Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 29, 2026.

Decrease in Anogenital Distance among Male Infants with Prenatal Phthalate Exposure

Shanna H. Swan, Katharina M. Main, Fan Liu and 9 more

Environmental Health Perspectives · 2005 · CC BY

doi:10.1289/ehp.8100

Abstract

Prenatal phthalate exposure impairs testicular function and shortens anogenital distance (AGD) in male rodents. We present data from the first study to examine AGD and other genital measurements in relation to prenatal phthalate exposure in humans. A standardized measure of AGD was obtained in 134 boys 2–36 months of age. AGD was significantly correlated with penile volume (R = 0.27, p = 0.001) and the proportion of boys with incomplete testicular descent (R = 0.20, p = 0.02). We defined the anogenital index (AGI) as AGD divided by weight at examination [AGI = AGD/weight (mm/kg)] and calculated the age-adjusted AGI by regression analysis. We examined nine phthalate monoester metabolites, measured in prenatal urine samples, as predictors of age-adjusted AGI in regression and categorical analyses that included all participants with prenatal urine samples (n = 85). Urinary concentrations of four phthalate metabolites [monoethyl phthalate (MEP), mono-n-butyl phthalate (MBP), monobenzyl phthalate (MBzP), and monoisobutyl phthalate (MiBP)] were inversely related to AGI. After adjusting for age at examination, p-values for regression coefficients ranged from 0.007 to 0.097. Comparing boys with prenatal MBP concentration in the highest quartile with those in the lowest quartile, the odds ratio for a shorter than expected AGI was 10.2 (95% confidence interval, 2.5 to 42.2). The corresponding odds ratios for MEP, MBzP, and MiBP were 4.7, 3.8, and 9.1, respectively (all p-values < 0.05). We defined a summary phthalate score to quantify joint exposure to these four phthalate metabolites. The age-adjusted AGI decreased significantly with increasing phthalate score (p-value for slope = 0.009). The associations between male genital development and phthalate exposure seen here are consistent with the phthalate-related syndrome of incomplete virilization that has been reported in prenatally exposed rodents. The median concentrations of phthalate metabolites that are associated with short AGI and incomplete testicular descent are below those found in one-quarter of the female population of the United States, based on a nationwide sample. These data support the hypothesis that prenatal phthalate exposure at environmental levels can adversely affect male reproductive development in humans.

References 41

  1. 1.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1080/01926230390202335

  2. 2.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1080/01926230490265894

  3. 3.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1093/toxsci/kfg128

  4. 4.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0022-3476(87)80075-6

  5. 5.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  6. 6.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1002/tera.1420420111

  7. 7.
  8. 8.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1093/humrep/deh656

  9. 9.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  10. 10.
  11. 11.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0890-6238(01)00111-3

  12. 12.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0890-6238(03)00037-6

  13. 13.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1530/rep.1.00025

  14. 14.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0278-6915(99)00128-3

  15. 15.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/0009-2797(81)90134-4

  16. 16.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1080/01926230252824716

  17. 17.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/0041-008x(80)90165-9

  18. 18.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  19. 19.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1093/toxsci/58.2.350

  20. 20.
  21. 21.
  22. 22.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  23. 23.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1093/toxsci/62.2.236

  24. 24.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1289/ehp.112-a541b

  25. 25.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1002/bms.1200140815

  26. 26.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1093/toxsci/55.1.143

  27. 27.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0890-6238(00)00105-2

  28. 28.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  29. 29.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  30. 30.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1093/toxsci/58.2.339

  31. 31.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  32. 32.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1159/000111240

  33. 33.
  34. 34.
  35. 35.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1570-0232(03)00164-8

  36. 36.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.02.038

  37. 37.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1093/humrep/16.5.972

  38. 38.
  39. 39.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.reprotox.2003.10.006

  40. 40.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  41. 41.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1242/jeb.01501

Cited by papers we hold 42

and 22 more

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.