Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 25, 2026.

Clinical outcomes of patients requiring ventilatory support in Brazilian intensive care units: a multicenter, prospective, cohort study

Luciano CP Azevedo, Marcelo Park, Jorge IF Salluh and 18 more

Critical Care · 2013 · CC BY

doi:10.1186/cc12594

Abstract

Introduction. Contemporary information on mechanical ventilation (MV) use in emerging countries is limited. Moreover, most epidemiological studies on ventilatory support were carried out before significant developments, such as lung protective ventilation or broader application of non-invasive ventilation (NIV). We aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics, outcomes and risk factors for hospital mortality and failure of NIV in patients requiring ventilatory support in Brazilian intensive care units (ICU).

Methods. In a multicenter, prospective, cohort study, a total of 773 adult patients admitted to 45 ICUs over a two-month period requiring invasive ventilation or NIV for more than 24 hours were evaluated. Causes of ventilatory support, prior chronic health status and physiological data were assessed. Multivariate analysis was used to identifiy variables associated with hospital mortality and NIV failure.

Results. Invasive MV and NIV were used as initial ventilatory support in 622 (80%) and 151 (20%) patients. Failure with subsequent intubation occurred in 54% of NIV patients. The main reasons for ventilatory support were pneumonia (27%), neurologic disorders (19%) and non-pulmonary sepsis (12%). ICU and hospital mortality rates were 34% and 42%. Using the Berlin definition, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was diagnosed in 31% of the patients with a hospital mortality of 52%. In the multivariate analysis, age (odds ratio (OR), 1.03; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01 to 1.03), comorbidities (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.28 to 3.17), associated organ failures (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.20), moderate (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.10 to 3.35) to severe ARDS (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.01 to 4.41), cumulative fluid balance over the first 72 h of ICU (OR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.39 to 4.28), higher lactate (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.27 to 2.50), invasive MV (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.32 to 5.39) and NIV failure (OR, 3.95; 95% CI, 1.74 to 8.99) were independently associated with hospital mortality. The predictors of NIV failure were the severity of associated organ dysfunctions (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.34), ARDS (OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.10 to 4.82) and positive fluid balance (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.02 to 4.30).

Conclusions. Current mortality of ventilated patients in Brazil is elevated. Implementation of judicious fluid therapy and a watchful use and monitoring of NIV patients are potential targets to improve outcomes in this setting.

Trial registration. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01268410.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 25, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Acute respiratory failure is frequent and commonly a severe organ dysfunction occurring in the intensive care unit (ICU). Under this circumstance, invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) are life-sustaining interventions. However, despite significant advances in ventilatory support, it remains associated with elevated mortality and a significant impairment in the patients' quality of life in the post-ICU setting. Therefore, information about the epidemiological aspects of patients under MV is important from both clinical and health policy perspectives. However, most studies on the epidemiology of ventilatory support are outdated or were carried out before significant developments in the field, such as lung protective ventilation or the widespread application of non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV). Moreover, these studies were usually carried out in high-income countries and very few contemporary data from emerging countries are available. Specifically from Brazil, a previous trial evaluated the mortality of patients with acute respiratory failure. However, this study was a single center trial carried out only in a tertiary hospital and just included individuals with invasive mechanical ventilation and not patients under NIV. Comprehensive information about the clinical characteristics, outcomes and risk factors for mortality of these patients is essential to assist clinicians in the decision-making process and to allow better resource allocation. Therefore, we carried out a multicenter, observational cohort study in Brazilian ICUs to describe the clinical outcomes of patients submitted to ventilatory support as well as to identify variables associated with hospital mortality.

Design and setting

The Epidemiology of Respiratory Insufficiency in Critical Care (ERICC) study was a multicenter prospective cohort study conducted in 45 Brazilian ICUs between 1 June 2011 and 31 July 2011. The study was coordinated by the Research and Education Institute from Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo and D'Or Institute for Research and Education, Rio de Janeiro. Invitations were sent to ICUs registered at the Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network (BRICNet) database and 45 ICUs from 12 Brazilian states agreed to participate. Investigators and centers are listed at the acknowledgements section. The study was strictly observational and decisions related to patients' care were at the discretion of the attending ICU team. The study was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) at the coordinating center (Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa - CEPesq - approval number HSL 2010/51) and, subsequently, by the National Ethics Committee and local review boards at each participating site. The need for informed consent was waived or requested in some sites according to the local IRBs directives.

