No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 27, 2026.

Potentials and future perspectives of multi-target drugs in cancer treatment: the next generation anti-cancer agents

Ali Doostmohammadi, Hossein Jooya, Kimia Ghorbanian and 2 more

Cell Communication and Signaling · 2024 · Review · CC BY

Abstract

Cancer is a major public health problem worldwide with more than an estimated 19.3 million new cases in 2020. The occurrence rises dramatically with age, and the overall risk accumulation is combined with the tendency for cellular repair mechanisms to be less effective in older individuals. Conventional cancer treatments, such as radiotherapy, surgery, and chemotherapy, have been used for decades to combat cancer. However, the emergence of novel fields of cancer research has led to the exploration of innovative treatment approaches focused on immunotherapy, epigenetic therapy, targeted therapy, multi-omics, and also multi-target therapy. The hypothesis was based on that drugs designed to act against individual targets cannot usually battle multigenic diseases like cancer. Multi-target therapies, either in combination or sequential order, have been recommended to combat acquired and intrinsic resistance to anti-cancer treatments. Several studies focused on multi-targeting treatments due to their advantages include; overcoming clonal heterogeneity, lower risk of multi-drug resistance (MDR), decreased drug toxicity, and thereby lower side effects. In this study, we'll discuss about multi-target drugs, their benefits in improving cancer treatments, and recent advances in the field of multi-targeted drugs. Also, we will study the research that performed clinical trials using multi-target therapeutic agents for cancer treatment.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 27, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

1Cancer is a leading cause of worldwide death and the most prevalent disease, with an estimated 19.3 million new cancer cases around the world in 2020. Therefore, its early detection and effective treatment development are crucial for managing this life-threatening disease.

2Limitations of conventional chemotherapeutic agents, lack of specificity in existing epigenetic targeting drugs, and drug resistance are among the main challenges in cancer therapy. Through decades, different strategies have been developed for cancer treatment such as immunotherapy, gene therapy, epigenetic therapies, etc.. While numerous cancer types may initially respond to chemotherapy, they can eventually develop resistance to it. The ability of cancer cells to develop resistance against traditional treatments, and the growing number of drug-resistant cancers highlights the need for more research and the development of new treatments.

3Targeted therapy, also known as precision medicine, blocks cancer cell growth by interfering with specific molecules needed for cancer development and growth, instead of simply interfering with all rapidly dividing cells like traditional chemotherapy. Tamoxifen was the first targeted cancer therapy approved in the 1970s. It blocks the growth of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer cells by binding to the estrogen receptor and preventing estrogen from binding. The targeting therapy can be classified into single- and multi-targeting agents.

4Single-target therapy has been a major advance in cancer treatment, but it has limitations. When single-target therapy fails, the alternative strategy is multi-target therapy, which includes polypharmacological drugs or drug combinations.

5Polypharmacology involves targeting multiple tumor growth and progression-related pathways, making it more effective in treating complex diseases and drug-resistant cancers. Studies in polypharmacology could reveal new off-targets for current drugs, offering insight into drug side effects and toxicities. Furthermore, it can aid drug repurposing by identifying new indications or therapeutic targets for existing drugs. Despite the optimistic outlook on multi-target therapy, overcoming challenges such as appropriate target selection is crucial for enhancing treatment efficacy.

6Herein, we'll dive into the concept of polypharmacology, its potential, challenges, and future perspectives. Also, we'll argue the recent multi-target drug studies and potential therapeutic targets for developing anticancer agents in few prevalence malignancies.

Single-, combination-, and multi target directed ligands-therapies; what's the difference?

7Cancer treatments can be categorized based on the way therapeutic agents are employed into single agents, combination, and multi-target directed ligands (MTDLs) which are described as follows.

8Monotherapy, also known as single-target therapy, aims to combat cancer by selectively attacking certain genes and proteins responsible for the survival and proliferation of malignant cells. Unlike conventional chemotherapy drugs that exhibit a lack of selectivity towards cancer cells versus normal cells, this method ensures reduced harm to healthy cells, consequently minimizing the occurrence of substantial toxicity and side effects. While monotherapy has shown some efficacy in certain cases, it may not be effective for all patients because the tumor cells can become resistant to monotherapies.

9Combination therapy is a therapeutic modality that employs combining two or more agents with different mechanisms of action to achieve synergistic effects against cancer. Since the discovery of new pharmacological anti-cancer agents is arduous and costly, it is essential to identify more effective methods that are economically viable. While monotherapy is still applicable in some cases, combination therapy is increasingly recognized for its effectiveness and broad treatment coverage in managing complex diseases like cancer. However combination therapy is a feasible option, there are remain challenges such as cost-effectiveness, and identifying the best drug combinations which will be discussed in the next section.

10Drug resistance is an important issue with current treatments which can be overcome using MTDLs. MTDLs are a new class of drugs that target multiple receptors/enzymes simultaneously leading to better efficacy, preventing drug resistance development, and also combating it. This strategy also has the potential to lower the required dosage of individual drugs, reducing the risk of adverse effects and enhancing treatment outcomes. On the other hand, designing selective MTDLs with high affinity to their targets while avoiding off-target effects is a significant challenge in MTDLs treatments. Understanding the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of designed ligands is another challenge, however, computer-aided drug designing tools provided applications for describing PK (i.e. absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) properties) of designed drugs more predictably. MTDLs reveal great superiority in comparison to mono- & combination-therapies which will further be discussed.

Cancer and the necessity of using multi-targeted drugs

11Cancer resistance is affected by Darwinian law, intra-tumor cell heterogeneity, and compensatory pathways often result in the tumor cells' survival. It is the main challenge with monotherapies, which is attributed to up to 90% of cancer-associated deaths and can be caused by various factors. Under the treatment pressure, cancer cells can adapt molecular and cellular mechanisms to evade the effects of the drug, often evolve into more aggressive or metastasis phenotypes, and limit the success of monotherapies.

12Combination therapies have shown great potential for cancer treatment reducing monotherapy's defects. They improve treatment outcomes, lead to synergistic anticancer effects, overcome clonal heterogeneity, and reduce drug resistance probability. However, it's challenging to identify an effective combination. Combination therapy can also lead to side effect accumulation. They may include the sum of each drug's known side effects or completely unexpected side effects caused by drug-drug interactions. The treatment-related adverse events resulting from combination therapy had led to dose reduction or discontinuation reported in several studies. Therefore, computational methods are employed to predict the right combinations for cancer treatment. In comparison, the MTDLs are constructed of a single compound designed for multifunctional properties with fewer side effects and more predictable toxicity. Also, combination therapies indicated higher utility values than monotherapies but they were generally more expensive. While the MTDLs can modulate multiple targets simultaneously making it cost-effective as monotherapies and high efficacy as combination therapies in administration for patients. Additionally, the potential for useful drug combinations is restricted by the risk of side effects, drug interactions, and technological challenges in obtaining stable pharmaceuticals. However, in theory, the number of useful combinations is unlimited if the molecular structure is properly selected and optimized. Also, in practice, it is most feasible to obtain ligands based on two to five pharmacophores. Moreover, the drugs regimen of a combination therapy can indicate different absorption and distribution profiles which can affect the treatment outcomes. Also, administering doses or timings for agents of a combination treatment regimen with different half-lives is also challenging. In contrast, using the computational approaches in designing MTDLs provides more predictable PK & physicochemical features resulting in more desirable ADMET profile of designed drugs. In addition, it's generally easier to optimize the dose for a multi-targeted ligand than to do so separately for the components of the combination therapy regimen. Lastly, the clinical trial approval in a combination therapy requires each drug to be investigated separately, and then in combination with each other which is cost- and time-consuming while, MTDLs are time- & cost-efficient for clinical trials since a single compound is involved in the study.

13Overall, multi-targeted treatments, specifically MTDLs, can provide several benefits in cancer treatment leading to improved overall survival with decreased side effects for cancerous patients.

Strategies for developing MTDLs

14The methods commonly used to develop MTDLs can be classified into two categories. The first category involves a random screening approach, while the second category utilizes a knowledge-based approach to combine scaffolds from different active molecules with known activity against a particular target. This latter approach is referred to as the framework combination approach.

15Random screening involves using quantitive structure–activity relationship (QSAR) and/or virtual screening to discover an anti-cancer agent. QSAR serves as a valuable tool for uncovering the interplay between structure and activity within smaller congeneric compound series and enables the understanding of physicochemical and biological properties of the molecules for further targeting in cancer treatment. On the other hand, virtual screening allows for the docking of thousands or even millions of compounds to bind to proteins associated with cancer in a relatively cost-effective way. By doing so, it can help in the discovery of potential inhibitors for specific proteins or entire signaling pathways involved in the development of cancer.

16The framework combination approach is a knowledge-based method to discover multi-target drugs by combining drugs/pharmacophores for developing a new hybrid molecule with the desired activity toward multiple targets. The molecular components or individual partners can come together covalently to form a molecular matrix, by fusing, merging, or linking.

17The fused strategy combines two or more distinct biologically active pharmacophoric moieties, usually via a zero-length linker or a spacer, to form a new molecular hybrid. While merged strategy involves merging pharmacophores into one molecule, resulting in the development of a unique, smaller chemical compound with retained pharmacological properties but notably different chemical traits. The combined agents might hold onto the functional properties of one or both of the overlapping drugs. Also, this strategy can lead to a resulting compound with reduced molecular weight compared to fusing/linking strategies employment. Furthermore, the merging requires in-depth knowledge about the side chains interaction and the conformation that affects the compound function while the linking strategy is simpler. The linking is the binding of two compounds that bind within their pharmacophores together through a linker (cleavable or not) to obtain a new compound capable of aiming multiple targets at the same time. For example, trastuzumab emtansine, an FDA-approved drug, is an MTDL that linked an anti-HER2/neu antibody with emtansine (a microtubule inhibitor) through MCC (4-[N-maleimidomethyl]cyclohexane-1-carboxylate) linker. Furthermore, the linking strategy also makes designing a variety range of hybridizations possible in comparison to the merge & fused strategies. Although these strategies are utilized prevalently in neurological disorders, their principles are also applied in developing anticancer agents to achieve more efficient treatments. Last, a schematic overview of MTDLs deigning strategies is depicted in Fig. 1.

Current cancer multi-target therapeutics

18The current cancer treatments mostly target receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). They're transmembrane receptors that play a role in many cellular processes, including growth, differentiation, and metabolism. RTKs are key regulators of cancer cell growth and metastasis. Dysregulation of RTK signaling can lead to a variety of human diseases, including cancer. Its alterations are common in a wide variety of cancers, highlighting their importance in cancer progression and making them promising therapeutic targets.

19The JAK/STAT signaling pathway is a critical player in cancer treatment and multi-target therapy, with abnormal activation observed in various solid malignancies such as breast, lung, liver, head and neck, and stomach cancers. This heightened JAK/STAT signaling has been associated with poorer prognoses, including increased recurrence rates and reduced overall survival. Consequently, targeting this pathway holds promise for therapeutic interventions in cancer, showing efficacy in modulating the progression of solid tumors. In summary, the JAK/STAT signaling pathway presents substantial therapeutic opportunities and is a key focus for multi-target therapy in solid malignancies.

