Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 17, 2026.

The actin cortex at a glance

Priyamvada Chugh, Ewa K. Paluch

Journal of Cell Science · 2018 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.1242/jcs.186254

Abstract

Precisely controlled cell deformations are key to cell migration, division and tissue morphogenesis, and have been implicated in cell differentiation during development, as well as cancer progression. In animal cells, shape changes are primarily driven by the cellular cortex, a thin actomyosin network that lies directly underneath the plasma membrane. Myosin-generated forces create tension in the cortical network, and gradients in tension lead to cellular deformations. Recent studies have provided important insight into the molecular control of cortical tension by progressively unveiling cortex composition and organization. In this Cell Science at a Glance article and the accompanying poster, we review our current understanding of cortex composition and architecture. We then discuss how the microscopic properties of the cortex control cortical tension. While many open questions remain, it is now clear that cortical tension can be modulated through both cortex composition and organization, providing multiple levels of regulation for this key cellular property during cell and tissue morphogenesis.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 17, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

The cellular cortex is a thin actin network bound to the plasma membrane that is present in most animal cells. Cortical actin filaments are organized as a dense crosslinked meshwork containing over a hundred actin-binding proteins (ABPs), including myosin-2 motors. Myosin-2 pulls on actin filaments, generating contractile stresses in the network. These stresses give rise to cortical tension, a key determinant of cell surface tension. Gradients in cortical tension drive changes in shape, such as those observed during cell migration, cell division and tissue morphogenesis. Moreover, misregulation of cortex contractility has been linked to developmental defects, for instance in neural tube closure, and diseases including cancer and immunodeficiency. In this article and the accompanying poster, we review the rapidly expanding literature about cortex composition and organization, and discuss how these affect cortical tension and, as a result, the function of the cortex in morphogenesis.

Cortex function

The main function of the actin cortex is the control of animal cell morphogenesis. Local changes in cortex composition or organization can lead to cortical tension gradients, which result in local contractions and cellular deformations (see poster). For instance, during cell migration, cortical tension is usually higher at the back of the cell, powering cell body retraction. Rearward contractility gradients also result in cortical flows throughout the cell body, which can be instrumental in generating the forces that propel migrating cells forward. Cortex contractions can also result in the formation of blebs (see Box 1), which have been shown to function as leading-edge protrusions during cell migration in three-dimensional environments both in culture and in vivo. Cell lines and cellular blebsHeLa cells (particularly in mitosis), Drosophila S2 cells, normal rat kidney cells and filamin-deficient melanoma M2 cells are the most common cultured cell lines used in cortex studies (see poster).Cellular blebs are also used as a model for the cortex (see poster). Blebs are spherical membrane protrusions driven by hydrostatic pressure generated in the cytoplasm by the contractile cortex. Blebs are initially devoid of cortex and re-assemble a cortical network de novo as they retract. Thus, they have been used as a convenient model system for the study of cortex assembly, particularly in M2 cells, which display constitutive prominent blebbing. Furthermore, blebs can be isolated, providing an enriched cortex fraction for proteomics.In vivo systemsIn vivo, much of our understanding of the mechanisms controlling cortex contractions comes from studies in Xenopus laevis, Dictyostelium discoideum, C. elegans and Drosophila (see poster). X. laevis was one of the first systems where cortical instabilities were characterized, and continues to be used as a model for investigating contractions in development. Dictyostelium cells are extensively used to study cortex dynamics, particularly during cell division. In C. elegans, contractility-driven cortical flows have been well characterized during zygote polarization. Drosophila embryos are widely used to investigate apical cortex contractions during epithelial morphogenesis, for example, during ventral furrow formation, germ band extension and dorsal closure.In vitro systemsInvestigating the mechanisms of contractility generation in cells can be difficult because of redundancies between components and feedback loops interfering with specific perturbations. In vitro systems, using purified components in known concentrations, have been instrumental in expanding our understanding of contractility generation in cortex-like actomyosin networks.In vitro studies have helped to formulate mechanisms for how myosin activity in isotropic cortical networks results in overall contractile forces (reviewed in ). Recent work has also dissected the relationship between crosslinking, motor activity and network contractility. Finally, actomyosin contractility has been reconstituted at the surface of liposomes, allowing researchers to explore the effect of membrane attachment on contractility.

Cell lines and cellular blebs

HeLa cells (particularly in mitosis), Drosophila S2 cells, normal rat kidney cells and filamin-deficient melanoma M2 cells are the most common cultured cell lines used in cortex studies (see poster).

Cellular blebs are also used as a model for the cortex (see poster). Blebs are spherical membrane protrusions driven by hydrostatic pressure generated in the cytoplasm by the contractile cortex. Blebs are initially devoid of cortex and re-assemble a cortical network de novo as they retract. Thus, they have been used as a convenient model system for the study of cortex assembly, particularly in M2 cells, which display constitutive prominent blebbing. Furthermore, blebs can be isolated, providing an enriched cortex fraction for proteomics.

In vivo systems

In vivo, much of our understanding of the mechanisms controlling cortex contractions comes from studies in Xenopus laevis, Dictyostelium discoideum, C. elegans and Drosophila (see poster). X. laevis was one of the first systems where cortical instabilities were characterized, and continues to be used as a model for investigating contractions in development. Dictyostelium cells are extensively used to study cortex dynamics, particularly during cell division. In C. elegans, contractility-driven cortical flows have been well characterized during zygote polarization. Drosophila embryos are widely used to investigate apical cortex contractions during epithelial morphogenesis, for example, during ventral furrow formation, germ band extension and dorsal closure.

In vitro systems

Investigating the mechanisms of contractility generation in cells can be difficult because of redundancies between components and feedback loops interfering with specific perturbations. In vitro systems, using purified components in known concentrations, have been instrumental in expanding our understanding of contractility generation in cortex-like actomyosin networks.

In vitro studies have helped to formulate mechanisms for how myosin activity in isotropic cortical networks results in overall contractile forces (reviewed in ). Recent work has also dissected the relationship between crosslinking, motor activity and network contractility. Finally, actomyosin contractility has been reconstituted at the surface of liposomes, allowing researchers to explore the effect of membrane attachment on contractility.

Precise modulation of cortex contractility also drives the series of shape changes underlying cell division (reviewed in; ). Mitotic rounding displayed by cells in culture, as well as in tissues, is thought to be driven by reorganization of actin into a uniform cortical layer and a progressive increase in cortex tension. Failure in mitotic rounding leads to defects in spindle assembly, pole splitting and a delay in mitotic progression. At the end of mitosis, a gradient in cortical tension from the poles towards the equator drives cleavage furrow ingression (; Rappaport, 1967; ). Importantly, even though cell cleavage is driven by actomyosin accumulation in an equatorial contractile ring, a contractile cortex remains at the poles of the cell throughout cytokinesis (see poster). This polar cortex must be precisely controlled, as asymmetries in contractility between the two poles can lead to cell shape instabilities, aneuploidy and division failure. Interestingly, a controlled asymmetry in polar contractility has been proposed to drive asymmetric division in neuroblasts.

Cortex tension can also contribute to cell polarization. In Drosophila neuroblasts, myosin-dependent asymmetric polar cortex extension during anaphase contributes to polarity protein segregation. Similarly, in one-cell Caenorhabditis elegans embryos, posterior-to-anterior actomyosin flows drive the segregation of PAR polarity proteins (see Box 1).

During cell–cell contact formation, a local decrease in cortex tension at the cell–cell interface has been shown to control the size of the adhesion zone in zebrafish progenitor cells and mouse blastocysts. Experiments and modelling suggest that this decrease in interfacial cortex tension, much more than the changes in adhesion strength, control cell contact formation and as a result, cell sorting in tissues.

Finally, in polarized epithelia, apical cortex contractions are often instrumental in tissue morphogenesis (reviewed in; ). Interestingly, in many systems, overall tissue contractions have been shown to result from pulsed cortical contractions. Pulsed contractions might facilitate overall tissue contraction by facilitating cell rearrangements. Oscillatory contractions could be an intrinsic property of the actomyosin cortex (;;, reviewed in ). However, in several systems, other processes, such as mechanical feedback loops involving adhesion molecules or an underlying oscillation in the activity of the small GTP-ase RhoA, have been proposed to stabilize cortex oscillations. The exact mechanism of pulsed cortex contractions might thus be cell type dependent.

