Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 16, 2026.

Inflammation after spinal cord injury: a review of the critical timeline of signaling cues and cellular infiltration

Daniel J. Hellenbrand, Charles M. Quinn, Zachariah J. Piper and 3 more

Journal of Neuroinflammation · 2021 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.1186/s12974-021-02337-2

Abstract

Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating neurological condition that results in a loss of motor and sensory function. Although extensive research to develop treatments for SCI has been performed, to date, none of these treatments have produced a meaningful amount of functional recovery after injury. The primary injury is caused by the initial trauma to the spinal cord and results in ischemia, oxidative damage, edema, and glutamate excitotoxicity. This process initiates a secondary injury cascade, which starts just a few hours post-injury and may continue for more than 6 months, leading to additional cell death and spinal cord damage. Inflammation after SCI is complex and driven by a diverse set of cells and signaling molecules. In this review, we utilize an extensive literature survey to develop the timeline of local immune cell and cytokine behavior after SCI in rodent models. We discuss the precise functional roles of several key cytokines and their effects on a variety of cell types involved in the secondary injury cascade. Furthermore, variations in the inflammatory response between rats and mice are highlighted. Since current SCI treatment options do not successfully initiate functional recovery or axonal regeneration, identifying the specific mechanisms attributed to secondary injury is critical. With a more thorough understanding of the complex SCI pathophysiology, effective therapeutic targets with realistic timelines for intervention may be established to successfully attenuate secondary damage.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 16, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Background

Every year in North America approximately 12,500 people are paralyzed due to a spinal cord injury (SCI). After SCI, there is a primary injury caused by the initial trauma, which compromises neurons and glia and initiates a secondary injury cascade that leads to additional cell death and spinal cord damage over the subsequent weeks. This overwhelming inflammatory response in the early phase of injury, combined with the disrupted blood–spinal cord barrier, progressively adds to spinal cord swelling and damage. The end result in the chronic stage is a dense glial scar leaving patients with a loss of both sensory and motor function below the level of injury. The paralysis often leaves patients unable to care for themselves, exemplifying the need to develop a treatment to help retain or restore function after SCI.

Inflammation after SCI is complex and orchestrated by many cell types and numerous inflammatory cytokines including tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and interleukin-6 (IL-6), among several others. Although there are several positive effects from inflammation after SCI, the extensive infiltration of immune cells is a principal contributor to neural degeneration. These immune cells are guided to the lesion site from the periphery via cytokines and chemokines released by microglia, astrocytes, and peripherally derived macrophages (PDMs) within the lesion. Overall, there is a general consensus among scientists regarding the inflammation process after SCI. However, there are discrepancies in the inflammation timeline and the extent of cytokine regulation after injury in the literature. Delineation of precise functional roles of cytokines and their timeline of upregulation/downregulation may provide insight into how to regulate acute inflammatory reactions after SCI.

The objective of this review is to conduct an extensive survey of the literature to develop a precise timeline of immune cell and cytokine regulation in the spinal cord after SCI. Here we discuss the injury timeline with a focus on cellular behavior, cytokine activity, and the corresponding changes that occur to the injury site. The majority of studies on inflammation after SCI utilize rodent models. After SCI, mice develop fibrous connective tissue domains throughout the injury site, which differs from rats and other mammals that develop necrotic lesion cavities encased by reactive astrocytes. Thus, we will also discuss differences in cytokine profiles observed between rats and mice.

Literature review

An electronic search of the Medline database for literature describing animal models of SCI from 1946 to 2021 was performed using the following conditions: SCI (MeSH Terms) AND inflammation (MeSH Terms) OR secondary injury (MeSH Terms). For the timeline of local cytokine regulation, the results were further screened and only included articles utilizing rats or mice with uninjured controls or sham controls for comparison of local upregulation or downregulation of cytokines within their experiments (Fig. 1).

Inflammation after SCI

Neuroinflammation is the activation of the central nervous system’s (CNS) innate immune system in response to an inflammatory challenge, which is characterized by a host of cellular and molecular changes within the CNS. This inflammation is mediated by the upregulation of cytokines/chemokines (Table 1), which are produced by resident microglia, astrocytes, peripherally derived immune cells, and endothelial cells. Three inflammatory cytokines, TNF, IL-1, and IL-6 have been studied extensively and are upregulated within hours after the initial injury (Table 1, Figs. 2 and 3). This production in inflammatory cytokines and chemokines results in extensive infiltration of immune cells including microglia, PDMs, and neutrophils, which continue the production of additional inflammatory mediators. Although the degree of neuroinflammation depends on the extent of the primary stimulus or insult, the primary insult often results in an overreaction of the inflammatory process after CNS injury leading to additional cell death.