20The NF-κB pathway is another crucial regulator facilitating communication between inflammation and cancer at various levels. Activation of NF-κB leads to the induction of several target genes, including those that promote cell proliferation and inhibit apoptosis. Additionally, NF-κB signaling interacts with multiple other pathways, such as STAT3, AP1, interferon regulatory factors, NRF2, Notch, WNT–β-catenin, and p53. Notably, all recognized hallmarks of cancer involve NF-κB activation. Alterations in the NF-κB pathway are frequently observed in both solid and hematopoietic malignancies, promoting tumor cell proliferation and survival. Excessive activation of the NF-κB-signaling pathway has been documented in various tumor tissues, making research on this pathway for targeted cancer therapy a significant area of interest. Studies have shown that inhibition of NF-κB, either by knocking out RelA or IKK2 or by overexpressing a dominant negative form of IκBα, significantly reduces tumor volume, lowers tumor grade, and prolongs survival in mouse models.

21An overview of these three pathways and their involvement in cancer development, progression, and overall survival is depicted in Fig. 2. Next, we will further review multi-target drugs in cancer treatment.

Imatinib

22Imatinib (Glivec) is a first-generation multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2001 for malignant metastatic or unresectable gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). It's a 2-phenyl amino pyrimidine derivative that has been used to treat chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and advanced anaplastic thyroid cancer. Imatinib acts by inhibiting Bcr-Abl, c-KIT, and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) tyrosine kinase activity through binding to their ATP-binding site. According to the Fu et al. study, it indicated that imatinib's most adverse events include skin color change (55.6%) and edema (38.9%). The drug resistance related to imatinib was lysosomal sequestration that affects its target site concentration. Furthermore, it has been suggested that glucose transporter (GLUT)-1 is involved in the acquisition of imatinib resistance by GIST cells, which can be overcome by combining WZB117 & imatinib.

Lapatinib

23Lapatinib is a first-generation quinazoline based TKI that inhibits epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) reversibly. HER2 overexpression has been observed in 20 to 30% of breast cancers which is related to more aggressive disease and higher mortality. Also, the overexpression of EGFR was observed in 16–36% of breast cancer cases. The FDA approved lapatinib in March 2007 for treating advanced or metastatic breast cancer patients with overexpression of HER2.

24The lapatinib clinical trials were conducted on hormonally untreated prostate and metastatic urothelial bladder cancer, but there was no reported significant antitumor activity. In a phase II trial, the treatment with lapatinib did not show significant efficacy in inducing tumor regression for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in 75 patients studied. On the other, lapatinib therapy is associated with a significant reduction in various forms of pain, including musculoskeletal pain, headache, bone pain, and pain in extremities, in cancer patients. Its resistance is associated with a widespread reprogramming of glycolysis, which is mediated by phosphorylation and is accompanied by changes in metabolites and increased sensitivity to glycolysis inhibition. The most common toxicities are diarrhea and rash, which are mostly mild to moderate in severity. In most cases, symptoms are mild and do not lead to drug discontinuation.

Sorafenib

25Sorafenib as the first oral multi-kinase inhibitor was approved by the FDA for the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in 2005, advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in 2007, and advanced radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid carcinoma in 2013. It inhibits the activity of the serine-threonine kinases Raf-1 and B-Raf, the receptor tyrosine kinase activity of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-1/2/3, platelet-derived growth factor receptor β (PDGFR-β), c-Kit, RET, and FLT3. Several studies have reported diarrhea, hand-foot syndrome, rash, and fatigue as the most common adverse events related to sorafenib treatment. Also, drug discontinuation due to intolerance or toxicities was responsible for 16% of cancerous patients. Tumor cells could exhibit primary resistance or acquired resistance. In primary resistance, patients have low response rates at the initial treatment with sorafenib and gene polymorphism may play a crucial part in regulating the function of sorafenib. Many factors such as intratumor genetic heterogeneity may induce acquired resistance following sorafenib treatment, thus other treatment options should be provided. HCC cell's metabolic characterization changes are also associated with their resistance to sorafenib and can be overcome by combination with aspirin.

Pazopanib

26Pazopanib, an oral second-generation TKI, has been approved by the FDA (2009) for RCC and soft tissue sarcoma treatment. Preclinical studies have suggested that pazopanib inhibits both angiogenic and oncogenic signaling pathways by VEGFR, PDGFR, fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), and c-Kit inhibition. It downregulates the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway through the inhibition of pan-RAF. Interestingly, in a phase I study, 58% of patients demonstrated > 50% reduction in tumor blood flow at Day 8 of treatment, which increased to 91% at Day 22. Pazopanib is associated with several adverse effects, with hypertension as the most common one, followed by cytopenia, proteinuria, prolonged QT interval, elevated liver enzymes, diarrhea, nausea, and fatigue. Pazopanib has indicated significant potential as a treatment option for NSCLC, breast cancer, urothelial carcinoma, thyroid cancer, and GIST.

Sunitinib

27Sunitinib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, received first approval from the FDA in January 2006 for treating advanced RCC. Subsequently, it has gained global approval for this use as well as for treating GISTs and advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in patients who are resistant or intolerant to imatinib. It also has shown potential antitumor activity in various other malignancies, such as thyroid, lung, bladder, pancreatic, and esophageal carcinomas, gliomas, and sarcomas. Sunitinib exerts its anti-angiogenesis effect by inhibiting RTKs including EGFR, FGFR-1, PDGFR-β, VEGFR-1/2/3, RET, FLT3, KIT, and CSF1R through competitive binding to their adenosine triphosphate (ATP) pocket. In 2011, it was approved by the FDA for the second time to treat progressive, well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. There are a few ways to the drug resistance of sunitinib. One of them is autophagy-flux-associated sunitinib lysosomal sequestration which leads to the isolation of the drug from the cytoplasm in endoplasmic cells. It also can promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in metastatic RCC cells, leading to resistance to sunitinib treatment. Moreover, the most common side effects include diarrhea, nausea, asthenia, and fatigue which many studies focused on managing the drug's related drug resistance.

Vandetanib

28This second-generation TKI is another quinazoline-based orally active small molecule that exhibits potent inhibitory activity against multiple targets, including VEGFR-2 and -3, EGFR, and the rearranged during transfection (RET) receptors. Vandetanib significantly disrupts the EGFR-induced production of angiogenic growth factors, leading to an "indirect" impact on angiogenesis in vivo. The FDA approved vandetanib in April 2011 for symptomatic or progressive medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic disease treatment. The common adverse events are reported diarrhea, hypertension, QTc prolongation, and fatigue. Among these, QTc prolongation which significantly increased during treatment with vandetanib should be well-considered due to its life-threatening effect. Genetic alterations, including DNA mutations and epigenetic modifications, contribute to the resistance of medullary thyroid carcinoma to tyrosine kinase inhibition. To overcome this resistance, a potential strategy involves targeting these genetic alterations by adding further therapeutic agents.

Axitinib

29Axitinib is a second-generation targeted drug that selectively inhibits VEGFR 1, 2, and 3 tyrosine kinase activity. It was first recommended for FDA approval by the Oncology Drug Advisory Committee (ODAC), and full approval was granted in January 2012 for the treatment of patients with advanced RCC. This antiangiogenic drug improved the overall survival of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The common expected side effects of this indazole-based agent are hypertension (16%), fatigue (11%), and diarrhea (11%). Another point to be considered is to monitor proteinuria before initiation and periodically during treatment. So if moderate to severe proteinuria develops, the dose is reduced or even temporarily the treatment stops. Generally, the majority of side effects are manageable with supportive care and dose modification. So far, there has been no report of drug resistance to this drug.

Cabozantinib

30It's a second-generation multi-targeted TKI with inhibitory effects against C-mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (C-MET), VEGFR2, RET, KIT, AXL, and FLT3, all of which play a role in the pathogenesis of liver cancer. Cabozantinib was approved by the FDA for advanced RCC (2016), HCC (2019), and differentiated thyroid cancer (2021). It provides a substantial clinical advantage over sunitinib when used as the first-line therapy for patients with metastatic RCC. Additionally, sunitinib-induced resistance can be overcome using cabozantinib in the treatment of RCC. Furthermore, HCC cells overexpressed C-MET up to 40%, and tumor cells with low C-MET levels exhibited primary resistance to C-MET inhibitors such as cabozantinib. However, rational combinations show the potential to overcome this resistance. The most reported side effects associated with the treatment were hypertension, fatigue, and diarrhea.

Regorafenib

31Regorafenib is a sorafenib-derived, multitargeted kinase inhibitor approved by the FDA in 2017. This second-generation TKI has demonstrated beneficial effects in the treatment of advanced HCC, metastatic colorectal cancer, and GISTs. The drug targets RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway by inhibiting the VEGFR, PDGFR, FGFR, KIT, and RET. It also can suppress AXL signaling, inhibit STAT3, and promote cell death in triple negative breast cancer. Moreover, the colon cancer cell's growth and survival can be affected by regorafenib-induced generation of reactive oxygen species and synergistically enhanced oxaliplatin-induced cell growth inhibition. Regorafenib's effectiveness and safety have been demonstrated in several studies. It increases patient survival and disease progression prevention which is more appealing than sorafenib due to its greater potential for RTK inhibition. Also, a clinical study by Pavlakis et al. indicated regorafenib potential in the treatment of refractory advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer. The side effects consist of hand-foot skin reaction, hypertension, and fatigue. It has shown that HCC patients with higher topoisomerase IIα expression had shorter overall survival, but its inhibition reverses drug resistance to regorafenib.

Lorlatinib

32Lorlatinib is a multi-target drug and a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor that can target anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and ROS1. Besides common side effects of lorlatinib including hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, edema, weight gain, and peripheral neuropathy, it has been approved twice by the FDA. The first one was in November 2018 for previously treated ALK-Positive metastatic NSCLC. In March 2021, loratinib (brand name Lorbrena) was approved for the second time by the FDA for first-line treatment of patients with metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC. The results of a clinical trial involving 296 patients compared the effectiveness of lorlatinib versus crizotinib. The findings indicated that lorlatinib offers advantages over crizotinib and supports its use for patients with or without baseline brain metastases. Lorlatinib resistance can be caused by various mechanisms, such as ALK rearrangement in NSCLC. To overcome the resistance, some combinations such as combination with gilteritinib has been shown promising effects in silico in ALK-positive lung cancer cells.

Lenvatinib

33Lenvatinib is an FDA-approved (2018) TKI drug for the treatment of RCC, unresectable or advanced HCC, and radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer. It has been investigated due to its therapeutic effects in advanced endometrial cancer, adenoid cystic, medullary thyroid, and anaplastic thyroid carcinomas. In a comparative clinical study, lenvatinib demonstrated similar overall survival to sorafenib in untreated advanced HCC as a first-line treatment. Lenvatinib prevents tumor angiogenesis through inhibition of VEGFR-1, -2, and -3, and also blocks the proliferation of tumor cells through inhibition of FGFR-1, FGFR-2, FGFR-3, & FGFR-4, PDGFRα, RET, and c-KIT. Hypertension, fatigue, weight loss, diarrhea, and nausea are the most reported adverse effects of this medication. The acquired resistance with administration of lenvatinib in advanced HCC may be caused by increased activation of EGFR and insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R)/insulin receptor (INSR). To potentially overcome or delay resistance to the anti-tumor effects of lenvatinib, combining multiple drugs to simultaneously inhibit different angiogenic pathways could be a promising future strategy.