Cortex composition

A mass spectrometry study using isolated cellular blebs to obtain enriched cortical fractions identified over 150 ABPs in the cortex of constitutively blebbing human melanoma M2 cells (see Box 1), and the function of specific cortical ABPs has been investigated in a number of other cell lines. We discuss here some cortex-specific functions of key ABPs (see poster).

Actin filament nucleators

Cortical actin assembly appears to result from the combined action of formins, which nucleate and elongate linear actin filaments, and the Arp2/3 complex, which drives filament branch formation. Mass spectrometry combined with a visual screen has shown that in melanoma M2 cells, the cortex is nucleated predominantly by the formin mDia1 (encoded by DIAPH1) and the Arp2/3 complex. In mouse oocytes, the formin Daam1 also contributes to cortex assembly. Interestingly, in HeLa cells, mDia1, but not Arp2/3, is essential for cell division, and in Drosophila notum cells, cortical actin nucleation shifts from being dominated by Arp2/3 to formin upon mitosis entry. Such shifts between nucleators could affect cortex architecture and mechanics.

Regulators of actin assembly and disassembly

The most abundant regulators of actin assembly and disassembly that have been identified by mass spectrometry in M2 cell cortices are the capping proteins CAPZA and CAPZB, the actin-severing and -disassembling protein cofilin (CFL1 and CFL2), and profilin 1 (PFN1), which binds actin monomers and promotes actin polymerization. Precise regulation of cortical actin assembly is important during cell division. Depletion of either CFL1 or CAPZB increases cortex thickness and decreases cortex tension in mitotic HeLa cells, suggesting that regulation of actin filament length is crucial to tension control (, and discussion of cortex tension below). Depletion of the actin severing protein WDR1 (the human homologue of the yeast actin-interacting protein 1, Aip1) interferes with mitotic rounding, further suggesting defects in the build-up of cortical tension when F-actin assembly is perturbed.

The role of cofilin and its close relative actin-depolymerizing factor (ADF, also known as destrin) in mitosis has been controversial. In HeLa cells, ADF/cofilin has been reported to be inactivated in mitosis through phosphorylation by LIM kinase-1 (LIMK1) and Aurora A, and this inactivation has been proposed to control cortex stability and stable spindle positioning. However, CFL1 depletion affects the cortex in mitotic HeLa cells, suggesting that cofilin maintains cortical activity in mitosis. It has also been proposed that phosphorylated ADF/cofilin some actin-severing activity.

During cytokinesis, active dephosphorylated cofilin is essential for successful cell division, possibly because it prevents an excessive F-actin accumulation during cleavage furrow formation. Interestingly, in Dictyostelium cells, Aip1 depletion also leads to excessive cortical actin accumulation and cytokinesis failure. ADF/cofilin depletion results in the formation of abnormally large polar blebs, which appear to destabilize the spindle and lead to cytokinetic defects. Abnormal cortex contractions and spindle instabilities also occur upon depletion of profilin (chickadee) in Drosophila S2 cells, while in the C. elegans early embryo, profilin depletion impairs cortical actin assembly and leads to cytokinesis failure.

Actin crosslinkers

Many different bundlers and crosslinkers have been found in the actin cortex, including α-actinin proteins, fascin, filamin proteins, plastin proteins (also known as fimbrin proteins) and Eps8. While bundlers (e.g. fascin and plastin) tend to align actin filaments into parallel and/or anti-parallel stacks, crosslinkers (e.g. filamin) organize them into more random networks. Interestingly, some proteins, such as α-actinin, appear to be able to promote both types of organization. In vitro studies indicate that the level of crosslinking in the cortex is a key regulator of actomyosin contractility. However, redundancies between crosslinkers may make it difficult to discern the functional role of crosslinking in the cellular cortex. Nonetheless, cortical tension is strongly reduced upon plastin deletion in C. elegans zygotes, leading to defects in polarization and cytokinesis. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)-activated actin filament bundling by Eps8 has also been shown to increase tension and favour bleb formation during confined migration of cancer cells. Furthermore, a recent screen for regulators of mitotic cell mechanics has shown that the crosslinkers α-actinin and fascin contribute to the control of mitotic rounding force, which is related to cortical tension.

Crosslinkers also regulate cortex contraction dynamics; for example, increased crosslinking slows down cleavage furrow ingression in cytokinesis. Interestingly, during Dictyostelium cytokinesis, distinct crosslinkers localize to the equator and the poles, suggesting that crosslinkers contribute to the local control of actin architecture during cell division.

Actin-membrane linkers

Cortical F-actin is tethered to the plasma membrane through actin-membrane linkers, including ezrin-radixin-moesin (ERM) proteins and myosin-1 motors. In Drosophila S2 cells, activation of moesin (the only ERM protein in Drosophila) is required for mitotic cortex stiffening and cell rounding, and as a result for spindle stability. In mammalian cells, ERMs are also activated in mitotic cells; their impaired activation does not interfere with rounding, but is required for proper spindle orientation. Furthermore, ERM inactivation at the cell poles appears to be crucial for relaxation of polar tension during cytokinesis.

Membrane-to-cortex attachment is also a key regulator of bleb-based cell migration, as blebs form at locations of reduced attachment. Reduced ERM activity has been shown to be involved in bleb-based migration of cultured Walker carcinosaroma cells and zebrafish primordial germ cells, and interfering with either ERM or myosin-1B activity enhances bleb formation in migrating zebrafish progenitors during gastrulation. In chemotaxing Dictyostelium cells, talin contributes to attachment of the cortex to the membrane and forms a gradient towards the cell rear, facilitating bleb formation at the front.

Myosin motors

Myosin-2 motors are a key cortex component, as they generate most of the cortical contractile tension (see below). A myosin-2 motor is a hexamer composed of two heavy chains, two regulatory light chains and two essential light chains. Non-muscle myosin-2 assembles into bipolar minifilaments that exert contractile forces in the cortex. All three myosin-2 heavy chain isoforms, MYH9 (myosin-2A), MYH10 (myosin-2B) and MYH14 (myosin-2C), have been shown to localize to the cortex. The different isoforms can co-assemble into mixed minifilaments. Whether specific isoforms exert distinct functions in the cortex remains poorly understood. Besides myosin-2, several myosin-1 isoforms, which are involved in membrane-to-cortex attachment, and myosin-18, which can co-assemble with myosin-2, also localize to the cortex.

In addition to the proteins discussed here, a number of signalling pathways affect cortex organization and mechanics, and have been extensively reviewed elsewhere.

Cortex organization

The mechanical properties of the cortex are governed not only by its composition but also by how the components are spatially organized. Cortex architecture remains poorly understood owing to the sub-resolution dimensions of the cortex. However, recent studies have started unveiling the nanoscale organization of the cortex (see poster).

Cortex thickness

In some large oocytes, cortex thickness can be directly measured via optical microscopy. For instance, in meiotic mouse oocytes, an Arp2/3-dependent cortex thickening from ∼1.4 to 4 µm has been reported. Interestingly, this thickening is associated with the exclusion of myosin-2 from the cortex and a decrease in cortex tension. In smaller cells, cortex thickness is usually below the resolution of conventional light microscopy. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) in Dictyostelium cells and in retracting blebs in melanoma M2 cells suggests that the cortical layer spans ∼100 nm. More recently, sub- and super-resolution techniques have been used to assess cortex thickness via light microscopy. Clark et al. have used sub-resolution analysis of confocal images to extract cortical thickness from the relative localization of cortical actin and the plasma membrane, revealing thicknesses of ∼200 nm in mitotic HeLa cells. Clausen et al. directly measured an approximate cortex thicknesses of 130 nm in Jurkat cells by performing stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy and also reported the existence of a gap (∼20 nm) between the cortex and the membrane. Interestingly, cortical thickness appears to be precisely controlled, as the thickness of the cortex that reassembles de novo in a bleb sometimes overshoots, but then returns to original values as the bleb retracts. We recently reported that cortical thickness in mitotic HeLa cells is primarily regulated by CAPZB, DIAPH1 and CFL1, which control actin assembly and disassembly, and thus filament length.