Although the present review focuses primarily on the localized inflammatory response to SCI in rodent models, it is important to note that there is systemic inflammation occurring after SCI. Due to the inability to sample the spinal cord parenchyma of human patients after injury, many are investigating whether human blood serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytokine samples may be used as biomarkers to provide insight into injury severity, thereby influencing treatment decisions. Kwon et al. found that at 24 h after injury, cytokines IL-6, IL-8, and MCP-1, along with structural proteins, such as GFAP, tau, and S100β, were present in significantly higher concentrations than corresponding serum samples in human patients. In the CSF of a rat SCI model 6 h after injury, TNFɑ, IL-2, IL-10, IL-17ɑ, and IFN-γ concentrations were significantly increased, and serum concentrations of TNFɑ, IL-1β, and IL-6 have been shown to remain elevated in rat throughout the first week following SCI. This is similar to the local upregulation of these cytokines that occurs within the injured spinal tissue (Figs. 2 and 3). Interestingly, the upregulation of proinflammatory cytokines TNFɑ and IL-1β persists in the serum 28 days after SCI in a rat, while IL-4 is downregulated at 28 days and there is no significant change in IL-10 at this timepoint. However, Ogurcov et al. found a decreased concentration of both IL-1β and IL-10 in serum of human patients 14 days after SCI. Furthermore, they report the elevation of IL-4 and IFN-γ levels at this timepoint. In general, analysis of cytokine in CSF and serum display similar patterns as the local response in injured spinal tissue (Figs. 2 and 3).

Locally, the primary trauma after SCI, injures the glial cells in the spinal cord and damages blood vessels causing ischemia. The death of nearby glial cells and the ischemia are the initial structural and cellular damage that triggers the secondary injury cascade. The primary cytokines that have been studied extensively within this cascade are listed in Table 1 in terms of the cells that secrete them, receptors they bind to, and their effects after SCI. Below, we discuss the timeline of this cascade in terms of cytokine/chemokine regulation and cellular infiltration.

Within the first hour post-injury

Ischemia, oxidative damage, edema and glutamate excitotoxicity all start minutes after SCI and contribute to substantial secondary damage. Cell permeabilization, pro-apoptotic signaling and ischemic injury due to the destruction of the microvascular supply cause additional cell dysfunction and death just minutes after SCI. There is also intracellular calcium dysregulation in both neurons and glia, resulting in the activation of calpains, which can cause mitochondrial dysfunction and cell death. Microglia, the resident immune cells, quickly respond to the injury and their early response is protective. However, microglia rapidly change to proinflammatory cells and release cytokines setting off a cascade of events that lead to an infiltration of peripheral immune cells. The activated microglia retract their cytoplasmic processes and become indistinguishable in terms of morphology from the PDMs, which enter from damaged blood vessels. Within 30-min post-injury, microglia and astrocytes begin expressing inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and TNFɑ mRNA. Pineau and Lacroix showed that TNFɑ mRNA positive cells, including microglia, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and neurons, peaked just 1 h after mice sustained a spinal cord contusion.

Cytokine signaling from 1-h up to 3-h post-injury

Using colocalization studies for mRNA after SCI in mice, Pineau and Lacroix showed that during the first few hours, proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β, TNFɑ, and IL-6 were being synthesized by microglia/macrophages, astrocytes, and neurons. Using various techniques to measure TNFα in these early hours after SCI, five other studies all observed significant increases in TNFɑ levels (Fig. 2B). There were also five studies that measured IL-1β using various techniques in these early hours after SCI and three of these studies observed a significant increase in IL-1β (Fig. 2A). However, two experiments utilizing enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) to measure IL-1β did not observe an increase at this early timepoint, which may be the result of the discrepancy in time needed to synthesize the full protein and the time needed for it to be proteolytically processed to its active form by caspase 1. There were very similar trends in the early IL-6 upregulation to that of IL-1β (Fig. 2C). The proinflammatory cytokines TNFɑ, IL-1β, and IL-6 are presumed to be the predominant players early in the injury timeline. Thus, these three cytokine levels were the most frequently analyzed in these early hours after SCI (Fig. 2).

