462: 1056–1060.
Not in our library10.1038/nature08656
- 3.
Burki F, Keeling PJ (2014 ) Rhizaria. Curr Biol 24: R103–107.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2013.12.025
- 4.
del Campo J, Sieracki ME, Molestina R, Keeling PJ, Massana R, et al (2014 ) The others: our biased perspective on eukaryotic genomes. Trends Ecol Evol 29: 252–259.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tree.2014.03.006
- 5.
Armbrust EV, Berges JA, Bowler C, Green BR, Martinez D, et al (2004 ) The genome of the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana: ecology, evolution, and metabolism. Science 306: 79–86.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1101156
- 6.
Derelle E, Ferraz C, Rombauts S, Rouze P, Worden AZ, et al (2006 ) Genome analysis of the smallest free-living eukaryote Ostreococcus tauri unveils many unique features. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 11647–11652.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0604795103
- 7.
Palenik B, Grimwood J, Aerts A, Rouze P, Salamov A, et al (2007 ) The tiny eukaryote Ostreococcus provides genomic insights into the paradox of plankton speciation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 7705–7710.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0611046104
- 8.
Bowler C, Allen AE, Badger JH, Grimwood J, Jabbari K, et al (2008 ) The Phaeodactylum genome reveals the evolutionary history of diatom genomes. Nature 456: 239–244.
Not in our library10.1038/nature07410
- 9.
Worden AZ, Lee JH, Mock T, Rouze P, Simmons MP, et al (2009 ) Green evolution and dynamic adaptations revealed by genomes of the marine picoeukaryotes Micromonas. Science 324: 268–272.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1167222
- 10.
Gobler CJ, Berry DL, Dyhrman ST, Wilhelm SW, Salamov A, et al (2011 ) Niche of harmful alga Aureococcus anophagefferens revealed through ecogenomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 4352–4357.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1016106108
- 11.
Nichols SA, Roberts BW, Richter DJ, Fairclough SR, King N (2012 ) Origin of metazoan cadherin diversity and the antiquity of the classical cadherin/beta-catenin complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 13046–13051.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1120685109
- 12.
Curtis BA, Tanifuji G, Burki F, Gruber A, Irimia M, et al (2012 ) Algal genomes reveal evolutionary mosaicism and the fate of nucleomorphs. Nature 492: 59–65.
Not in our library10.1038/nature11681
- 13.
Read BA, Kegel J, Klute MJ, Kuo A, Lefebvre SC, et al (2013 ) Pan genome of the phytoplankton Emiliania underpins its global distribution. Nature 499: 209–213.
Not in our library10.1038/nature12221
- 14.
Marin B, Melkonian M (2010 ) Molecular phylogeny and classification of the Mamiellophyceae class. nov. (Chlorophyta) based on sequence comparisons of the nuclear- and plastid-encoded rRNA operons. Protist 161: 304–336.
Not in our library10.1016/j.protis.2009.10.002
- 15.
Fensome RA, Taylor FJR, Norris G, Sarjeant WAS, Wharton DI, et al.. (1993) A classification of living and fossil dinoflagellates. Hanover (Pennsylvania): Sheridan Press. 351 p.
Not in our library
- 16.
Saldarriagaa JF, Taylor FJR, Cavalier-Smith T, Menden-Deuer S, Keeling PJ (2004 ) Molecular data and the evolutionary history of dinoflagellates. Eur J Protist 40: 85–111.
Not in our library
- 17.
Sun S, Chen J, Li W, Altintas I, Lin A, et al (2011 ) Community cyberinfrastructure for Advanced Microbial Ecology Research and Analysis: the CAMERA resource. Nucleic Acids Res 39: D546–D551.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkq1102
- 18.
Aury JM, Jaillon O, Duret L, Noel B, Jubin C, et al (2006 ) Global trends of whole-genome duplications revealed by the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. Nature 444: 171–178.
Not in our library10.1038/nature05230
- 19.
- 20.
- 21.
Amin SA, Parker MS, Armbrust EV (2012 ) Interactions between diatoms and bacteria. Microbiol Molec Biol Rev 76: 667–684.
Not in our library10.1128/mmbr.00007-12
- 22.
Massana R, Pedros-Alio C (2008 ) Unveiling new microbial eukaryotes in the surface ocean. Curr Opin Microbiol 11: 213–218.
Not in our library10.1016/j.mib.2008.04.004
- 23.
Guillou L, Viprey M, Chambouvet A, Welsh RM, Kirkham AR, et al (2008 ) Widespread occurrence and genetic diversity of marine parasitoids belonging to Syndiniales (Alveolata). Environ Microbiol 10: 3349–3365.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01731.x
- 24.