Cortex density

Cortex density is likely to not only affect cortex mechanics, but also cortex–membrane interactions and diffusion of organelles through the cortical mesh. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) have both been used to map the surface of the cortex, revealing typical mesh sizes of 100 nm or less (see poster). Cortical mesh size appears to be affected by actin nucleators, and can also be modulated by drugs affecting actin polymerization dynamics.

Notably, these techniques only probe the mesh size of the outermost layer of the cortex. Electron tomography of ∼100-nm-thick sub-membrane layers obtained by shearing off the top surface of the cell has given some insight into cortex organization on the cytoplasmic side, and revealed mesh sizes between 50 and 200 nm, depending on the cell type. How the cortex is organized in the transverse direction remains largely unknown, although a recent super-resolution study suggests that there is a gradient in the transversal density of the cortex, with a maximum actin density at a finite distance from the membrane.

Filament organization

Cortex mechanics is also likely to be affected by the length, polarity and spatial organization of cortical actin filaments. While little is known about filament polarity and length, filament organization has been assessed in several systems. In rounded cells, cortical actin appears to be mostly isotropic. In contrast, partial filament alignment along the equator has been observed during cytokinesis using SEM and fluorescence-detected linear dichroism microscopy, and, more recently, super-resolution imaging. In C. elegans zygotes, where the cortex is less dense than in cultured cells, equatorial filament alignment could be visualized in live cells and was shown to directly result from cortical flows towards the equator. A recent study in sea urchin embryos showed, via super-resolution microscopy and TEM, that actin and myosin form contractile units in the cytokinetic ring, with anti-parallel actin filaments connected by regularly spaced myosin-2 minifilaments (see poster).

Cortex turnover

Finally, the relative turnover rates of cortex constituents are likely to have a strong influence on cortex viscoelasticity and contraction dynamics. Cortical actin typically turns over within a few tens of seconds. During cytokinesis, myosin-2 activity appears to accelerate actin turnover at the contractile ring, while crosslinking by α-actinin slows it down. In Dictyostelium cells, turnover of cortical components appears to be overall slower at the equator than at the poles. Interestingly, in that system, while some crosslinkers (with fast turnover dynamics) slowed down furrow ingression, others such as cortexillin (with slow turnover dynamics) appeared to be instrumental for generating actomyosin tension. The exact influence of turnover of cortex constituents on cortex mechanics remains poorly understood.

Cortex mechanics

The mechanical property of the cortex that is key for its function in cell morphogenesis is cortical tension (see Box 2). Cortical tension is most prominently controlled by myosin-2 activity. In addition, actin turnover could contribute to contractile tension generation. In order for turnover to generate tension, the polymerizing or depolymerizing filament ends must remain attached to the rest of the network either via crosslinkers that remain bound to a filament tip undergoing turnover, or other end-tracking proteins such as formins (see poster, reviewed in ). To what extent turnover-driven processes contribute to cortical tension has not been systematically investigated. However, inhibition of myosin activity can reduce cortical tension by as much as 80%, and estimates based on typical myosin-2-exerted forces indicate that myosin activity is sufficient to account for tension values that have been measured experimentally. The mechanical property of the cortex most extensively investigated is tension. Absolute cortex tension measurements rely on direct cell micromanipulation, most commonly by AFM or micropipette aspiration (MPA) (see poster). In AFM measurements, tension is determined from the response of the cell to compression. The most-accurate AFM surface tension measurements are obtained with spherical cells compressed by a flat cantilever; this method is thus mainly applicable to rounded cells in isolation. AFM measurements have, for instance, shown that cortex tension increases between interphase and mitosis in cultured cells, that higher cortex tension promotes confined migration of cancer cells and that tensile forces contribute to cell sorting during zebrafish gastrulation. Recently, AFM measurements of mitotic rounding force, a readout of cortical tension, have been used to conduct a large-scale screen of regulators of cortex mechanics. In MPA measurements, tension is determined from the pressure required to aspirate a cell into a micropipette. MPA only requires the portion of the cell near the pipette to be spherical and can thus be applied to cells adhering to a substrate. MPA tension measurements have shown that a threshold tension is required for cellular bleb formation, that cortical tension decreases in meiosis in mouse oocytes and that tension decreases during post-ovulation ageing of mouse eggs. Both AFM and MPA have been used extensively for the investigation of cortical tension regulation.An alternative method to assess cortical tension, which does not require direct contact with the cell and can thus be applied to cells in tissues, is laser ablation (see poster). Typically, a pulsed laser is used to locally disrupt the cortex and the resulting recoil of the network around the cut is measured. This method has been extensively used to probe cortex mechanics in C. elegans and zebrafish embryos. Laser ablations of cell–cell junctions or of entire cells are also commonly used to probe the mechanics of the apical cortex in epithelial tissues in developing embryos, particularly in Drosophila, but also in C. elegans and mouse. Importantly, laser ablation experiments only yield relative cortex tension values, as both cortical tensile forces and frictional forces slowing down cortical flows influence recoil velocities.Finally, optical tweezers have been used to probe cortical viscoelastic properties (reviewed in ) and more recently, the mechanics of cell–cell junctions in Drosophila epithelia.

The mechanical property of the cortex most extensively investigated is tension. Absolute cortex tension measurements rely on direct cell micromanipulation, most commonly by AFM or micropipette aspiration (MPA) (see poster). In AFM measurements, tension is determined from the response of the cell to compression. The most-accurate AFM surface tension measurements are obtained with spherical cells compressed by a flat cantilever; this method is thus mainly applicable to rounded cells in isolation. AFM measurements have, for instance, shown that cortex tension increases between interphase and mitosis in cultured cells, that higher cortex tension promotes confined migration of cancer cells and that tensile forces contribute to cell sorting during zebrafish gastrulation. Recently, AFM measurements of mitotic rounding force, a readout of cortical tension, have been used to conduct a large-scale screen of regulators of cortex mechanics. In MPA measurements, tension is determined from the pressure required to aspirate a cell into a micropipette. MPA only requires the portion of the cell near the pipette to be spherical and can thus be applied to cells adhering to a substrate. MPA tension measurements have shown that a threshold tension is required for cellular bleb formation, that cortical tension decreases in meiosis in mouse oocytes and that tension decreases during post-ovulation ageing of mouse eggs. Both AFM and MPA have been used extensively for the investigation of cortical tension regulation.

An alternative method to assess cortical tension, which does not require direct contact with the cell and can thus be applied to cells in tissues, is laser ablation (see poster). Typically, a pulsed laser is used to locally disrupt the cortex and the resulting recoil of the network around the cut is measured. This method has been extensively used to probe cortex mechanics in C. elegans and zebrafish embryos. Laser ablations of cell–cell junctions or of entire cells are also commonly used to probe the mechanics of the apical cortex in epithelial tissues in developing embryos, particularly in Drosophila, but also in C. elegans and mouse. Importantly, laser ablation experiments only yield relative cortex tension values, as both cortical tensile forces and frictional forces slowing down cortical flows influence recoil velocities.

Finally, optical tweezers have been used to probe cortical viscoelastic properties (reviewed in ) and more recently, the mechanics of cell–cell junctions in Drosophila epithelia.

The function and regulation of myosin-2 in controlling cortical tension has been extensively studied. For a long time, the contribution of other aspects of the cortical network to tension has been largely overlooked, and myosin-2 reporter intensity is commonly used as a readout of tension in morphogenesis studies. However, since tension results from myosins exerting forces on the actin network, it is to be expected that, at a given myosin activity, network architecture would also influence tension. Indeed, several in vitro studies of reconstituted actomyosin networks showed that actin filament organization and crosslinking level strongly affect tension. Recent studies make similar observations in cells. Taken together, the emerging view is that cortical tension is maximal for an intermediate level of connectivity in the actomyosin network. Connectivity can be varied by diverse mechanisms, including by changes in the level of crosslinking, branching or actin filament length. When connectivity is too low, stresses cannot propagate within the network, and global tension is low. When connectivity is too high, the network is too rigid to remodel, and tension in the network is low. At optimum connectivity levels, the network is thought to be sufficiently connected for tension propagation and sufficiently malleable to allow for remodelling, favouring contractile configurations. The microscopic mechanisms that drive the observed tension maximum remain to be investigated (;; reviewed in ).

