Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Disponibilità a pagare e disponibilità ad accettare per la riduzione dell'impatto paesaggistico delle linee elettriche dell'alta tensione

Matilde Marazzi, Tiziano Tempesta

Aestimum · 2009

doi:10.13128/aestimum-6283 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Some recent studies pointed out that electricity pylons are one of the most important factors of rural landscape degradation. In order to estimate the monetary value of pylons visual impact, two different contingent valuation approaches were used. The first one simulated a referendum poll in which people were asked to state his or her willingness to accept a compensation (throw the reduction of paid taxes) for the loss of landscape quality. In the second one people were asked to state the willingness to pay to underground the overhead lines. Results highlight that political markets simulation will reduce, but not eliminate, differences between WTA and WTP. The reasons of such a result are discussed at the light of recent international research in this field.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.