Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 26, 2026.

Timing of vasopressor initiation and mortality in septic shock: a cohort study

Vance Beck, Dan Chateau, Gregory L Bryson and 5 more

Critical Care · 2014 · CC BY

doi:10.1186/cc13868

Abstract

Introduction. Despite recent advances in the management of septic shock, mortality remains unacceptably high. Earlier initiation of key therapies including appropriate antimicrobials and fluid resuscitation appears to reduce the mortality in this condition. This study examined whether early initiation of vasopressor therapy is associated with improved survival in fluid therapy-refractory septic shock.

Methods. Utilizing a well-established database, relevant information including duration of time to vasopressor administration following the initial documentation of recurrent/persistent hypotension associated with septic shock was assessed in 8,670 adult patients from 28 ICUs in Canada, the United States of America, and Saudi Arabia. The primary endpoint was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary endpoints were length of ICU and hospital stay as well as duration of ventilator support and vasopressor dependence. Analysis involved multivariate linear and logistic regression analysis.

Results. In total, 8,640 patients met the definition of septic shock with time of vasopressor/inotropic initiation documented. Of these, 6,514 were suitable for analysis. The overall unadjusted hospital mortality rate was 53%. Independent mortality correlates included liver failure (odds ratio (OR) 3.46, 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.67 to 4.48), metastatic cancer (OR 1.63, CI, 1.32 to 2.01), AIDS (OR 1.91, CI, 1.29 to 2.49), hematologic malignancy (OR 1.88, CI, 1.46 to 2.41), neutropenia (OR 1.78, CI, 1.27 to 2.49) and chronic hypertension (OR 0.62 CI, 0.52 to 0.73). Delay of initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy (OR 1.07/hr, CI, 1.06 to 1.08), age (OR 1.03/yr, CI, 1.02 to 1.03), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II Score (OR 1.11/point, CI, 1.10 to 1.12) were also found to be significant independent correlates of mortality. After adjustment, only a weak correlation between vasopressor delay and hospital mortality was found (adjusted OR 1.02/hr, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.03, P <0.001). This weak effect was entirely driven by the group of patients with the longest delays (>14.1 hours). There was no significant relationship of vasopressor initiation delay to duration of vasopressor therapy (P = 0.313) and only a trend to longer duration of ventilator support (P = 0.055) among survivors.

Conclusion. Marked delays in initiation of vasopressor/inotropic therapy are associated with a small increase in mortality risk in patients with septic shock.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 26, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Despite advancements in understanding and treatment, septic shock remains a worldwide healthcare problem. With an increasing annual incidence in the developed world, mortality remains between 25 and 50% of those afflicted. The pathophysiology of septic shock is complex and involves vasodilatation, relative and absolute hypovolemia, myocardial dysfunction, increased metabolic rate and altered regional and microvascular blood flow. Septic shock appears to cause a loss of autoregulation, making the perfusion of many vital organs and tissues dependent on blood pressure. Early and aggressive fluid resuscitation of sepsis has been suggested to have a critical role in optimization of organ perfusion, preservation of end organ function and improvement of survival.

Hypotension despite adequate fluid resuscitation therapy is a defining criterion in the diagnosis of septic shock. To maintain organ perfusion, current guidelines recommend maintaining a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 65 mmHg with fluid therapy and vasopressors even when hypovolemia has not yet been resolved. According to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign this recommendation is considered ‘strong’ although supporting evidence is considered ‘weak’.

Many studies have compared different vasopressor agents for the resuscitation of septic shock but very few have investigated the role that the timing of vasopressor initiation in relation to hypotension onset plays in outcome.

