Skip to content
naulon

Corrected on Oct 12, 2004.

Source: the publisher, via Crossref · checked Oct 17, 2026 · Read the notice

Nicotine's Defensive Function in Nature

Anke Steppuhn, Klaus Gase, Bernd Krock and 2 more

PLoS Biology · 2004

doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020217

Abstract

Plants produce metabolites that directly decrease herbivore performance, and as a consequence, herbivores are selected for resistance to these metabolites. To determine whether these metabolites actually function as defenses requires measuring the performance of plants that are altered only in the production of a certain metabolite. To date, the defensive value of most plant resistance traits has not been demonstrated in nature. We transformed native tobacco(Nicotiana attenuata) with a consensus fragment of its two putrescine N-methyl transferase (pmt) genes in either antisense or inverted-repeat (IRpmt) orientations. Only the latter reduced (by greater than 95%) constitutive and inducible nicotine. With D(4)-nicotinic acid (NA), we demonstrate that silencing pmt inhibits nicotine production, while the excess NA dimerizes to form anatabine. Larvae of the nicotine-adapted herbivore Manduca sexta (tobacco hornworm) grew faster and, like the beetle Diabrotica undecimpunctata, preferred IRpmt plants in choice tests. When planted in their native habitat, IRpmt plants were attacked more frequently and, compared to wild-type plants, lost 3-fold more leaf area from a variety of native herbivores, of which the beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua, and Trimerotropis spp. grasshoppers caused the most damage. These results provide strong evidence that nicotine functions as an efficient defense in nature and highlights the value of transgenic techniques for ecological research.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 17, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Plants produce many secondary metabolites, of which some are thought to function as direct defenses against pathogens and herbivores by reducing their performance, survival, and reproduction. Numerous plant allelochemicals with antiherbivore properties are classified according to their mode of action (e.g., toxins, antifeedants, antidigestive proteins, etc.) and have been used in agriculture to control insect pests. The fact that a secondary metabolite reduces herbivore performance does not by itself demonstrate that the endogenously expressed metabolite functions defensively in the plant's natural environment, because the evolutionary interaction between herbivores and their host plants may have reduced the defensive efficacy of the metabolite. Phytophagous insects have evolved various strategies to cope with allelochemicals and tend to tolerate, or even co-opt, plant defenses for their own defenses.

Pharmacological studies demonstrating a resistance effect of metabolites applied to plants or artificial diets, and studies using heterologously expressed genes in agricultural systems, represent a first step in evaluating the defensive function of a secondary metabolite. The interpretation of these studies is confounded by both the altered ecological context in which the resistance is measured and the altered chemical milieu, which is also known to influence the defensive function of a metabolite. Stronger evidence for resistance effects of allelochemicals arises from studies establishing correlations between plant resistance against herbivores and the genetically variable accumulation of secondary metabolites or from studies demonstrating the defensive role played by a suite of elicited metabolites. Ideally, the benefits of a putative defense trait should be determined in plants differing only in a single gene that controls the expression of a resistance trait and are otherwise identical. To date, studies measuring resistance of “near isogenic” lines with altered metabolite accumulations provide the strongest evidence for their resistance, but these lines, which are created by repetitive backcrossing, are likely to differ in many loci linked to the target locus, which may also affect resistance. Such problems of genetic linkage have been overcome through the use of genetic transformation to explore the fitness effects of herbicide resistance and pathogen resistance in field populations of Arabidopsis. In this study, we use transgenic silencing to alter a single putative resistance trait—the production of nicotine—and thereby establish its contribution to plant resistance in the field.

The pyridine alkaloid nicotine is one of the best-studied putative plant resistance traits. Because it can interact with the acetylcholine receptors in the nervous systems of animals, nicotine is extremely toxic to most herbivores and, consequently, was one of the first insecticides used to control pests in agriculture. Evidence for the resistance value of nicotine arises from the agricultural practice of using nicotine sprays and genotypes of cultivated tobacco differing in nicotine levels. Although nicotine is widely toxic, insects adapted to nicotine-producing plants have evolved resistance to this alkaloid. The tobacco specialist Manduca sexta (tobacco hornworm) tolerates doses of nicotine that are fatal to unadapted herbivores but grows more slowly on high-nicotine diets. Other studies suggest that M. sexta might even be better defended by dietary nicotine against its parasitoid, Cotesia congregata, which suffers higher mortality when parasitizing larvae fed on high- rather than low-nicotine diets. Thus, the coevolutionary arms race between nicotine-producing plants and their adapted herbivores may have reduced the defensive value of nicotine.