Proteins linking the actin cortex to the plasma membrane, such as ERM proteins and myosin-1 motors, have been shown to contribute to cortical tension in Dictyostelium and mouse oocytes. However, in other cell types, membrane-to-cortex attachment does not appear to affect cortical tension, but rather controls effective plasma membrane tension, which is a measure of how easy it is to deform the membrane, for example, during protrusion formation. In Dictyostelium cells, membrane-to-cortex attachment via moesin has also been shown to control cortical stiffness and to be required for mitotic rounding. Importantly, cortical stiffness is distinct from cortical tension: stiffness, which is a measure of the ratio between the forces applied and the extent of the resulting deformation, is an effective property that depends on the experimental configuration, whereas cortical tension is a property of the cortex at any given time, and does not depend on how it is measured (for definitions, see poster and ). Stiffness generally depends on cortical tension, but could also be influenced by other physical parameters. These two properties could thus be controlled by different mechanisms.

Finally, membrane-to-cortex attachment could also affect cortex contractions by generating a friction that slows down cortex flows. The dynamics of cortex contractions and the length scales over which they propagate also depend on the level of crosslinking of the cortex and on the rate of turnover of these crosslinks, which determine the viscoelastic material properties of the cortex (see Box 2).

Conclusions and perspectives

Contractility of a ‘superficial plasma gel layer’ at the cell surface was proposed to be a key driver of cell shape changes at the end of the 19th century (discussed in ), and parallels between cleavage furrow ingression and cell rear contraction during migration had already been discussed as early as 1939. However, for a long time, our comprehension of cortex contractility in non-muscle cells remained very limited (discussed in ). The last 10 years have brought a remarkable leap in our understanding of the cellular actin cortex. Both cortex composition and its mechanical properties are now relatively well understood, and how changes in composition and mechanics drive specific shape changes is beginning to be unveiled.

The biggest challenge for the coming years will be to truly bridge the molecular and cellular scales in cortex studies. Recent work has highlighted that the nanoscale organization of the cortex, in addition to the concentration and activities of its components, is key to the control of cortical tension. While some methods are available to probe the surface architecture of the cortex, how the network is organized in the transverse direction remains essentially a black box. New tools, possibly combining super-resolution and electron microscopy, will be required to unveil the transversal density, orientation and polarity of cortical actin filaments, as well as the localization of other cortex components involved in tension generation.

Another open question is how the cortex is being remodelled when it transitions into other actin structures, such as lamellipodia during cell spreading. Lamellipodia, stress fibres and the cortex appear to contain essentially the same molecular components. It is currently unclear what determines which network structure dominates at any given time. Studies of cell shape changes in development and differentiation, where transitions between cell states are often associated with transitions in cell shape and actin organization, are likely to unveil some key determinants of actin network architecture. These are likely to be driven by intracellular pathways, as well as environmental signals. As our understanding of the cortex in isolation matures, the interplay between cell state, the extracellular environment, cell shape and intracellular actin organization are an exciting and vastly unexplored research avenue.

References 154

  1. 1.

    Alvarado J., Sheinman M., Sharma A., MacKintosh F. C. and Koenderink G. H. (2013 ). Molecular motors robustly drive active gels to a critically connected state. Nat. Phys. 9, 591-597.

    Not in our library10.1038/nphys2715

  2. 2.

    Amack J. D. and Manning M. L. (2012 ). Knowing the boundaries: extending the differential adhesion hypothesis in embryonic cell sorting. Science 338, 212

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1223953

  3. 3.

    Amano T., Kaji N., Ohashi K. and Mizuno K. (2002 ). Mitosis-specific activation of LIM motif-containing protein kinase and roles of cofilin phosphorylation and dephosphorylation in mitosis. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 22093-22102.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m201444200

  4. 4.

    Aoki K., Maeda F., Nagasako T., Mochizuki Y., Uchida S. and Ikenouchi J. (2016 ). A RhoA and Rnd3 cycle regulates actin reassembly during membrane blebbing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, E1863-E1871.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1600968113

  5. 5.

    Baird M. A., Billington N., Wang A., Adelstein R. S., Sellers J. R., Fischer R. S. and Waterman C. M. (2017 ). Local pulsatile contractions are an intrinsic property of the myosin 2A motor in the cortical cytoskeleton of adherent cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 28, 240-251.

    Not in our library10.1091/mbc.e16-05-0335

  6. 6.

    Bambardekar K., Clément R., Blanc O., Chardès C. and Lenne P.-F. (2015 ). Direct laser manipulation reveals the mechanics of cell contacts in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 1416-1421.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1418732112

  7. 7.

    Beach J. R., Shao L., Remmert K., Li D., Betzig E. and Hammer J. A. (2014 ). Nonmuscle myosin II isoforms coassemble in living cells. Curr. Biol. 24, 1160-1166.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.071

  8. 8.

    Behrndt M., Salbreux G., Campinho P., Hauschild R., Oswald F., Roensch J., Grill S. W. and Heisenberg C.-P. (2012 ). Forces driving epithelial spreading in zebrafish gastrulation. Science 338, 257-260.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1224143

  9. 9.

    Bergert M., Erzberger A., Desai R. A., Aspalter I. M., Oates A. C., Charras G., Salbreux G. and Paluch E. K. (2015 ). Force transmission during adhesion-independent migration. Nat. Cell Biol. 17, 524-529.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncb3134

  10. 10.

    Billington N., Beach J. R., Heissler S. M., Remmert K., Guzik-Lendrum S., Nagy A., Takagi Y., Shao L., Li D., Yang Y. et al. (2015 ). Myosin 18A coassembles with nonmuscle myosin 2 to form mixed bipolar filaments. Curr. Biol. 25, 942-948.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2015.02.012

  11. 11.

    Biro M., Romeo Y., Kroschwald S., Bovellan M., Boden A., Tcherkezian J., Roux P. P., Charras G. and Paluch E. K. (2013 ). Cell cortex composition and homeostasis resolved by integrating proteomics and quantitative imaging. Cytoskelet. Hoboken 70, 741-754.

    Not in our library10.1002/cm.21142

  12. 12.

    Blanchard G. B., Murugesu S., Adams R. J., Martinez-Arias A. and Gorfinkiel N. (2010 ). Cytoskeletal dynamics and supracellular organisation of cell shape fluctuations during dorsal closure. Development 137, 2743-2752.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.045872

  13. 13.

    Blaser H., Reichman-Fried M., Castanon I., Dumstrei K., Marlow F. L., Kawakami K., Solnica-Krezel L., Heisenberg C.-P. and Raz E. (2006 ). Migration of zebrafish primordial germ cells: a role for myosin contraction and cytoplasmic flow. Dev. Cell 11, 613-627.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2006.09.023

  14. 14.
  15. 15.

    Bray D. and White J. (1988 ). Cortical flow in animal cells. Science 239, 883

    Not in our library10.1126/science.3277283

  16. 16.

    Bretscher A., Edwards K. and Fehon R. G. (2002 ). ERM proteins and merlin: integrators at the cell cortex. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 586-599.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrm882

  17. 17.

    Brugués J., Maugis B., Casademunt J., Nassoy P., Amblard F. and Sens P. (2010 ). Dynamical organization of the cytoskeletal cortex probed by micropipette aspiration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 15415-15420.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0913669107

  18. 18.

    Cabernard C., Prehoda K. E. and Doe C. Q. (2010 ). A spindle-independent cleavage furrow positioning pathway. Nature 467, 91-94.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature09334

  19. 19.

    Capco D. G., Tutnick J. M. and Bement W. M. (1992 ). The role of protein kinase C in reorganization of the cortical cytoskeleton during the transition from oocyte to fertilization-competent egg. J. Exp. Zool. Part Ecol. Genet. Physiol. 264, 395-405.

    Not in our library10.1002/jez.1402640405

  20. 20.

    Carreno S., Kouranti I., Glusman E. S., Fuller M. T., Echard A. and Payre F. (2008 ). Moesin and its activating kinase Slik are required for cortical stability and microtubule organization in mitotic cells. J. Cell Biol. 180, 739-746.