Cytokine signaling and cellular reactions from 3-h up to 6-h post-injury

At this early stage of inflammation, the majority of the literature agrees that the primary inflammatory cytokines, TNFɑ, IL-1β, and IL-6, are all significantly upregulated (Fig. 2). Pineau and Lacroix observed that at 3 h after SCI in mice, the number of cells expressing the TNFɑ mRNA transcript at the lesion epicenter was significantly upregulated compared to uninjured controls. However, the number of cells had decreased by 66% compared with the 1-h timepoint. Two research groups did not observe a significant increase in TNFɑ protein expression at 4 h after a rat contusion, which suggests a return to baseline after a rapid onset of TNFɑ. Although the upregulation of IL-1β and IL-6 lags slightly behind that of TNFɑ and IL-1ɑ, most of the literature agrees that IL-1β and IL-6 are significantly upregulated within this 3–6-h time window. The expression of growth-related oncogene (GRO), the rat analogue of IL-8, is also significantly upregulated at 4-h post-injury. The cytokine regulated upon activation, normal T-cell expressed and presumably secreted (RANTES), which induces migration and recruitment of T-cells, eosinophils, basophils, and leukocytes, has been shown to be significantly upregulated 4-h post-injury, although it is not as prevalent in the literature. This early upregulation in inflammatory cytokines is produced predominantly by microglia and astrocytes and leads to the recruitment of peripheral immune cells.

Although anti-inflammatory cytokines are capable of reducing proinflammatory cytokines, they are generally present at low levels or absent after SCI. IL-4 and IL-13 are related anti-inflammatory cytokines that have been shown to induce alternative macrophage activation, and IL-10 is an anti-inflammatory cytokine that has been shown to downregulate pro-inflammatory cytokines. Four hours after SCI in mice, IL-10 was significantly upregulated, yet, at this same time post-injury in rats IL-10 was not upregulated. In contrast, IL-13 was upregulated in rats but not in mice. A number of researchers have shown that there are differences in the adaptive immune system between mice and rats as well as between different strains of mice, which may explain the discrepancies in anti-inflammatory cytokine regulation.

The majority of the literature shows that in this 3–6-h post-injury period there is an upregulation in inflammatory cytokines, which are produced largely by local microglia and astrocytes, leading to further recruitment and proliferation of microglia and astrocytes and the recruitment of peripheral immune cells (Fig. 4). Neutrophils begin to appear 4–6 h after SCI and produce oxidative and proteolytic enzymes to sterilize and prepare the area for repair. However, overwhelming numbers of neutrophils result in tissue damage.

Lipid peroxidation, the process by which free oxygen radicals react with the polyunsaturated fatty acids of membrane lipids, leads to 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) formation and disrupts cell membrane fluidity, metabolic processes, and ion transport systems. 4-HNE itself is neurotoxic and can bind to cellular proteins and damage their structural and functional integrity. Xiong et al. also observed that byproduct formation such as 4-HNE increases as soon as 3-h post-injury and remains high for 2 weeks.

Cytokine signaling and cellular reactions from 6-h up to 12-h post-injury

Almost all of the literature shows that the upregulation in proinflammatory cytokines TNFɑ, IL-1β, and IL-6 continues through the 6–12-h timeframe post-injury (Figs. 2 and 3). There is also a significant increase in monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1), macrophage inflammatory protein 1-alpha (MIP-1ɑ), RANTES, GRO, and C–X–C motif chemokine ligand 1 (CXCL1). The majority of the literature shows that IL-4, IL-10, and IL-13 remain at baseline levels (Fig. 2G–I). Ultimately, this inflammatory environment continues the recruitment and proliferation of microglia and astrocytes and the recruitment of peripheral immune cells. Apoptosis from this exacerbated inflammation process after SCI peaks near 8 h in neurons and around 24 h in glial cells.

During these early hours after injury, polymorphonuclear leukocytes are the predominant infiltrating cells, and over-activation of these cells continue to cause tissue destruction through the release of significant amounts of neurotoxins including reactive oxygen species (ROS), reactive nitrogen species (RNS), chemokines, and enzymes. Popovich et al. also showed that lymphocytes begin to accumulate around blood vessels in gray matter as early as 6 h after SCI in rats.