In the native tobacco species Nicotiana attenuata and N. sylvestris, nicotine is the most abundant alkaloid. Elicitation of N. attenuata with jasmonic acid methyl ester (MeJA) in its native habitat increases nicotine content, which is correlated with enhanced plant fitness when plants are attacked. However, herbivore attack and MeJA elicitation (as well as the plant's endogenous jasmonic acid cascade) regulate many resistance traits, including trypsin protease inhibitors (TPIs), diterpene glycosides, and volatile emissions involved in indirect defense. Hence, nicotine is only one of a suite of putative defense traits elicited by herbivore attack, and its specific role remains to be determined.

In laboratory trials, resistance benefits of nicotine production against M. sexta larvae were established using transgenic N. sylvestris plants silenced in their nicotine biosynthesis by antisense expression of putrescine N-methyl transferase (PMT). Plant consumption and the performance of M. sexta larvae were negatively correlated with constitutive nicotine levels in laboratory feeding trials; whether this result applies to plants in their natural habitat is unclear. To examine the resistance effect of nicotine, we transformed N. attenuata with inverted-repeat pmt (IRpmt) and antisense pmt constructs and found that only IRpmt plants had strongly reduced nicotine content. We characterized the defense and growth phenotypes of two independently transformed homozygous IRpmt lines and found that measured direct and indirect defenses did not differ from those of the wild-type (WT) plants, except for a dramatic reduction (greater than 95%) of MeJA-elicited and constitutive nicotine production and an increase in anatabine content. In pulse-chase experiments with D4-nicotinic acid (NA) ethyl ester, we demonstrated that the increased anatabine likely results from a dimerization of the NA that would normally have been used in nicotine biosynthesis. In feeding trials, M. sexta larvae preferred and grew faster on IRpmt than WT leaves. We transplanted WT and IRpmt plants into N. attenuata's native habitat in southwestern Utah and elicited a subset with MeJA. Several naturally occurring herbivore species attacked and damaged unelicited IRpmt plants more than unelicited or elicited WT and elicited IRpmt plants. These results demonstrate that nicotine functions as an effective resistance trait under natural conditions.

IRpmt Constructs Silence Nicotine Production

Nicotine accumulation was not reduced in most of the independent lines transformed with antisense pmt constructs (25 lines of pNATPMT1 and six lines of pCAMPMT1) compared to WT (Figure 1A). None of the five lines with lower nicotine accumulation in the T1 screen had nicotine levels lower than those of WT in the homozygous T2 generation. In contrast, 29 of 34 independently transformed lines with the IRpmt construct pRESC5PMT had dramatically reduced constitutive and MeJA-induced nicotine accumulations (Figure 1B). The suppression of nicotine accumulation was stable during plant development and when plants were grown in the glasshouse or in the field in Utah. Clearly, inverted-repeat constructs are more efficient at silencing the expression of endogenous genes, as has been previously described.

Genomic and Transcriptional Characterization

Two homozygous T2 IRpmt lines (108 and 145) with reduced nicotine levels were further characterized. Southern blot analysis using a probe hybridizing to the selective marker in the IRpmt construct demonstrated that both lines contained a single insertion (Figure S1). Transformation with a pRESC transformation vector allowed the transferred DNA (T-DNA) and flanking DNA at the insertion site to be recovered from the plant genomic DNA. These experiments demonstrated that the T-DNA integrated into the N. attenuata genome at a single site in each line, since all sequenced clones from a line (108, n = 4; 145, n = 5) contained the same flanking sequence (see Figure S1 and Protocol S1).

Transcripts of the pmt genes in the two lines were significantly reduced to approximately 10% of the constitutive and MeJA-induced WT mRNA levels (Figure 2A), demonstrating that the targeted genes were successfully silenced.