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.200709161

  21. 21.

    Cartagena-Rivera A. X., Logue J. S., Waterman C. M. and Chadwick R. S. (2016 ). Actomyosin cortical mechanical properties in nonadherent cells determined by atomic force microscopy. Biophys. J. 110, 2528-2539.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bpj.2016.04.034

  22. 22.

    Carvalho K., Tsai F.-C., Lees E., Voituriez R., Koenderink G. H. and Sykes C. (2013 ). Cell-sized liposomes reveal how actomyosin cortical tension drives shape change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 16456-16461.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1221524110

  23. 23.
  24. 24.

    Chaigne A., Campillo C., Gov N. S., Voituriez R., Azoury J., Umaña-Diaz C., Almonacid M., Queguiner I., Nassoy P., Sykes C. et al. (2013 ). A soft cortex is essential for asymmetric spindle positioning in mouse oocytes. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 958-966.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncb2799

  25. 25.

    Chalut K. J. and Paluch E. K. (2016 ). The actin cortex: a bridge between cell shape and function. Dev. Cell 38, 571-573.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2016.09.011

  26. 26.
  27. 27.

    Charras G. T., Hu C.-K., Coughlin M. and Mitchison T. J. (2006 ). Reassembly of contractile actin cortex in cell blebs. J. Cell Biol. 175, 477-490.

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.200602085

  28. 28.

    Charras G. T., Coughlin M., Mitchison T. J. and Mahadevan L. (2008 ). Life and times of a cellular bleb. Biophys. J. 94, 1836-1853.

    Not in our library10.1529/biophysj.107.113605

  29. 29.

    Cheeks R. J., Canman J. C., Gabriel W. N., Meyer N., Strome S. and Goldstein B. (2004 ). C. elegans PAR proteins function by mobilizing and stabilizing asymmetrically localized protein complexes. Curr. Biol. 14, 851-862.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2004.05.022

  30. 30.

    Chugh P., Clark A. G., Smith M. B., Cassani D. A. D., Dierkes K., Ragab A., Roux P. P., Charras G., Salbreux G. and Paluch E. K. (2017 ). Actin cortex architecture regulates cell surface tension. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 689-697.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncb3525

  31. 31.

    Clark A. G., Dierkes K. and Paluch E. K. (2013 ). Monitoring actin cortex thickness in live cells. Biophys. J. 105, 570-580.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bpj.2013.05.057

  32. 32.

    Clark A. G., Wartlick O., Salbreux G. and Paluch E. K. (2014 ). Stresses at the cell surface during animal cell morphogenesis. Curr. Biol. 24, R484-R494.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.059

  33. 33.

    Clausen M. P., Colin-York H., Schneider F., Eggeling C. and Fritzsche M. (2017 ). Dissecting the actin cortex density and membrane-cortex distance in living cells by super-resolution microscopy. J. Phys. Appl. Phys. 50, 064002

    Not in our library10.1088/1361-6463/aa52a1

  34. 34.

    Collier S., Paschke P., Kay R. R. and Bretschneider T. (2017 ). Image based modeling of bleb site selection. Sci. Rep. 7, 6692

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-017-06875-9

  35. 35.

    Connell M., Cabernard C., Ricketson D., Doe C. Q. and Prehoda K. E. (2011 ). Asymmetric cortical extension shifts cleavage furrow position in Drosophila neuroblasts. Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 4220-4226.

    Not in our library10.1091/mbc.e11-02-0173

  36. 36.

    Coravos J. S., Mason F. M. and Martin A. C. (2017 ). Actomyosin pulsing in tissue integrity maintenance during morphogenesis. Trends Cell Biol. 27, 276-283.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tcb.2016.11.008

  37. 37.

    Cramer L. P. and Mitchison T. J. (1997 ). Investigation of the mechanism of retraction of the cell margin and rearward flow of nodules during mitotic cell rounding. Mol. Biol. Cell 8, 109-119.

    Not in our library10.1091/mbc.8.1.109

  38. 38.

    Cunningham C., Gorlin J., Kwiatkowski D., Hartwig J., Janmey P., Byers H. and Stossel T. (1992 ). Actin-binding protein requirement for cortical stability and efficient locomotion. Science 255, 325

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1549777

  39. 39.
  40. 40.

    Dai J., Ting-Beall H. P., Hochmuth R. M., Sheetz M. P. and Titus M. A. (1999 ). Myosin I contributes to the generation of resting cortical tension. Biophys. J. 77, 1168-1176.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0006-3495(99)76968-7

  41. 41.

    Dean S. O., Rogers S. L., Stuurman N., Vale R. D. and Spudich J. A. (2005 ). Distinct pathways control recruitment and maintenance of myosin II at the cleavage furrow during cytokinesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 13473-13478.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0506810102

  42. 42.

    Dierkes K., Sumi A., Solon J. and Salbreux G. (2014 ). Spontaneous oscillations of elastic contractile materials with turnover. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 148102

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.113.148102

  43. 43.

    Ding W. Y., Ong H. T., Hara Y., Wongsantichon J., Toyama Y., Robinson R. C., Nédélec F. and Zaidel-Bar R. (2017 ). Plastin increases cortical connectivity to facilitate robust polarization and timely cytokinesis. J. Cell Biol. 216, 1371-1386.

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.201603070

  44. 44.
  45. 45.

    Diz-Muñoz A., Romanczuk P., Yu W., Bergert M., Ivanovitch K., Salbreux G., Heisenberg C.-P. and Paluch E. K. (2016 ). Steering cell migration by alternating blebs and actin-rich protrusions. BMC Biol. 14, 74

    Not in our library10.1186/s12915-016-0294-x

  46. 46.

    Eghiaian F., Rigato A. and Scheuring S. (2015 ). Structural, mechanical, and dynamical variability of the actin cortex in living cells. Biophys. J. 108, 1330-1340.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bpj.2015.01.016

  47. 47.

    Ennomani H., Letort G., Guérin C., Martiel J.-L., Cao W., Nédélec F., De La Cruz E. M., Théry M. and Blanchoin L. (2016 ). Architecture and connectivity govern actin network contractility. Curr. Biol. 26, 616-626.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2015.12.069

  48. 48.

    Escuin S., Vernay B., Savery D., Gurniak C. B., Witke W., Greene N. D. E. and Copp A. J. (2015 ). Rho-kinase-dependent actin turnover and actomyosin disassembly are necessary for mouse spinal neural tube closure. J. Cell Sci. 128, 2468-2481.

    Not in our library10.1242/jcs.164574

  49. 49.

    Evans E. and Yeung A. (1989 ). Apparent viscosity and cortical tension of blood granulocytes determined by micropipet aspiration. Biophys. J. 56, 151-160.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0006-3495(89)82660-8

  50. 50.

    Falzone T. T., Lenz M., Kovar D. R. and Gardel M. L. (2012 ). Assembly kinetics determine the architecture of α-actinin crosslinked F-actin networks. Nat. Commun. 3, 861

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms1862

  51. 51.

    Farhadifar R., Röper J.-C., Aigouy B., Eaton S. and Jülicher F. (2007 ). The influence of cell mechanics, cell-cell interactions, and proliferation on epithelial packing. Curr. Biol. 17, 2095-2104.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.049

  52. 52.

    Fenix A. M., Taneja N., Buttler C. A., Lewis J., Van Engelenburg S. B., Ohi R. and Burnette D. T. (2016 ). Expansion and concatenation of nonmuscle myosin IIA filaments drive cellular contractile system formation during interphase and mitosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 27, 1465-1478.

    Not in our library10.1091/mbc.e15-10-0725

  53. 53.
  54. 54.

    Fishkind D. J. and Wang Y. (1993 ). Orientation and three-dimensional organization of actin filaments in dividing cultured cells. J. Cell Biol. 123, 837-848.

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.123.4.837

  55. 55.

    Fritzsche M., Lewalle A., Duke T., Kruse K. and Charras G. (2013 ). Analysis of turnover dynamics of the submembranous actin cortex. Mol. Biol. Cell 24, 757-767.

    Not in our library10.1091/mbc.e12-06-0485

  56. 56.