Entrectinib

34It's an orally active, small-molecule TKI for tropomyosin receptor kinases (TRK)-A/B/C, ROS1, and ALK that can cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB). Entrectinib received breakthrough and priority designations from the FDA (in August 2019) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the treatment of neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK)-positive solid tumors in adults and children with no standard options as well as adults with ROS1 + NSCLC. This second-generation agent has a significant potential for treating primary and metastatic central nervous system (CNS) tumors with no adverse off-target activity. The most studied adverse effects include fatigue, paresthesia, dysgeusia, myalgia, and nausea. A study described a rare entrectinib resistance mechanisms in ROS1-rearranged NSCLC. Another study by Russo et al. analyzed NTRK1 mutations that drive resistance to TRK Inhibitors. However, further assessments are also required for the occurrence percentage of the mutations.

35Last, Table 1 summed up the drugs that have been described above with their respective details. Also, the drug's FDA approval timeline has been depicted in Fig. 3. It shows that FDA-approved multi-target drugs had an upward trend which indicates their effectiveness and as a result, scientist's interests. In addition, the approval of these multi-target drugs by the FDA further underscores the potential of multi-target therapies in enhancing the outcomes of cancer treatment. Noteworthy, as it obvious most of multi-target drugs that developed in recent years are multi TKI, however, targeting novel biomarkers and different pathways at the same time using MTDLs approach would be a great opportunity to overcome RTK-induced resistance in cancerous cell.

Potential targets for development of a novel multi-target cancer treatment

36Colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers are among the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Therefore, targeting the potential biomarkers in these three prevalent malignancies can result in more effective multi-target agents leading to a reduction in the cancer population worldwide. Below, the potent targets (i.e. highly expressed markers or markers with the expression limited to tumor cells) have been introduced with their respective role in cancer development, progression, and survival.

NSCLC

37The NSCLC is a heterogeneous malignancy that accounts for ∼85%–87% of all lung cancers, which is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The statistics recorded 1.28 million new NSCLC cases from 2010 to 2017 in United States.

38Several proteins have been found to play crucial roles in NSCLC's development, progression, and survival. One of these markers is EGFR with an overexpression between 40–80% in advanced NSCLC patients. This receptor is a member of the ErbB family that can initiate and progress the NSCLC by regulating both apoptosis and cell proliferation. The HER2, another ErbB family member, indicates RTK activity with an overexpression range of 2.4% to 38%. Moreover, the overexpression of RTK's downstream signaling pathway molecules including phosphorylated-Akt (p-Akt) and -mTOR (p-mTOR) was observed in 78% & 46.7% of NSCLC patients, respectively. The RTK/Ras/PI3K/Akt pathway promotes oncogenesis by affecting cell proliferation & growth, apoptosis, and angiogenesis, so its inhibition could be beneficial for patients. In addition, the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) is a protein with a crucial role in the initiation of protein synthesis. The phospho-eIF4E expression has been found to correlate with p-Akt indicating that eIF4E activation plays a crucial role in the NSCLC progression and its upregulation has been found in 39.9% of NSCLC-diagnosed patients.

39The AIB1 is a known potent transcriptional coactivator of estrogen receptor α that functions through direct contact with the nuclear receptor, and the overexpression (in 48.3% cases) is associated with shortened patient survival and acts as a biomarker for NSCLC patients with poor prognosis. The C-MET alterations are also associated with NSCLC's poor prognosis and its expression upregulates in 25–75% of diagnosed cases. It is responsible for the drug resistance in most of lung cancerous cells. Another tumor marker that mediates critical processes for cancer progression, such as migration, cell adhesion, and tumorigenesis is osteopontin. Its expression rate in tumor cells is 67.8%, while only 20.2% of normal lung tissues express this oncogenic protein.

40A study by Maeda et al. found that carcinoembryonic antigen has the potential for targeting NSCLCs with a high level of expression (in ~ 35–60% cases) and is involved in tumor cell proliferation, adhesion, and migration. The junction adhesion molecule (JAM)-A is a protein expressed on endothelial-, epithelial-, and immune cells as well as platelets. The high expression of JAM-A occurred in 37% of NSCLC in comparison to the normal tissues which significantly correlates with TNM stage, lymph node metastasis, and a decrease in overall survival.

Prostate cancer

41Prostate cancer (PC) is the second cause of death and the first place of new cases of cancer in the United States among males. The growth of prostate tumors is dependent on androgens and about 80–90% of cases rely on androgens at the initial diagnosis. Furthermore, the CUB domain-containing protein 1 (CDCP1) is a transmembrane protein that serves as a substrate for SRC family kinases and can cause tumor progression. It's found to be overexpressed in approximately 50% of metastatic biopsies and around 30% of primary tumors.

42The remodeling and spacing factor 1 (RSF1) protein has also been suggested to contribute to cancer progression, as its expression levels have been found to increase in more advanced pathological stages, lymph node metastasis, higher Gleason scores, and increased tumor cell proliferation. Detectable levels of RSF1 expression were observed in 79.2% of the 16,456 interpretable PC studied. The prostate tumor overexpressed-1 (PTOV1) is a protein with 80% overexpression in patients with prostate intraepithelial neoplasia, and it's linked to prostate cancer progression. It also accumulates and alters the cancer cell's biological behavior. A protein from the G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) family called prostate-specific GPCR 2 (PSGR2) is a receptor whose expression is restricted to human prostate tissue and exhibits distinct expressions in normal and tumor tissues. The overexpression of this protein in normal and tumor tissues has a significant difference (62% of examined patients).

43The receptor-interacting protein kinase 2 (RIPK2) is also a predictive marker and can influence disease progression. It's gained or amplified in approximately 65% of lethal metastatic castration-resistant PC and can stabilize the c-Myc transcription factor. Caveolin-1 is a membrane protein highly expressed in PC and it's associated with disease progression, castration resistance, and biochemical recurrence. Out of 197 cases of prostate cancer in the Chen et al. study, 111 cases were reported caveolin-1 positive (56.35%). Furthermore, elevated levels of fibroblast growth factor 8 (FGF8) in PC have been linked to reduced patient survival rates, and this association remains present even in cases of androgen-independent disease. Around 50% of clinically localized human PC express increased FGF8, while 80% or more of advanced cancers express increased FGF8. Trefoil factor 3 (TFF3) has the ability to activate ERK1/2, a crucial element of the MAPK signaling pathway. This activation ultimately leads to the promotion of tumor cell proliferation. The studies have reported that TFF3 overexpression is observed in over 40% of PC cells.

Colorectal cancer

44Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequently diagnosed and the second most fatal cancer for both males and females. Globally, there is a rise in the occurrence of CRC among young adults. These facts highlight the importance of new potential and novel targets for the development of anti-CRC therapeutic agents. The coiled-coil domain containing 34 (CCDC34) is a protein whose overexpression is related to CRC apoptosis reduction and metastasis enhancement and is thought to be affected via survivin, Bcl-2, N-cadherin, and E-cadherin regulation. The protein-positive rate is reported in 74.12% of patients' tissues. The G-protein-coupled prostaglandin E receptor 2 (PTGER2) is a receptor that plays a crucial role in the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), tumoral microsatellite instability (MSI), and survival. Out of the 516 colorectal cancers that were studied, PTGER2 overexpression was found in 169 tumors, which accounts for 33% of the total. Furthermore, numerous studies have demonstrated the involvement of cyclin B1 in cancer cell differentiation, growth, apoptosis, and resistance to chemotherapy. In 88% of the patients with CRC, cyclin B1 was found to be overexpressed compared to the non-neoplastic colorectal mucosa cells.

45Mutations that deactivate the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene and result in the increased activity of the Wnt signaling pathway play a crucial role in initiating the development of CRC and its progression. The APC-related mutations account for approximately 80% of CRC cases. This evidence indicates the potential of targeting the Wnt signaling pathway. The overexpression of TP53 protein (TP53 +), which is involved in lymphatic and vascular invasion, is detected in 53% of stage III CRC patients. It also has been investigated that adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in stage III CRC is restricted to cases with low-level TP53 protein expression. Moreover, the serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 3 (SRSF3) is another potential target that its high expression is associated with cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and metastasis. The SRSF3 has been reported to be negative or weakly positive in 80% of patients with metastatic stage IV colorectal cancer, which was markedly related to poor survival, so it's not a good aim for advanced CRC patients. But overall, the percentage of SRSF3 overexpression in CRC has been reported to be approximately 70.6% which makes it favorable especially in earlier stages.

46The introduced potential biomarkers for developing new anti-cancer MTDLs can be targeted whether in inhibition of the exact protein or gene downregulation. Lastly, the above mentioned malignancies with their respective biomarkers & overexpression percentages are depicted in Fig. 4.

Future perspective

47According to the 2020 statistics, there were approximately 19.3 million new cases of cancer and 10 million cancer-related deaths worldwide. This indicates the emergence of exploration of the complexities and drug resistance associated with this disease. In recent decades, treatments have focused on targeting therapy which started with monotherapy and continued with combination therapies, and in recent years multi-targeted therapy has been introduced to find novel and more effective cancer treatments.

48Polypharmacology involves the design and utilization of pharmaceutical agents that can act on multiple targets or disease pathways. This approach offers the potential to develop more effective drugs by specifically modulating multiple targets. Recent advancements in the computational biology approach lead to AI-based tools development for generating small molecules in silico more precisely with the employment of deep learning/reinforcement learning methods. These web servers paved the way for the de novo design of molecules by providing knowledge-based machine learning algorithms, so drugs with more efficacy and lower toxicity become more achievable for both experts and non-experts. Then, designed small molecules can be further optimized by their affinity to selected targets using molecular docking web servers such as NeuralDock. Also, for similairization of real-world interaction between ligands and their respective targets, molecular dynamics can be performed. Apart from these applications, AI-based methods provide opportunities for drug repurposing which are helpful in designing a multi-target drug. In addition, the identification of protein's structure and function which is necessary in the process of in silico drug designing has been facilitated by single crystal X-ray diffraction (SC-XRD), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and cryo-electron microscopy (Cryo-EM) methods. On the other hand, the current multi-targeted agents are focused on small molecule deployment while the potency of peptide-based multi-targeted drugs has not been well-considered. Peptides offer significant therapeutic potential due to their high binding affinities, selectivity, specificity, and efficacy. They can also bind to surfaces, making them useful for targeting "undruggable" targets. Additionally, the diverse side chains in peptides provide a wide range of potential therapeutic targets.

49All in all, MTDLs offer promising opportunities for targeting complex diseases such as cancer, either in small molecules or peptide conformations, and should be considered in hard-to-treat malignancies.

Conclusion

50Cancer treatment has become more necessary in recent years due to high rate of cancer cases worldwide. Also, treatment-induced drug resistance is another challenge that had an upward trend in recent years. These highlight the emergence of developing novel treatment strategies for combating cancer more effectively to overcome drug resistance. In the last decades, scientists moved on from monotherapy to combination therapy and recently multi-targeted agents due to the promised application provided by multi-target drugs. Moreover, the traffic of FDA-approved multi-targeted therapeutics after 2010 indicates the interest of researchers in this field. However, there are challenges in multi-target drug development such as PK/PD predictability. Recent advancements in computational biology unlocked new tools for designing hybrid compounds capable of targeting different biomarkers synergistically with desired PK features. Despite the progress in computational biology, the knowledge of drug designers is really important because the employment of these tools is not solely sufficient for achieving more effective drugs with favorable outcomes. Overall, polypharmacology, especially MTDLs, indicates reliable potential for overcoming cancer resistance.