Lopez-Garcia P, Rodriguez-Valera F, Pedros-Alio C, Moreira D (2001 ) Unexpected diversity of small eukaryotes in deep-sea Antarctic plankton. Nature 409: 603–607.
Not in our library10.1038/35054537
- 25.
Cuvelier ML, Allen AE, Monier A, McCrow JP, Messié M, et al (2010 ) Targeted metagenomics and ecology of globally important uncultured eukaryotic phytoplankton. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 107: 14679–14684.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1001665107
- 26.
Monier A, Welsh RM, Gentemann C, Weinstock G, Sodergren E, et al (2012 ) Phosphate transporters in marine phytoplankton and their viruses: cross-domain commonalities in viral-host gene exchanges. Environ Microbiol 14: 162–176.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02576.x
- 27.
Vaulot D, Lepere C, Toulza E, De la Iglesia R, Poulain J, et al (2012 ) Metagenomes of the picoalga Bathycoccus from the Chile coastal upwelling. PLoS ONE 7: e39648.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0039648
- 28.
Cameron Thrash J, Temperton B, Swan BK, Landry ZC, Woyke T, et al (2014 ) Single-cell enabled comparative genomics of a deep ocean SAR11 bathytype. ISME J E-pub ahead of print. doi:10.1038/ismej.2013.243
Not in our library10.1038/ismej.2013.243
- 29.
Rinke C1, Schwientek P, Sczyrba A, Ivanova NN, Anderson IJ, et al (2013 ) Insights into the phylogeny and coding potential of microbial dark matter. Nature 499: 431–437.
Not in our library10.1038/nature12352
- 30.
Wu AR, Neff NF, Kalisky T, Dalerba P, Treutlein B, et al (2014 ) Quantitative assessment of single-cell RNA-sequencing methods. Nat Methods 11: 41–46.
Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.2694
- 31.
Massana R, Karniol B, Pommier T, Bodaker I, Beja O (2008 ) Metagenomic retrieval of a ribosomal DNA repeat array from an uncultured marine alveolate. Environ Microbiol 10: 1335–1343.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01549.x
- 32.
Not F, Gausling R, Azam F, Heidelberg JF, Worden AZ (2007 ) Vertical distribution of picoeukaryotic diversity in the open ocean. Environ Microbiol 9: 1233–1252.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01247.x
Cited by papers we hold 21
- Emerging Diversity of Channelrhodopsins and Their Structure-Function Relationships · 2022Not checked
- Functional repertoire convergence of distantly related eukaryotic plankton lineages abundant in the sunlit ocean · 2022No notice
- Complex Response of the Chlorarachniophyte <named-content content-type="genus-species">Bigelowiella natans</named-content> to Iron Availability · 2021Not checked
- Bioengineering of Microalgae: Recent Advances, Perspectives, and Regulatory Challenges for Industrial Application · 2020No notice
- Testing the advantages and disadvantages of short- and long- read eukaryotic metagenomics using simulated reads · 2020Not checked
- Genetic tool development in marine protists: emerging model organisms for experimental cell biology · 2020Corrected
- MetaEuk—sensitive, high-throughput gene discovery, and annotation for large-scale eukaryotic metagenomics · 2020No notice
- PhycoCosm, a comparative algal genomics resource · 2020No notice
- Integrative analysis of large scale transcriptome data draws a comprehensive landscape of Phaeodactylum tricornutum genome and evolutionary origin of diatoms · 2018Not checked
- Symbiodinium genomes reveal adaptive evolution of functions related to coral-dinoflagellate symbiosis · 2018Corrected
- Nuclear genome sequence of the plastid-lacking cryptomonad Goniomonas avonlea provides insights into the evolution of secondary plastids · 2018Not checked
- A global ocean atlas of eukaryotic genes · 2018No notice
- Marine microbial metagenomes sampled across space and time · 2018Corrected
- Persistence and Adaptation in Immunity: T Cells Balance the Extent and Thoroughness of Search. · 2016Not checked
- Cyanobacteria and Eukaryotic Algae Use Different Chemical Variants of Vitamin B12 · 2016No notice
- Comparative genomics explains the evolutionary success of reef-forming corals · 2016No notice
- Genetic Codes with No Dedicated Stop Codon: Context-Dependent Translation Termination · 2016No notice
- Evolution of alternative biosynthetic pathways for vitamin C following plastid acquisition in photosynthetic eukaryotes · 2015No notice
- The Road to Metagenomics: From Microbiology to DNA Sequencing Technologies and Bioinformatics · 2015No notice
- Mutation Rates in Plastid Genomes: They Are Lower than You Might Think · 2015No notice
and 1 more
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.