After SCI, activated microglia and PDMs have the capability to take on different functional phenotypes. Resolution-phase macrophages are enriched with major histocompatibility complex II (MHC) expression, express anti-inflammatory cytokines TGF-β1 and IL-10, and have elevated expression of key enzymes involved in synthesizing pro-resolving mediators that actively turn off inflammation. In vivo, macrophages in general are not fully inflammatory (M1) or anti-inflammatory (M2), but rather exist on a continuum in which their roles and phenotype are dictated by the extracellular environment. As early as 6 h after SCI in mice, Kigerl et al. observed antigen-presenting MHCII cells in the dorsal roots, meninges, and within a subset of perivascular spaces.

Cytokine signaling and cellular reactions from 12-h up to 24-h post-injury

The majority of the literature continues to show elevated levels of TNFɑ, IL-1β, and IL-6 (Fig. 2A–C). There are also increased levels of GRO, IL-7, and chemokines MCP-1, and MIP-1α. IL-4, IL-10, IL-13 and TGF-β1 all remain at baseline levels (Fig. 1G–I). Although IL-4 was not upregulated, Francos-Quijorna et al. observed an upregulation of IL-4Rɑ on microglia and macrophages.

Cells expressing IL-1β and cells expressing IL-6 both peaked at 12-h post-injury. Infiltrating leukocytes also produce IL-1β, TNFɑ, IL-6, and LIF 12-h post-injury. The infiltrating neutrophils, which phagocyte and clear debris, secrete proteases, elastase, myeloperoxidase, and release reactive oxygen species, peak at 24-h post-injury. The byproduct formation of 4-HNE also peaked at 24 h and remained elevated for 2 weeks.

Cytokine signaling and cellular reactions from 24 h up to 7-day post-injury

Pineau and Lacroix’s colocalization studies showed that TNFɑ mRNA levels 2-day post-injury had returned to the levels detected in mice that had received laminectomy only. The number of IL-1β positive cells continued to decrease at 2-, 4- and 7-day post-injury, and from 24 h up to 4 days, the average number of cells expressing the IL-6 transcript progressively decreased to become almost nonexistent at 7 days. Despite the decrease observed in the number of cells expressing mRNA, several researchers observed levels that were significantly higher than their uninjured controls at 1 day (TNFɑ 77.8%, IL-1β 79.2%, IL-6 88.2%), 3 days (TNFɑ 80.1%, IL-1β 68.8%, IL-6 73.7%), and 7 days (TNFɑ 64.3%, IL-1β 41.7%, IL-6 23.1%) after SCI (Figs. 1 and 2). These trends were similar in the literature for both rats and mice after SCI. GRO was also significantly elevated on day 1, day 3, and day 7.

There is significant upregulation of chemokines throughout this first week recruiting monocytes, T-cells, and dendritic cells to the injury site. MIP-1α is upregulated on day 1, day 3, and day 7. When tested, CXCL1 expression is significantly increased on day 3 and day 7 and RANTES is significantly upregulated on day 3. Previous studies have shown that MCP-1 mRNA is increased in mice 1-day post-injury and returns to baseline before 7-day post-injury. However, here there are some conflicting results 7-day post-injury. Although studies looking at mRNA MCP-1α levels 7-day post-injury observed a significant increase in mice and rats, a study using multiplex assay 7-day post-injury in rats observed a significant decrease in MCP-1α levels (Fig. 2F). MIF and COX2 were inducibly expressed after SCI in rats and peak levels were observed on day 4.

Some cytokines displayed contrasting behaviors between rat and mouse models during the 24-h to 7-day period. In mice, IFN-γ levels were significantly increased 1 day, 3 days, and 7 days after injury, but IFN-γ levels in rats were significantly decreased at 3 days and 7 days following SCI (Fig. 2E). Levels of IL-2 and IL-5 were significantly decreased in rats on day 3 and day 7 post-injury, where in mice there was no change in IL-2 levels, and a significant increase in IL-5 levels 3-day post-injury. IL-13 was also significantly decreased 3 days and 7 days after SCI in rats. However, in mice IL-13 was significantly upregulated 1 day and 3 days after SCI and returned to baseline levels 7-day post-injury (Fig. 1I). Similarly, IL-4 levels were not changed 1 day, 3 days, and 7 days after SCI in rats, but were significantly increased 1 day, 3 days, and 7 days post-injury in mice (Fig. 2H).