Metabolic Consequences of pmt Silencing in N. attenuata

Consistent with the observed silencing of pmt transcripts, the constitutive and induced nicotine levels in transformed plants of both lines were dramatically reduced to 3%–4% of the levels found in WT plants (Figure 2B). All 29 IRpmt lines with reduced nicotine levels accumulated the alkaloid anatabine, which was not detected in WT plants. Constitutive and MeJA-induced total (nicotine, anabasine, and anatabine) alkaloid contents of the two IRpmt lines were about one-half and one-third of the WT levels, respectively, of which anatabine comprised 30% and 23% (Figure 2C). Levels of anabasine representing 20% of the constitutive and 8% of the MeJA-elicited total alkaloid contents in WT plants were unchanged in IRpmt plants (Figure S2). Elevated anatabine levels were also found in recently published studies with antisense pmt transformation of N. tabacum; elevated anatabine levels did not affect transcript levels of other genes encoding enzymes involved in alkaloid metabolism.

Anatabine consists of a pyridine and a piperideine ring. Both are likely derived from NA, which is also the precursor of the pyridine ring of nicotine. Disrupting nicotine biosynthesis at the formation of the pyrrolidine ring by silencing PMT activity might cause an oversupply of the NA used in the biosynthesis of anatabine. Feeding the roots of hydroponically grown MeJA-elicited WT plants with NA ethyl ester resulted in formation of anatabine at levels of about a third of the total alkaloids (nicotine and anatabine) (Figure 3); in the IRpmt lines, anatabine constitutes 98% of the total alkaloids. Feeding plants with D4-NA ethyl ester results in the formation not only of D4-nicotine and D4-anatabine but also of D8-anatabine, demonstrating that the last integrates two D4-NA units. When these experiments are conducted with WT plants, about half of the anatabine is labeled, suggesting that the unlabeled half was formed from endogenous unlabeled NA. In addition, about one-fourth of the WT nicotine was D4-nicotine. In IRpmt plants, in contrast, only traces of D4-nicotine were found, but one-third of the anatabine was either D4- or D8-labeled. In summary, exogenously supplied NA is taken up by the roots of N. attenuata plants and used in alkaloid biosynthesis, and an oversupply of NA results in the formation of anatabine. These results support the hypothesis that the silencing of pmt disrupts nicotine biosynthesis, causing an oversupply of NA and the subsequent formation of anatabine.

IRpmt plants did not differ from WT plants in any other measured secondary metabolite or growth parameter. Constitutive or MeJA-induced levels of caffeoylputrescine, chlorogenic aid, rutin (Figure S2), TPI activity, or the release of cis-α-bergamotene (Figure S3) in IRpmt-transformed plants did not differ from those of WT plants. Rosette-stage and elongation-stage growth in individual pots in both the glasshouse and the field (Figure S4) did not differ between WT and IRpmt lines, and transformed lines were not visually or morphologically distinguishable from WT plants. Hence, the IRpmt plants represent an ideal construct with which to examine the ecological consequences of nicotine production.

Effects of Nicotine Silencing on N. attenuata Herbivores

M. sexta larvae reared on IRpmt plants in the glasshouse gained significantly more mass and changed instars faster than larvae reared on WT plants (n = 17–20; ANOVA: p < 0.01, p WT-PMT108 < 0.02, p WT-PMT145 < 0.01). The differences were comparable to those observed for M. sexta larvae reared on nicotine-enriched artificial diets or on nicotine-enhanced WT or antisense-pmt–transformed N. sylvestris plants. Two-thirds of freshly eclosed M. sexta larvae, given the choice between leaf material from WT or IRpmt (108) plants, preferred to initiate feeding on the latter (n = 43; Chi2 = 6.7, p < 0.01). Such behavior suggests that nicotine plays an important role in determining feeding sites of M. sexta larvae, as has been suggested in a study with cultivated tobacco. While the relative toxic effects of anatabine and nicotine remain unstudied, these results are likely to underestimate the influence of nicotine on M. sexta choice and performance, because IRpmt plants had enhanced levels of anatabine.

