Skip to content
naulon
Get started

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 20, 2026.

Gastric cancer-derived exosomal miR-519a-3p promotes liver metastasis by inducing intrahepatic M2-like macrophage-mediated angiogenesis

Shengkui Qiu, Li Xie, Chen Lu and 12 more

Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research · 2022 · CC BY

doi:10.1186/s13046-022-02499-8

Abstract

Background. Liver metastasis (LM) is a major obstacle to the prognosis of gastric cancer (GC) patients, but the molecular mechanism underlying gastric cancer liver metastasis (GC-LM) remains unknown. Exosomes have been identified as an important mediator of communication between tumor cells and the microenvironment. Therefore, we sought to investigate the effects of primary GC cells on the liver microenvironment and the role of exosomal microRNAs (exo-miRNA) in GC-LM.

Methods. Sequential differential centrifugation, transmission electron microscopy and NanoSight analysis were used to extract and characterize exosomes. MicroRNA sequencing in GC-derived exosomes and mRNA sequencing in PMA-treated THP-1 cells were used to identify differentially expressed miRNAs in exosomes and the functional targets of exosomal miR-519a-3p (exo-miR-519a-3p) in macrophages, respectively. Tracing and internalization of exosomes and transfer of exo-miR-519a-3p were observed by immunofluorescence. Tubule formation assays, aortic ring assays, and exosome-educated GC-LM model were used to investigate the roles of GC-derived exosomes and exo-miR-519a-3p in angiogenesis and GC-LM. Luciferase reporter assay, qRT-PCR, Western blot, ELISA, flow cytometry and immunofluorescence were used to investigate the regulatory mechanism of exo-miR-519a-3p at GC-LM.

Results. The expression level of miR-519a-3p in serum exosomes was significantly higher in GC-LM patients than in patients without LM, and high expression of exo-miR-519a-3p indicates a worse prognosis. GC-derived exosomes are mainly accumulated in the liver and internalized by intrahepatic macrophages. Mechanistically, exo-miR-519a-3p activates the MAPK/ERK pathway by targeting DUSP2, thereby causing M2-like polarization of macrophages. M2-like polarized macrophages accelerate GC-LM by inducing angiogenesis and promoting intrahepatic premetastatic niche formation.

Conclusions. Our results indicate that exo-miR-519a-3p plays a critical role in mediating crosstalk between primary GC cells and intrahepatic macrophages and is a potential therapeutic target for GC-LM.

Supplementary Information. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13046-022-02499-8.

References 63

  1. 1.

    Guan X. Cancer metastases: challenges and opportunities. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2015;5:402-418.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.apsb.2015.07.005

  2. 2.

    Romano F, Garancini M, Uggeri F, Degrate L, Nespoli L, Gianotti L, et al. Surgical treatment of liver metastases of gastric cancer: state of the art. World J Surg Oncol. 2012;10:157.

    Not in our library10.1186/1477-7819-10-157

  3. 3.

    Ajani JA, D’Amico TA, Almhanna K, Bentrem DJ, Chao J, Das P, et al. Gastric cancer, version 3.2016, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016;14:1286-312.

    Not in our library10.6004/jnccn.2016.0137

  4. 4.

    Xu R, Rai A, Chen M, Suwakulsiri W, Greening DW, Simpson RJ. Extracellular vesicles in cancer — implications for future improvements in cancer care. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15:617-638.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41571-018-0036-9

  5. 5.

    Zhang ZG, Buller B, Chopp M. Exosomes — beyond stem cells for restorative therapy in stroke and neurological injury. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019;15:193-203.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41582-018-0126-4

  6. 6.
    Cancer-derived exosomal miR-25-3p promotes pre-metastatic niche formation by inducing vascular permeability and angiogenesis · 2018
    No notice
  7. 7.
    Tumor-derived exosomal miR-1247-3p induces cancer-associated fibroblast activation to foster lung metastasis of liver cancer · 2018
    No notice
  8. 8.