Selection of participants and definitions

Patients aged ≥ 18 years old requiring ventilatory support for > 24 h during the first 48 h of ICU admission at the participating ICUs were included in the study. In the subgroup of patients undergoing NIV, only those that used this modality for at least 6 h/day were included. Patients with a previous tracheostomy, admitted for routine uncomplicated postoperative care (ICU stay < 48 h), readmissions and those with terminal conditions were not considered.

Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected during the ICU stay, including the main diagnosis for ICU admission, the reasons for and modality of ventilatory support (conventional MV or NIV), chronic health status, the Charlson Comorbidity Index, the need for vasopressors, dialysis, tracheostomy, the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS 3) and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. Patients who first received NIV, irrespective of its duration, and subsequently required endotracheal intubation were considered as NIV failure. The cumulative fluid balance over the first 72 h of ICU stay was also calculated. Sepsis was diagnosed using the current definitions. The patient was considered to have an infection when there were clinical, laboratory, radiological and microbiological findings suggesting the presence of infection that justified the administration of antibiotics (excluding prophylaxis). Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was defined and classified according to the Berlin definition. The main outcome of interest in the current study was all cause in-hospital mortality.

Data entry and processing

Data were collected using a web-based specific and standardized electronic case report form. Each investigator and research coordinator was provided access to the website, where all study documentation, including a comprehensive manual describing data collection requirements and variable definitions, was available. A central office was accessible through telephone and email contact to provide support to investigators. Local investigators were responsible for training local staff for data collection, supervising data collection, controlling for data completeness and quality.

Data consistency was assessed through a rechecking procedure of a 5% random sample of patients. Data were screened in detail by three investigators (LCA, MS, MP) for missing information, implausible and outlying values, logical errors and insufficient details. In case of unconformity, local investigators were contacted to provide the requested information.

Statistical analysis

Standard descriptive statistics were used to describe the study population. Continuous variables were reported as median (25% to 75% interquartile range, IQR). Univariate and multivariate analysis using a binary logistic regression were used to identify factors associated with the dependent variables (hospital mortality or NIV failure). We also carried out analysis of SOFA score excluding the respiratory component to reduce interaction with ARDS in the multivariate analysis and to assess the severity of associated organ failures. Linearity between each continuous variable and the dependent variable was demonstrated using locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS). In case of nonlinearity, the variable was transformed or stratified according to the analysis of the functional form and clinical significance. For categorical variables with multiple levels, the reference level was attributed to the one with the lowest probability of the dependent variable. Variables yielding P-values < 0.2 by univariate analysis were entered in the multivariate analysis to estimate the independent association of each covariate with the dependent variable. Results were summarized as odds ratios (OR) and respective 95% confidence intervals (CI). Possible interactions were tested. Two-tailed P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Characteristics of study population

The study flowchart is shown in Figure 1. A total of 773 patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria of the study and were therefore evaluated. Their main characteristics are depicted in Table 1. The most frequent diagnoses at ICU admission were pneumonia (27%), neurological diseases (19%), non-pulmonary sepsis (12%) and obstructive pulmonary disease (6%). Patients were admitted to the ICU at a median of one (zero to three) day after hospital admission. Median SAPS 3 score was 62 (52 to 72) points and the probability of death estimated by the global equation was 40 ± 24%. Using the customized equation for countries from Central and South America, the probability of death estimated by SAPS 3 was 52 ± 26%. Most patients (67%) used vasopressors during their stay in the ICU and 19% required renal replacement therapy (RRT).

Ventilatory support

Invasive MV was initially used in 80% (n = 622) of the patients and NIV was used in the remaining 20% (n = 151) of the patients as the initial ventilatory support (Table 1 and Figure 2). Of the later, 81 (54%) patients failed NIV support and were subsequently intubated for invasive MV. Ventilatory modes used initially in patients who received invasive MV were pressure-controlled ventilation (n = 371, 60%), volume-controlled ventilation (n = 186, 30%), pressure-support ventilation (n = 54, 9%) and others (n = 11, 1%). Median tidal volume was 7.5 (6.1 to 8.7) mL/kg of predicted body weight and plateau pressures were below 30 cmH2O in the vast majority of the patients.

