Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 18, 2026.

Current progress on bio-based polymers and their future trends

Ramesh P Babu, Kevin O'Connor, Ramakrishna Seeram

Progress in Biomaterials · 2013

doi:10.1186/2194-0517-2-8

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 18, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Bio-based polymers are materials which are produced from renewable resources. The terms bio-based polymers and biodegradable polymers are used extensively in the literature, but there is a key difference between the two types of polymers. Biodegradable polymers are defined as materials whose physical and chemical properties undergo deterioration and completely degrade when exposed to microorganisms, carbon dioxide (aerobic) processes, methane (anaerobic processes), and water (aerobic and anaerobic processes). Bio-based polymers can be biodegradable (e.g., polylactic acid) or nondegradable (e.g., biopolyhethylene). Similarly, while many bio-based polymers are biodegradable (e.g., starch and polyhydroxyalkanoates), not all biodegradable polymers are bio-based (e.g., polycaprolactone).

Bio-based polymers still hold a tiny fraction of the total global plastic market. Currently, biopolymers share less than 1% of the total market. At the current growth rate, it is expected that biopolymers will account for just over 1% of polymers by 2015 (Doug ).

The worldwide interest in bio-based polymers has accelerated in recent years due to the desire and need to find non-fossil fuel-based polymers. As indicated by ISI Web of Sciences and Thomas Innovations, there is a tremendous increase in the number of publication citations on bio-based polymers and applications in recent years, as shown in Figure 1 (Chen and Martin ).

Bio-based polymers offer important contributions by reducing the dependence on fossil fuels and through the related positive environmental impacts such as reduced carbon dioxide emissions. The legislative landscape is also changing where bio-based products are being favored through initiatives such as the Lead Market Initiative (European Union) and BioPreferred (USA). As a result, there is a worldwide demand for replacing petroleum-derived raw materials with renewable resource-based raw materials for the production of polymers.

The first generation of bio-based polymers focused on deriving polymers from agricultural feedstocks such as corn, potatoes, and other carbohydrate feedstocks. However, the focus has shifted in recent years due to a desire to move away from food-based resources and significant breakthroughs in biotechnology. Bio-based polymers similar to conventional polymers are produced by bacterial fermentation processes by synthesizing the building blocks (monomers) from renewable resources, including lignocellulosic biomass (starch and cellulose), fatty acids, and organic waste. Natural bio-based polymers are the other class of bio-based polymers which are found naturally, such as proteins, nucleic acids, and polysaccharides (collagen, chitosan, etc.). These bio-based polymers have shown enormous growth in recent years in terms of technological developments and their commercial applications. There are three principal ways to produce bio-based polymers using renewable resources:Using natural bio-based polymers with partial modification to meet the requirements (e.g., starch)Producing bio-based monomers by fermentation/conventional chemistry followed by polymerization (e.g., polylactic acid, polybutylene succinate, and polyethylene)Producing bio-based polymers directly by bacteria (e.g., polyhydroxyalkanoates).

Using natural bio-based polymers with partial modification to meet the requirements (e.g., starch)

Producing bio-based monomers by fermentation/conventional chemistry followed by polymerization (e.g., polylactic acid, polybutylene succinate, and polyethylene)

Producing bio-based polymers directly by bacteria (e.g., polyhydroxyalkanoates).

In this paper, an overview of bio-based polymers made from renewable resources and natural polymers derived from plant and animal origins is presented. The review will focus on the preparation, properties, applications, and future trends for bio-based polymers. This paper discusses the use of renewable resources such as lignocellulosic biomass to create monomers and polymers that can replace petroleum-based polymers, such as polyester, polylactic acids, and other natural bio-based polymers, which are presented in Figure 2.

Polylactic acid

Polylactic acid (PLA) has been known since 1845 but not commercialized until early 1990. PLA belongs to the family of aliphatic polyesters with the basic constitutional unit lactic acid. The monomer lactic acid is the hydroxyl carboxylic acid which can be obtained via bacterial fermentation from corn (starch) or sugars obtained from renewable resources. Although other renewable resources can be used, corn has the advantage of providing a high-quality feedstock for fermentation which results in a high-purity lactic acid, which is required for an efficient synthetic process. l-lactic acid or d-lactic acid is obtained depending on the microbial strain used during the fermentation process.