    Fritzsche M., Erlenkämper C., Moeendarbary E., Charras G. and Kruse K. (2016 ). Actin kinetics shapes cortical network structure and mechanics. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501337-e1501337.

    Not in our library10.1126/sciadv.1501337

  57. 57.

    Fujibuchi T., Abe Y., Takeuchi T., Imai Y., Kamei Y., Murase R., Ueda N., Shigemoto K., Yamamoto H. and Kito K. (2005 ). AIP1/WDR1 supports mitotic cell rounding. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 327, 268-275.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.11.156

  58. 58.

    Goehring N. W., Trong P. K., Bois J. S., Chowdhury D., Nicola E. M., Hyman A. A. and Grill S. W. (2011 ). Polarization of PAR proteins by advective triggering of a pattern-forming system. Science 334, 1137

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1208619

  59. 59.

    Goudarzi M., Banisch T. U., Mobin M. B., Maghelli N., Tarbashevich K., Strate I., van den Berg J., Blaser H., Bandemer S., Paluch E. et al. (2012 ). Identification and regulation of a molecular module for bleb-based cell motility. Dev. Cell 23, 210-218.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2012.05.007

  60. 60.

    Green R. A., Paluch E. and Oegema K. (2012 ). Cytokinesis in animal cells. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 28, 29-58.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101011-155718

  61. 61.

    Guha M., Zhou M. and Wang Y. (2005 ). Cortical Actin turnover during cytokinesis requires myosin II. Curr. Biol. 15, 732-736.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2005.03.042

  62. 62.

    Haase K. and Pelling A. E. (2015 ). Investigating cell mechanics with atomic force microscopy. J. R. Soc. Interface 12, 20140970-20140970.

    Not in our library10.1098/rsif.2014.0970

  63. 63.

    Hanakam F., Albrecht R., Eckerskorn C., Matzner M. and Gerisch G. (1996 ). Myristoylated and non-myristoylated forms of the pH sensor protein hisactophilin II: intracellular shuttling to plasma membrane and nucleus monitored in real time by a fusion with green fluorescent protein. EMBO J. 15, 2935-2943.

    Not in our library

  64. 64.

    Harris A. R., Peter L., Bellis J., Baum B., Kabla A. J. and Charras G. T. (2012 ). Characterizing the mechanics of cultured cell monolayers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 16449-16454.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1213301109

  65. 65.

    Heller E., Kumar K. V., Grill S. W. and Fuchs E. (2014 ). Forces generated by cell intercalation tow epidermal sheets in mammalian tissue morphogenesis. Dev. Cell 28, 617-632.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2014.02.011

  66. 66.

    Heng Y.-W. and Koh C.-G. (2010 ). Actin cytoskeleton dynamics and the cell division cycle. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 42, 1622-1633.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biocel.2010.04.007

  67. 67.

    Henson J. H., Ditzler C. E., Germain A., Irwin P. M., Vogt E. T., Yang S., Wu X. and Shuster C. B. (2017 ). The ultrastructural organization of actin and myosin ii filaments in the contractile ring: new support for an old model of cytokinesis. Mol. Biol. Cell 28, 613-623.

    Not in our library10.1091/mbc.e16-06-0466

  68. 68.

    Hiraiwa T. and Salbreux G. (2016 ). Role of turnover in active stress generation in a filament network. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 188101

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.116.188101

  69. 69.

    Hochmuth R. M. (2000 ). Micropipette aspiration of living cells. J. Biomech. 33, 15-22.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0021-9290(99)00175-x

  70. 70.

    Hoffman B. D. and Crocker J. C. (2009 ). Cell mechanics: dissecting the physical responses of cells to force. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 11, 259-288.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.bioeng.10.061807.160511

  71. 71.

    Hoijman E., Rubbini D., Colombelli J. and Alsina B. (2015 ). Mitotic cell rounding and epithelial thinning regulate lumen growth and shape. Nat. Commun. 6, 7355

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms8355

  72. 72.

    Ishikawa-Ankerhold H. C., Gerisch G. and Müller-Taubenberger A. (2010 ). Genetic evidence for concerted control of actin dynamics in cytokinesis, endocytic traffic, and cell motility by coronin and Aip1. Cytoskeleton 67, 442-455.

    Not in our library10.1002/cm.20456

  73. 73.

    Jurado J., de Navascués J. and Gorfinkiel N. (2016 ). α-Catenin stabilises Cadherin–Catenin complexes and modulates actomyosin dynamics to allow pulsatile apical contraction. J. Cell Sci. 129, 4496

    Not in our library10.1242/jcs.193268

  74. 74.

    Kaji N., Ohashi K., Shuin M., Niwa R., Uemura T. and Mizuno K. (2003 ). Cell cycle-associated changes in slingshot phosphatase activity and roles in cytokinesis in animal cells. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 33450-33455.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m305802200

  75. 75.

    Kaji N., Muramoto A. and Mizuno K. (2008 ). LIM Kinase-mediated Cofilin phosphorylation during mitosis is required for precise spindle positioning. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 4983-4992.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m708644200

  76. 76.

    Kasza K. E., Farrell D. L. and Zallen J. A. (2014 ). Spatiotemporal control of epithelial remodeling by regulated myosin phosphorylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 11732-11737.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1400520111

  77. 77.

    Kim H. Y. and Davidson L. A. (2011 ). Punctuated actin contractions during convergent extension and their permissive regulation by the non-canonical Wnt-signaling pathway. J. Cell Sci. 124, 635-646.

    Not in our library10.1242/jcs.067579

  78. 78.

    Koenderink G. H. and Paluch E. K. (2018 ). Architecture shapes contractility in actomyosin networks. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 50, 79-85.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ceb.2018.01.015

  79. 79.

    Kondo T. and Hayashi S. (2013 ). Mitotic cell rounding accelerates epithelial invagination. Nature 494, 125-129.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature11792

  80. 80.

    Krieg M., Arboleda-Estudillo Y., Puech P.-H., Käfer J., Graner F., Müller D. J. and Heisenberg C.-P. (2008 ). Tensile forces govern germ-layer organization in zebrafish. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 429-436.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncb1705

  81. 81.

    Kronlage C., Schäfer-Herte M., Böning D., Oberleithner H. and Fels J. (2015 ). Feeling for filaments: quantification of the cortical actin web in live vascular endothelium. Biophys. J. 109, 687-698.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bpj.2015.06.066

  82. 82.

    Kunda P., Pelling A. E., Liu T. and Baum B. (2008 ). Moesin controls cortical rigidity, cell rounding, and spindle morphogenesis during mitosis. Curr. Biol. 18, 91-101.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2007.12.051

  83. 83.

    Kunda P., Rodrigues N. T. L., Moeendarbary E., Liu T., Ivetic A., Charras G. and Baum B. (2012 ). PP1-mediated moesin dephosphorylation couples polar relaxation to mitotic exit. Curr. Biol. 22, 231-236.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2011.12.016

  84. 84.

    Lämmermann T., Bader B. L., Monkley S. J., Worbs T., Wedlich-Soldner R., Hirsch K., Keller M., Forster R., Critchley D. R., Fassler R. et al. (2008 ). Rapid leukocyte migration by integrin-independent flowing and squeezing. Nature 453, 51-55.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature06887

  85. 85.

    Lancaster O. M., Le Berre M., Dimitracopoulos A., Bonazzi D., Zlotek-Zlotkiewicz E., Picone R., Duke T., Piel M. and Baum B. (2013 ). Mitotic rounding alters cell geometry to ensure efficient bipolar spindle formation. Dev. Cell 25, 270-283.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2013.03.014

  86. 86.

    Larson S. M., Lee H. J., Hung P.-H., Matthews L. M., Robinson D. N. and Evans J. P. (2010 ). Cortical mechanics and meiosis II completion in mammalian oocytes are mediated by myosin-II and Ezrin-Radixin-Moesin (ERM) proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 21, 3182-3192.

    Not in our library10.1091/mbc.e10-01-0066

  87. 87.

    Levayer R. and Lecuit T. (2012 ). Biomechanical regulation of contractility: spatial control and dynamics. Trends Cell Biol. 22, 61-81.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tcb.2011.10.001

  88. 88.