Since secondary metabolism is known to be sensitive to environmental parameters that differ between glasshouse and field conditions (e.g., UV-B influence; ), nicotine, anatabine, and TPI levels of WT and IRpmt plants grown in the field plantation were analyzed: they were found not to differ from plants grown under laboratory conditions (Figure 4A). A M. sexta feeding choice test evaluating the larvae's choice between field-grown WT and IRpmt plants (n = 57; Chi2 = 7.74, p < 0.01) verified the results described above for the same experiment conducted with glasshouse-grown plants. Thus, the phenotype of glasshouse-grown IRpmt plants was not altered by growth under field conditions. In addition, choice tests with field-collected D. undecimpunctata, which was observed colonizing only IRpmt plants in the field plantation, revealed that 77% of these beetles preferred the nicotine-deficient IRpmt leaf material over WT (n = 35; Chi2 = 10.31, p < 0.001). Another beetle species observed occasionally on WT plants, Trichobarus mucorea, does not distinguish between WT and IRpmt leaf material in choice tests (n = 19; Chi2 = 0.05, p = 0.8).

In the field plantation, IRpmt plants lost significantly more leaf area to herbivores than did WT plants (Figure 4B), demonstrating that nicotine indeed functions as a direct resistance trait of N. attenuata in its native habitat. Over a period of 16 d, IRpmt plants exposed to naturally occurring herbivores lost 16% of their total leaf area to herbivores, an amount that is more than double the amount of damage incurred by WT plants. In order to meet compliance requirements described in the Code of Federal Regulations (7CFR340.3c) for the introduction of organisms altered through genetic engineering, flowers were removed as they matured, and therefore we could not directly measure the fitness consequences of this greater herbivore load. However, in other experiments with N. attenuata plants grown in natural populations, leaf area damage is negatively correlated with capsule number, suggesting that the strongly enhanced herbivore damage of the nicotine-deficient IRpmt plants translates into a fitness loss.

IRpmt plants were attacked by a variety of insect herbivores. About half of the total herbivore damage resulted from S. exigua feeding (Figure 4C). One-third of the total herbivore damage was damage from grasshoppers of the genus Trimerotropis, which followed the same general pattern of distribution as S. exigua damage, but the differences between unelicited IRpmt and WT plants were not significant. The damage caused by Epetrix hirtipennis was variable but significantly higher for unelicited IRpmt compared to WT plants (ANOVA: F = 2.81, df = 3, p = 0.04, p PMT-WT < 0.05).

MeJA elicitation significantly reduced the damage of IRpmt plants to levels found on WT plants, suggesting that MeJA treatment elicits defense traits that are as efficient as the constitutive levels of nicotine in protecting plants. MeJA elicitation of N. attenuata plants is known to induce a diverse suite of transcriptional responses and secondary metabolites including TPIs, phenolics, flavonoids, phenolic putrescine conjugates, diterpene sugar esters, and volatile organic compounds, some of which apparently function as resistance traits. Which component of this complex suite of elicited metabolites is as effective as nicotine remains to be determined. It should be noted that the overall amounts of leaf area lost to herbivores was relatively low during the field experiments. Only 5% of the canopy area was lost from control and MeJA-elicited WT plants. In previous experiments, fitness differences were observed between control and MeJA-elicited WT plants in populations that had lost approximately 40% of their canopy area to herbivores.

Altogether, these results provide direct evidence for the defensive value of nicotine. In a field trial, we established that a native tobacco, which produces large amounts of nicotine, is better defended against its natural herbivores than are nicotine-deficient transformants of the same genetic background. This is likely mediated by the reduction of herbivore performance and by the fact that these phytophagous insects prefer low-nicotine diets. In contrast to studies demonstrating genetic correlations between the production of secondary metabolites and herbivore resistance, the resistance effects established in this study can be directly attributed to the altered traits. The fact that the silencing of one enzyme in the nicotine biosynthetic pathway redirects metabolite flux, resulting in the accumulation of an apparently less toxic alkaloid, anatabine, underscores the importance of characterizing single-gene transformants for secondary effects.