PLA can be synthesized from lactic acid by direct polycondensation reaction or ring-opening polymerization of lactide monomer. However, it is difficult to obtain high molecular weight PLA via polycondensation reaction because of water formation during the reaction. Nature Works LLC (previously Cargill Dow LLC) has developed a low-cost continuous process for the production of PLA (Erwin et al. ). In this process, low molecular weight pre-polymer lactide dimers are formed during a condensation process. In the second step, the pre-polymers are converted into high molecular weight PLA via ring-opening polymerization with selected catalysts. Depending on the ratio and stereochemical nature of the monomer (l or d), various types of PLA and PLA copolymers can be obtained. The final properties of PLA produced are highly dependent on the ratio of the d and l forms of the lactic acid which are listed in Table 1 for various blend ratios (Garlotta ).

PLA is a commercially interesting polymer as it shares some similarities with hydrocarbon polymers such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET). It has many unique characteristics, including good transparency, glossy appearance, high rigidity, and ability to tolerate various types of processing conditions.

PLA is a thermoplastic polymer which has the potential to replace traditional polymers such as PET, PS, and PC for packaging to electronic and automotive applications (Majid et al. ). While PLA has similar mechanical properties to traditional polymers, the thermal properties are not attractive due to low T g of 60°C. This problem can be overcome by changing the stereochemistry of the polymer and blending with other polymers and processing aids to improve the mechanical properties, e.g., varying the ratio of l and d isomer ratio strongly influences the crystallinity of the final polymer. However, much more work is required to improve the properties of PLA to suit various applications.

Currently, Nature Works LLC, USA, is the major supplier of PLA sold under the brand name Ingeo, with a production capacity of 100,000 ton/year. There are other manufactures of PLA based in the USA, Europe, China, and Japan developing various grades of PLA suitable for different industrial sectors such as automobile, electronics, medical devices, and commodity applications, which are mentioned in Table 2) (Doug; Ravenstijn ).

PLA is widely used in many day-to-day applications. It has been mainly used in food packing (including food trays, tableware such as plates and cutlery, water bottles, candy wraps, cups, etc.). Although PLA has one of the highest heat resistances and mechanical strengths of all bio-based polymers, it is still not suitable for use in electronic devices and other engineering applications. NEC Corporation (Japan) recently produced a PLA with carbon and kenaf fibers with improved thermal and flame retardancy properties. Fujitsu (Japan) developed a polycarbonate blend with PLA to make computer housings. In recent years, PLA has been employed as a membrane material for use in automotive and chemical industry.

The ease of melt processing has led to the production of PLA fibers, which are increasingly accepted in a wide variety of textiles from dresses to sportswear, furnishing to drapes, and soft nonwoven baby wipes to tough landscape textiles. These textiles can outperform traditional textiles made from synthetic counterparts. Bioresorbable scaffolds produced with PLA and various PLA blends are used in implants for growing living cells. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the use of PLA for certain human clinical applications (Dorozhkin; Garlotta ). In addition, PLA-based materials have been used for bone support splints. Applications of PLA-based polymers in various fields are listed in Table 3.

Polyhydroxyalkanoates

Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) are a family of polyesters produced by bacterial fermentation with the potential to replace conventional hydrocarbon-based polymers. PHAs occur naturally in a variety of organisms, but microorganisms can be employed to tailor their production in cells. Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB), the simplest PHA, was discovered in 1926 by Maurice Lemoigne as a constituent of the bacterium Bacillus megaterium (Lemoigne ).

PHA can be produced by varieties of bacteria using several renewable waste feedstocks. A generic process to produce PHA by bacterial fermentation involves fermentation, isolation, and purification from fermentation broth. A large fermentation vessel is filled with mineral medium and inoculated with a seed culture that contains bacteria. The feedstocks include cellulosics, vegetable oils, organic waste, municipal solid waste, and fatty acids depending on the specific PHA required. The carbon source is fed into the vessel until it is consumed and cell growth and PHA accumulation is complete. In general, a minimum of 48 h is required for fermentation time. To isolate and purify PHA, cells are concentrated, dried, and extracted with solvents such as acetone or chloroform. The residual cell debris is removed from the solvent containing dissolved PHA by solid-liquid separation process. The PHA is then precipitated by the addition of an alcohol (e.g., methanol) and recovered by a precipitation process (Kathiraser et al. ).