    Lewis W. H. (1939 ). The role of a superficial plasmagel layer in changes of form, locomotion and division of cells in tissue cultures. Arch. Exp. Zellforsch. 23, 1-7.

    Not in our library

  89. 89.

    Liu Y.-J., Le Berre M., Lautenschlaeger F., Maiuri P., Callan-Jones A., Heuzé M., Takaki T., Voituriez R. and Piel M. (2015 ). Confinement and low adhesion induce fast amoeboid migration of slow mesenchymal cells. Cell 160, 659-672.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.007

  90. 90.
  91. 91.

    Lu Y., Zhang Y., Pan M.-H., Kim N.-H., Sun S.-C. and Cui X.-S. (2017 ). Daam1 regulates fascin for actin assembly in mouse oocyte meiosis. Cell Cycle 16, 1350-1356.

    Not in our library10.1080/15384101.2017.1325045

  92. 92.

    Luo T., Mohan K., Iglesias P. A. and Robinson D. N. (2013 ). Molecular mechanisms of cellular mechanosensing. Nat. Mater. 12, 1064-1071.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmat3772

  93. 93.

    Machicoane M., de Frutos C. A., Fink J., Rocancourt M., Lombardi Y., Garel S., Piel M. and Echard A. (2014 ). SLK-dependent activation of ERMs controls LGN–NuMA localization and spindle orientation. J. Cell Biol. 205, 791

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.201401049

  94. 94.

    Mackenzie A. C., Kyle D. D., McGinnis L. A., Lee H. J., Aldana N., Robinson D. N. and Evans J. P. (2016 ). Cortical mechanics and myosin-II abnormalities associated with post-ovulatory aging: implications for functional defects in aged eggs. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 22, 397-409.

    Not in our library10.1093/molehr/gaw019

  95. 95.

    Maddox A. S. and Burridge K. (2003 ). RhoA is required for cortical retraction and rigidity during mitotic cell rounding. J. Cell Biol. 160, 255-265.

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.200207130

  96. 96.

    Maître J.-L., Berthoumieux H., Krens S. F. G., Salbreux G., Jülicher F., Paluch E. and Heisenberg C.-P. (2012 ). Adhesion functions in cell sorting by mechanically coupling the cortices of adhering cells. Science 338, 253

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1225399

  97. 97.

    Maître J.-L., Niwayama R., Turlier H., Nédélec F. and Hiiragi T. (2015 ). Pulsatile cell-autonomous contractility drives compaction in the mouse embryo. Nat. Cell Biol. 17, 849-855.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncb3185

  98. 98.

    Maître J.-L., Turlier H., Illukkumbura R., Eismann B., Niwayama R., Nédélec F. and Hiiragi T. (2016 ). Asymmetric division of contractile domains couples cell positioning and fate specification. Nature 536, 344-348.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature18958

  99. 99.

    Maliga Z., Junqueira M., Toyoda Y., Ettinger A., Mora-Bermúdez F., Klemm R. W., Vasilj A., Guhr E., Ibarlucea-Benitez I., Poser I. et al. (2013 ). A genomic toolkit to investigate kinesin and myosin motor function in cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 325-334.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncb2689

  100. 100.

    Manning M. L., Foty R. A., Steinberg M. S. and Schoetz E.-M. (2010 ). Coaction of intercellular adhesion and cortical tension specifies tissue surface tension. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 12517-12522.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1003743107

  101. 101.

    Martin A. C., Kaschube M. and Wieschaus E. F. (2009 ). Pulsed contractions of an actin–myosin network drive apical constriction. Nature 457, 495-499.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature07522

  102. 102.

    Martin A. C., Gelbart M., Fernandez-Gonzalez R., Kaschube M. and Wieschaus E. F. (2010 ). Integration of contractile forces during tissue invagination. J. Cell Biol. 188, 735-749.

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.200910099

  103. 103.
  104. 104.

    Matzke R., Jacobson K. and Radmacher M. (2001 ). Direct, high-resolution measurement of furrow stiffening during division of adherent cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 607-610.

    Not in our library10.1038/35078583

  105. 105.

    Maupin P. and Pollard T. D. (1986 ). Arrangement of actin filaments and myosin-like filaments in the contractile ring and of actin-like filaments in the mitotic spindle of dividing HeLa cells. J. Ultrastruct. Mol. Struct. Res. 94, 92-103.

    Not in our library10.1016/0889-1605(86)90055-8

  106. 106.

    Mayer M., Depken M., Bois J. S., Jülicher F. and Grill S. W. (2010 ). Anisotropies in cortical tension reveal the physical basis of polarizing cortical flows. Nature 467, 617-621.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature09376

  107. 107.

    Mayer M., Salbreux G. and Grill S. W. (2012 ). Biophysics of cell developmental processes: a lasercutter's perspective. In Comprehensive Biophysics. Vol. 7. E.H. Egelman, editor. Oxford: Academic Press 194-207.

    Not in our library

  108. 108.

    Morone N., Fujiwara T., Murase K., Kasai R. S., Ike H., Yuasa S., Usukura J. and Kusumi A. (2006 ). Three-dimensional reconstruction of the membrane skeleton at the plasma membrane interface by electron tomography. J. Cell Biol. 174, 851-862.

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.200606007

  109. 109.

    Moulding D. A., Record J., Malinova D. and Thrasher A. J. (2013 ). Actin cytoskeletal defects in immunodeficiency. Immunol. Rev. 256, 282-299.

    Not in our library10.1111/imr.12114

  110. 110.

    Mukhina S., Wang Y.-L. and Murata-Hori M. (2007 ). α-Actinin Is required for tightly regulated remodeling of the actin cortical network during cytokinesis. Dev. Cell 13, 554-565.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2007.08.003

  111. 111.

    Munjal A., Philippe J.-M., Munro E. and Lecuit T. (2015 ). A self-organized biomechanical network drives shape changes during tissue morphogenesis. Nature 524, 351-355.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature14603

  112. 112.

    Munro E., Nance J. and Priess J. R. (2004 ). Cortical flows powered by asymmetrical contraction transport PAR proteins to establish and maintain anterior-posterior polarity in the early C. elegans embryo. Dev. Cell 7, 413-424.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2004.08.001

  113. 113.

    Murrell M., Oakes P. W., Lenz M. and Gardel M. L. (2015 ). Forcing cells into shape: the mechanics of actomyosin contractility. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 486-498.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrm4012

  114. 114.

    Murthy K. and Wadsworth P. (2005 ). Myosin-II-dependent localization and dynamics of F-actin during cytokinesis. Curr. Biol. 15, 724-731.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2005.02.055

  115. 115.

    Nambiar R., McConnell R. E. and Tyska M. J. (2009 ). Control of cell membrane tension by myosin-I. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 11972-11977.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0901641106

  116. 116.

    Nishikawa M., Naganathan S. R., Jülicher F. and Grill S. W. (2017 ). Controlling contractile instabilities in the actomyosin cortex. ELife 6, e19595

    Not in our library10.7554/elife.19595

  117. 117.

    Ou G., Stuurman N., D'Ambrosio M. and Vale R. D. (2010 ). Polarized myosin produces unequal-size daughters during asymmetric cell division. Science 330, 677-680.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1196112

  118. 118.
  119. 119.

    Ramanathan S. P., Helenius J., Stewart M. P., Cattin C. J., Hyman A. A. and Muller D. J. (2015 ). Cdk1-dependent mitotic enrichment of cortical myosin II promotes cell rounding against confinement. Nat. Cell Biol. 17, 148-159.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncb3098

  120. 120.

    Ramkumar N. and Baum B. (2016 ). Coupling changes in cell shape to chromosome segregation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 511-521.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrm.2016.75

  121. 121.

    Rappaport R. (1996 ). Cytokinesis in Animal Cells. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Not in our library

  122. 122.

    Rauzi M., Lenne P.-F. and Lecuit T. (2010 ). Planar polarized actomyosin contractile flows control epithelial junction remodelling. Nature 468, 1110-1114.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature09566

  123. 123.