Outcome analysis

The overall ICU and hospital mortality rates were 34% and 42%, respectively (Figure 2 and Table 1). In the univariate analysis, age, ideal body weight, SOFA score at day 1, SAPS 3 score, Charlson comorbidity index, hospital length of stay before ICU, admission from the emergency room and from the operating room were associated with hospital mortality. Additionally, NIV failure, lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio, ARDS diagnosis, tracheostomy, duration of ventilatory support, need for vasopressors and renal replacement therapy (RRT), cumulative fluid balance and maximal blood lactate concentrations were also associated with hospital mortality (Table 1). In multivariate analysis, older age, higher SOFA scores (without respiratory component at Day 1), Charlson comorbidity index > 2, moderate to severe ARDS, NIV failure, use of invasive MV, higher lactate concentrations and both very negative or positive cumulative fluid balance over the first 72 hours of ICU stay were independently associated with increased hospital mortality (Table 2).

ARDS diagnosis according to the Berlin definition

ARDS was diagnosed in 242 (31%) patients (Figure 2). Of these, 77% were supported with invasive MV and 23% received NIV as the initial ventilatory support. The rate of NIV failure in ARDS patients was 69%, as compared to 45% in non-ARDS patients (P = 0.007). ICU and hospital mortality in the ARDS population was 46% and 52%, respectively (Figure 2). In Figure 3, we depicted the ICU and hospital mortality rates for each category of ARDS. The combined ICU mortality for ARDS moderate and severe (the former definition of ARDS) was 55% and the hospital mortality was 60%.

Non-invasive ventilation characteristics and failure

The characteristics of patients that initially received NIV are shown in Table 3. The most common diagnoses were pneumonia (23%), neurologic disorders (21%) and non-pulmonary sepsis (12%). Classical indications for NIV, such as obstructive pulmonary disease and congestive heart failure, were present in only 5% and 8% of the cases, respectively. NIV failure occurred in 54% (81/151) of patients receiving NIV initially. Factors related to NIV failure in univariate analysis were total SOFA score, SOFA score excluding respiratory component, ARDS diagnosis, length of NIV, tracheostomy, use of vasopressors and a positive cumulative fluid balance. As expected, ICU and hospital lengths of stay and mortality were higher in patients who experienced NIV failure (Table 3). In multivariate analysis, a SOFA score without the respiratory component ≥ 4 points, a diagnosis of ARDS and a cumulative fluid balance higher than 2 L in the first 72 hours of ICU stay were associated with NIV failure (Table 3). The frequency of NIV failure as well as hospital mortality increased significantly with the number of these risk factors presented by the patients (Figure 4).

Weaning and tracheostomy

Table 4 depicts the variables related to weaning in our population. Carrying out a spontaneous breathing trial and a successful extubation were protective factors for mortality in the univariate analysis. Additionally, 30% of the patients that were successfully extubated received non-invasive ventilation after extubation. Weaning failure with subsequent reintubation occurred in 15% of the patients. Tracheostomy was carried out in 182 (29%) patients under invasive mechanical ventilation 7 (5 to 11) days after endotracheal intubation.

Discussion

In the present study, mortality rates of patients in Brazilian ICUs requiring ventilatory support were elevated, regardless of the underlying condition. Factors such as age, comorbidities, ARDS, disease severity and variables related to ICU support like positive fluid balance and NIV failure are independently associated with hospital mortality. We also observed that more than half of the patients receiving NIV as the primary modality of ventilatory support failed and required invasive mechanical ventilation subsequently. Variables independently associated with NIV failure were the severity of organ dysfunctions, the presence of ARDS and a positive fluid balance.

The mortality rate of critically ill patients under ventilatory support and patients with ARDS is elevated in both observational and interventional studies. In the last decade, however, important ventilatory interventions, such as lung protective strategies with reduction in tidal volumes and widespread use of NIV, were more frequently incorporated in the clinical practice and could have resulted in different mortality rates. Nevertheless, some recent studies showed very modest or no changes in these outcomes. In a systematic review by Phua et al., the pooled mortality rate of ARDS in observational studies was 48% and did not decrease significantly in the last years. More recently, Villar et al. reported a hospital mortality rate of 48% for ARDS patients under low tidal volume ventilation. We observed a higher mortality rate for the entire cohort and a more prominent rate for ARDS patients. However, our results are within the predicted mortality range of SAPS 3 and comparable to those reported in similar countries, such as Argentina. Possible explanations for our findings may include unequal access to healthcare as well as unmeasured factors related to the process of caring for these patients.