Study design

Data from a retrospective review of adult patients (≥18 years old) diagnosed with septic shock was used to create the Cooperative Antimicrobial Therapy of Septic Shock Database (member listing in Additional file 1). Consecutive adult septic shock patients from 28 medical institutions in Canada, the United States and Saudi Arabia for periods between 1996 and 2008 were retrospectively identified using either internal ICU registries/databases and/or International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9 or ICD-10) coding strategies. Patients from surgical, medical and mixed ICUs were included. Each potential case was screened to determine eligibility to meet the criteria for septic shock as described by the 1991 Society of Critical Care Medicine/American College of Chest Physicians consensus statement on sepsis definition. All included cases were required to have no other obvious cause of shock. Each institution contributed a minimum of 50 cases. A waived consent protocol was approved by the Health Ethics Board of the University of Manitoba and at each individual participating center (listing in Additional file 2). The Ethics Boards waived the need for informed consent because of the retrospective, risk-free nature of the study in combination with the use of de-identified data.

Data management

Data including the time to vasopressor administration after documentation of persistent or recurrent hypotension refractory to fluid administration were retrospectively collected from clinical records using a uniform data extraction template by several trained research nurses or research assistants with medical training (medical students, residents, fellows). All data extractors reviewed >100 charts.

Hypotension was defined as a mean blood pressure <65 mmHg, a systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, or a decrease in systolic pressure of 40 mmHg from the patient’s baseline consistent with the Society of Critical Care Medicine/American College of Chest Physicians criteria for septic shock. An episode of hypotension was considered to represent the initial onset of septic shock when hypotension persisted from the onset despite fluid (>2 l saline or equivalent) administration (persistent hypotension), or when hypotension was only transiently improved (hypotension resolution for <1 hour) with fluid resuscitation (recurrent hypotension). Hypotension that resolved following fluid resuscitation alone (crystalloid or colloid) without subsequent clinical deterioration was not considered to represent the initial onset of septic shock-related hypotension. Similarly, patients exclusively treated with an inotropic agent without a vasopressor during the first 24 hours were excluded from the database. Organ failure was determined according to previously described criteria.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SAS version 9.1 (Cary, NC USA). Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the patient population, including mean and standard deviation for continuous variables (or median and inter-quartile range for skewed distributions) and frequency and proportion for categorical variables. Empirical logit plots were used to explore the functional form of the association between vasopressor delay fraction (analyzed continuously and also as categorized at decile cutpoints) and survival to hospital discharge. The shortest time delay decile (≤6 minutes) was excluded from the analysis as this usually represents cases where hypotension existed for an unknown period before arrival in the emergency department. In this circumstance, the true time from hypotension onset to vasopressor initiation is indeterminate.

The unadjusted association between survival to hospital discharge and vasopressor delay was estimated using simple logistic regression. A similar analysis was done with respect to the occurrence of individual and total number of organ failures after the day of shock (incremental organ failures from day 2 to day 10). A wide variety of epidemiologic factors (age, sex), comorbidities (AIDS, hematologic malignancy (lymphoma/leukemia/multiple myeloma), metastatic cancer, heart disease, organ transplant, hypertension, respiratory disease, renal disease, diabetes, autoimmune conditions, thromboembolism, neurological diseases), severity of illness (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) score), laboratory values (admission lactic acid and bicarbonate levels, white cell count) and therapeutic elements (time to initial appropriate antimicrobial therapy) were first assessed with respect to hospital survival and organ failure using univariate analysis. Those that were significant at P < 0.05 were retained for inclusion in the model. Multivariable logistic regression was then used to estimate the adjusted association and to identify independent correlates of mortality and organ failure. Mortality and individual organ failure results are expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Total incremental organ failure after the admission day (day 2 to day 10) was analyzed using Poisson regression with results expressed as rate ratios. Because hospital length of stay (LOS) and ICU LOS are count variables, these secondary outcomes were analyzed using generalized linear regression with a negative binomial distribution and logarithmic link function, adjusted for the same covariates as in the primary outcome analysis. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median with interquartile range as appropriate.

Results

There were a total of 8,670 patients that fit the diagnostic criteria for septic shock. Thirty patients did not have a time of vasopressor initiation available and were excluded. Another 2,126 patients were excluded due to inadequate data acquisition of other significant analytic variables, primarily time to appropriate antimicrobial therapy from documentation of hypotension. In total, 6,514 observations were included in this analysis.