Conclusion

Plant secondary metabolites are widely accepted as essential components of a plant's direct defenses against its natural enemies, but unambiguous proof has been lacking, mainly because of the difficulty of altering the expression of single traits in plants and testing the consequences of these manipulations under natural conditions. Transformation technology has provided biologists with the ability to manipulate and study the ecological consequences of single-gene manipulations. To date, the technology has largely been used for the heterologous expression of resistance genes (e.g., Bacillus thuringiensis d-endotoxin) in agricultural systems (see for an elegant exception), and therefore has provided little evidence for the defensive value of endogenously expressed traits against a plant's native herbivore community. The scientific value of transgenically silencing endogenous genes in native plants to understand the ecological function of particular genes has been undermined by the polarized attitudes towards the use of genetically modified organisms in agriculture. Transgenic down-regulation of nicotine demonstrates that N. attenuata is under relentless herbivore pressure. Disabling this resistance trait, even in a year of low herbivore abundance, results in a large increase in opportunistic herbivory and supports the conclusion that secondary metabolites play an important role in explaining why the earth is largely green.

Plant material and transformation

N. attenuata Torr. ex Watson (synonymous with N. torreyana Nelson and Macbr.; Solanaceae) grown from field-collected seeds and inbred 11 or 14 generations were used for transformation and all experiments. Seed germination and the Agrobacterium tumifaciens (strain LBA 4404)–mediated transformation procedure are described in. In order to silence the expression of the two N. attenuata pmt genes, plants were transformed with pCAMPMT1 and pNATPMT1 vectors, which contain a gene fragment of pmt1 (which has 95% identity to pmt2) in an antisense orientation, and pRESC5PMT, which contains the pmt gene fragment twice in an inverted orientation separated by intron 3 of the Flaveria trinervia gene pyruvate orthophosphate dikinase (pdk) (for vector construction and plasmids see Figure S5 and Protocol S1). T1 plants were screened for hygromycin resistance (hygromycin phosphotransferase II gene of the vector pCAMBIA-1301) and constitutive and induced nicotine accumulation; homozygosity was determined by resistance screening of the T2 plants. Two independently transformed homozygous IRpmt lines (108 and 145) were further characterized by Southern blot analysis and by the rescuing of the transformation vector from genomic DNA into Escherichia coli to identify copy number and insertion site of the T-DNA (see Figure S1 and Protocol S1).

PMT mRNA accumulation and secondary metabolites.

Transformed lines (108 and 145) and WT plants were grown in 1-l hydroponic vessels in a climate chamber as described in, and 4-wk-old rosette-stage plants were treated (elicited) on the first two fully expanded (source) leaves with 150 μg of MeJA per plant applied in 20 μl of lanolin paste, or left untreated. Approximately 200 mg of young roots was harvested and frozen in liquid nitrogen 10 h after elicitation, and RNA was extracted with Tri Reagent (Sigma, Taufkirchen, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions (n = 3/line/treatment). PMT transcript accumulation was analyzed by real-time PCR (ABI PRISM 7000; Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany). cDNA was generated from 20 ng of RNA with MultiScribe reverse transcriptase (Applied Biosystems), and amplified using the qPCR core reagent kit (Eurogentec, Searing, Belgium) and a probe and primers that were gene-specific (for sequences see Figure S6). For analysis of secondary metabolites, leaves growing one node above the sink-source transition leaf and young root tissue were harvested 4 d after elicitation (n = 8–10/line/treatment). Samples were analyzed by HPLC for alkaloids, caffeoylputrescine, chlorogenic acid, and rutin. A peak occurring in IRpmt alkaloid extracts but not in extracts of WT N. attenuata was collected and identified by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging as anatabine (for spectra and method, see Protocol S1).

To determine whether a NA oversupply was responsible for the formation of anatabine in the transformed lines, we supplied 4-wk-old plants with either unlabeled or D4-NA ethyl ester (1 mM) in their hydroponic solution 24 h after MeJA elicitation (n = 4/line/treatment). After 4 d, the treated leaf was harvested and extracted as above, but analyzed by LC/MS/MS to detect incorporation of the deuterium into nicotine and anatabine (for instrument conditions, see Protocol S1).