There is a significant gap between the recommendations of low tidal volumes for ARDS patients and their adoption in practice. Several observational studies demonstrated the lack of adherence to this strategy and our study confirms these findings. Moreover, a recent meta-analysis suggests that even ventilated patients without ARDS may benefit from low tidal volumes. However, it is important also to emphasize that in this trial and similar to other studies, the majority of patients were ventilated with plateau pressures below the limit of 30 cmH20, which may partially compensate the harmful effects of high tidal volumes.

In our study, more than 60% of the patients under invasive MV for more than 24 hours were submitted to a spontaneous breathing trial and 54% were extubated, which is similar to previous reports. Seventeen percent of the patients used NIV after extubation, an incidence also comparable to other studies. Tracheostomy was done in 29% percent of the patients in a median period of one week after initiation of MV. There is significant heterogeneity in the rates of tracheostomy in patients under MV as well as at the time of the procedure. A previous one-day point-prevalence study of MV that included patients from Brazil showed that tracheostomy was done in 27% of the individuals in a median of 8 (1 to 15) days after ventilatory support. These numbers are similar to our report and to comparable countries such as Argentina, Chile and Uruguay.

NIV was used as the first line of treatment for respiratory failure in 20% of the patients in our population, with a 54% failure rate. The failure rates for NIV are quite variable in the literature and seem to be related to the cause of respiratory failure and disease severity. Elevated failure rates are worrisome since NIV failure has been previously associated with increased mortality risk and, in this study, was an independent risk factor for mortality. We could speculate that misperception of disease severity by the multidisciplinary team may have contributed to over-utilization of NIV for high-risk patients, delaying invasive mechanical ventilation and contributing to the poor outcome of these patients.

Another example of a potentially modifiable risk factor for mortality is related to the fluid strategy. A positive fluid balance is consistently associated with adverse outcomes in the ICU setting, mainly for patients with ARDS and acute kidney injury. We found that the extremes of cumulative fluid balance in the first three days are independently associated with hospital mortality. Interestingly, we also found that a positive fluid balance in the first days was associated with NIV failure. Our data suggest that, taking into account the hemodynamic status, a judicious fluid balance in the first days of ICU stay may be a safer goal in patients under ventilatory support.

The present study has several shortcomings. First, it was carried out during the winter period in the Southern hemisphere, and this may have influenced the incidence of respiratory infections and also the occurrence of ARDS. However, the study was conducted between early June and the end of July and epidemiologic data demonstrate that both Influenza and other lower respiratory infections present a different seasonality varying according to the region of the country. We did not collect data on the origin and on the time of ARDS development, which precludes a more detailed evaluation of these patients. In addition, we used a convenience sample of ICUs that usually participate in clinical studies in Brazil and the sites that included patients are predominantly from the Southeast and Southern regions of the country, thus our data may not be representative of the entire nation. However, the concentration of hospitals from these regions is in accordance with a higher concentration of ICU beds and the healthcare system in Brazil. Considering that academic institutions and those participating in clinical studies usually have better organization and standards of care, it is possible that the actual mortality of mechanically ventilated patients may be even higher.

Conclusions

Current mortality of mechanically ventilated patients in Brazil remains elevated. Implementation of judicious fluid therapy and a watchful use and monitoring of NIV patients are potential targets to improve outcomes in this setting.

Key messages

• Contemporary information on mechanical ventilation use in emerging countries is limited. Moreover, most epidemiological studies on ventilatory support were carried out before significant developments, such as lung protective ventilation or widespread application of non-invasive ventilation.

• In mechanically ventilated patients in Brazil, factors such as age, comorbidities, ARDS, disease severity and variables related to ICU support, such as positive fluid balance and NIV failure, are independently related to hospital mortality.

• NIV failure occurred in 54% of the patients and was associated with the severity of organ dysfunctions, presence of ARDS and positive fluid balance.