The majority of researchers did not observe a significant increase in the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 until 3-day post-injury, which remained elevated until 7 days after SCI (Fig. 2G). There were also several researchers that did not observe changes in IL-10 levels after SCI in both mice and rats. TGF-β1 was significantly increased 3-day and 7-day post-injury.

Using flow cytometry after SCI in rats, Beck et al. demonstrated a time-dependent multiphasic response of cellular inflammation, where the initial phases of cellular inflammation were composed of an early peak of neutrophils 1-day post-injury, followed by a peak of macrophages/microglia 7-day post-injury, and T-cells peaking at 9-day post-injury. This timeline of cellular inflammation in rats with SCI is in agreement with other literature for neutrophils, macrophages, and lymphocytes (Fig. 4). After SCI in mice, neutrophils enter the injured spinal cord within 6 h, but surprisingly do not reach peak numbers until 14-day post-injury and persist for up to 6-week post-injury.

Although axons begin to retract within 2-day post-injury due to the initial trauma, there is a later phase of axon retraction caused by activated macrophages. Bisicchia et al. demonstrated that autophagosomes mediating the initiation of autophagy accumulate in axotomized neurons 1 day after SCI and remain high from 3 to 5 days before falling slightly 7-day post-injury. By 5-day post-injury, activated microglia and PDMs are the predominant inflammatory cells, where phagocytic macrophages are mostly located in areas of necrosis and microglia are at the margins. Lendate et al. showed that microglia are highly dynamic, proliferate extensively the first week after SCI, and form a dense cellular interface at the border of the lesion between reactive astrocytes and infiltrating PDMs (Figs. 4 and 5).

Cytokine signaling and cellular reactions from 7-day up to 14-day post-injury

A second surge was observed in cells expressing TNFɑ and IL-1β 14 days after SCI in mice. This second upregulation of TNFɑ and IL-1β appears to only occur in mice, and not rats (Fig. 2A, B). IL-6 appears to be returning to baseline in both rats and mice by 14-day post-injury (Fig. 1C). Mukhumedshina et al. measured cytokine levels 14 days after SCI in a rat and observed a significant increase in IL-1ɑ, GRO, IL-2, and MIP-1ɑ, and a significant decrease in levels of IL-13, IL-2, IL-5, IL-18, IL-17ɑ, and GM-CSF. IL-1ɑ, IL-4, IL-12, IL-15, RANTES, MIP-1ɑ, MCP-1, and IL-7 are significantly upregulated in mice 14-day post-injury. Beyond day 14 post-injury, there is less data measuring cytokine levels for comparison (Fig. 2).

Although there is proliferation of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells and maturation over the first 2-week post-injury, the end result is still improper remyelination. The response of microglia and PDMs are similar after SCI in mice, rats, and humans, where peak numbers are reached around 7-day post-injury and remain in the injury site for months after injury. In contrast, lymphocyte infiltration is much larger in mice than in rats or humans and peaks at a much later timepoint (14-day post-injury) in mice. Also unique to mice is the infiltration of fibroblast-like cells and the formation of fibrotic tissue matrix. It is suggested that the infiltration of fibroblast-like cells coupled with the larger T-cell infiltration may be responsible for minimizing the development of cysts in mice.

Cytokine signaling and cellular reactions greater than 14-day post-injury

Astrocytes are the predominant subtype of glial cells in the central nervous system that work to maintain neurons as well as the blood spinal cord barrier. Although initially reactive astrocytes migrate to the lesion and aid in the tissue repair process after SCI, they eventually become scar-forming astrocytes and form a glial scar around the lesion. This thick layer of astrocytes surrounding the injury site is characterized by cellular hypertrophy, process extension, and the increased expression of intermediate filaments, such as glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) (Fig. 5).

T-cells are responsible for cell mediated adaptive immunity. Infiltration of T-cells into the injured spinal cord occurs at different times depending on the species and strain of animal. After SCI, T-cell proliferation and cytokine production is further induced by chemokines CXCL10 and RANTES. It is still a controversial topic on whether T-cells cause secondary degeneration or mediate wound repair after SCI. Gonzalez et al. neutralized the chemoattractant CXCL10 and showed that it limited T-cell infiltration and improved tissue preservation and functional recovery, suggesting a negative role for T-cells. After SCI in rats, Wu et al. observed that the dominant T-cells were cytotoxic T-cells (> 90%) with small numbers of regulatory T-cells (< 10%), which again suggests more of a destructive role in regard to tissue recovery. Furthermore, Lui et al. showed that T-cell-derived perforin destroys the blood spinal cord barrier after SCI, resulting in an infiltration of inflammatory cytokines aggravating secondary injury. After SCI in mice, T-cell infiltration peaks around 14 days, decreases for approximately 2 weeks, then increases again over the next few weeks to reach amounts similar to the level at 14-day post-injury, and are still detected for at least 42-day post-injury.