    Reichl E. M., Ren Y., Morphew M. K., Delannoy M., Effler J. C., Girard K. D., Divi S., Iglesias P. A., Kuo S. C. and Robinson D. N. (2008 ). Interactions between myosin and actin crosslinkers control cytokinesis contractility dynamics and mechanics. Curr. Biol. 18, 471-480.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.056

  124. 124.

    Remmerbach T. W., Wottawah F., Dietrich J., Lincoln B., Wittekind C. and Guck J. (2009 ). Oral cancer diagnosis by mechanical phenotyping. Cancer Res. 69, 1728-1732.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-4073

  125. 125.

    Reymann A.-C., Boujemaa-Paterski R., Martiel J.-L., Guérin C., Cao W., Chin H. F., De La Cruz E. M., Théry M. and Blanchoin L. (2012 ). Actin network architecture can determine myosin motor activity. Science 336, 1310

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1221708

  126. 126.
  127. 127.

    Ritchey L. and Chakrabarti R. (2014 ). Aurora A kinase modulates actin cytoskeleton through phosphorylation of Cofilin: implication in the mitotic process. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA-Mol. Cell Res. 1843, 2719-2729.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.07.014

  128. 128.

    Rodrigues N. T. L., Lekomtsev S., Jananji S., Kriston-Vizi J., Hickson G. R. X. and Baum B. (2015 ). Kinetochore-localized PP1-Sds22 couples chromosome segregation to polar relaxation. Nature 524, 489-492.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature14496

  129. 129.

    Roh-Johnson M., Shemer G., Higgins C. D., McClellan J. H., Werts A. D., Tulu U. S., Gao L., Betzig E., Kiehart D. P. and Goldstein B. (2012 ). Triggering a cell shape change by exploiting preexisting actomyosin contractions. Science 335, 1232-1235.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1217869

  130. 130.

    Rosa A., Vlassaks E., Pichaud F. and Baum B. (2015 ). Ect2/Pbl acts via rho and polarity proteins to direct the assembly of an isotropic actomyosin cortex upon mitotic entry. Dev. Cell 32, 604-616.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2015.01.012

  131. 131.

    Rossy J., Gutjahr M. C., Blaser N., Schlicht D. and Niggli V. (2007 ). Ezrin/moesin in motile Walker 256 carcinosarcoma cells: Signal-dependent relocalization and role in migration. Exp. Cell Res. 313, 1106-1120.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.12.023

  132. 132.

    Roubinet C., Decelle B., Chicanne G., Dorn J. F., Payrastre B., Payre F. and Carreno S. (2011 ). Molecular networks linked by Moesin drive remodeling of the cell cortex during mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 195, 99-112.

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.201106048

  133. 133.
  134. 134.

    Saha A., Nishikawa M., Behrndt M., Heisenberg C.-P., Jülicher F. and Grill S. W. (2016 ). Determining physical properties of the cell cortex. Biophys. J. 110, 1421-1429.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bpj.2016.02.013

  135. 135.

    Salbreux G., Charras G. and Paluch E. (2012 ). Actin cortex mechanics and cellular morphogenesis. Trends Cell Biol. 22, 536-545.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tcb.2012.07.001

  136. 136.

    Schwayer C., Sikora M., Slováková J., Kardos R. and Heisenberg C.-P. (2016 ). Actin Rings of Power. Dev. Cell 37, 493-506.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2016.05.024

  137. 137.

    Sedzinski J., Biro M., Oswald A., Tinevez J.-Y., Salbreux G. and Paluch E. (2011 ). Polar actomyosin contractility destabilizes the position of the cytokinetic furrow. Nature 476, 462-466.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature10286

  138. 138.

    Severson A. F., Baillie D. L. and Bowerman B. (2002 ). A Formin Homology protein and a profilin are required for cytokinesis and Arp2/3-independent assembly of cortical microfilaments in C. elegans. Curr. Biol. 12, 2066-2075.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0960-9822(02)01355-6

  139. 139.

    Shutova M. S., Spessott W. A., Giraudo C. G. and Svitkina T. (2014 ). Endogenous species of mammalian nonmuscle myosin IIA and IIB include activated monomers and heteropolymers. Curr. Biol. 24, 1958-1968.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2014.07.070

  140. 140.

    Solon J., Kaya-Çopur A., Colombelli J. and Brunner D. (2009 ). Pulsed forces timed by a ratchet-like mechanism drive directed tissue movement during dorsal closure. Cell 137, 1331-1342.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.050

  141. 141.

    Srivastava V. and Robinson D. N. (2015 ). Mechanical stress and network structure drive protein dynamics during cytokinesis. Curr. Biol. 25, 663-670.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.025

  142. 142.

    Stewart M. P., Helenius J., Toyoda Y., Ramanathan S. P., Muller D. J. and Hyman A. A. (2011 ). Hydrostatic pressure and the actomyosin cortex drive mitotic cell rounding. Nature 469, 226-230.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature09642

  143. 143.

    Tetley R. J., Blanchard G. B., Fletcher A. G., Adams R. J. and Sanson B. (2016 ). Unipolar distributions of junctional Myosin II identify cell stripe boundaries that drive cell intercalation throughout Drosophila axis extension. Elife 5, e12094

    Not in our library10.7554/elife.12094

  144. 144.

    Tinevez J.-Y., Schulze U., Salbreux G., Roensch J., Joanny J.-F. and Paluch E. (2009 ). Role of cortical tension in bleb growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 18581-18586.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0903353106

  145. 145.

    Toyoda Y., Cattin C. J., Stewart M. P., Poser I., Theis M., Kurzchalia T. V., Buchholz F., Hyman A. A. and Müller D. J. (2017 ). Genome-scale single-cell mechanical phenotyping reveals disease-related genes involved in mitotic rounding. Nat. Comm. 8, 1266

    Not in our library10.1038/s41467-017-01147-6

  146. 146.

    Tsankova A., Pham T. T., Garcia D. S., Otte F. and Cabernard C. (2017 ). Cell polarity regulates biased myosin activity and dynamics during asymmetric cell division via Drosophila rho kinase and protein kinase N. Dev. Cell 42, 143-155.e5.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2017.06.012

  147. 147.

    Turlier H., Audoly B., Prost J. and Joanny J.-F. (2014 ). Furrow constriction in animal cell Cytokinesis. Biophys. J. 106, 114-123.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bpj.2013.11.014

  148. 148.

    Vicente-Manzanares M., Ma X., Adelstein R. S. and Horwitz A. R. (2009 ). Non-muscle myosin II takes centre stage in cell adhesion and migration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 778-790.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrm2786

  149. 149.

    Werner A., Disanza A., Reifenberger N., Habeck G., Becker J., Calabrese M., Urlaub H., Lorenz H., Schulman B., Scita G. et al. (2013 ). SCFFbxw5 mediates transient degradation of actin remodeller Eps8 to allow proper mitotic progression. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 179-188.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncb2661

  150. 150.

    Wiggan O., Shaw A. E., DeLuca J. G. and Bamburg J. R. (2012 ). ADF/cofilin regulates actomyosin assembly through competitive inhibition of myosin II binding to F-actin. Dev. Cell 22, 530-543.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2011.12.026

  151. 151.

    Yang X., Yu K., Hao Y., Li D., Stewart R., Insogna K. L. and Xu T. (2004 ). LATS1 tumour suppressor affects cytokinesis by inhibiting LIMK1. Nat. Cell Biol. 6, 609-617.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncb1140

  152. 152.

    Zaidel-Bar R., Zhenhuan G. and Luxenburg C. (2015 ). The contractome - a systems view of actomyosin contractility in non-muscle cells. J. Cell Sci. 128, 2209-2217.

    Not in our library10.1242/jcs.170068

  153. 153.

    Zatulovskiy E., Tyson R., Bretschneider T. and Kay R. R. (2014 ). Bleb-driven chemotaxis of Dictyostelium cells. J. Cell Biol. 204, 1027

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.201306147

  154. 154.

    Zhang Y., Yoshida A., Sakai N., Uekusa Y., Kumeta M. and Yoshimura S. H. (2017 ). In vivo dynamics of the cortical actin network revealed by fast-scanning atomic force microscopy. Microscopy 66, 272-282.

    Not in our library10.1093/jmicro/dfx015

Cited by papers we hold 2

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.