ADMETlab: a platform for systematic ADMET evaluation based on a comprehensively collected ADMET database

Abstract

References 48

1. 1.

   Mullard A. 2013 FDA drug approvals. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014;13(2):85-89.

   Not in our library10.1038/nrd4239

2. 2.

   Mullard A. 2016 FDA drug approvals. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16(2):73-76.

   Not in our library10.1038/nrd.2017.14

3. 3.

   Fordyce CB, Roe MT, Ahmad T, Libby P, Borer JS, Hiatt WR, et al. Cardiovascular drug development: is it dead or just hibernating? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(15):1567-1582.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.jacc.2015.03.016

4. 4.

   Cheng F, Li W, Liu G, Tang Y. In silico ADMET prediction: recent advances, current challenges and future trends. Curr Top Med Chem. 2013;13(11):1273-1289.

   Not in our library10.2174/15680266113139990033

5. 5.

   Wang Y, Xing J, Xu Y, Zhou N, Peng J, Xiong Z, et al. In silico ADME/T modelling for rational drug design. Q Rev Biophys. 2015;48(4):488-515.

   Not in our library10.1017/s0033583515000190

6. 6.

   Wishart DS. Improving early drug discovery through ADME modelling: an overview. Drugs R&D. 2007;8(6):349-362.

   Not in our library10.2165/00126839-200708060-00003

7. 7.

   Rosales-Hernandez MC, Correa-Basurto J. The importance of employing computational resources for the automation of drug discovery. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2015;10(3):213-219.

   Not in our library10.1517/17460441.2015.1005071

8. 8.

   Hou T. Theme title: in silico ADMET predictions in pharmaceutical research. Adv Drug Deliver Rev. 2015;86:1.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.addr.2015.06.006

9. 9.

   Tao L, Zhang P, Qin C, Chen SY, Zhang C, Chen Z, et al. Recent progresses in the exploration of machine learning methods as in silico ADME prediction tools. Adv Drug Deliver Rev. 2015;86:83-100.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.addr.2015.03.014

10. 10.

    Wang N, Huang C, Dong J, Yao Z, Zhu M, Deng Z, et al. Predicting human intestinal absorption with modified random forest approach: a comprehensive evaluation of molecular representation, unbalanced data, and applicability domain issues. RSC Adv. 2017;7(31):19007-19018.

    Not in our library10.1039/c6ra28442f

11. 11.

    Wang NN, Dong J, Deng YH, Zhu MF, Wen M, Yao ZJ, et al. ADME properties evaluation in drug discovery: prediction of Caco-2 cell permeability using a combination of NSGA-II and boosting. J Chem Inf Model. 2016;56(4):763-773.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00642

12. 12.

    Pires DEV, Blundell TL, Ascher DB. pkCSM: predicting small-molecule pharmacokinetic and toxicity properties using graph-based signatures. J Med Chem. 2015;58(9):4066-4072.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00104

13. 13.

    Davies M, Dedman N, Hersey A, Papadatos G, Hall MD, Cucurull-Sanchez L, et al. ADME SARfari: comparative genomics of drug metabolizing systems. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(10):1695-1697.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btv010

14. 14.

    Dong J, Wang NN, Liu KY, Zhu MF, Yun YH, Zeng WB, et al. ChemBCPP: a freely available web server for calculating commonly used physicochemical properties. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst. 2017;171:65-73.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.chemolab.2017.10.006

15. 15.

    Landrum. RDKit: open-source cheminformatics. Release 2014.03.1. 2010

    Not in our library

16. 16.
    Pybel: a Python wrapper for the OpenBabel cheminformatics toolkit · 2008

    No notice
17. 17.

    Cao D, Xu Q, Hu Q, Liang Y. ChemoPy: freely available python package for computational biology and chemoinformatics. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(8):1092-1094.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btt105

18. 18.
    ChemDes: an integrated web-based platform for molecular descriptor and fingerprint computation · 2015

    No notice
19. 19.

    Dong J, Yao ZJ, Wen M, Zhu MF, Wang NN, Miao HY, et al. BioTriangle: a web-accessible platform for generating various molecular representations for chemicals, proteins. DNAs/RNAs and their interactions. J Cheminform. 2016;8(1):34.

    Not in our library10.1186/s13321-016-0146-2

20. 20.

    Pedregosa F, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, Blondel M, et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res. 2012;12(10):2825-2830.

    Not in our library

21. 21.

    van der Walt S, Colbert SC, Varoquaux G. The NumPy array: a structure for efficient numerical computation. Comput Sci Eng. 2011;13(2):22-30.

    Not in our library10.1109/mcse.2011.37

22. 22.

    Mckinney W. Python for data analysis: data wrangling with Pandas, NumPy, and IPython. 2017.

    Not in our library

23. 23.
    The ChEMBL database in 2017 · 2016

    No notice
24. 24.