After SCI, pericytes, the main source of the scar connective tissue, enter the lesion area with blood vessel sprouts and form the stromal component of the scar tissue. Pericytes can also be activated by trace amines to locally constrict the vasculature. Thus, pericytes regulate the capillary tone and blood flow in the spinal cord after injury. After SCI in mice, the number of pericyte-derived cells peaked at 2 weeks, which was shown to be more than a 25-fold increase, and then decreased after 4 months before leveling off and remaining for at least 7 months. The final glial scar is compartmentalized with infiltrating immune cells in the center, microglia interacting with pericytes around the edges, and astrocytes surrounding the periphery (Fig. 5).

Conclusions

Over the past few decades, there have been a plethora of researchers studying the complex inflammatory process that follows SCI. This research has helped to define the critical timeline of cell infiltration and cytokine profiles that occur after SCI. The majority of this work has been performed using rodent models. Although there are many similarities in both rats and mice after SCI, differences exist in terms of neutrophil infiltration, lymphocyte infiltration, fibrotic scarring, and an absence of cysts in mice. Overall, these rodent models have served well in defining the cytokines, chemokines, and reactive species involved after SCI.

To date, there is no successful treatment for SCI patients to either help retain function after the injury, or regain function through regeneration after the injury. Many scientists are in agreement that adapting/minimizing the secondary injury that occurs after SCI would be a premiere target for treating SCI patients. Thus, research needs to continue in this area to discover new mechanisms to modulate inflammation after SCI.

References 189

  1. 1.

    Hachem LD, Ahuja CS, Fehlings MG. Assessment and management of acute spinal cord injury: from point of injury to rehabilitation. J Spinal Cord Med. 2017;40:665-675.

    Not in our library10.1080/10790268.2017.1329076

  2. 2.

    Fawcett JW, Asher RA. The glial scar and central nervous system repair. Brain Res Bull. 1999;49:377-391.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0361-9230(99)00072-6

  3. 3.

    Glaser J, Gonzalez R, Perreau VM, Cotman CW, Keirstead HS. Neutralization of the chemokine CXCl10 enhances tissue sparing and angiogenesis following spinal cord injury. J Neurosci Res. 2004;77:701-708.

    Not in our library10.1002/jnr.20204

  4. 4.
  5. 5.

    Garcia E, Mondragon-Caso J, Ibarra A. Spinal cord injury: potential neuroprotective therapy based on neural-derived peptides. Neural Regen Res. 2016;11:1762-1763.

    Not in our library10.4103/1673-5374.194718

  6. 6.

    Mortazavi MM, Verma K, Harmon OA, Griessenauer CJ, Adeeb N, Theodore N, Tubbs RS. The microanatomy of spinal cord injury: a review. Clin Anat. 2015;28:27-36.

    Not in our library10.1002/ca.22432

  7. 7.

    Lee SI, Jeong SR, Kang YM, Han DH, Jin BK, Namgung U, Kim BG. Endogenous expression of interleukin-4 regulates macrophage activation and confines cavity formation after traumatic spinal cord injury. J Neurosci Res. 2010;88:2409-2419.

    Not in our library10.1002/jnr.22411

  8. 8.

    Zhang Z, Krebs CJ, Guth L. Experimental analysis of progressive necrosis after spinal cord trauma in the rat: etiological role of the inflammatory response. Exp Neurol. 1997;143:141-152.

    Not in our library10.1006/exnr.1996.6355

  9. 9.

    Kuhn PL, Wrathall JR. A mouse model of graded contusive spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 1998;15:125-140.

    Not in our library10.1089/neu.1998.15.125

  10. 10.

    Steward O, Schauwecker PE, Guth L, Zhang Z, Fujiki M, Inman D, Wrathall J, Kempermann G, Gage FH, Saatman KE, Raghupathi R, McIntosh T. Genetic approaches to neurotrauma research: opportunities and potential pitfalls of murine models. Exp Neurol. 1999;157:19-42.

