Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 22, 2026.

Male partner influence on family planning and contraceptive use: perspectives from community members and healthcare providers in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Yolandie Kriel, Cecilia Milford, Joanna Cordero and 4 more

Reproductive Health · 2019 · CC BY

doi:10.1186/s12978-019-0749-y

Abstract

Background. South Africa faces numerous reproductive challenges that include high rates of unplanned and adolescent pregnancies. The uptake and utilization of family planning services and modern contraception methods depend on numerous factors. The male partner plays a key role in reproductive health but data on this topic are outdated or have a predominant HIV prevention focus. The purpose of this paper is to explore the influence of male partners on family planning and contraceptive (FP/C) uptake and use within the contemporary South African setting, and to identify further areas of exploration.

Methods. This qualitative study was conducted in a community and healthcare provision setting in the eThekwini District in KwaZulu-Natal province, South Africa. Data were collected from twelve community-based focus group discussions (n = 103), two healthcare providers focus group discussions (n = 16), and eight key informant individual in-depth interviews. Following a constructionist paradigm and using the health utilization behaviour model, data were analysed using thematic analysis, allowing a robust and holistic exploration of the data.

Results. The data from this study revealed the complex and evolving role that male partners play in FP/C uptake and use within this setting. Key themes from the data elucidated the dual nature of male involvement in FP/C use. Culturally influenced gender dynamics and adequate understanding of FP/C information were highlighted as key factors that influenced male attitudes and perceptions about contraceptive use, whether positively or negatively. Male opposition was attributed to limited understanding; misunderstandings about side-effects; male dominance in relationships; and physical abuse. These factors contributed to covert or discontinued use by female partners. Pathways identified through which male partners positively influenced FP/C uptake and access include: social support, adequate information, and shared responsibility.

Conclusions. Understanding the role that male partners play in FP/C uptake and use is important in preventing unintended pregnancies and improving family planning policy and service delivery programmes. By identifying the barriers that male partners present, appropriate strategies can be implemented. Equally important is identifying how male partners facilitate and promote adherence and use, and how these positive strategies can be incorporated into policy to improve the uptake and use of FP/C.

References 63

  1. 1.

    Adding it up: the costs and benefits of investing in sexual and reporductive health 2014 [http://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/Adding%20It%20Up-Final-11.18.14.pdf].

    Not in our library

  2. 2.

    Cleland J, Harbison S, Shah IH. Unmet need for contraception: issues and challenges. Stud Fam Plan. 2014;45(2):105-122.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00380.x

  3. 3.

    SADHS: South African Demographic and Health Survey 2016: Key Indicator Report. In.www.statssa.gov.za: Statistics South Africa; 2016.

    Not in our library

  4. 4.

    District Health Barometer 2016/2017. In. Edited by Massyn N, Padarath A, Peer N, Day C. Durban: Health Systems Trust; 2017.

    Not in our library

  5. 5.

    SADHS, Africa MRCS, DHS M. South African demographic and health survey 1998 - full report. In. 1998.

    Not in our library

  6. 6.

    Maharaj P. Stalling contraception? Perspectives and experiences of sexually active women and men. Agenda. 2012;26(2):100-110.

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    van Rensburg H, Ataguba J, Benatar S, Doherty J, Englebrecht M, Heunis J, Janse van Rensburg A, Kigozi N, McIntyre D, Pelser A et al: Health and health Care in South Africa, second edn. Pretoria: Van Schaik; 2012.

    Not in our library

  8. 8.
  9. 9.

    Adeniyi OV, Ajayi AI, Moyaki MG, Goon DT, Avramovic G, Lambert J. High rate of unplanned pregnancy in the context of integrated family planning and HIV care services in South Africa. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:1-1.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12913-018-2942-z

  10. 10.

    Haffejee F, O’Connor L, Govender N, Reddy P, Sibiya MN, Ghuman S, Ngxongo T, Borg D. Factors associated with unintended pregnancy among women attending a public health facility in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. S Afr Fam Pract. 2017:1–5.

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    Morrell R, Jewkes R, Lindegger G. Hegemonic masculinity/masculinities in South Africa: culture, power, and gender politics. Men Masculinities. 2012;15(1):11-30.

    Not in our library

  12. 12.
  13. 13.

    Iyun Victoria, Brittain Kirsty, Phillips Tamsin K, le Roux Stanzi, McIntyre James A, Zerbe Allison, Petro Greg, Abrams Elaine J, Myer Landon. Prevalence and determinants of unplanned pregnancy in HIV-positive and HIV-negative pregnant women in Cape Town, South Africa: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(4):e019979.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019979

  14. 14.

