Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Null hypothesis significance testing: a guide to commonly misunderstood concepts and recommendations for good practice [version 5; referees: 2 approved, 2 not approved]

Cyril Pernet

F1000Research · 2017

doi:10.12688/f1000research.6963.5 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Although thoroughly criticized, null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) remains the statistical method of choice used to provide evidence for an effect, in biological, biomedical and social sciences. In this short guide, I first summarize the concepts behind the method, distinguishing test of significance (Fisher) and test of acceptance (Newman-Pearson) and point to common interpretation errors regarding the p-value. I then present the related concepts of confidence intervals and again point to common interpretation errors. Finally, I discuss what should be reported in which context. The goal is to clarify concepts to avoid interpretation errors and propose simple reporting practices.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.