Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Measurement of Upper Limb Range of Motion Using Wearable Sensors: A Systematic Review

Corrin P. Walmsley, Sîan A. Williams, Tiffany Grisbrook and 3 more

Sports Medicine - Open · 2018

doi:10.1186/s40798-018-0167-7 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Wearable sensors are portable measurement tools that are becoming increasingly popular for the measurement of joint angle in the upper limb. With many brands emerging on the market, each with variations in hardware and protocols, evidence to inform selection and application is needed. Therefore, the objectives of this review were related to the use of wearable sensors to calculate upper limb joint angle. We aimed to describe (i) the characteristics of commercial and custom wearable sensors, (ii) the populations for whom researchers have adopted wearable sensors, and (iii) their established psychometric properties. METHODS: A systematic review of literature was undertaken using the following data bases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, IEEE, and Scopus. Studies were eligible if they met the following criteria: (i) involved humans and/or robotic devices, (ii) involved the application or simulation of wearable sensors on the upper limb, and (iii) calculated a joint angle. RESULTS: Of 2191 records identified, 66 met the inclusion criteria. Eight studies compared wearable sensors to a robotic device and 22 studies compared to a motion analysis system. Commercial (n = 13) and custom (n = 7) wearable sensors were identified, each with variations in placement, calibration methods, and fusion algorithms, which were demonstrated to influence accuracy. CONCLUSION: Wearable sensors have potential as viable instruments for measurement of joint angle in the upper limb during active movement. Currently, customised application (i.e. calibration and angle calculation methods) is required to achieve sufficient accuracy (error < 5°). Additional research and standardisation is required to guide clinical application. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO ( CRD42017059935 ).

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

References94

  1. 17.

39 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

All 94 references

Cited by papers we hold2

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.