Demographic characteristics and existing comorbidity

The baseline characteristics of the patients in the entire cohort are presented in Table 1. The average age was 62 ± 1 years with male predominance (57.0%). The most common existing comorbidities were diabetes inclusive of oral hypoglycemic and insulin-requiring (26.6%), chronic renal failure inclusive of dialysis (23.6%), and hypertension (19.1%). Illness severity is presented in Table 2 with the average APACHE II score being 26.1 ± 8.2. Baseline (day 1) laboratory results also presented in Table 2 showed elevated levels of serum creatinine (219 ± 181 μmol/l), leukocyte count (16.3 ± 16.1 × 106 cells/l), International Normalized Ratio (1.5 ± 1.4) and serum lactate (4.8 ± 4.4 mmol/l). The heart rate was elevated at 115 ± 29 beats/minute. Approximately 40% of cases were due to nosocomially acquired infection (Table 2). Culture negative and bacteremic/fungemic patients each accounted for about one-third of the cohort. The lungs, abdomen and urinary tract were the most common infection sites and Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae were the most frequently isolated pathogens (Table 2).

Treatment characteristics

The median time to vasopressor initiation was 3 hours (25 to 75% range: 1 to 7.1 hours). The distribution of vasopressor use is presented in Table 3. The most commonly used vasopressor was norepinephrine in about two-thirds of patients, with dopamine being the second most common used in approximately one-half. Use of a given vasopressor was not exclusive of use of others. Dobutamine, an inotropic agent, was used for at least 30 minutes during the first 24 hours after pressor initiation in 12.2% of cases. However, inotropes were never initiated before pressors and an intrope alone was never used (per inclusion criteria). Steroids were used in 32% of patients.

Outcomes

The overall unadjusted mortality rate was 53%. Unadjusted mortality among deciles ranged from 47.6% to 63.0% (Figure 1).

Independent correlates of mortality

The significant independent correlates of mortality from the multivariable analysis are presented in Table 4 in order of descending influence on mortality based on Wald χ2 values. Among these correlates, the APACHE II score was most significant with an OR of 1.11 per point (95% CI = 1.10 to 1.12). Antimicrobial delay was the next most important variable, each hour of delay was associated with a 7% increase in mortality (OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.08) and age was associated with a 2.6% increase in mortality per year of life (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.03). Among categorical variables, liver failure had the strongest association with mortality (OR = 3.46, 95% CI = 2.67 to 4.48). A history of hypertension was found to convey a protective effect (OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.52 to 0.73).

After adjusting for independent correlates of mortality (AIDS, hypertension, liver failure, neutropenia, malignancy, metastatic disease, APACHE II score and delay in appropriate antimicrobials), there was a weak association of delay of vasopressors with in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.03, P < 0.001). To examine the impact of delays in vasopressor initiation further, deciles of delay were examined in the model. The results are shown in Figure 2. At increasing delays of approximately 0.50 to 1.15 hours, 1.16 to 2.00 hours, 2.01 to 2.90 hours, 2.91 to 4.00 hours, 4.01 to 5.75 hours, 5.76 to 8.45 hours, 8.46 to 14.10 hours and >14.10 hours (reference second decile, 7 to 30 minutes as per the analysis protocol), the adjusted OR of survival was significantly increased only for the final, latest decile (OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.76, P = 0.048).

Secondary outcome analysis (organ failure and length of stay)

Secondary outcomes were adjusted for the same independent predictors of mortality as the primary outcome. In both unadjusted and adjusted analyses, a strong trend or actual significance was found between the delay to pressor initiation and the occurrence of organ failures. Adjusted P values were as follows: renal, P = 0.0182; respiratory, P < 0.0001; hematologic, P = 0.0788; central nervous system, P = 0.0208; coagulation, P = 0.0089; metabolic, P < 0.0001. Notably, in each case, the last decile (>14.1 hours) accounted for the impact of pressor delay on the occurrence of organ failure. In addition, the total incremental organ failures after the day of presentation (that is, day 2 to day 10) was associated with pressor delay. Again, this relationship was driven by the last decile of delay (Figure 3).