• Current mortality of ventilated patients in Brazil is exceedingly high. Implementation of judicious fluid therapy and a watchful use and monitoring of NIV patients are potential targets to improve outcomes in this setting.

Abbreviations

AIDS: Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; ARDS: Acute respiratory distress syndrome; BRICNet: Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network; CI: Confidence interval; COPD: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; ERICC: Epidemiology of Respiratory Insufficiency in Critical Care; ICU: Intensive care unit; IRB: Institutional Review Board; LOS: Length-of-stay; LOWESS: Locally weighted scatterplot smoothing; MV: Mechanical ventilation; NIV: Non-invasive mechanical ventilation; OR: Odds ratio; PEEP: Positive end-expiratory pressure; RRT: Renal replacement therapy; SAPS 3: Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3; SOFA: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment

Competing interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests regarding the topic of this manuscript.

Authors' contributions

All authors contributed significantly to this manuscript, including study conception (LCPA, MP, JIFS, GS, MS), data acquisition (all authors), data analysis and interpretation (LCPA, MP, MS, JIFS), drafting manuscript (LCPA, MS, JIFS), revising the manuscript for important intellectual content (all authors), and approval of the final copy (all authors).

References 44

  1. 1.

    Estenssoro E The FINNALI study on acute respiratory failure: not the final cutIntensive Care Med2009 3513281330

    Not in our library10.1007/s00134-009-1518-0

  2. 2.

    Wunsch H Linde-Zwirble WT Angus DC Hartman ME Milbrandt EB Kahn JM The epidemiology of mechanical ventilation use in the United StatesCrit Care Med2010 3819471953

    Not in our library10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181ef4460

  3. 3.

    Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome NetworkN Engl J Med2000 34213011308

    Not in our library10.1056/nejm200005043421801

  4. 4.

    Villar J Blanco J Añón JM Santos-Bouza A Blanch L Ambrós A Gandía F Carriedo D Mosteiro F Basaldúa S Fernández RL Kacmarek RM ALIEN NetworkThe ALIEN study: incidence and outcome of acute respiratory distress syndrome in the era of lung protective ventilationIntensive Care Med2011 3719321941

    Not in our library10.1007/s00134-011-2380-4

  5. 5.

    Herridge MS Tansey CM Matté A Tomlinson G Diaz-Granados N Cooper A Guest CB Mazer CD Mehta S Stewart TE Kudlow P Cook D Slutsky AS Cheung AM Canadian Critical Care Trials GroupFunctional disability 5 years after acute respiratory distress syndromeN Engl J Med2011 36412931304

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa1011802

  6. 6.

    Amato MB Barbas CS Medeiros DM Magaldi RB Schettino GP Lorenzi-Filho G Kairalla RA Deheinzelin D Munoz C Oliveira R Takagaki TY Carvalho CR Effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndromeN Engl J Med1998 338347354

    Not in our library10.1056/nejm199802053380602

  7. 7.

    Demoule A Girou E Richard JC Taille S Brochard L Increased use of noninvasive ventilation in French intensive care unitsIntensive Care Med2006 3217471755

    Not in our library10.1007/s00134-006-0229-z

  8. 8.

    Demoule A Girou E Richard JC Taille S Brochard L Benefits and risks of success or failure of noninvasive ventilationIntensive Care Med2006 3217561765

    Not in our library10.1007/s00134-006-0324-1

  9. 9.

    Linko R Okkonen M Pettila V Perttila J Parviainen I Ruokonen E Tenhunen J Ala-Kokko T Varpula T Acute respiratory failure in intensive care units. FINNALI: a prospective cohort studyIntensive Care Med2009 3513521361

    Not in our library10.1007/s00134-009-1519-z

  10. 10.

    Tomicic V Espinoza M Andresen M Molina J Calvo M Ugarte H Godoy J Gálvez S Maurelia JC Delgado I Esteban A Grupo Chileno para el Estudio de la Ventilación Mecánica[Characteristics and factors associated with mortality in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: first Chilean multicenter study]Rev Med Chil2008 136959967

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    Franca SA Toufen C Jr Hovnanian AL Albuquerque AL Borges ER Pizzo VR Carvalho CR The epidemiology of acute respiratory failure in hospitalized patients: a Brazilian prospective cohort studyJ Crit Care2011 26330e1-8

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.10.010

  12. 12.