    EPA. https://www.epa.gov/. Accessed at 2018 Jan 15

    Not in our library

25. 25.

    Wishart DS, Knox C, Guo AC, Shrivastava S, Hassanali M, Stothard P, et al. DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(SI):D668-D672.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkj067

26. 26.

    Dong J, Yao ZJ, Zhu MF, Wang NN, Lu B, Chen AF, et al. ChemSAR: an online pipelining platform for molecular SAR modeling. J Cheminform. 2017;9(1):27.

    Not in our library10.1186/s13321-017-0215-1

27. 27.

    Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn. 2001;45(1):5-32.

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1010933404324

28. 28.

    Cao D, Yang Y, Zhao J, Yan J, Liu S, Hu Q, et al. Computer-aided prediction of toxicity with substructure pattern and random forest. J Chemometr. 2012;26(1):7-15.

    Not in our library10.1002/cem.1416

29. 29.

    Cao D, Hu Q, Xu Q, Yang Y, Zhao J, Lu H, et al. In silico classification of human maximum recommended daily dose based on modified random forest and substructure fingerprint. Anal Chim Acta. 2011;692(1–2):50-56.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.aca.2011.02.010

30. 30.

    Cao D, Dong J, Wang N, Wen M, Deng B, Zeng W, et al. In silico toxicity prediction of chemicals from EPA toxicity database by kernel fusion-based support vector machines. Chemometr Intell Lab. 2015;146:494-502.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.07.009

31. 31.

    Strobl C, Malley J, Tutz G. An introduction to recursive partitioning: rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. Psychol Methods. 2009;14(4):323-348.

    Not in our library10.1037/a0016973

32. 32.

    Wold S, Sjostrom M, Eriksson L. PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chemometr Intell Lab. 2001;58(2):109-130.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0169-7439(01)00155-1

33. 33.

    Cao D, Xu Q, Liang Y, Chen X, Li H. Prediction of aqueous solubility of druglike organic compounds using partial least squares, back-propagation network and support vector machine. J Chemometr. 2010;24(9):584-595.

    Not in our library

34. 34.

    Jiang W, Shen Y, Ding Y, Ye C, Zheng Y, Zhao P, et al. A naive Bayes algorithm for tissue origin diagnosis (TOD-Bayes) of synchronous multifocal tumors in the hepatobiliary and pancreatic system. Int J Cancer. 2018;142(2):357-368.

    Not in our library10.1002/ijc.31054

35. 35.

    Xia Y, Liu C, Da B, Xie F. A novel heterogeneous ensemble credit scoring model based on bstacking approach. Expert Syst Appl. 2018;93:182-199.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.eswa.2017.10.022

36. 36.

    Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv Drug Deliver Rev. 2001;46(1–3):3-26.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00129-0

37. 37.

    Ghose AK, Viswanadhan VN, Wendoloski JJ. A knowledge based approach in designing combinatorial and medicinal chemistry libraries for drug discovery: 1. Qualitative and quantitative definitions of a drug like molecule. In: Abstracts of papers of the American Chemical Society, vol. 217, no. 1; 1999. p. U708.

    Not in our library10.1021/cc9800071

38. 38.

    Oprea TI. Property distribution of drug-related chemical databases. J Comput Aid Mol Des. 2000;14(3):251-264.

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1008130001697

39. 39.

    Veber DF, Johnson SR, Cheng HY, Smith BR, Ward KW, Kopple KD. Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates. J Med Chem. 2002;45(12):2615-2623.

    Not in our library10.1021/jm020017n

40. 40.

    Varma MVS, Obach RS, Rotter C, Miller HR, Chang G, Steyn SJ, et al. Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination. J Med Chem. 2010;53(3):1098-1108.

    Not in our library10.1021/jm901371v

Cited by papers we hold 9

• Deep-PK: deep learning for small molecule pharmacokinetic and toxicity prediction · 2024
  No notice
• Evaluation of Free Online ADMET Tools for Academic or Small Biotech Environments · 2023
  No notice
• Marine fungal metabolite butyrolactone I prevents cognitive deficits by relieving inflammation and intestinal microbiota imbalance on aluminum trichloride-injured zebrafish · 2022
  Not checked
• HobPre: accurate prediction of human oral bioavailability for small molecules · 2022
  Not checked
• Ameliorative Role of Nutraceutical Quercetin and its Derivatives Against Cognitive Impairment Process Induced by Lead Exposure in Drosophila melanogaster(Fruit Fly) · 2021
  Not checked
• Gliptins vs. Milk-derived Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibiting Biopeptides: Physicochemical Characterization and Pharmacokinetic Profiling · 2021
  Not checked
• ADMETlab 2.0: an integrated online platform for accurate and comprehensive predictions of ADMET properties · 2021
  No notice
• Computational Approaches in Preclinical Studies on Drug Discovery and Development · 2020
  No notice
• In silico Strategies to Support Fragment-to-Lead Optimization in Drug Discovery · 2020
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.