For the survivors, while controlling for significant variables, delay in vasopressor initiation was not predictive of hospital LOS (P = 0.19) or ICU LOS (P = 0.17). In addition, there was no significant impact on duration of vasopressor/inotropic therapy (P = 0.313) and only a trend towards a longer duration of ventilator support (P = 0.055) among survivors.

Discussion

Hypotension is a central feature in the pathophysiology of septic shock. The duration of hypotension before intervention in cardiogenic shock caused by massive myocardial infarction, obstructive shock due to pulmonary embolus and hypovolemic shock due to major trauma/hemorrhage is a key determinant of survival. Outcome in these conditions is closely associated with earlier initiation of therapy. Similarly, in septic shock, early initiation of fluid resuscitation and rapid administration of appropriate antimicrobials are critical determinants of outcome and central tenets of management. Based on these factors, we hypothesized that longer duration of hypotension without hemodynamic support using vasopressor infusion may result in a higher mortality rate and an increased incidence of organ failure in septic shock patients.

Our study demonstrates that the interval between diagnosis of septic shock and the administration of vasopressor agents is a significant although modest independent correlate to in-hospital mortality and development of late organ failure. The entire increasing mortality effect with increased delays in vasopressor initiation is related to the increased mortality in the final decile group (>14 hours post hypotension documentation) relative to the reference group. Similarly, increasing probability of incremental aggregate organ failures after the day of shock (that is, day 2 to day 10) is only seen in the highest delay decile groups (>14 hours post hypotension documentation). New-onset renal, respiratory, central nervous system, coagulation and metabolic failures were also individually associated with pressor delays >14 hours. Perhaps because of the modest strength of the correlation between pressor delay and mortality/organ failure, there is no association in the survivor group with ICU or hospital length of stay, ventilator duration or total vasopressor administration time.

Studies have shown that septic shock as defined in part by persistent hypotension is an indicator of a marked increase in morality risk in septic states. At least two retrospective human septic shock studies show an increasing mortality with increasing severity and duration of hypotension. Varpula and colleagues showed in 111 septic shock patients that the time spent below a MAP of 65 mmHg in the first 48 hours was a strong predictor of mortality. In another retrospective study, Dünser and colleagues similarly measured the area under the curve for MAP and effect on mortality in 274 sepsis patients. This study demonstrated that the time spent with MAP <55 mmHg was associated with increased risk of death. However, a similar correlation did not exist with the duration when MAP was <60 mmHg, <65 mmHg, <70 mmHg and <75 mmHg.

While there has been much study into the comparison of vasopressors/inotropes individually and in combination, there has been a relative paucity in the literature regarding the timing of their initiation in septic shock. The 2012 Surviving Sepsis Guidelines recommend that vasopressor support be started for fluid-refractory shock as part of the 6-hour bundle based solely on expert opinion. A rat model of endotoxic shock has suggested potential benefit with a higher proportionate splanchnic blood flow, lower lactate levels and less overall fluid support requirement for early compared with delayed norepinephrine administration. A porcine model of fecal peritonitis/shock has demonstrated that delayed resuscitation (inclusive of antibiotics, fluids and pressors) was associated with increased physiologic instability and higher pressor requirements. Conversely, in a small (n = 95) retrospective human study, no difference in organ dysfunction or ICU LOS was noted with early (<1.37 hours) versus late (>1.37 hours) administration of vasopressors. These studies have their limitations in that two were animal studies and none utilized survival as an endpoint.