    Song K-H, Park MS, Nandu TS, Gadad S, Kim S-C, Kim M-Y. GALNT14 promotes lung-specific breast cancer metastasis by modulating self-renewal and interaction with the lung microenvironment. Nat Commun. 2016;7:13796.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms13796

  9. 9.

    Huang X, Yuan T, Liang M, Du M, Xia S, Dittmar R, et al. Exosomal miR-1290 and miR-375 as prognostic markers in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2015;67:33-41.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.035

  10. 10.

    Ko J, Bhagwat N, Yee SS, Ortiz N, Sahmoud A, Black T, et al. Combining machine learning and Nanofluidic technology to diagnose pancreatic cancer using exosomes. ACS Nano. 2017;11:11182-11193.

    Not in our library10.1021/acsnano.7b05503

  11. 11.

    Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116:281-297.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00045-5

  12. 12.

    Liu Y, Gu Y, Han Y, Zhang Q, Jiang Z, Zhang X, et al. Tumor Exosomal RNAs promote lung pre-metastatic niche formation by activating alveolar epithelial TLR3 to recruit neutrophils. Cancer Cell. 2016;30:243-256.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ccell.2016.06.021

  13. 13.

    Zhang L, Zhang S, Yao J, Lowery FJ, Zhang Q, Huang W-C, et al. Microenvironment-induced PTEN loss by exosomal microRNA primes brain metastasis outgrowth. Nature. 2015;527:100-104.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature15376

  14. 14.

    Costa-Silva B, Aiello NM, Ocean AJ, Singh S, Zhang H, Thakur BK, et al. Pancreatic cancer exosomes initiate pre-metastatic niche formation in the liver. Nat Cell Biol. 2015;17:816-826.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncb3169

  15. 15.

    Peinado H, Alečković M, Lavotshkin S, Matei I, Costa-Silva B, Moreno-Bueno G, et al. Melanoma exosomes educate bone marrow progenitor cells toward a pro-metastatic phenotype through MET. Nat Med. 2012;18:883-891.

    Not in our library10.1038/nm.2753

  16. 16.

    Peinado H, Zhang H, Matei IR, Costa-Silva B, Hoshino A, Rodrigues G, et al. Pre-metastatic niches: organ-specific homes for metastases. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17:302-317.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrc.2017.6

  17. 17.

    Liu Y, Cao X. Characteristics and Significance of the Pre-metastatic Niche. Cancer Cell Elsevier. 2016;30:668-681.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ccell.2016.09.011

  18. 18.

    Keirsse J, Van Damme H, Geeraerts X, Beschin A, Raes G, Van Ginderachter JA. The role of hepatic macrophages in liver metastasis. Cell Immunol. 2018;330:202-215.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cellimm.2018.03.010

  19. 19.

    Cassetta L, Pollard JW. Targeting macrophages: therapeutic approaches in cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2018;17:887-904.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrd.2018.169

  20. 20.

    Lewis CE, Pollard JW. Distinct Role of Macrophages in Different Tumor Microenvironments. Cancer Res Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2006;66:605-12.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-4005

  21. 21.

    Li B, Xia Y, Lv J, Wang W, Xuan Z, Chen C, et al. miR-151a-3p-rich small extracellular vesicles derived from gastric cancer accelerate liver metastasis via initiating a hepatic stemness-enhancing niche. Oncogene. 2021;40:6180-6194.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41388-021-02011-0

  22. 22.

    Xu Z, Chen Y, Ma L, Chen Y, Liu J, Guo Y, et al. Role of exosomal non-coding RNAs from tumor cells and tumor-associated macrophages in the tumor microenvironment. Mol Ther. 2022;S1525–0016(22):00233–7.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ymthe.2022.01.046

  23. 23.
    Macrophage Polarity and Disease Control · 2021
    No notice
  24. 24.
    Macrophage Polarization and Its Role in Liver Disease · 2021
    No notice
  25. 25.