To examine the release of cis-α-bergamotene in the transformed lines compared to WT, volatiles from hydroponically grown plants (n = 3–5/line/treatment) enclosed in open-top volatile collection chambers were collected for an 8 h period starting 24 h after MeJA elicitation of the first two source leaves, and analyzed by GC/MS. TPI activity in the MeJA-treated leaf 3 d after elicitation was analyzed in plants (n = 5/line/treatment) by radial diffusion activity assay.

M. sexta performance and feeding choice

In the glasshouse, 2-wk-old seedlings were planted individually into 2-l pots with potting soil (C 410; Stender, Schermbeck, Germany) at 26–28 °C under 16-h supplemental light from Philips Sun-T Agro 400- or 600-W Na lights. For analysis of performance, newly eclosed M. sexta larvae (North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States) were placed on the first-stem leaf of 8-wk-old WT and IRpmt (108 and 145) plants and allowed to feed for 14 d. Larval mass was recorded at 8, 10, 12, and 14 d.

The first feeding choice of M. sexta was determined by placing newly eclosed larvae in the center of a 3-cm–diameter cup containing, on opposite sides, 1.5-cm2 WT and IRpmt (108) leaf pieces and recording the leaf on which larvae started feeding (n = 44).

Resistance of WT and IRpmt plants to herbivores in the natural habitat.

In a field plantation (15 m × 18 m; GPS: lat 37°08′45′′N, long 114°01′12′′) in N. attenuata's natural habitat in southwest Utah, transformed IRpmt (108) and WT plants were exposed to naturally occurring herbivores dispersing from adjacent populations. To allow for spatial heterogeneity, plants were transplanted in a paired design (with 0.3 m and 1.5 m between plants of a pair and between pairs, respectively) in which plants were matched for equal rosette diameters. Plants were grown in soil (Potting Mix; Miracle-Gro, Marysville, Ohio, United States) for 5 wk after germination, and were transplanted into the field plot (10 columns by 15 lines) in their 3.8-l pots. Seven days after transplantation, 30 WT and IRpmt plants were elicited with 150 μg of MeJA per plant applied in 20 μl of lanolin paste to the two youngest rosette leaves. Starting 4 d after transplantation, each plant was examined for damage and insects (including predators and eggs) every other day for 14 d. Damage amount was estimated as a percentage of the total leaf area, and the characteristic damage caused by caterpillars, beetles, grasshoppers, myrids, and leafhoppers was noted separately. The most abundant herbivores observed in the field plantation during the release were S. exigua, Trimerotropis spp., E. hirtipennis, and D. undecimpunctata. M. sexta and M. quinquemaculata occurred in the season only rarely, and no eggs were laid in the plantation during the 14 d. As plants began to elongate and produce flowers, they were examined daily, and all flowers were removed before opening and anthesis to meet the performance standards in the Code of Federal Regulations (7CFR340.3c). Consequently, direct fitness measures were unobtainable in this experiment.

For analysis of alkaloids and TPIs under field conditions, leaf samples of WT and IRpmt plants in the plot (n = 6) were taken 7 wk after transplantation and frozen (dry ice). To determine if the herbivore phenotype of IRpmt plants observed in glasshouse-grown plants was retained in plants grown under natural light conditions, the M. sexta choice experiment was repeated. The first feeding choices of freshly eclosed M. sexta larvae (North Carolina State University) and of adults of field-collected D. undecimpunctata and Trichobarus mucorea (Chrysomelidae and Curculionidae) found on N. attenuata were determined as described above.

Accession Numbers

GenBank accession numbers for the genes discussed in this paper are bla from puc19 (L09137), hygromycin phosphotransferase II from pCAMBIA-1301 (AF234297), pdk (X79095), pmt1 (AF280402), and pmt2 (AF280403).

References 41

  1. 1.

    Appel HM, Martin MM. Significance of metabolic load in the evolution of host specificity in Manduca sexta. Ecology. 1992;73:216-228.

    Not in our library

  2. 2.

    Baldwin IT. Short-term damage-induced increases in tobacco alkaloids protect plants. Oecologia. 1988;75:367-370.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf00376939

  3. 3.

    Baldwin IT. Jasmonate-induced responses are costly but benefit plants under attack in native populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:8113-8118.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.95.14.8113

  4. 4.