References 240

1.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-49.
Not in our library10.3322/caac.21660
2.
ecancermedicalscience · 2016
No notice
3.
Pourgholi A, Dadashpour M, Mousapour A, Amandi AF, Zarghami N. Anticancer potential of silibinin loaded polymeric nanoparticles against breast cancer cells: insight into the apoptotic genes targets. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention: APJCP. 2021;22(8):2587.
Not in our library10.31557/apjcp.2021.22.8.2587
4.
Innovative approaches for cancer treatment: current perspectives and new challenges · 2019
No notice
5.
Charmsaz S, Collins DM, Perry AS, Prencipe M. Novel Strategies for Cancer Treatment: Highlights from the 55th IACR Annual Conference. Cancers. 2019;11(8):1125.
Not in our library10.3390/cancers11081125
6.
Alagheband Y, Jafari-gharabaghlou D, Imani M, Mousazadeh H, Dadashpour M, Firouzi-Amandi A, et al. Design and fabrication of a dual-drug loaded nano-platform for synergistic anticancer and cytotoxicity effects on the expression of leptin in lung cancer treatment. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology. 2022;73:103389.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jddst.2022.103389
7.
Makhoba XH, Viegas C, Mosa RA, Viegas FPD, Pooe OJ. Potential Impact of the Multi-Target Drug Approach in the Treatment of Some Complex Diseases. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2020;14:3235-49.
Not in our library10.2147/dddt.s257494
8.
Drug Resistance in Cancer: An Overview · 2014
No notice
9.
Joo WD, Visintin I, Mor G. Targeted cancer therapy–are the days of systemic chemotherapy numbered? Maturitas. 2013;76(4):308-314.
Not in our library10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.09.008
10.
Yan L, Rosen N, Arteaga C. Targeted cancer therapies. Chin J Cancer. 2011;30(1):1-4.
Not in our library10.5732/cjc.010.10553
11.
Makhoba XH, Viegas C, Mosa RA, Viegas FPD, Pooe OJ. Potential Impact of the Multi-Target Drug Approach in the Treatment of Some Complex Diseases. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2020;14:3235-3249.
Not in our library10.2147/dddt.s257494
12.
Reddy AS, Zhang S. Polypharmacology: drug discovery for the future. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2013;6(1):41-47.
Not in our library10.1586/ecp.12.74
13.
Multi-target pharmacology: possibilities and limitations of the “skeleton key approach” from a medicinal chemist perspective · 2015
No notice
14.
Gerber DE. Targeted therapies: a new generation of cancer treatments. Am Fam Physician. 2008;77(3):311-319.
Not in our library
15.
Small molecules in targeted cancer therapy: advances, challenges, and future perspectives · 2021
No notice
16.
Montoya S, Soong D, Nguyen N, Affer M, Munamarty SP, Taylor J. Targeted Therapies in Cancer: To Be or Not to Be, Selective. Biomedicines. 2021;9(11):1591.
Not in our library10.3390/biomedicines9111591
17.
Combination therapy in combating cancer · 2017
No notice
18.
DiMasi JA, Hansen RW, Grabowski HG. The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs. J Health Econ. 2003;22(2):151-185.
Not in our library10.1016/s0167-6296(02)00126-1
19.
He B, Lu C, Zheng G, He X, Wang M, Chen G, et al. Combination therapeutics in complex diseases. J Cell Mol Med. 2016;20(12):2231-2240.
Not in our library10.1111/jcmm.12930
20.
Towards a solution for the access challenges faced by combination treatments 2021 [Available from: https://www.europeanpharmaceuticalreview.com/article/164000/towards-a-solution-for-the-access-challenges-faced-by-combination-treatments/.
Not in our library
21.
Lopez JS, Banerji U. Combine and conquer: challenges for targeted therapy combinations in early phase trials. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14(1):57-66.
Not in our library10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.96
22.
Brindisi M, Kessler SM, Kumar V, Zwergel C. Editorial: Multi-target directed ligands for the treatment of cancer. Front Oncol. 2022;12:980141.
Not in our library10.3389/fonc.2022.980141
23.
Rodríguez-Soacha DA, Scheiner M, Decker M. Multi-target-directed-ligands acting as enzyme inhibitors and receptor ligands. Eur J Med Chem. 2019;180:690-706.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.07.040
24.
Alcaro S, Bolognesi ML, García-Sosa AT, Rapposelli S. Editorial: Multi-Target-Directed Ligands (MTDL) as Challenging Research Tools in Drug Discovery: From Design to Pharmacological Evaluation. Front Chem. 2019;7:71.
Not in our library10.3389/fchem.2019.00071
25.
Gurung AB, Ali MA, Lee J, Farah MA, Al-Anazi KM. An Updated Review of Computer-Aided Drug Design and Its Application to COVID-19. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:8853056.
Not in our library10.1155/2021/8853056
26.
McGranahan N, Swanton C. Biological and therapeutic impact of intratumor heterogeneity in cancer evolution. Cancer Cell. 2015;27(1):15-26.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ccell.2014.12.001
27.
Tumor cell plasticity in targeted therapy-induced resistance: mechanisms and new strategies · 2023
No notice
28.
Holohan C, Van Schaeybroeck S, Longley DB, Johnston PG. Cancer drug resistance: an evolving paradigm. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13(10):714-726.
Not in our library10.1038/nrc3599
29.
Firouzi Amandi A, Jokar E, Eslami M, Dadashpour M, Rezaie M, Yazdani Y, et al. Enhanced anti-cancer effect of artemisinin-and curcumin-loaded niosomal nanoparticles against human colon cancer cells. Med Oncol. 2023;40(6):170.
Not in our library10.1007/s12032-023-02032-7
30.
Jafari-Gharabaghlou D, Dadashpour M, Khanghah OJ, Salmani-Javan E, Zarghami N. Potentiation of Folate-Functionalized PLGA-PEG nanoparticles loaded with metformin for the treatment of breast Cancer: possible clinical application. Mol Biol Rep. 2023;50(4):3023-3033.
Not in our library10.1007/s11033-022-08171-w
31.
Amirsaadat S, Jafari-Gharabaghlou D, Dadashpour M, Zarghami N. Potential anti-proliferative effect of nano-formulated curcumin through modulating micro RNA-132, Cyclin D1, and hTERT genes expression in breast cancer cell lines. Journal of Cluster Science. 2023;34:2537-2546.
Not in our library10.1007/s10876-023-02404-z
32.
Ayoub NM. Editorial: Novel Combination Therapies for the Treatment of Solid Cancers. Front Oncol. 2021;11:708943
Not in our library10.3389/fonc.2021.708943
33.
A curative combination cancer therapy achieves high fractional cell killing through low cross-resistance and drug additivity · 2019
No notice
34.
Firouzi-Amandi A, Tarahomi M, Rahmani-Youshanlouei H, Heris RM, Jafari-Gharabaghlou D, Zarghami N, et al. Development, characterization, and in vitro evaluation of cytotoxic activity of Rutin loaded PCL-PEG nanoparticles against Skov3 ovarian cancer cell. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention: APJCP. 2022;23(6):1951.
Not in our library10.31557/apjcp.2022.23.6.1951
35.
The promise and challenges of combination therapies with antibody-drug conjugates in solid tumors · 2024
No notice
36.
Humphrey RW, Brockway-Lunardi LM, Bonk DT, Dohoney KM, Doroshow JH, Meech SJ, et al. Opportunities and challenges in the development of experimental drug combinations for cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(16):1222-1226.
Not in our library10.1093/jnci/djr246
37.
Gogas H, Dréno B, Larkin J, Demidov L, Stroyakovskiy D, Eroglu Z, et al. Cobimetinib plus atezolizumab in BRAF(V600) wild-type melanoma: primary results from the randomized phase III IMspire170 study. Annals of oncology: official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology. 2021;32(3):384-394.
Not in our library10.1016/j.annonc.2020.12.004
38.
Özdemir D, Büssgen M. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of combination therapy versus monotherapy in malignant melanoma. Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice. 2023;16(1):106.
Not in our library10.1186/s40545-023-00611-7
39.
Robert C, Karaszewska B, Schachter J, Rutkowski P, Mackiewicz A, Stroiakovski D, et al. Improved overall survival in melanoma with combined dabrafenib and trametinib. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(1):30-39.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa1412690
40.
Ascierto PA, McArthur GA, Dréno B, Atkinson V, Liszkay G, Di Giacomo AM, et al. Cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib in advanced BRAF(V600)-mutant melanoma (coBRIM): updated efficacy results from a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(9):1248-1260.
Not in our library10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30122-x
41.
Long-Term Outcomes With Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab or Nivolumab Alone Versus Ipilimumab in Patients With Advanced Melanoma · 2022
No notice
42.
Flanary V, Fisher J, Wilk E, Howton T, Lasseigne B. Computational Advancements in Cancer Combination Therapy Prediction. JCO Precis Oncol. 2023;7:e2300261.
Not in our library10.1200/po.23.00261
43.
Kong W, Midena G, Chen Y, Athanasiadis P, Wang T, Rousu J, et al. Systematic review of computational methods for drug combination prediction. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2022;20:2807-2814.
Not in our library10.1016/j.csbj.2022.05.055
44.
Agis-Torres A, Sölhuber M, Fernandez M, Sanchez-Montero JM. Multi-Target-Directed Ligands and other Therapeutic Strategies in the Search of a Real Solution for Alzheimer's Disease. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2014;12(1):2-36.
Not in our library10.2174/1570159x113116660047
45.
Ryszkiewicz P, Malinowska B, Schlicker E. Polypharmacology: promises and new drugs in 2022. Pharmacol Rep. 2023;75(4):755-770.
Not in our library10.1007/s43440-023-00501-4
46.
Zhang RX, Wong HL, Xue HY, Eoh JY, Wu XY. Nanomedicine of synergistic drug combinations for cancer therapy - Strategies and perspectives. Journal of controlled release: official journal of the Controlled Release Society. 2016;240:489-503.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.06.012
47.
Chandrasekaran B, Abed SN, Al-Attraqchi O, Kuche K, Tekade RK. Chapter 21 - Computer-Aided Prediction of Pharmacokinetic (ADMET) Properties. In: Tekade RK, editor. Dosage Form Design Parameters: Academic Press; 2018. p. 731–55.
Not in our library
48.
Das S, Basu S, Roy K. Strategies for Multi-Target Directed Ligands: Application in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) Therapeutics. Multi-Target Drug Design Using Chem-Bioinformatic Approaches. 2019;367-83.
Not in our library
49.
Tropsha A, Merz JKM, Reynolds CH, Ringe D. QSAR in drug discovery. Drug Design: Structure- and Ligand-Based Approaches. 2010;151-164.
Not in our library
50.
Umar AB, Uzairu A, Shallangwa GA, Uba S. QSAR modelling and molecular docking studies for anti-cancer compounds against melanoma cell line SK-MEL-2. Heliyon. 2020;6(3):e03640.
Not in our library10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03640
51.
Pinto GP, Hendrikse NM, Stourac J, Damborsky J, Bednar D. Virtual screening of potential anticancer drugs based on microbial products. Semin Cancer Biol. 2022;86:1207-1217.
Not in our library10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.07.012
52.
