Validity and reliability of the Mexican resilience measurement scale in families of children with chronic conditions
Filiberto Toledano-Toledano, José Moral de la Rubia, Laurie D. McCubbin and 12 more
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · 2017
doi:10.1186/s12955-017-0817-3 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Abstract Background The resilience to face disease is a process of positive adaptation despite the loss of health. It involves developing vitality and skills to overcome the negative effects of adversity, risks, and vulnerability caused by disease. In Mexico, the Mexican Resilience Measurement Scale (RESI-M) has been validated with a general population and has a five-factor structure. However, this scale does not allow evaluation of resilience in specific subpopulations, such as caregivers. Method This study investigated the psychometric properties of RESI-M in 446 family caregivers of children with chronic diseases. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed, internal consistency values were calculated using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, and mean comparisons were determined using t-tests. Results The expected five-factor model showed an adequate fit with the data based on a maximum likelihood test. The internal consistency for each factor ranged from.76 to.93, and the global internal consistency was.95. No average difference in RESI-M and its factors was found between women and men. Conclusion The RESI-M showed internal consistency and its model of five correlated factors was valid among family caregivers of children with chronic diseases.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.