    Not in our library10.1006/exnr.1999.7040

  11. 11.

    Jakeman LB, Guan Z, Wei P, Ponnappan R, Dzwonczyk R, Popovich PG, Stokes BT. Traumatic spinal cord injury produced by controlled contusion in mouse. J Neurotrauma. 2000;17:299-319.

    Not in our library10.1089/neu.2000.17.299

  12. 12.

    Kigerl KA, McGaughy VM, Popovich PG. Comparative analysis of lesion development and intraspinal inflammation in four strains of mice following spinal contusion injury. J Comp Neurol. 2006;494:578-594.

    Not in our library10.1002/cne.20827

  13. 13.

    DiSabato DJ, Quan N, Godbout JP. Neuroinflammation: the devil is in the details. J Neurochem. 2016;139(Suppl 2):136-153.

    Not in our library10.1111/jnc.13607

  14. 14.

    Kwon BK, Stammers AM, Belanger LM, Bernardo A, Chan D, Bishop CM, Slobogean GP, Zhang H, Umedaly H, Giffin M, Street J, Boyd MC, Paquette SJ, Fisher CG, Dvorak MF. Cerebrospinal fluid inflammatory cytokines and biomarkers of injury severity in acute human spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27:669-682.

    Not in our library10.1089/neu.2009.1080

  15. 15.

    Ogurcov S, Shulman I, Garanina E, Sabirov D, Baichurina I, Kuznetcov M, Masgutova G, Kostennikov A, Rizvanov A, James V, Mukhamedshina Y. Blood serum cytokines in patients with subacute spinal cord injury: a pilot study to search for biomarkers of injury severity. Brain Sci. 2021;11:322.

    Not in our library10.3390/brainsci11030322

  16. 16.

    Kwon BK, Streijger F, Fallah N, Noonan VK, Belanger LM, Ritchie L, Paquette SJ, Ailon T, Boyd MC, Street J, Fisher CG, Dvorak MF. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers to stratify injury severity and predict outcome in human traumatic spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2017;34:567-580.

    Not in our library10.1089/neu.2016.4435

  17. 17.

    Cox A, Varma A, Barry J, Vertegel A, Banik N. Nanoparticle estrogen in rat spinal cord injury elicits rapid anti-inflammatory effects in plasma, cerebrospinal fluid, and tissue. J Neurotrauma. 2015;32:1413-1421.

    Not in our library10.1089/neu.2014.3730

  18. 18.

    Hasturk A, Atalay B, Calisaneller T, Ozdemir O, Oruckaptan H, Altinors N. Analysis of serum pro-inflammatory cytokine levels after rat spinal cord ischemia/reperfusion injury and correlation with tissue damage. Turk Neurosurg. 2009;19:353-359.

    Not in our library

  19. 19.

    Jiang Y, Gong FL, Zhao GB, Li J. Chrysin suppressed inflammatory responses and the inducible nitric oxide synthase pathway after spinal cord injury in rats. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15:12270-12279.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms150712270

  20. 20.

    Celik H, Karatay M, Erdem Y, Yildirim AE, Sertbas I, Karatay E, Kul H, Guvenc Y, Koksal I, Menekse G, Alagoz F, Kertmen HH, Caydere M. The biochemical, histopathological and clinical comparison of the neuroprotective effects of subcutaneous adalimumab and intravenous methylprednisolone in an experimental compressive spinal cord trauma model. Turk Neurosurg. 2016;26:622-631.

    Not in our library10.5137/1019-5149.jtn.13210-14.1

  21. 21.

    Zeng H, Liu N, Yang YY, Xing HY, Liu XX, Li F, La GY, Huang MJ, Zhou MW. Lentivirus-mediated downregulation of alpha-synuclein reduces neuroinflammation and promotes functional recovery in rats with spinal cord injury. J Neuroinflamm. 2019;16:283.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12974-019-1658-2

  22. 22.

    Blight AR. Delayed demyelination and macrophage invasion: a candidate for secondary cell damage in spinal cord injury. Cent Nerv Syst Trauma. 1985;2:299-315.

    Not in our library10.1089/cns.1985.2.299

  23. 23.

    Tator CH. Review of experimental spinal cord injury with emphasis on the local and systemic circulatory effects. Neurochirurgie. 1991;37:291-302.