Ma X, Shi Z, Tan C, Jiang Y, Go M, Low B, et al. In-Silico Approaches to Multi-target Drug Discovery: Computer Aided Multi-target Drug Design. Multi-target Virtual Screening Pharmaceutical research. 2010;27:739-749.
Not in our library10.1007/s11095-010-0065-2
53.
Sampath Kumar HM, Herrmann L, Tsogoeva SB. Structural hybridization as a facile approach to new drug candidates. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2020;30(23):127514.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bmcl.2020.127514
54.
Concept of Hybrid Drugs and Recent Advancements in Anticancer Hybrids · 2022
No notice
55.
Hybrid Drugs—A Strategy for Overcoming Anticancer Drug Resistance? · 2021
No notice
56.
Pravin N, Jozwiak K. Effects of Linkers and Substitutions on Multitarget Directed Ligands for Alzheimer's Diseases: Emerging Paradigms and Strategies. International journal of molecular sciences. 2022;23(11).
Not in our library10.3390/ijms23116085
57.
In silico Strategies to Support Fragment-to-Lead Optimization in Drug Discovery · 2020
No notice
58.
Alkhzem AH, Woodman TJ, Blagbrough IS. Design and synthesis of hybrid compounds as novel drugs and medicines. RSC Adv. 2022;12(30):19470-19484.
Not in our library10.1039/d2ra03281c
59.
Ma H, Huang B, Zhang Y. Recent advances in multitarget-directed ligands targeting G-protein-coupled receptors. Drug Discov Today. 2020;25(9):1682-1692.
Not in our library10.1016/j.drudis.2020.07.004
60.
Wedam S, Fashoyin-Aje L, Gao X, Bloomquist E, Tang S, Sridhara R, et al. FDA Approval Summary: Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine for the Adjuvant Treatment of HER2-positive Early Breast Cancer. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2020;26(16):4180-4185.
Not in our library10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-3980
61.
Soltan OM, Shoman ME, Abdel-Aziz SA, Narumi A, Konno H, Abdel-Aziz M. Molecular hybrids: A five-year survey on structures of multiple targeted hybrids of protein kinase inhibitors for cancer therapy. Eur J Med Chem. 2021;225:113768.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113768
62.
Mechanisms of receptor tyrosine kinase activation in cancer · 2018
No notice
63.
Saraon P, Pathmanathan S, Snider J, Lyakisheva A, Wong V, Stagljar I. Receptor tyrosine kinases and cancer: oncogenic mechanisms and therapeutic approaches. Oncogene. 2021;40(24):4079-4093.
Not in our library10.1038/s41388-021-01841-2
64.
Sudhesh Dev S, Zainal Abidin SA, Farghadani R, Othman I, Naidu R. Receptor Tyrosine Kinases and Their Signaling Pathways as Therapeutic Targets of Curcumin in Cancer. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2021;12.
Not in our library10.3389/fphar.2021.772510
65.
JAK-STAT Signalling Pathway in Cancer · 2020
No notice
66.
Thomas SJ, Snowden JA, Zeidler MP, Danson SJ. The role of JAK/STAT signalling in the pathogenesis, prognosis and treatment of solid tumours. Br J Cancer. 2015;113(3):365-371.
Not in our library10.1038/bjc.2015.233
67.
JAK/STAT Signaling: Molecular Targets, Therapeutic Opportunities, and Limitations of Targeted Inhibitions in Solid Malignancies · 2022
No notice
68.
Taniguchi K, Karin M. NF-κB, inflammation, immunity and cancer: coming of age. Nat Rev Immunol. 2018;18(5):309-324.
Not in our library10.1038/nri.2017.142
69.
Rastogi S, Aldosary S, Saeedan AS, Ansari MN, Singh M, Kaithwas G. NF-κB mediated regulation of tumor cell proliferation in hypoxic microenvironment. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2023;14.
Not in our library10.3389/fphar.2023.1108915
70.
Xia L, Tan S, Zhou Y, Lin J, Wang H, Oyang L, et al. Role of the NFκB-signaling pathway in cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2018;11:2063-2073.
Not in our library10.2147/ott.s161109
71.
NF‐κB signaling in inflammation and cancer · 2021
No notice
72.
Xia Y, Shen S, Verma IM. NF-κB, an active player in human cancers. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014;2(9):823-830.
Not in our library10.1158/2326-6066.cir-14-0112
73.
Vallabhapurapu S, Karin M. Regulation and function of NF-kappaB transcription factors in the immune system. Annu Rev Immunol. 2009;27:693-733.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132641
74.
Chauhan A, Islam AU, Prakash H, Singh S. Phytochemicals targeting NF-κB signaling: Potential anti-cancer interventions. Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2022;12(3):394-405.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jpha.2021.07.002
75.
Zinatizadeh MR, Schock B, Chalbatani GM, Zarandi PK, Jalali SA, Miri SR. The Nuclear Factor Kappa B (NF-kB) signaling in cancer development and immune diseases. Genes & Diseases. 2021;8(3):287-297.
Not in our library10.1016/j.gendis.2020.06.005
76.
Dagher R, Cohen M, Williams G, Rothmann M, Gobburu J, Robbie G, et al. Approval summary: imatinib mesylate in the treatment of metastatic and/or unresectable malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2002;8(10):3034-3038.
Not in our library
77.
Cohen P, Cross D, Jänne PA. Kinase drug discovery 20 years after imatinib: progress and future directions. Nat Rev Drug Discovery. 2021;20(7):551-569.
Not in our library10.1038/s41573-021-00195-4
78.
Ha HT, Lee JS, Urba S, Koenig RJ, Sisson J, Giordano T, et al. A phase II study of imatinib in patients with advanced anaplastic thyroid cancer. Thyroid: official journal of the American Thyroid Association. 2010;20(9):975-980.
Not in our library10.1089/thy.2010.0057
79.
Yoneda KY, Cross CE, McQueen CA. 8.24 - The Pulmonary Toxicity of Anticancer Agents. Comprehensive Toxicology. 2010;477-510.
Not in our library
80.
Mughal TI, Schrieber A. Principal long-term adverse effects of imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. Biologics: targets & therapy. 2010;4:315-323.
Not in our library10.2147/btt.s5775
81.
Fu Y, Wei X, Lin L, Xu W, Liang J. Adverse reactions of sorafenib, sunitinib, and imatinib in treating digestive system tumors. Thoracic cancer. 2018;9(5):542-547.
Not in our library10.1111/1759-7714.12608
82.
Mlejnek P. What Is the Significance of Lysosomal-Mediated Resistance to Imatinib? Cells. 2023;12(5).
Not in our library10.3390/cells12050709
83.
Shima T, Taniguchi K, Tokumaru Y, Inomata Y, Arima J, Lee SW, et al. Glucose transporter‑1 inhibition overcomes imatinib resistance in gastrointestinal stromal tumor cells. Oncology reports. 2022;47(1).
Not in our library10.3892/or.2021.8218
84.
Tevaarwerk AJ, Kolesar JM. Lapatinib: a small-molecule inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 tyrosine kinases used in the treatment of breast cancer. Clin Ther. 2009;31(Pt 2):2332-2348.
Not in our library10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.11.029
85.
Du X, Yang B, An Q, Assaraf YG, Cao X, Xia J. Acquired resistance to third-generation EGFR-TKIs and emerging next-generation EGFR inhibitors. Innovation (Camb). 2021;2(2):100103.
Not in our library10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100103
86.
Dhuguru J, Ghoneim O. Quinazoline Based HDAC Dual Inhibitors as Potential Anti-Cancer Agents. Molecules. 2022;27:2294.
Not in our library10.3390/molecules27072294
87.
Krishnamurti U, Silverman JF. HER2 in breast cancer: a review and update. Adv Anat Pathol. 2014;21(2):100-107.
Not in our library10.1097/pap.0000000000000015
88.
Bhargava R, Gerald WL, Li AR, Pan Q, Lal P, Ladanyi M, et al. EGFR gene amplification in breast cancer: correlation with epidermal growth factor receptor mRNA and protein expression and HER-2 status and absence of EGFR-activating mutations. Mod Pathol. 2005;18(8):1027-1033.
Not in our library10.1038/modpathol.3800438
89.
Moy B, Kirkpatrick P, Kar S, Goss P. Lapatinib. Nat Rev Drug Discovery. 2007;6(6):431-432.
Not in our library10.1038/nrd2332
90.
Sridhar SS, Hotte SJ, Chin JL, Hudes GR, Gregg R, Trachtenberg J, et al. A multicenter phase II clinical trial of lapatinib (GW572016) in hormonally untreated advanced prostate cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2010;33(6):609-613.
Not in our library10.1097/coc.0b013e3181beac33
91.
Powles T, Huddart RA, Elliott T, Sarker SJ, Ackerman C, Jones R, et al. Phase III, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial That Compared Maintenance Lapatinib Versus Placebo After First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 1/2-Positive Metastatic Bladder Cancer. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2017;35(1):48-55.
Not in our library10.1200/jco.2015.66.3468
92.
Ross HJ, Blumenschein GR, Aisner J, Damjanov N, Dowlati A, Garst J, et al. Randomized phase II multicenter trial of two schedules of lapatinib as first- or second-line monotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2010;16(6):1938-1949.
Not in our library10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-08-3328
93.
Clinical data mining reveals analgesic effects of lapatinib in cancer patients · 2021
Not checked
94.
Ruprecht B, Zaal EA, Zecha J, Wu W, Berkers CR, Kuster B, et al. Lapatinib Resistance in Breast Cancer Cells Is Accompanied by Phosphorylation-Mediated Reprogramming of Glycolysis. Can Res. 2017;77(8):1842-1853.
Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-16-2976
95.
Chatsiproios D. Safety Profile and Clinical Recommendations for the Use of Lapatinib. Breast care (Basel, Switzerland). 2010;5(s1):16-21.
Not in our library10.1159/000285776
96.
Opdam FL, Guchelaar H-J, Beijnen JH, Schellens JHM. Lapatinib for Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer. Oncologist. 2012;17(4):536-542.
Not in our library10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0461
97.
Wilhelm S, Carter C, Lynch M, Lowinger T, Dumas J, Smith RA, et al. Discovery and development of sorafenib: a multikinase inhibitor for treating cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discovery. 2006;5(10):835-844.
Not in our library10.1038/nrd2130
98.
Cheng AL, Kang YK, Chen Z, Tsao CJ, Qin S, Kim JS, et al. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(1):25-34.
Not in our library10.1016/s1470-2045(08)70285-7
99.
Brose MS, Nutting CM, Jarzab B, Elisei R, Siena S, Bastholt L, et al. Sorafenib in radioactive iodine-refractory, locally advanced or metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet (London, England). 2014;384(9940):319-328.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60421-9
100.
Wilhelm SM, Carter C, Tang L, Wilkie D, McNabola A, Rong H, et al. BAY 43–9006 exhibits broad spectrum oral antitumor activity and targets the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway and receptor tyrosine kinases involved in tumor progression and angiogenesis. Can Res. 2004;64(19):7099-7109.
Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-1443
101.
Chang YS, Adnane J, Trail PA, Levy J, Henderson A, Xue D, et al. Sorafenib (BAY 43–9006) inhibits tumor growth and vascularization and induces tumor apoptosis and hypoxia in RCC xenograft models. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2007;59(5):561-574.
Not in our library10.1007/s00280-006-0393-4
102.
Karovic S, Shiuan EF, Zhang SQ, Cao H, Maitland ML. Patient-Level Adverse Event Patterns in a Single-Institution Study of the Multi-Kinase Inhibitor Sorafenib. Clin Transl Sci. 2016;9(5):260-266.
Not in our library10.1111/cts.12408
103.
Adverse effects of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in cancer therapy: pathophysiology, mechanisms and clinical management · 2023
