Ultrafine particles in the urban air: to the respiratory tract--and beyond?

Abstract

In 1994, when we introduced the ultrafine particle hypothesis stating that ambient ultrafine particles (UFP; < 0.1 µm in aerodynamic diameter) may cause adverse health effects at the first Colloquium for Particulate Air Pollution and Human Mortality and Morbidity in Irvine, California, it was met with friendly skepticism as well as out-right dismissal.Arguments were that UFP are very short-lived and disappear through heterogeneous and homogeneous aggregation within seconds or minutes and therefore are toxicologically irrelevant.These arguments did not recognize that UFP are continuously generated or that ambient UFP contribute very little, if any, mass to ambient PM 10 (particles < 10 µm in aerodynamic diameter) or PM 2.5 (particles < 2.5 µm in aerodynamic diameter).Indeed, the mass distribution of a typical urban aerosol among the different particle sizes may support this point (Figure 1).This attitude of skepticism has changed considerably.Research teams across the world are working now on UFP, forming multidisciplinary alliances between atmospheric scientists, engineers, epidemiologists, clinicians, and toxicologists.They investigate UFP sources, generation, physicochemical characteristics, behavior in ambient air, and potential effects and underlying mechanisms following their inhalation.Still, sound skepticism lingers, as demonstrated by the title of a presentation at the 2002 meeting of the Health Effects Institute: "Nanoparticles: Are They Real?"Obviously, there is no question that UFP are real, but it is also clear that we still do not know enough about them, despite significant progress in our understanding since 1994.Atmospheric UFP derived from gas-to-particle conversions have many sources, natural and anthropogenic, the latter being mostly derived from internal combustion Günter Oberdörster is an inhalation toxicologist who has been investigating effects and toxicokinetics of occupational and environmental particles for more than 25 years, more recently focusing on ultrafine particles.He is Professor of Toxicology and Director of the the U.S. EPA-funded Particulate Matter Center on ultrafine particles

Cited by papers we hold 14

• Occupational exposure to ultrafine particles in police officers: no evidence for adverse respiratory effects · 2018
  Not checked
• NF-κB-regulated microRNA-574-5p underlies synaptic and cognitive impairment in response to atmospheric PM2.5 aspiration · 2017
  No notice
• Long-Term Air Pollution and Traffic Noise Exposures and Mild Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study · 2016
  No notice
• A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Multiple Airborne Pollutants and Autism Spectrum Disorder · 2016
  No notice
• Traffic-Related Air Pollution and Parkinson’s Disease in Denmark: A Case–Control Study · 2015
  No notice
• Neurotoxicants Are in the Air: Convergence of Human, Animal, and In Vitro Studies on the Effects of Air Pollution on the Brain · 2014
  No notice
• The Adverse Effects of Air Pollution on the Nervous System · 2012
  No notice
• Air pollution from traffic and cancer incidence: a Danish cohort study · 2011
  No notice
• The nanosilica hazard: another variable entity · 2010
  No notice
• Barrier Capacity of Human Placenta for Nanosized Materials · 2009
  No notice
• Translocation of Inhaled Ultrafine Manganese Oxide Particles to the Central Nervous System · 2006
  No notice
• Translocation and potential neurological effects of fine and ultrafine particles a critical update. · 2006
  No notice
• Nanoparticles: Health Effects—Pros and Cons · 2006
  No notice
• Local Variations in CO and Particulate Air Pollution and Adverse Birth Outcomes in Los Angeles County, California, USA · 2005
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.