In our study, the timing of initiation of vasopressors following documentation of hypotension is only weakly associated with mortality in septic shock, as indicated by the low Wald X2 values in Table 4. The Wald X2 value for delays in antimicrobial initiation, the other remediable treatment parameter in the multivariate analysis, is 16.7 times higher. Note that this does not suggest that duration of hypotension before resuscitation (inclusive of appropriate antimicrobials and fluid resuscitation) is only weakly correlated to outcome. On the contrary, appropriate antimicrobial delays relative to hypotension and early fluid resuscitation are well established to have critical roles in improving outcome of septic shock. Only the delay of vasopressors appears to have a limited impact on outcome in this retrospective analysis.

Given the modest strength of the association, the statistical significance of time to vasopressor initiation relates primarily to the extraordinarily large number of cases in this dataset. The only decile group that appears to carry an increased mortality or specific organ failure risk relative to the reference group is the latest group (>14 hours post hypotension documentation). All included deciles to that point appear to carry no significant increased mortality or specific organ failure risk after adjustment for multiple morbid/epidemiologic factors. This finding is entirely congruent with the findings of Subramanian and colleagues, who showed no impact of vasopressor delays up to 12 hours on organ function in a smaller cohort of <100 patients.

A history of hypertension conveying a protective effect was an unexpected result on multivariate analysis. It is possible that this finding may be explained by user bias, in that these patients may have activated the healthcare system more frequently to gain a diagnosis of an otherwise silent condition. Hypertension is normally a silent condition, which may suggest that these patients had more routine access to medical care. Alternatively, the study entry criteria (decrease in systolic pressure >40 mmHg) used for many of these patients may be overly sensitive with respect to diagnosing septic shock. The impact of antimicrobial delay on mortality is not surprising because an earlier version of this database demonstrated this same finding and animal studies demonstrate parallel results.

Overall, the results of this study are congruent with the limited available human data. The study contributes significantly by adding statistical power with a larger sample size while correcting for known confounders (antimicrobial delay, disease severity). There are still significant study limitations. The study did control for delays in antimicrobial administration. However, we were unable to adjust for early fluid administration using this dataset. Although fluid resuscitation is considered a vital part of the initial resuscitation by emergency room physicians and intensivists, there are studies suggesting increased mortality associated with over-resuscitation of fluids. Other studies conversely suggest increased mortality with under-resuscitation with fluids. Significant interactions between the timing of vasopressor initiation and early fluid resuscitation that we are unable to capture in this dataset may exist. This is a significant limitation of this study and future analyses should also attempt to factor in fluid resuscitation.

There are other limitations to this study. This is a retrospective review with its inherent inability to account for all potential confounders. However, there has yet to be a randomized controlled trial of timing of vasopressor initiation in any critical illness. Given the ethical concerns of exposing moribund patients to potential harm, a prospective, randomized human study of timing of vasopressor initiation in septic shock would be challenging. Another limitation is that the use of hypotension as the defining criteria for septic shock in this patient group may be imperfect. MAP is at best a surrogate of inadequate microvascular perfusion in shock. It does not directly capture microcirculatory perfusion and cellular injury that lead to organ dysfunction and death. Nonetheless, other metabolic markers such as serum lactate and bicarbonate levels as well as severity of illness scores (APACHE II scores) were incorporated into the model to help adjust for variations in shock severity. Despite these limitations of blood pressure monitoring, given its universal access and ease of use it is the most relied upon clinical parameter for guiding therapy and will remain a mainstay in the treatment of septic shock for the foreseeable future.

Conclusion

From this study, we conclude that markedly delayed initiation of vasopressor medications in patients with septic shock is modestly associated with increased organ failure risk and decreased survival. Substantial delays of vasopressor initiation (>14 hours after hypotension documentation) are required to see these effects. Given the almost universal use of vasopressors in septic shock and the critical need for precise titration, further study of this area is warranted.

Key messages

•Delays in initiation of vasopressor therapy following the first documentation of hypotension in septic shock are modestly associated with increased specific organ failure and mortality risk.

•This increase in specific organ failure and mortality risk is entirely driven by the decile of patients with the greatest delays of >14 hours.

•Vasopressor initiation delays are not associated with increased time on vasopressors or on mechanical ventilation among survivors.