No notice
104.
Thomas L, Lai SY, Dong W, Feng L, Dadu R, Regone RM, et al. Sorafenib in Metastatic Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review. Oncologist. 2014;19(3):251-258.
Not in our library10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0362
105.
Fan G, Wei X, Xu X. Is the era of sorafenib over? A review of the literature. Therapeutic advances in medical oncology. 2020;12:1758835920927602.
Not in our library10.1177/1758835920927602
106.
Li S, Dai W, Mo W, Li J, Feng J, Wu L, et al. By inhibiting PFKFB3, aspirin overcomes sorafenib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2017;141(12):2571-2584.
Not in our library10.1002/ijc.31022
107.
Sternberg CN, Davis ID, Mardiak J, Szczylik C, Lee E, Wagstaff J, et al. Pazopanib in locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results of a randomized phase III trial. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2010;28(6):1061-1068.
Not in our library10.1200/jco.2009.23.9764
108.
van der Graaf WT, Blay JY, Chawla SP, Kim DW, Bui-Nguyen B, Casali PG, et al. Pazopanib for metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (PALETTE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet (London, England). 2012;379(9829):1879-1886.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60651-5
109.
Kumar R, Knick VB, Rudolph SK, Johnson JH, Crosby RM, Crouthamel MC, et al. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic correlation from mouse to human with pazopanib, a multikinase angiogenesis inhibitor with potent antitumor and antiangiogenic activity. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007;6(7):2012-2021.
Not in our library10.1158/1535-7163.mct-07-0193
110.
Gril B, Palmieri D, Qian Y, Smart D, Ileva L, Liewehr DJ, et al. Pazopanib reveals a role for tumor cell B-Raf in the prevention of HER2+ breast cancer brain metastasis. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2011;17(1):142-153.
Not in our library10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-10-1603
111.
Hurwitz HI, Dowlati A, Saini S, Savage S, Suttle AB, Gibson DM, et al. Phase I trial of pazopanib in patients with advanced cancer. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2009;15(12):4220-4227.
Not in our library10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-08-2740
112.
Dy GK, Adjei AA. Understanding, recognizing, and managing toxicities of targeted anticancer therapies. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63(4):249-79.
Not in our library10.3322/caac.21184
113.
O'Brien ME, Gaafar R, Hasan B, Menis J, Cufer T, Popat S, et al. Maintenance pazopanib versus placebo in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer patients non-progressive after first line chemotherapy: A double blind randomised phase III study of the lung cancer group, EORTC 08092 (EudraCT: 2010–018566-23, NCT01208064). Eur J Cancer. 2015;51(12):1511-28.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ejca.2015.04.026
114.
Chellappan DK, Chellian J, Ng ZY, Sim YJ, Theng CW, Ling J, et al. The role of pazopanib on tumour angiogenesis and in the management of cancers: A review. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;96:768-781.
Not in our library10.1016/j.biopha.2017.10.058
115.
Bible KC, Suman VJ, Molina JR, Smallridge RC, Maples WJ, Menefee ME, et al. Efficacy of pazopanib in progressive, radioiodine-refractory, metastatic differentiated thyroid cancers: results of a phase 2 consortium study. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(10):962-972.
Not in our library10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70203-5
116.
Mir O, Cropet C, Toulmonde M, Cesne AL, Molimard M, Bompas E, et al. Pazopanib plus best supportive care versus best supportive care alone in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours resistant to imatinib and sunitinib (PAZOGIST): a randomised, multicentre, open-label phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(5):632-641.
Not in our library10.1016/s1470-2045(16)00075-9
117.
Motzer RJ, Escudier B, Gannon A, Figlin RA. Sunitinib: Ten Years of Successful Clinical Use and Study in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma. Oncologist. 2017;22(1):41-52.
Not in our library10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0197
118.
Hao Z, Sadek I. Sunitinib: the antiangiogenic effects and beyond. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:5495-5505.
Not in our library10.2147/ott.s112242
119.
Sun L, Liang C, Shirazian S, Zhou Y, Miller T, Cui J, et al. Discovery of 5-[5-fluoro-2-oxo-1,2- dihydroindol-(3Z)-ylidenemethyl]-2,4- dimethyl-1H-pyrrole-3-carboxylic acid (2-diethylaminoethyl)amide, a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial and platelet-derived growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase. J Med Chem. 2003;46(7):1116-1119.
Not in our library10.1021/jm0204183
120.
Tridente G. Chapter 9 - Sunitinib. In: Tridente G, editor. Adverse Events and Oncotargeted Kinase Inhibitors: Academic Press; 2017. p. 199–219.
Not in our library
121.
Blumenthal GM, Cortazar P, Zhang JJ, Tang S, Sridhara R, Murgo A, et al. FDA approval summary: sunitinib for the treatment of progressive well-differentiated locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Oncologist. 2012;17(8):1108-1113.
Not in our library10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0044
122.
Wu S, Huang L, Shen R, Bernard-Cacciarella M, Zhou P, Hu C, et al. Drug resistance-related sunitinib sequestration in autophagolysosomes of endothelial cells. Int J Oncol. 2020;56(1):113-122.
Not in our library10.3892/ijo.2019.4924
123.
From Resistance to Sensitivity: Insights and Implications of Biphasic Modulation of Autophagy by Sunitinib · 2017
Not checked
124.
Oosterwijk-Wakka JC, de Weijert MCA, Franssen GM, Kolev DR, de Haan TAFJ, Boerman OC, et al. Combination of sunitinib and 177Lu-labeled antibody cG250 targeted radioimmunotherapy: A promising new therapeutic strategy for patients with advanced renal cell cancer. Neoplasia. 2022;32:100826.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neo.2022.100826
125.
Artesunate Inhibits Growth of Sunitinib-Resistant Renal Cell Carcinoma Cells through Cell Cycle Arrest and Induction of Ferroptosis · 2020
No notice
126.
Frampton JE. Vandetanib: in medullary thyroid cancer. Drugs. 2012;72(10):1423-1436.
Not in our library10.2165/11209300-000000000-00000
127.
Ataollahi E, Behrouz M, Mardaneh P, Emami M, Zare S, Zafarian H, et al. Novel quinazolinone derivatives as anticancer agents: Design, synthesis, biological evaluation and computational studies. J Mol Structure. 2024;1295:136622.
Not in our library10.1016/j.molstruc.2023.136622
128.
Fallahi P, Ferrari SM, Baldini E, Biricotti M, Ulisse S, Materazzi G, et al. The safety and efficacy of vandetanib in the treatment of progressive medullary thyroid cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2016;16(11):1109-1118.
Not in our library10.1080/14737140.2016.1238764
129.
Vozniak JM, Jacobs JM. Vandetanib. J Adv Pract Oncol. 2012;3(2):112-116.
Not in our library
130.
Kim M, Kim BH. Current Guidelines for Management of Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma. Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea). 2021;36(3):514-524.
Not in our library10.3803/enm.2021.1082
131.
Zang J, Wu S, Tang L, Xu X, Bai J, Ding C, et al. Incidence and risk of QTc interval prolongation among cancer patients treated with vandetanib: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(2):e30353.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0030353
132.
Glassberg B, Khan S, Pemov A, Hawley R, Widemann BC, Khan J, et al. Molecular mechanism(s) of resistance to vandetanib in medullary thyroid carcinoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2020;38(15_suppl):e15628-e.
Not in our library10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.e15628
133.
Bellesoeur A, Carton E, Alexandre J, Goldwasser F, Huillard O. Axitinib in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma: design, development, and place in therapy. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2017;11:2801-2811.
Not in our library10.2147/dddt.s109640
134.
Tyler T. Axitinib: newly approved for renal cell carcinoma. J Adv Pract Oncol. 2012;3(5):333-335.
Not in our library10.6004/jadpro.2012.3.5.7
135.
FDA Approves Inlyta (Axitinib) for Advanced Kidney Cancer. Oncology Times. 2012;34(4).
Not in our library
136.
Swiecicki PL, Bellile EL, Brummel CV, Brenner JC, Worden FP. Efficacy of axitinib in metastatic head and neck cancer with novel radiographic response criteria. Cancer. 2021;127(2):219-228.
Not in our library10.1002/cncr.33226
137.
Gunnarsson O, Pfanzelter NR, Cohen RB, Keefe SM. Evaluating the safety and efficacy of axitinib in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. Cancer management and research. 2015;7:65-73.
Not in our library10.2147/cmar.s74202
138.
Shang C, Hou Y, Meng T, Shi M, Cui G. The Anticancer Activity of Indazole Compounds: A Mini Review. Curr Top Med Chem. 2021;21(5):363-376.
Not in our library10.2174/1568026620999201124154231
139.
Escudier B, Gore M. Axitinib for the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Drugs R&D. 2011;11(2):113-126.
Not in our library10.2165/11591240-000000000-00000
140.
Fathi AT, Blonquist TM, Levis MJ, Hernandez D, Ballen KK, Avigan DE, et al. A Phase I Study of the Multi-Targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Cabozantinib in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Blood. 2016;128(22):5218.
Not in our library10.1182/blood.v128.22.5218.5218
141.
Cabozantinib Approved for Untreated Renal Cell Carcinoma. Oncology Times. 2018;40(4):16-17.
Not in our library10.1097/01.cot.0000530900.33684.ad
142.
Advances in drug development for hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical trials and potential therapeutic targets · 2021
No notice
143.
Duke ES, Barone AK, Chatterjee S, Mishra-Kalyani PS, Shen YL, Isikwei E, et al. FDA Approval Summary: Cabozantinib for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2022;28(19):4173-4177.
Not in our library10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-0873
144.
Sekino Y, Teishima J, Liang G, Hinata N. Molecular mechanisms of resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitor in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Int J Urol. 2022;29(12):1419-1428.
Not in our library10.1111/iju.15042
145.
Zhou L, Liu XD, Sun M, Zhang X, German P, Bai S, et al. Targeting MET and AXL overcomes resistance to sunitinib therapy in renal cell carcinoma. Oncogene. 2016;35(21):2687-2697.
Not in our library10.1038/onc.2015.343
146.
Deng S, Solinas A, Calvisi DF. Cabozantinib for HCC Treatment, From Clinical Back to Experimental Models. Front Oncol. 2021;11:756672.
Not in our library10.3389/fonc.2021.756672
147.
Jiang L, Li L, Liu Y, Zhan M, Lu L, Yuan S, et al. Drug resistance mechanism of kinase inhibitors in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2023;14.
Not in our library10.3389/fphar.2023.1097277
148.
Maroto P, Porta C, Capdevila J, Apolo AB, Viteri S, Rodriguez-Antona C, et al. Cabozantinib for the treatment of solid tumors: a systematic review. Therapeutic advances in medical oncology. 2022;14:17588359221107112.