    Esteban A Anzueto A Alía I Gordo F Apezteguía C Pálizas F Cide D Goldwaser R Soto L Bugedo G Rodrigo C Pimentel J Raimondi G Tobin MJ How is mechanical ventilation employed in the intensive care unit? An international utilization reviewAm J Respir Crit Care Med2000 16114501458

    Not in our library10.1164/ajrccm.161.5.9902018

  13. 13.

    Charlson ME Pompei P Ales KL MacKenzie CR A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validationJ Chronic Dis1987 40373383

    Not in our library10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8

  14. 14.

    Moreno RP Metnitz PG Almeida E Jordan B Bauer P Campos RA Iapichino G Edbrooke D Capuzzo M Le Gall JR SAPS 3--From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 2: Development of a prognostic model for hospital mortality at ICU admissionIntensive Care Med2005 3113451355

    Not in our library10.1007/s00134-005-2763-5

  15. 15.

    Vincent JL Moreno R Takala J Willatts S De Mendonça A Bruining H Reinhart CK Suter PM Thijs LG The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care MedicineIntensive Care Med1996 22707710

    Not in our library10.1007/bf01709751

  16. 16.

    Levy MM Fink MP Marshall JC Abraham E Angus D Cook D Cohen J Opal SM Vincent JL Ramsay G 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions ConferenceCrit Care Med2003 3112501256

    Not in our library10.1097/01.ccm.0000050454.01978.3b

  17. 17.

    Rosolem MM Rabello LS Lisboa T Caruso P Costa RT Leal JV Salluh JI Soares M Critically ill patients with cancer and sepsis: clinical course and prognostic factorsJ Crit Care2012 27301307

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.06.014

  18. 18.

    Ranieri VM Rubenfeld GD Thompson BT Ferguson ND Caldwell E Fan E Camporota L Slutsky AS Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin DefinitionJAMA2012 30725262533

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.2012.5669

  19. 19.

    Hosmer DW Lemershow S Applied logistic regression. (Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics)2000 2New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience

    Not in our library

  20. 20.

    Bernard GR Artigas A Brigham KL Carlet J Falke K Hudson L Lamy M Legall JR Morris A Spragg R The American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS. Definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordinationAm J Respir Crit Care Med1994 149818824

    Not in our library10.1164/ajrccm.149.3.7509706

  21. 21.

    Vincent JL Akca S De Mendonca A Haji-Michael P Sprung C Moreno R Antonelli M Suter PM SOFA Working GroupThe epidemiology of acute respiratory failure in critically ill patients(*)Chest2002 12116021609

    Not in our library10.1378/chest.121.5.1602

  22. 22.

    Behrendt CE Acute respiratory failure in the United States: incidence and 31-day survivalChest2000 11811001105

    Not in our library10.1378/chest.118.4.1100

  23. 23.

    Schettino G Altobelli N Kacmarek RM Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure outside clinical trials: experience at the Massachusetts General HospitalCrit Care Med2008 36441447

    Not in our library10.1097/01.ccm.0000300084.67277.90

  24. 24.

    Esteban A Ferguson ND Meade MO Frutos-Vivar F Apezteguia C Brochard L Raymondos K Nin N Hurtado J Tomicic V González M Elizalde J Nightingale P Abroug F Pelosi P Arabi Y Moreno R Jibaja M D'Empaire G Sandi F Matamis D Montañez AM Anzueto A VENTILA GroupEvolution of mechanical ventilation in response to clinical researchAm J Respir Crit Care Med2008 177170177

    Not in our library10.1164/rccm.200706-893oc

  25. 25.

    Metnitz PG Metnitz B Moreno RP Bauer P Del Sorbo L Hoermann C de Carvalho SA Ranieri VM Epidemiology of mechanical ventilation: analysis of the SAPS 3 databaseIntensive Care Med2009 35816825

    Not in our library10.1007/s00134-009-1449-9

  26. 26.

    Phua J Badia JR Adhikari NK Friedrich JO Fowler RA Singh JM Scales DC Stather DR Li A Jones A Gattas DJ Hallett D Tomlinson G Stewart TE Ferguson ND Has mortality from acute respiratory distress syndrome decreased over time? A systematic reviewAm J Respir Crit Care Med2009 179220227

    Not in our library10.1164/rccm.200805-722oc

  27. 27.