•Delay of initiation of appropriate antimicrobial, age and APACHE II score are also independent correlates of mortality.

Abbreviations

APACHE: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation; CI: confidence interval; LOS: length of stay; MAP: mean arterial pressure; OR: odds ratio.

Competing interests

AK received unrestricted funding for the initial development of this database from Lilly, Pfizer, Astellas, Merck and Bayer. Additional support was provided through grants from the Manitoba Health Research Council, the Health Sciences Foundation and the Deacon Foundation. The current analysis/paper was not funded by any sponsor. JEP consulted with Sangart, Artisan, Philips, and Immunetrics. All other authors have no other relevant competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

AK had full access to all the data in the study and is responsible for the integrity of the database and the accuracy of the data analysis. This specific research concept, the septic shock database and manuscript were developed by AK. AK, DC, AP, GLB and VB were responsible for the methodological design issues and data analysis. AK and VB drafted the manuscript. AK, VB, DC, AP, GLB, SZ and JEP contributed to data interpretation and manuscript revisions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References 42

  1. 1.

    Martin GS Mannino DM Eaton S Moss M The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000N Engl J Med2003 34815461554

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa022139

  2. 2.

    Kumar A Ellis P Arabi Y Roberts D Light B Parrillo JE Dodek P Wood G Kumar A Simon D Peters C Ahsan M Chateau D Cooperative Antimicrobial Therapy of Septic Shock Datbase Research GroupInitiation of inappropriate antimicrobial therapy results in a five-fold reduction of survival in human septic shockChest2009 13612371248

    Not in our library10.1378/chest.09-0087

  3. 3.

    Ranieri VM Thompson BT Barie PS Dhainaut JF Douglas IS Finfer S Gårdlund B Marshall JC Rhodes A Artigas A Payen D Tenhunen J Al-Khalidi HR Thompson V Janes J Macias WL Vangerow B Williams MD Drotrecogin alfa (activated) in adults with septic shockN Engl J Med2012 36620552064

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa1202290

  4. 4.

    Hotchkiss RS Karl IE Reevaluation of the role of cellular hypoxia and bioenergetic failure in sepsisJAMA1992 26715031510

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.1992.03480110079038

  5. 5.

    De Backer D Creteur J Preiser JC Dubois MJ Vincent JL Microvascular blood flow is altered in patients with sepsisAm J Respir Crit Care Med2002 16698104

    Not in our library10.1164/rccm.200109-016oc

  6. 6.

    Sakr Y Dubois MJ De Backer D Creteur J Vincent JL Persistent-microcirculatory alterations are associated with organ failure and death in patients with septic shockCrit Care Med2004 3218251831

    Not in our library10.1097/01.ccm.0000138558.16257.3f

  7. 7.

    Ledoux D Astiz ME Carpati CM Rackow EC Effects of perfusion pressure on tissue perfusion in septic shockCrit Care Med2000 2827292732

    Not in our library10.1097/00003246-200008000-00007

  8. 8.

    Parker MM Shelhamer JH Bacharach SL Green MV Natanson C Frederick TM Damske BA Parrillo JE Profound but reversible myocardial depression in patients with septic shockAnn Intern Med1984 100483490

    Not in our library10.7326/0003-4819-100-4-483

  9. 9.

    Kumar A Haery C Parrillo JE Myocardial dysfunction in septic shock: Part I, clinical manifestation of cardiovascular dysfunctionJ Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth2001 15364376

    Not in our library10.1053/jcan.2001.22317

  10. 10.

    Annane D Bellissant E Cavaillon JM Annane D Bellissant E Cavaillon JM Septic shockLancet2005 3656378

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17667-8

  11. 11.

    Trzeciak S Dellinger RP Parrillo JE Guglielmi M Bajaj J Abate NL Arnold RC Colilla S Zanotti S Hollenberg SM Early microcirculatory perfusion derangements in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: relationship to hemodynamics, oxygen transport, and survivalAnn Emerg Med1998 498898

    Not in our library10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.08.021

  12. 12.