    Barbosa P, Saunders JA, Kemper J, Trumbule R, Olechno J, et al. Plant allelochemicals and insect parasitoids effects of nicotine on Cotesia congregata (Say) (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) and Hyposoter annulipes (Cresson) (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). J Chem Ecol. 1986;12:1319-1328.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf01012351

  5. 5.

    Bell EA, Labeyrie V, Fabres G, Lachaise D. Secondary compounds and insect herbivores. Insects-plants: Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on insect-plant relationships (PAU 1986). 1987;19-23.

    Not in our library

  6. 6.

    Bennett RN, Wallsgrove RM. Secondary metabolites in plant defense mechanisms. New Phytol. 1994;127:617-633.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb02968.x

  7. 7.

    Berenbaum MR, Zangerl AR, Nitao JK. Constraints on chemical coevolution: Wild parsnips and the parsnip webworm. Evolution. 1986;40:1215-1228.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb05746.x

  8. 8.

    Bergelson J, Purrington CB. Surveying patterns in the cost of resistance in plants. Am Nat. 1996;148:536-558.

    Not in our library

  9. 9.

    Bergelson J, Purrington CB, Palm CJ, López-Gutiérrez J-C. Cost of resistance: A test using transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1996;263:1659-1663.

    Not in our library10.1098/rspb.1996.0242

  10. 10.

    Bowers MD, Puttick GM. Response of generalist and specialist insects to qualitative allelochemical variation. J Chem Ecol. 1988;14:319-334.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf01022549

  11. 11.

    Caldwell MM, Robberecht R, Flint SD. Internal filters: Prospects for UV-acclimation in higher plants. Physiol Plant. 1983;58:445-450.

    Not in our library

  12. 12.

    Carozzi N, Koziel M. Advances in insect control: The role of transgenic plants. 1997;301.

    Not in our library

  13. 13.

    Chintapakorn Y, Hamill JD. Antisense-mediated down-regulation of putrescine N-methyltransferase activity in transgenic Nicotiana tabacum L. can lead to elevated levels of anatabine at the expense of nicotine. Plant Mol Biol. 2003;53:87-105.

    Not in our library10.1023/b:plan.0000009268.45851.95

  14. 14.

    Glendinning JI. How do herbivorous insects cope with noxious secondary plant compounds in their diet? Entomol Exp Appl. 2002;104:15-25.

    Not in our library

  15. 15.

    Hairston NG, Smith FE, Slobodkin LB. Community structure, population control, and competition. Am Nat. 1960;94:421-425.

    Not in our library

  16. 16.

    Halitschke R, Baldwin IT. Antisense LOX expression increases herbivore performance by decreasing defense responses and inhibiting growth-related transcriptional reorganization in Nicotiana attenuata. Plant J. 2003;36:794-807.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01921.x

  17. 17.

    Halitschke R, Kessler A, Kahl J, Lorenz A, Baldwin IT. Ecophysiological comparison of direct and indirect defenses in Nicotiana attenuata. Oecologia. 2000;124:408-417.

    Not in our library10.1007/s004420000389

  18. 18.

    Hedin PA. Use of natural products in pest control: Developing research trends. In: Hedin PA, editor. Naturally occurring pest bioregulators. 1991;1-11.

    Not in our library

  19. 19.

    Hermsmeier D, Schittko U, Baldwin IT. Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. I. Large-scale changes in the accumulation of growth- and defense-related plant mRNAs. Plant Physiol. 2001;125:683-700.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.125.2.683

  20. 20.

    Hilder VA, Boulter D. Genetic engineering of crop plants for insect resistance: A critical review. Crop Prot. 1999;18:177-191.

    Not in our library

  21. 21.

    Jackson DM, Johnson AW, Stephenson MG. Survival and development of Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae on isogenic tobacco lines with different levels of alkaloids. J Econ Entomol. 2002;95:1294-1302.

    Not in our library10.1603/0022-0493-95.6.1294

  22. 22.

    Karban R, Agrawal AA. Herbivore offense. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 2002;33:641-664.

    Not in our library

  23. 23.

    Keinänen M, Oldham NJ, Baldwin IT. Rapid HPLC screening of jasmonate-induced increases in tobacco alkaloids, phenolics, and diterpene glycosides in Nicotiana attenuata. J Agric Food Chem. 2001;49:3553-3558.