    Dudgeon MR, Inhorn MC. Men's influences on women's reproductive health: medical anthropological perspectives. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59(7):1379-1395.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.11.035

  15. 15.

    Maharaj P. Male attitudes to family planning in the era of HIV/AIDS: evidence from KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. J South Afr Stud. 2001;27(2):245-257.

    Not in our library

  16. 16.

    Varga C. A. The Forgotten Fifty Per Cent: A Review of Sexual and Reproductive Health Research and Programs Focused on Boys and Young Men in Sub-Saharan Africa. African Journal of Reproductive Health. 2001;5(3):175.

    Not in our library

  17. 17.

    Helzner JF. Men's involvement in family planning. Reproductive health matters. 1996;4(7):146-154.

    Not in our library

  18. 18.

    Sciortino R. The challenge of addressing gender in reproductive health programmes examples from Indonesia. Reproductive health matters. 1998;6(11):33-44.

    Not in our library

  19. 19.

    Cook RJ. International human rights and women's reproductive health. Studies in family planning. 1993;73-86.

    Not in our library

  20. 20.

    Ndinda C, Ndhlovu T, Khalema NE. Conceptions of contraceptive use in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: lessons for programming. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(4):353.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijerph14040353

  21. 21.

    Raju S. Negotiating with patriarchy: addressing men in reproductive and child health. Econ Polit Wkly. 2001:4589–92.

    Not in our library

  22. 22.

    Preston-Whyte E. Culture, context and behaviour: anthropological perspectives on fertility in southern Africa. Southern African Journal of Demography. 1988;2(1):13-23.

    Not in our library

  23. 23.

    Geertz C. The interpretation of cultures. 1973.

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    Haider TL, Sharma M. Barriers to family planning and contraception uptake in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. International Quarterly of Community Health Education. 2013;33(4):403-413.

    Not in our library10.2190/iq.33.4.g

  25. 25.

    Bankole A, Singh S. Couples' fertility and contraceptive decision-making in developing countries: hearing the Man's voice. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 1998;24(1):15-24.

    Not in our library

  26. 26.
  27. 27.

    Ajah LO, Dim CC, Ezegwui HU, Iyoke CA, Ugwu EO. Male partner involvement in female contraceptive choices in Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;35(6):628-631.

    Not in our library10.3109/01443615.2014.991287

  28. 28.
  29. 29.

    Ochako R, Temmerman M, Mbondo M, Askew I. Determinants of modern contraceptive use among sexually active men in Kenya. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):56.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12978-017-0316-3

  30. 30.

    Fennell JL. MEN BRING CONDOMS, WOMEN TAKE PILLS: Men's and Women's roles in contraceptive decision making. Gend Soc. 2011;25(4):496-521.

    Not in our library

  31. 31.

    Sternberg P, Hubley J. Evaluating men's involvement as a strategy in sexual and reproductive health promotion. Health Promot Int. 2004;19(3):389-396.

    Not in our library10.1093/heapro/dah312

  32. 32.

    Okigbo CC, Speizer IS, Corroon M, Gueye A. Exposure to family planning messages and modern contraceptive use among men in urban Kenya, Nigeria, and Senegal: a cross-sectional study. Reprod Health. 2015;12(1):63.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12978-015-0056-1

  33. 33.

    DoH S. National Contraceptive and fertility planning policy and service delivery guidelines. 2012.

    Not in our library

  34. 34.
  35. 35.

    Statistics by place [http://www.statssa.gov.za/?page_id=1021&id=ethekwini-municipality].

    Not in our library

  36. 36.

    Pauli J, van Dijk R. Marriage as an end or the end of marriage? Change and continuity in southern African marriages. Anthropology Southern Africa. 2016;39(4):257-266.

    Not in our library

  37. 37.

    Posel D, Rudwick S, Casale D. Is marriage a dying institution in South Africa? Exploring changes in marriage in the context of ilobolo payments. Agenda. 2011;25(1):102-111.

    Not in our library

  38. 38.

    AIDSInfo [http://www.unaids.org/en/dataanalysis/datatools/aidsinfo/].

    Not in our library

  39. 39.

    Burr V. Social constructionism. Third edn. East Sussex. 2015.

    Not in our library

  40. 40.

    Lesch E, Kruger L-M. Mothers, daughters and sexual agency in one low-income south African community. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(5):1072-1082.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.01.005

All 63 references

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.