    Gutteriez G Brown SD Schlag R, Redl HResponse of the macrocirculationPathophysiology of Shock, Sepsis and Organ Failure1993 Berlin: Springer215229

    Not in our library

  13. 13.

    Terborg C Schummer W Albrecht M Reinhart K Weiller C Rother J Dysfunction of vasomotor reactivity in severe sepsis and septic shockIntensive Care Med2001 2712311234

    Not in our library10.1007/s001340101005

  14. 14.

    Rivers E Nguyen B Havstad S Ressler J Muzzin A Knoblich B Peterson E Tomlanovich M Early Goal-Directed Therapy Collaborative GroupEarly goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shockN Engl J Med2001 34513681377

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa010307

  15. 15.

    Dellinger RP Levy MM Rhodes A Annane D Gerlach H Opal SM Sevransky JE Sprung CL Douglas IS Jaeschke R Osborn TM Nunnally ME Townsend SR Reinhart K Kleinpell RM Angus DC Deutschman CS Machado FR Rubenfeld GD Webb SA Beale RJ Vincent J-L Moreno R Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including the Pediatric SubgroupSurviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012Crit Care Med2013 41580637

    Not in our library10.1097/ccm.0b013e31827e83af

  16. 16.

    Subramanian S Yilmaz M Rehman A Hubmayr RD Afessa B Gajic O Liberal vs. conservative vasopressor use to maintain mean arterial blood pressure during resuscitation of septic shock: an observational studyIntensive Care Med2008 34157162

    Not in our library10.1007/s00134-007-0862-1

  17. 17.

    Morimatsu H Singh K Uchino S Bellomo R Hart G Early and exclusive use of norepinephrine in septic shockResuscitation2004 62249254

    Not in our library10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.03.016

  18. 18.

    Bone R American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference: definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsisCrit Care Med1992 20864874

    Not in our library10.1097/00003246-199206000-00025

  19. 19.

    Sollet JP Garber GE Selecting patients with severe sepsis for drotrecogin alfa (activated) therapyAm J Surg2002 184S11S18

    Not in our library10.1016/s0002-9610(02)01132-7

  20. 20.

    Knaus WA Draper EA APACHE II: a severity of disease classification systemCrit Care Med1985 13818829

    Not in our library10.1097/00003246-198510000-00009

  21. 21.

    Baez AA Lane PL Sorondo B Giraldez EM Predictive effect of out-of-hospital time in outcomes of severely injured young adult and elderly patientsPrehosp Disaster Med2006 21427430

    Not in our library10.1017/s1049023x00004143

  22. 22.

    Wood KE Major pulmonary embolism: review of a pathophysiologic approach to the golden hour of hemodynamically significant pulmonary embolismChest2002 121877905

    Not in our library10.1378/chest.121.3.877

  23. 23.

    Blow O Magliore L Claridge JA Butler K Young JS The golden hour and the silver day: detection and correction of occult hypoperfusion within 24 hours improves outcome from major traumaJ Trauma1999 47964969

    Not in our library10.1097/00005373-199911000-00028

  24. 24.

    Boersma E Maas AC Deckers JW Simoons ML Early thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: reappraisal of the golden hourLancet1996 348771775

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(96)02514-7

  25. 25.

    Sebesta P Klika T Zdrahal P Kramar J Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: role of initial delay on survivalJ Mal Vasc1998 23361367

    Not in our library

  26. 26.

    Sebat F Musthafa AA Johnson D Kramer AA Shoffner D Eliason M Henry K Spurlock B Effect of a rapid response system for patients in shock on time to treatment and mortality during 5 yearsCrit Care Med2007 3525682575

    Not in our library10.1097/01.ccm.0000287593.54658.89

  27. 27.

    Gaieski DF Pines JM Band RA Mikkelson ME Massone R Furia FF Shofer FS Goyal M Impact of time to antibiotics on survival in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in whom early goal-directed therapy was initiated in the emergency departmentCrit Care Med2010 3810451053

    Not in our library10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181cc4824

  28. 28.