    Not in our library10.1021/jf010200+

  24. 24.

    Kessler A, Baldwin IT. Herbivore-induced plant vaccination. Part I. The orchestration of plant defenses in nature and their fitness consequences in the wild tobacco Nicotiana attenuata. Plant J. 2004;38:639-649.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02076.x

  25. 25.

    Kester KM, Peterson SC, Hanson F, Jackson DM, Severson RF. The roles of nicotine and natural enemies in determining larval feeding site distributions of Manduca sexta L. and Manduca quinquemaculata (Haworth) on tobacco. Chemoecology. 2002;12:1-10.

    Not in our library

  26. 26.

    Krügel T, Lim M, Gase K, Halitschke R, Baldwin IT. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Nicotiana attenuta, a model ecological expression system. Chemoecology. 2002;12:177-183.

    Not in our library

  27. 27.

    Leete E, Slattery SA. Incorporation of [2–14C]- and [6–14C] nicotinic acid into tobacco alkaloids. Biosynthesis of anatabine and α,β,-diperidyl. J Am Chem Soc. 1976;98:6326-6330.

    Not in our library10.1021/ja00436a043

  28. 28.

    Orozco-Cardenas M, McGurl B, Ryan CA. Expression of an antisense prosystemin gene in tomato plants reduces resistance toward Manduca sexta larvae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:8273-8276.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.90.17.8273

  29. 29.

    Parr JC, Thurston R. Toxicity of nicotine in synthetic diets to larvae of the tobacco hornworm. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 1972;65:1158-1188.

    Not in our library

  30. 30.

    Purrington CB, Bergelson J. Fitness consequences of genetically engineered herbicide and antibiotic resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics. 1997;145:807-814.

    Not in our library10.1093/genetics/145.3.807

  31. 31.

    Roda AL, Baldwin IT. Molecular technology reveals how the induced direct defenses of plants work. Basic Appl Ecol. 2003;4:15-26.

    Not in our library

  32. 32.

    Schmeltz I. Nicotine and other tobacco alkalioids. In: Jacobson M, Crosby DG, editors. Naturally occurring insecticides. 1971;99-136.

    Not in our library

  33. 33.

    Shonle I, Bergelson J. Evolutionary ecology of the tropane alkaloids of Datura stramonium L. (Solanaceae). Evolution. 2000;54:778-788.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00079.x

  34. 34.

    Tian D, Traw MB, Chen JQ, Kreitman, Bergelson J. Fitness costs of R-gene-mediated resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature. 2003;423:74-77.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature01588

  35. 35.

    Thorpe KW, Barbosa P. Effects of consumption of high and low nicotine tobacco by Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) on survival of gregarious endoparasitoid Cotesia congregata (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). J Chem Ecol. 1986;12:1329-1337.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf01012352

  36. 36.

    van Dam NM, Horn M, Mares M, Baldwin IT. Ontogeny constrains systemic protease inhibitor response in Nicotiana attenuata. J Chem Ecol. 2001;27:547-568.

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1010341022761

  37. 37.

    Voelckel C, Krugel T, Gase K, Heidrich N, van Dam NM, et al. Anti-sense expression of putrescine N-methyltransferase confirms defensive role of nicotine in Nicotiana sylvestris against Manduca sexta. Chemoecology. 2001;11:121-126.

    Not in our library

  38. 38.

    Wesley SV, Helliwell CA, Smith NA, Wang MB, Rouse DT, et al. Construct design for efficient, effective and high-throughput gene silencing in plants. Plant J. 2001;27:581-590.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01105.x

  39. 39.

    Wink M, Theile V. Alkaloid tolerance in Manduca sexta and phylogenetically related sphingids (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae). Chemoecology. 2002;12:29-46.

    Not in our library

  40. 40.

    Winz RA, Baldwin IT. Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. IV. Insect-induced ethylene reduces jasmonate-induced nicotine accumulation by regulating putrescine N-methyltransferase transcripts. Plant Physiol. 2001;125:2189-2202.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.125.4.2189

All 41 references

Cited by papers we hold 4

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.