Not in our library10.1177/17588359221107112
149.
Fondevila F, Méndez-Blanco C, Fernández-Palanca P, González-Gallego J, Mauriz JL. Anti-tumoral activity of single and combined regorafenib treatments in preclinical models of liver and gastrointestinal cancers. Exp Mol Med. 2019;51(9):1-15.
Not in our library10.1038/s12276-019-0308-1
150.
Arai H, Battaglin F, Wang J, Lo JH, Soni S, Zhang W, et al. Molecular insight of regorafenib treatment for colorectal cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2019;81:101912.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ctrv.2019.101912
151.
Wang Z, Zhu Q, Li X, Ren X, Li J, Zhang Y, et al. TOP2A inhibition reverses drug resistance of hepatocellular carcinoma to regorafenib. Am J Cancer Res. 2022;12(9):4343-4360.
Not in our library
152.
Tseng LM, Lau KY, Chen JL, Chu PY, Huang TT, Lee CH, et al. Regorafenib induces damage-associated molecular patterns, cancer cell death and immune modulatory effects in a murine triple negative breast cancer model. Exp Cell Res. 2023;429(1):113652.
Not in our library10.1016/j.yexcr.2023.113652
153.
Yu Y, Wu T, Zhang X, Li P, Ye L, Kuang J, et al. Regorafenib activates oxidative stress by inhibiting SELENOS and potentiates oxaliplatin-induced cell death in colon cancer cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 2023;957:175986.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ejphar.2023.175986
154.
Harrison DJ, Gill JD, Roth ME, Zhang W, Teicher B, Erickson S, et al. Initial in vivo testing of a multitarget kinase inhibitor, regorafenib, by the Pediatric Preclinical Testing Consortium. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2020;67(6):e28222.
Not in our library10.1002/pbc.28222
155.
Pavlakis N, Shitara K, Sjoquist KM, Martin AJ, Jaworski A, Yip S, et al. INTEGRATE IIa: A randomised, double-blind, phase III study of regorafenib versus placebo in refractory advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer (AGOC)—A study led by the Australasian Gastro-intestinal Trials Group (AGITG). J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(4_suppl):LBA294-LBA.
Not in our library10.1200/jco.2023.41.4_suppl.lba294
156.
Røed Skårderud M, Polk A, Kjeldgaard Vistisen K, Larsen FO, Nielsen DL. Efficacy and safety of regorafenib in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev. 2018;62:61-73.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.10.011
157.
Nagasaka M, Ge Y, Sukari A, Kukreja G, Ou SHI. A user’s guide to lorlatinib. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2020;151:102969.
Not in our library10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.102969
158.
Reed M, Rosales ALS, Chioda MD, Parker L, Devgan G, Kettle J. Consensus Recommendations for Management and Counseling of Adverse Events Associated With Lorlatinib: A Guide for Healthcare Practitioners. Advances in Therapy. 2020;37(6):3019-30.
Not in our library10.1007/s12325-020-01365-3
159.
Syed YY. Lorlatinib: First Global Approval. Drugs. 2019;79(1):93-98.
Not in our library10.1007/s40265-018-1041-0
160.
Drug and Device News. P & T: a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management. 2018;43(12):719-733.
Not in our library
161.
Solomon BJ, Bauer TM, Mok TSK, Liu G, Mazieres J, de Marinis F, et al. Efficacy and safety of first-line lorlatinib versus crizotinib in patients with advanced, ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: updated analysis of data from the phase 3, randomised, open-label CROWN study. Lancet Respir Med. 2023;11(4):354-366.
Not in our library10.1016/s2213-2600(22)00437-4
162.
Gilteritinib overcomes lorlatinib resistance in ALK-rearranged cancer · 2021
Not checked
163.
Hao Z, Wang P. Lenvatinib in Management of Solid Tumors. Oncologist. 2020;25(2):e302-e310.
Not in our library10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0407
164.
Makker V, Taylor MH, Aghajanian C, Oaknin A, Mier J, Cohn AL, et al. Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Endometrial Cancer. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2020;38(26):2981-2992.
Not in our library10.1200/jco.19.02627
165.
Tchekmedyian V, Sherman EJ, Dunn L, Tran C, Baxi S, Katabi N, et al. Phase II Study of Lenvatinib in Patients With Progressive, Recurrent or Metastatic Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2019;37(18):1529-1537.
Not in our library10.1200/jco.18.01859
166.
Schlumberger M, Jarzab B, Cabanillas ME, Robinson B, Pacini F, Ball DW, et al. A Phase II Trial of the Multitargeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Lenvatinib (E7080) in Advanced Medullary Thyroid Cancer. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2016;22(1):44-53.
Not in our library10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-1127
167.
Lenvatinib for Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer · 2017
No notice
168.
Kudo M, Finn RS, Qin S, Han K-H, Ikeda K, Piscaglia F, et al. Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. The Lancet. 2018;391(10126):1163-1173.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30207-1
169.
Zhao Y, Zhang YN, Wang KT, Chen L. Lenvatinib for hepatocellular carcinoma: From preclinical mechanisms to anti-cancer therapy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2020;1874(1):188391.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbcan.2020.188391
170.
Berdelou A, Borget I, Godbert Y, Nguyen T, Garcia ME, Chougnet CN, et al. Lenvatinib for the Treatment of Radioiodine-Refractory Thyroid Cancer in Real-Life Practice. Thyroid: official journal of the American Thyroid Association. 2018;28(1):72-78.
Not in our library10.1089/thy.2017.0205
171.
EGFR inhibition reverses resistance to lenvatinib in hepatocellular carcinoma cells · 2022
Not checked
172.
Capozzi M, De Divitiis C, Ottaiano A, von Arx C, Scala S, Tatangelo F, et al. Lenvatinib, a molecule with versatile application: from preclinical evidence to future development in anti-cancer treatment. Cancer management and research. 2019;11:3847-3860.
Not in our library10.2147/cmar.s188316
173.
Liu D, Offin M, Harnicar S, Li BT, Drilon A. Entrectinib: an orally available, selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of NTRK, ROS1, and ALK fusion-positive solid tumors. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018;14:1247-1252.
Not in our library10.2147/tcrm.s147381
174.
Menichincheri M, Ardini E, Magnaghi P, Avanzi N, Banfi P, Bossi R, et al. Discovery of Entrectinib: A New 3-Aminoindazole As a Potent Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK), c-ros Oncogene 1 Kinase (ROS1), and Pan-Tropomyosin Receptor Kinases (Pan-TRKs) inhibitor. J Med Chem. 2016;59(7):3392-3408.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00064
175.
Jiang Q, Li M, Li H, Chen L. Entrectinib, a new multi-target inhibitor for cancer therapy. Biomed Pharmacother. 2022;150:112974.
Not in our library10.1016/j.biopha.2022.112974
176.
Doebele RC, Drilon A, Paz-Ares L, Siena S, Shaw AT, Farago AF, et al. Entrectinib in patients with advanced or metastatic NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours: integrated analysis of three phase 1–2 trials. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(2):271-282.
Not in our library10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30691-6
177.
Ku BM, Bae YH, Lee KY, Sun JM, Lee SH, Ahn JS, et al. Entrectinib resistance mechanisms in ROS1-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer. Invest New Drugs. 2020;38(2):360-368.
Not in our library10.1007/s10637-019-00795-3
178.
Guaitoli G, Bertolini F, Bettelli S, Manfredini S, Maur M, Trudu L, et al. Deepening the Knowledge of ROS1 Rearrangements in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Diagnosis, Treatment, Resistance and Concomitant Alterations. International journal of molecular sciences. 2021;22(23).
Not in our library10.3390/ijms222312867
179.
Russo M, Misale S, Wei G, Siravegna G, Crisafulli G, Lazzari L, et al. Acquired Resistance to the TRK Inhibitor Entrectinib in Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Discov. 2016;6(1):36-44.
Not in our library10.1158/2159-8290.cd-15-0940
180.
Rosenzweig SA. Acquired Resistance to Drugs Targeting Tyrosine Kinases. Adv Cancer Res. 2018;138:71-98.
Not in our library10.1016/bs.acr.2018.02.003
181.
Aveic S, Tonini GP. Resistance to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in solid tumors: can we improve the cancer fighting strategy by blocking autophagy? Cancer Cell Int. 2016;16(1):62.
Not in our library10.1186/s12935-016-0341-2
182.
Kim HI, Lim H, Moon A. Sex Differences in Cancer: Epidemiology. Genetics and Therapy Biomolecules & therapeutics. 2018;26(4):335-342.
Not in our library10.4062/biomolther.2018.103
183.
He LR, Zhao HY, Li BK, Zhang LJ, Liu MZ, Kung HF, et al. Overexpression of AIB1 negatively affects survival of surgically resected non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(8):1675-1681.
Not in our library10.1093/annonc/mdp592
184.
Liu TC, Jin X, Wang Y, Wang K. Role of epidermal growth factor receptor in lung cancer and targeted therapies. Am J Cancer Res. 2017;7(2):187-202.
Not in our library
185.
Ganti AK, Klein AB, Cotarla I, Seal B, Chou E. Update of Incidence, Prevalence, Survival, and Initial Treatment in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the US. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7(12):1824-1832.
Not in our library10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.4932
186.
Hirsch FR, Varella-Garcia M, Cappuzzo F. Predictive value of EGFR and HER2 overexpression in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Oncogene. 2009;28(1):S32-S37.
Not in our library10.1038/onc.2009.199
187.
Prabhakar CN. Epidermal growth factor receptor in non-small cell lung cancer. Translational Lung Cancer Research. 2015;4(2):110-118.
Not in our library10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2015.01.01
188.
Zhao J, Xia Y. Targeting HER2 Alterations in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Comprehensive Review. JCO Precis Oncol. 2020;4:411-425.
Not in our library10.1200/po.19.00333
189.
Yoshizawa A, Fukuoka J, Shimizu S, Shilo K, Franks TJ, Hewitt SM, et al. Overexpression of Phospho-eIF4E Is Associated with Survival through AKT Pathway in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(1):240-248.
Not in our library10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-09-0986
190.
Cheng H, Shcherba M, Pendurti G, Liang Y, Piperdi B, Perez-Soler R. Targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway: potential for lung cancer treatment. Lung cancer management. 2014;3(1):67-75.
Not in our library10.2217/lmt.13.72
191.
Amorim IS, Lach G, Gkogkas CG. The Role of the Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4E (eIF4E) in Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Frontiers in Genetics. 2018;9.
Not in our library10.3389/fgene.2018.00561
192.
Kiliti AJ, Sharif GM, Martin MB, Wellstein A, Riegel AT. AIB1/SRC-3/NCOA3 function in estrogen receptor alpha positive breast cancer. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2023;14.
Not in our library10.3389/fendo.2023.1250218
193.