    Estenssoro E Dubin A Laffaire E Canales H Sáenz G Moseinco M Pozo M Gómez A Baredes N Jannello G Osatnik J Incidence, clinical course, and outcome in 217 patients with acute respiratory distress syndromeCrit Care Med2002 3024502456

    Not in our library10.1097/00003246-200211000-00008

  28. 28.
  29. 29.

    Bozza FA Salluh JI An urban perspective on sepsis in developing countriesLancet Infect Dis2010 10290291

    Not in our library10.1016/s1473-3099(10)70074-8

  30. 30.

    Young MP Manning HL Wilson DL Mette SA Riker RR Leiter JC Liu SK Bates JT Parsons PE Ventilation of patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: has new evidence changed clinical practice?Crit Care Med2004 3212601265

    Not in our library10.1097/01.ccm.0000127784.54727.56

  31. 31.

    Serpa Neto A Cardoso SO Manetta JA Pereira VG Espósito DC Pasqualucci Mde O Damasceno MC Schultz MJ Association between use of lung-protective ventilation with lower tidal volumes and clinical outcomes among patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysisJAMA2012 30816511659

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.2012.13730

  32. 32.

    Esteban A Anzueto A Frutos F Alía I Brochard L Stewart TE Benito S Epstein SK Apezteguía C Nightingale P Arroliga AC Tobin MJ Mechanical Ventilation International Study GroupCharacteristics and outcomes in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a 28-day international studyJAMA2002 287345355

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.287.3.345

  33. 33.

    Frutos-Vivar F Esteban A Apezteguia C González M Arabi Y Restrepo MI Gordo F Santos C Alhashemi JA Pérez F Peñuelas O Anzueto A Outcome of reintubated patients after scheduled extubationJ Crit Care2011 26502509

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.12.015

  34. 34.

    Zagli G Linden M Spina R Bonizzoli M Cianchi G Anichini V Matano S Benemei S Nicoletti P Peris A Early tracheostomy in intensive care unit: a retrospective study of 506 cases of video-guided Ciaglia Blue Rhino tracheostomiesJ Trauma2010 68367372

    Not in our library10.1097/ta.0b013e3181a601b3

  35. 35.

    Nathens AB Rivara FP Mack CD Rubenfeld GD Wang J Jurkovich GJ Maier RV Variations in rates of tracheostomy in the critically ill trauma patientCrit Care Med2006 3429192924

    Not in our library10.1097/01.ccm.0000243800.28251.ae

  36. 36.

    Flaatten H Gjerde S Heimdal JH Aardal S The effect of tracheostomy on outcome in intensive care unit patientsActa Anaesthesiol Scand2006 509298

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00898.x

  37. 37.

    Antonelli M Conti G Moro ML Esquinas A Gonzalez-Diaz G Confalonieri M Pelaia P Principi T Gregoretti C Beltrame F Pennisi MA Arcangeli A Proietti R Passariello M Meduri GU Predictors of failure of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a multi-center studyIntensive Care Med2001 2717181728

    Not in our library10.1007/s00134-001-1114-4

  38. 38.

    Carrillo A Gonzalez-Diaz G Ferrer M Martinez-Quintana ME Lopez-Martinez A Llamas N Alcazar M Torres A Non-invasive ventilation in community-acquired pneumonia and severe acute respiratory failureIntensive Care Med2012 38458466

    Not in our library10.1007/s00134-012-2475-6

  39. 39.

    Chandra D Stamm JA Taylor B Ramos RM Satterwhite L Krishnan JA Mannino D Sciurba FC Holguin F Outcomes of noninvasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the United States, 1998-2008Am J Respir Crit Care Med2012 185152159

    Not in our library10.1164/rccm.201106-1094oc

  40. 40.

    Sakr Y Vincent JL Reinhart K Groeneveld J Michalopoulos A Sprung CL Artigas A Ranieri VM High tidal volume and positive fluid balance are associated with worse outcome in acute lung injuryChest2005 12830983108

    Not in our library10.1378/chest.128.5.3098

All 44 references

Cited by papers we hold 2

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.