    Sica A, Larghi P, Mancino A, Rubino L, Porta C, Totaro MG, et al. Macrophage polarization in tumour progression. Semin Cancer Biol. 2008;18:349-355.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.semcancer.2008.03.004

  26. 26.

    Pardali E, Goumans M-J, ten Dijke P. Signaling by members of the TGF-beta family in vascular morphogenesis and disease. Trends Cell Biol. 2010;20:556-567.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tcb.2010.06.006

  27. 27.

    Carmeliet P, Jain RK. Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications of angiogenesis. Nature. 2011;473:298-307.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature10144

  28. 28.

    Haigh JJ, Morelli PI, Gerhardt H, Haigh K, Tsien J, Damert A, et al. Cortical and retinal defects caused by dosage-dependent reductions in VEGF-A paracrine signaling. Dev Biol. 2003;262:225-241.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0012-1606(03)00356-7

  29. 29.

    Holderfield MT, Hughes CCW. Crosstalk between vascular endothelial growth factor, notch, and transforming growth factor-beta in vascular morphogenesis. Circ Res. 2008;102:637-652.

    Not in our library10.1161/circresaha.107.167171

  30. 30.

    Leung DW, Cachianes G, Kuang WJ, Goeddel DV, Ferrara N. Vascular endothelial growth factor is a secreted angiogenic mitogen. Science. 1989;246:1306-1309.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.2479986

  31. 31.

    Shao Y, Chen T, Zheng X, Yang S, Xu K, Chen X, et al. Colorectal cancer-derived small extracellular vesicles establish an inflammatory premetastatic niche in liver metastasis. Carcinogenesis. 2018;39:1368-1379.

    Not in our library10.1093/carcin/bgy115

  32. 32.
    Liquid biopsy: Exosomal microRNAs as novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in cancer · 2022
    No notice
  33. 33.
    Extracellular Vesicles – Biomarkers and Effectors of the Cellular Interactome in Cancer · 2013
    No notice
  34. 34.

    Owens DM, Keyse SM. Differential regulation of MAP kinase signalling by dual-specificity protein phosphatases. Oncogene. 2007;26:3203-3213.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.onc.1210412

  35. 35.

    Zhou D, Huang C, Lin Z, Zhan S, Kong L, Fang C, et al. Macrophage polarization and function with emphasis on the evolving roles of coordinated regulation of cellular signaling pathways. Cell Signal. 2014;26:192-197.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cellsig.2013.11.004

  36. 36.

    Baumann D, Drebant J, Hägele T, Burger L, Serger C, Lauenstein C, et al. p38 MAPK signaling in M1 macrophages results in selective elimination of M2 macrophages by MEK inhibition. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9:e002319.

    Not in our library10.1136/jitc-2020-002319

  37. 37.

    Wei W, Zhang Y, Song Q, Zhang Q, Zhang X, Liu X, et al. Transmissible ER stress between macrophages and tumor cells configures tumor microenvironment. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2022;79:403.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00018-022-04413-z

  38. 38.

    Ramesh A, Brouillard A, Kumar S, Nandi D, Kulkarni A. Dual inhibition of CSF1R and MAPK pathways using supramolecular nanoparticles enhances macrophage immunotherapy. Biomaterials. 2020;227:119559.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119559

  39. 39.

    Zhang Y, Liu D, Chen X, Li J, Li L, Bian Z, et al. Secreted monocytic miR-150 enhances targeted endothelial cell migration. Mol Cell. 2010;39:133-144.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2010.06.010

  40. 40.

    Yin Y, Cai X, Chen X, Liang H, Zhang Y, Li J, et al. Tumor-secreted miR-214 induces regulatory T cells: a major link between immune evasion and tumor growth. Cell Res. 2014;24:1164-1180.

    Not in our library10.1038/cr.2014.121

All 63 references

Cited by papers we hold 3

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.