Lee YJ, Han J-Y, Lee GK, Shin J, Yun SA, Oh JY, et al. C-MET overexpression as a resistance biomarker to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(15_suppl):e20660-e.
Not in our library10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.e20660
194.
Faiella A, Riccardi F, Cartenì G, Chiurazzi M, Onofrio L. The Emerging Role of c-Met in Carcinogenesis and Clinical Implications as a Possible Therapeutic Target. Journal of oncology. 2022;2022:5179182.
Not in our library10.1155/2022/5179182
195.
The role of osteopontin in the progression of solid organ tumour · 2018
No notice
196.
Jin Y, Tong DY, Chen JN, Feng ZY, Yang JY, Shao CK, et al. Overexpression of Osteopontin, αvβ3 and Pim-1 Associated with Prognostically Important Clinicopathologic Variables in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. PloS one. 2012;7(10):e48575.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0048575
197.
Maeda R, Suda T, Hachimaru A, Tochii D, Tochii S, Takagi Y. Clinical significance of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level in patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(1):176-186.
Not in our library10.21037/jtd.2017.01.30
198.
Kankanala VLM, S.K.R. Carcinoembryonic Antigen: StatPearls Publishing; 2023 [Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK578172/.
Not in our library
199.
Kiss M, Lebegge E, Murgaski A, Van Damme H, Kancheva D, Brughmans J, et al. Junctional adhesion molecule-A is dispensable for myeloid cell recruitment and diversification in the tumor microenvironment. Frontiers in Immunology. 2022;13.
Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2022.1003975
200.
Zhang M, Luo W, Huang B, Liu Z, Sun L, Zhang Q, et al. Overexpression of JAM-A in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Correlates with Tumor Progression. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(11):e79173.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0079173
201.
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73(1):17-48.
Not in our library10.3322/caac.21763
202.
Bevan CL. Androgen receptor in prostate cancer: cause or cure? Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2005;16(9):395-397.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tem.2005.09.006
203.
Androgen Receptor Signaling Pathway in Prostate Cancer: From Genetics to Clinical Applications · 2020
No notice
204.
Alajati A, D'Ambrosio M, Troiani M, Mosole S, Pellegrini L, Chen J, et al. CDCP1 overexpression drives prostate cancer progression and can be targeted in vivo. J Clin Investig. 2020;130(5):2435-2450.
Not in our library10.1172/jci131133
205.
Zhao N, Chopra S, Trepka K, Wang YH, Sakhamuri S, Hooshdaran N, et al. CUB Domain-Containing Protein 1 (CDCP1) Is a Target for Radioligand Therapy in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer, including PSMA Null Disease. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2022;28(14):3066-3075.
Not in our library10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-3858
206.
Höflmayer D, Hamuda M, Schroeder C, Hube-Magg C, Simon R, Göbel C, et al. High RSF1 protein expression is an independent prognostic feature in prostate cancer. Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden). 2020;59(3):268-273.
Not in our library10.1080/0284186x.2019.1686537
207.
Cai G, Yang Q, Sun W. RSF1 in cancer: interactions and functions. Cancer Cell Int. 2021;21(1):315.
Not in our library10.1186/s12935-021-02012-9
208.
Santamaría A, Fernández PL, Farré X, Benedit P, Reventós J, Morote J, et al. PTOV-1, a Novel Protein Overexpressed in Prostate Cancer, Shuttles between the Cytoplasm and the Nucleus and Promotes Entry into the S Phase of the Cell Division Cycle. Am J Pathol. 2003;162(3):897-905.
Not in our library10.1016/s0002-9440(10)63885-0
209.
Weng J, Wang J, Hu X, Wang F, Ittmann M, Liu M. PSGR2, a novel G-protein coupled receptor, is overexpressed in human prostate cancer. Int J Cancer. 2006;118(6):1471-1480.
Not in our library10.1002/ijc.21527
210.
Xu LL, Stackhouse BG, Florence K, Zhang W, Shanmugam N, Sesterhenn IA, et al. PSGR, a novel prostate-specific gene with homology to a G protein-coupled receptor, is overexpressed in prostate cancer. Can Res. 2000;60(23):6568-6572.
Not in our library
211.
Hammudi M, Aldhahri W, Kalola A, McCullum C, Motoni C, Martha A, et al. RIPK2 as a prognostic biomarker and predictor of aggressive prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(6_suppl):211.
Not in our library10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.211
212.
Receptor-interacting protein kinase 2 (RIPK2) stabilizes c-Myc and is a therapeutic target in prostate cancer metastasis · 2022
Not checked
213.
Caveolin-1-mediated sphingolipid oncometabolism underlies a metabolic vulnerability of prostate cancer · 2020
Not checked
214.
Association of Caveolin-1 Expression With Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis · 2021
Not checked
215.
Dorkin TJ, Robinson MC, Marsh C, Bjartell A, Neal DE, Leung HY. FGF8 over-expression in prostate cancer is associated with decreased patient survival and persists in androgen independent disease. Oncogene. 1999;18(17):2755-2761.
Not in our library10.1038/sj.onc.1202624
216.
Zhang Y, Liu Y, Wang L, Song H. The expression and role of trefoil factors in human tumors. Translational Cancer Research. 2019;8(4):1609-1617.
Not in our library10.21037/tcr.2019.07.48
217.
Garraway IP, Seligson D, Said J, Horvath S, Reiter RE. Trefoil factor 3 is overexpressed in human prostate cancer. Prostate. 2004;61(3):209-214.
Not in our library10.1002/pros.20096
218.
Faith DA, Isaacs WB, Morgan JD, Fedor HL, Hicks JL, Mangold LA, et al. Trefoil factor 3 overexpression in prostatic carcinoma: prognostic importance using tissue microarrays. Prostate. 2004;61(3):215-227.
Not in our library10.1002/pros.20095
219.
Lotfollahzadeh S R-BA, Cagir B. Colon Cancer: StatPearls 2023 Jan.
Not in our library
220.
Kim BJ, Hanna MH. Colorectal cancer in young adults. J Surg Oncol. 2023;127(8):1247-1251.
Not in our library10.1002/jso.27320
221.
Geng W, Liang W, Fan Y, Ye Z, Zhang L. Overexpression of CCDC34 in colorectal cancer and its involvement in tumor growth, apoptosis and invasion. Mol Med Rep. 2018;17(1):465-473.
Not in our library10.3892/mmr.2017.7860
222.
Baba Y, Nosho K, Shima K, Goessling W, Chan AT, Ng K, et al. PTGER2 overexpression in colorectal cancer is associated with microsatellite instability, independent of CpG island methylator phenotype. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention: a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology. 2010;19(3):822-831.
Not in our library10.1158/1055-9965.epi-09-1154
223.
Gomez LA, de Las PA, Reiner T, Burnstein K, Perez-Stable C. Increased expression of cyclin B1 sensitizes prostate cancer cells to apoptosis induced by chemotherapy. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007;6(5):1534-1543.
Not in our library10.1158/1535-7163.mct-06-0727
224.
Matthess Y, Raab M, Sanhaji M, Lavrik IN, Strebhardt K. Cdk1/cyclin B1 controls Fas-mediated apoptosis by regulating caspase-8 activity. Mol Cell Biol. 2010;30(24):5726-5740.
Not in our library10.1128/mcb.00731-10
225.
Wang A, Yoshimi N, Ino N, Tanaka T, Mori H. Overexpression of cyclin B1 in human colorectal cancers. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1997;123(2):124-127.
Not in our library10.1007/bf01269891
226.
Ye C, Wang J, Wu P, Li X, Chai Y. Prognostic role of cyclin B1 in solid tumors: a meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017;8(2):2224-2232.
Not in our library10.18632/oncotarget.13653
227.
Chen Y, Chen M, Deng K. Blocking the Wnt/β‑catenin signaling pathway to treat colorectal cancer: Strategies to improve current therapies (Review). International journal of oncology. 2023;62(2).
Not in our library10.3892/ijo.2022.5472
228.
Noe O, Filipiak L, Royfman R, Campbell A, Lin L, Hamouda D, et al. Adenomatous polyposis coli in cancer and therapeutic implications. Oncol Rev. 2021;15(1):534.
Not in our library10.4081/oncol.2021.534
229.
Cheng X, Xu X, Chen D, Zhao F, Wang W. Therapeutic potential of targeting the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in colorectal cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;110:473-481.
Not in our library10.1016/j.biopha.2018.11.082
230.
Li XL, Zhou J, Chen ZR, Chng WJ. P53 mutations in colorectal cancer - molecular pathogenesis and pharmacological reactivation. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(1):84-93.
Not in our library10.3748/wjg.v21.i1.84
231.
Williams DS, Mouradov D, Browne C, Palmieri M, Elliott MJ, Nightingale R, et al. Overexpression of TP53 protein is associated with the lack of adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in patients with stage III colorectal cancer. Mod Pathol. 2020;33(3):483-95.
Not in our library10.1038/s41379-019-0353-2
232.
Wang J-L, Guo C-R, Sun T-T, Su W-Y, Hu Q, Guo F-F, et al. SRSF3 functions as an oncogene in colorectal cancer by regulating the expression of ArhGAP30. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20(1):120.
Not in our library10.1186/s12935-020-01201-2
233.
Zhou Z, Gong Q, Lin Z, Wang Y, Li M, Wang L, et al. Emerging Roles of SRSF3 as a Therapeutic Target for Cancer. Front Oncol. 2020;10.
Not in our library10.3389/fonc.2020.577636
234.
Zhang Y, Wang M, Meng F, Yang M, Chen Y, Guo X, et al. A novel SRSF3 inhibitor, SFI003, exerts anticancer activity against colorectal cancer by modulating the SRSF3/DHCR24/ROS axis. Cell death discovery. 2022;8(1):238.
Not in our library10.1038/s41420-022-01039-9
235.
Ishida S, Aasawat T, Sumita M, Katouda M, Yoshizawa T, Yoshizoe K, et al. ChemTSv2: Functional molecular design using de novo molecule generator. WIREs Computational Molecular Science. 2023;13(6):e1680.
Not in our library10.1002/wcms.1680
236.
Blaschke T, Arús-Pous J, Chen H, Margreitter C, Tyrchan C, Engkvist O, et al. REINVENT 2.0: An AI Tool for De Novo Drug Design. J Chem Inf Model. 2020;60(12):5918-22.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00915
237.
Liu X, Ye K, van Vlijmen HWT, Emmerich MTM, Ijzerman AP, van Westen GJP. DrugEx v2: de novo design of drug molecules by Pareto-based multi-objective reinforcement learning in polypharmacology. Journal of Cheminformatics. 2021;13(1):85.
Not in our library10.1186/s13321-021-00561-9
238.
Sha CM, Wang J, Dokholyan NV. NeuralDock: Rapid and Conformation-Agnostic Docking of Small Molecules. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences. 2022;9.
Not in our library10.3389/fmolb.2022.867241
239.
Ab Ghani NS, Ramlan EI, Firdaus-Raih M. Drug ReposER: a web server for predicting similar amino acid arrangements to known drug binding interfaces for potential drug repositioning. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(W1):W350-W356.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkz391
240.
Wang N, Jia W, Wang J, Yang Z, Liu Y, Huang D, et al. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel donepezil-tacrine hybrids as multi-functional agents with low neurotoxicity against Alzheimer’s disease. Bioorg Chem. 2024;143:107010.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bioorg.2023.107010

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.