Oltre il conflitto: l’argomentazione = Beyond the conflict: the argumentation
Vito De Nardis
H-ermes: Journal of Communication · 2014
doi:10.1285/i22840753n3p165 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Beyond the conflict: the argumentation. The paper aims to investigate the relationship between conflict and communication into two main parts: in the first instance the two lexemes are subjected to semantic analysis and at a later time is shown the possibility of avoiding the interpersonal hostility by adopting an argumentative attitude. The semantic area of conflictus, in fact, allows to presuppose that the clash between two parties is the degeneration of an incompatibility of position, but in the perspective of the argumentation the difference of opinion becomes a condition which can lead to a new reality, so the stage of confrontation between antithetical positions is to be overcome in the direction of reconstitution of the initial symbolic unity. Arguing in the classical meaning implies a cooperative research of the best solution to restore a balance and the persuasion that is pursued implies the search for mutual belonging
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.