Difficulties encountered by public health workers in COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-sectional study based on five provinces
Zhicheng Du, Hua You, Huan Zhou and 7 more
BMC Health Services Research · 2021
doi:10.1186/s12913-021-06699-4 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Objectives The aim of this study is to address the difficulties encountered by public health workers in the early and middle stages of their efforts to combat COVID-19, compare the gaps among different types of institutions, and identify shortcomings in epidemic control. Methods Using multi-stage sampling, a survey of public health workers involved in the prevention and control of COVID-19 was conducted from 18 February to 1 March 2020 through a self-administered questionnaire. These public health workers were from the primary health care center (defined as “primary-urban” and “primary-rural” for those in urban and rural areas, respectively) and the center for disease control and prevention (defined as “non-primary”) in five provinces including Hubei, Guangdong, Sichuan, Jiangsu and Gansu, China. Results A total of 9,475 public health workers were surveyed, of which 40.0 %, 27.0 % and 33.0 % were from the primary-rural, primary-urban and non-primary, respectively. The resources shortage were reported by 27.9 % participants, with the primary-rural being the worst affected ( OR = 1.201, 95 % CI : 1.073–1.345). The difficulties in data processing were reported by 31.5 % participants, with no significant differences among institutions. The difficulties in communication and coordination were reported by 29.8 % participants, with the non-primary being the most serious (primary-rural: OR = 0.520, 95 % CI : 0.446–0.606; primary-urban: OR = 0.533, 95 % CI : 0.454–0.625). The difficulties with target audiences were reported by 20.2 % participants, with the primary-urban being the worst ( OR = 1.368, 95 % CI : 1.199–1.560). The psychological distress were reported by 48.8 % participants, with no significant differences among institutions. Conclusions Psychological distress is the most serious problem in the prevention and control of COVID-19. Resources shortage in primary-rural, difficulties in communication and coordination in non-primary, and difficulties with target audiences in the primary-urban deserve attention. This study will provide scientific evidences for improving the national public health emergency management system, especially for reducing the urban-rural differences in emergency response capacity.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
References6
6 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.