    Kumar A Roberts D Wood KE Light B Parrillo JE Sharma S Suppes R Feinstein D Zanotti S Taiberg L Gurka D Kumar A Cheang C Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shockCrit Care Med2006 3415891596

    Not in our library10.1097/01.ccm.0000217961.75225.e9

  29. 29.

    Valles J Rello J Ochagavia A Garnacho J Alcala MA Community-acquired bloodstream infection in critically ill adult patients: impact of shock and inappropriate antibiotic therapy on survivalChest2003 12316151624

    Not in our library10.1378/chest.123.5.1615

  30. 30.

    Rangel-Frausto MS Pittet D Costigan M Hwang T Davis CS Wenzel RP The natural history of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), a prospective studyJAMA1995 273117123

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.1995.03520260039030

  31. 31.

    Varpula M Tallgren M Saukkonen K Voipio-Pulkki LM PettilΣ V Hemodynamic variables related to outcome in septic shockIntensive Care Med2005 3110661071

    Not in our library10.1007/s00134-005-2688-z

  32. 32.

    Dünser MW Takala J Ulmer H Mayr VD Luckner G Jochberger S Daudel F Lepper P Hasibeder WR Jakob SM Arterial blood pressure during early sepsis and outcomeIntensive Care Med2009 3512251233

    Not in our library10.1007/s00134-009-1427-2

  33. 33.

    Annane D Vignon P Renault A Bollaert PE Charpentier C Martin C Troché G Ricard JD Nitenberg G Papazian L Azoulay E Bellissant E Norepinephrine plus dobutamine versus epinephrine alone for management of septic shock: a randomised trialLancet2007 370676684

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61344-0

  34. 34.

    Russell JA Walley KR Singer J Gordon AC Hebert PC Cooper J Holmes CL Mehta S Granton JT Storms MM Cook DJ Presneill JJ Ayers D Vasopressin versus norepinephrine infusion in patients with septic shockN Engl J Med2008 58877887

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa067373

  35. 35.

    De Backer D Biston P Devriendt J Madl C Chochrad D Aldecoa C Brasseur A Defrance P Gottignies P Vincent JL Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shockN Engl J Med2010 362779789

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa0907118

  36. 36.

    Sennoun N Montemont C Gibot S Lacolley P Levy B Comparative effects of early versus delayed use of norepinephrine in resuscitated endotoxic shockCrit Care Med2007 3517361740

    Not in our library10.1097/01.ccm.0000269028.28521.08

  37. 37.

    Correa TD Vuda M Blaser AR Takala J Djafarzadeh S Dunser MW Silva E Lensch M Wilkens L Jakob SM Effect of treatment delay on disease severity and need for resuscitation in porcine fecal peritonitisCrit Care Med2012 4028412849

    Not in our library10.1097/ccm.0b013e31825b916b

  38. 38.

    Kumar A Haery C Paladugu B Kumar A Symeoneides S Taiberg L Osman J Trenholme G Opal SM Goldfarb R Parillo JE The duration of hypotension before the initiation of antibiotic treatment is a critical determinant of survival in a murine model of Escherichia coli septic shock: association with serum lactate and inflammatory cytokine levelsJ Infect Dis2006 193251258

    Not in our library10.1086/498909

  39. 39.

    Frimodt-Moller N Thomsen VF The pneumococcus and the mouse protection test: inoculum, dosage and timingActa Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B1986 943337

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1699-0463.1986.tb03017.x

  40. 40.

    Maitland K Kiguli S Opoka RO Engoru C Olupot-Olupot P Akech SO Nyeko R Mtove G Reyburn H Lang T Brent B Evans JA Tibenderana JK Crawley J Russell EC Levin M Babiker AG Gibb DM Mortality after fluid bolus in African children with severe infectionN Engl J Med2011 36424832495

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa1101549

All 42 references

Cited by papers we hold 3

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.