Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Propofol-assisted deep extubation in the dental treatment of pediatrics: a randomized controlled triple-blind trial

Wei Cui, Xiang Zhang, Ying Shang and 1 more

BMC Anesthesiology · 2025

doi:10.1186/s12871-025-03170-3 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To verify whether propofol-assisted deep extubation is associated with fewer complications in pediatric patients undergoing dental treatment. Materials and methods This prospective study enrolled 60 pediatric candidates undergoing elective dental interventions, with randomized allocation to either deep extubation (DE; n = 30) or awake extubation (AE; n = 30) protocols. The primary endpoint was the incidence of at least 1 respiratory adverse event, whereas time to extubation (TOE), time to wake-up (TOW), hemodynamic fluctuations during extubation, incidence of emergence agitation (EA), nasal obstruction, epistaxis, sore throat, and hoarse voice after extubation were the secondary endpoints. Results The DE group reported significantly lower incidence of at least 1 respiratory adverse event (0.0% VS 23.3%, P = 0.016). The TOE was significantly shorter in the DE group, averaging 2.78 ± 0.87 min, compared to 5.50 ± 1.01 min in the AE group (P <.001). The TOW was longer in the DE group, with an average of 15.03 ± 3.44 min compared to 10.63 ± 1.52 min in the AE group (P <.001). The average value of mean arterial pressure (AVMAP) during extubation was lower in the DE group at 74.70 ± 13.35 mmHg, compared to 87.43 ± 15.31 mmHg in the AE group (P <.001). The average value of heart rate (AVHR) in the DE group was 108.37 ± 13.41 bpm, while in the AE group, it was 127.93 ± 20.74 bpm (P <.001). Additionally, the rates of sore throat and hoarse voice were significantly lower in the DE group (6.7% and 3.3%) than in the AE group (27% and 30%). Conclusions For pediatric patients undergoing dental treatment, propofol-assisted deep extubation is superior, allowing for less extubation time without increasing airway complications. This technique provides a smoother extubation with fewer hemodynamic fluctuations and lower incidences of voice hoarseness and persistent coughing, provided that certain rules for deep extubation are followed.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

References45

    40 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

    All 45 references

    Reads

    Read by people on this page

    None yet.

    Checked or read by AI through naulon

    None yet.

    A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

    Are you an author?

    Is this your paper?

    Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.