Jak badać politykę?
Marek Pająk
Politeja · 2014
doi:10.12797/politeja.11.2014.32.03 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
How to study politics? Contemporary methodological discourse in political science on the example of the Flyvbjerg Debate The article is the analysis of contemporary methodological discourse in political science on the example of the Flyvbjerg Debate. The article focuses on Bent Flyvbjerg’s and David D. Laitin’s positions linking them with broader discussions in political science. Especially those concerning proper model of scientific researches. The author traces evolution of political science from the perspective of controversy between protagonists of analytical‑empirical model and their critics.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.