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    Young W. Secondary injury mechanisms in acute spinal cord injury. J Emerg Med. 1993;11(Suppl 1):13-22.

    Not in our library

  25. 25.

    Kwon BK, Tetzlaff W, Grauer JN, Beiner J, Vaccaro AR. Pathophysiology and pharmacologic treatment of acute spinal cord injury. Spine J. 2004;4:451-464.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.spinee.2003.07.007

  26. 26.

    LaPlaca MC, Simon CM, Prado GR, Cullen DK. CNS injury biomechanics and experimental models. Prog Brain Res. 2007;161:13-26.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0079-6123(06)61002-9

  27. 27.

    Choo AM, Liu J, Lam CK, Dvorak M, Tetzlaff W, Oxland TR. Contusion, dislocation, and distraction: primary hemorrhage and membrane permeability in distinct mechanisms of spinal cord injury. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;6:255-266.

    Not in our library10.3171/spi.2007.6.3.255

  28. 28.

    Oyinbo CA. Secondary injury mechanisms in traumatic spinal cord injury: a nugget of this multiply cascade. Acta Neurobiol Exp. 2011;71:281-299.

    Not in our library10.55782/ane-2011-1848

  29. 29.

    Schanne FA, Kane AB, Young EE, Farber JL. Calcium dependence of toxic cell death: a final common pathway. Science. 1979;206:700-702.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.386513

  30. 30.

    Davalos D, Grutzendler J, Yang G, Kim JV, Zuo Y, Jung S, Littman DR, Dustin ML, Gan WB. ATP mediates rapid microglial response to local brain injury in vivo. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:752-758.

    Not in our library10.1038/nn1472

  31. 31.

    Hines DJ, Hines RM, Mulligan SJ, Macvicar BA. Microglia processes block the spread of damage in the brain and require functional chloride channels. Glia. 2009;57:1610-1618.

    Not in our library10.1002/glia.20874

  32. 32.

    Popovich PG, Guan Z, McGaughy V, Fisher L, Hickey WF, Basso DM. The neuropathological and behavioral consequences of intraspinal microglial/macrophage activation. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2002;61:623-633.

    Not in our library10.1093/jnen/61.7.623

  33. 33.

    David S, Kroner A. Repertoire of microglial and macrophage responses after spinal cord injury. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12:388-399.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrn3053

  34. 34.

    David S, Lopez-Vales R, Wee YV. Harmful and beneficial effects of inflammation after spinal cord injury: potential therapeutic implications. Handb Clin Neurol. 2012;109:485-502.

    Not in our library10.1016/b978-0-444-52137-8.00030-9

  35. 35.

    Popovich P, McTigue D. Damage control in the nervous system: beware the immune system in spinal cord injury. Nat Med. 2009;15:736-737.

    Not in our library10.1038/nm0709-736

  36. 36.

    Kroner A, Greenhalgh AD, Zarruk JG, Passos Dos Santos, Gaestel M, David S. TNF and increased intracellular iron alter macrophage polarization to a detrimental M1 phenotype in the injured spinal cord. Neuron. 2014;83:1098-1116.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2014.07.027

  37. 37.

    Pineau I, Lacroix S. Proinflammatory cytokine synthesis in the injured mouse spinal cord: multiphasic expression pattern and identification of the cell types involved. J Comp Neurol. 2007;500:267-285.

    Not in our library10.1002/cne.21149

  38. 38.

    Stammers AT, Liu J, Kwon BK. Expression of inflammatory cytokines following acute spinal cord injury in a rodent model. J Neurosci Res. 2012;90:782-790.

    Not in our library10.1002/jnr.22820

  39. 39.

    Bethea JR, Nagashima H, Acosta MC, Briceno C, Gomez F, Marcillo AE, Loor K, Green J, Dietrich WD. Systemically administered interleukin-10 reduces tumor necrosis factor-alpha production and significantly improves functional recovery following traumatic spinal cord injury in rats. J Neurotrauma. 1999;16:851-863.

    Not in our library10.1089/neu.1999.16.851

  40. 40.

    Pan JZ, Ni L, Sodhi A, Aguanno A, Young W, Hart RP. Cytokine activity contributes to induction of inflammatory cytokine mRNAs in spinal cord following contusion. J Neurosci Res. 2002;68:315-322.

    Not in our library10.1002/jnr.10215

All 189 references

Cited by papers we hold 3

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.