Not checked for notices yet.

Understanding the supports needed for policy implementation: a comparative analysis of the placement of intermediaries across three mental health systems

Heather L. Bullock, John N. Lavis

Health Research Policy and Systems · 2019

doi:10.1186/s12961-019-0479-1 (opens in a new tab)

References 35

1.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
2.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
3.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
4.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
5.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
6.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
7.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
8.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
9.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
10.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
11.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
12.
A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project · 2015
No notice
13.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
14.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
15.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
16.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
17.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
18.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
19.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
20.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
21.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
22.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
23.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
24.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
25.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
26.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
27.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
28.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
29.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
30.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
31.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
32.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
33.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
34.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
35.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 1

Revisiting concepts of evidence in implementation science · 2022
No notice

Questions about this paper

We email you if it is retracted, withdrawn, corrected or flagged.

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.