More than 150 PHA monomers have been identified as the constituents of PHAs (Steinbüchel and Valentin ). Such diversity allows the production of bio-based polymers with a wide range of properties, tailored for specific applications. Poly-3-hydroxybutyrate was the first bacterial PHA identified. It has received the greatest attention in terms of pathway characterization and industrial-scale production. It possesses similar thermal and mechanical properties to those of polystyrene and polypropylene (Savenkova et al. ). However, due to its slow crystallization, narrow processing temperature range, and tendency to ‘creep’, it is not attractive for many applications, requiring development in order to overcome these shortcomings (Reis et al. ). Several companies have developed PHA copolymers with typically 80% to 95% (R)-3-hydroxybutyric acid monomer and 5% to 20% of a second monomer in order to improve the properties of PHAs. Some specific examples of PHAs include the following:

Poly(3HB): Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)Poly(3HB-co-3HV): Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate), PHBVPoly(3-HB-co-4HB): Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate)Poly(3HB-co-3HH): Poly(3-hydroxyoctanoate-co-hydroxyhexanoate)Poly(3HO-co-3HH): Poly(3-hydroxyoctanoate-co-hydroxyhexanoate)Poly (4-HB): Poly(4-hydroxybutyrate).

Poly(3HB): Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)

Poly(3HB-co-3HV): Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate), PHBV

Poly(3-HB-co-4HB): Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate)

Poly(3HB-co-3HH): Poly(3-hydroxyoctanoate-co-hydroxyhexanoate)

Poly(3HO-co-3HH): Poly(3-hydroxyoctanoate-co-hydroxyhexanoate)

Poly (4-HB): Poly(4-hydroxybutyrate).

The copolymer poly(3HB-co-3HV) has a much lower crystallinity, decreased stiffness and brittleness, and increased tensile strength and toughness compared to poly(3HB) while remaining biodegradable. It also has a higher melt viscosity, which is a desirable property for extrusion and blow molding (Hanggi ).

The first commercial plant for PHBV was built in the USA in a joint venture between Metabolix and Archer Daniels Midland. However, the joint venture between these two companies ended in 2012. Currently, Tianan Biologic Material Co. in China is the largest producer of PHB and PHB copolymers. Tianan's PHBV contains about 5% valerate which improves the flexibility of the polymer. Tainjin Green Biosciences, China, invested along with DSM to build a production plant with 10-kton/year capacity to produce PHAs for packing and biomedical applications (DSM press release ). The current global manufacturers of PHB-based polymers are listed in Table 4 (Doug; Ravenstijn 2010).

PHA polymers are thermoplastic, and their thermal and mechanical properties depend on their composition. The T g of the polymers varies from −40°C to 5°C, and the melting temperatures range from 50°C to 180°C, depending on their chemical composition (McChalicher and Srienc ). PHB is similar in its material properties to polypropylene, with a good resistance to moisture and aroma barrier properties. Polyhydroxybutyric acid synthesized from pure PHB is relatively brittle and stiff. PHB copolymers, which may include other fatty acids such as beta-hydroxyvaleric acid, may be elastic (McChalicher and Srienc ).

PHAs can be processed in existing polymer-processing equipment and can be converted into injection-molded components: film and sheet, fibers, laminates, and coated articles; nonwoven fabrics, synthetic paper products, disposable items, feminine hygiene products, adhesives, waxes, paints, binders, and foams. Metabolix has received FDA clearance for use of PHAs in food contact applications. These materials are suitable for a wide range of food packing applications including caps and closures, disposable items such as forks, spoons, knives, tubs, trays, and hot cup lids, and products such as housewares, cosmetics, and medical packaging (Philip et al. ).

PHA and its copolymers are widely used as biomedical implant materials. Various applications of PHA and their polymer blends are listed in Table 5. These include sutures, suture fasteners, meniscus repair devices, rivets, bone plates, surgical mesh, repair patches, cardiovascular patches, tissue repair patches, and stem cell growth. Changing the PHA composition allows the manufacturer to tune the properties such as biocompatibility and polymer degradation time within desirable time frames under specific conditions. PHAs can also be used in drug delivery due to their biocompatibility and controlled degradability. Only a few examples of PHAs have been evaluated for this type of applications, and it remains an important area for exploitation (Tang et al. ).

Polybutylene succinate

Polybutylene succinate (PBS) is an aliphatic polyester with similar properties to those of PET. PBS is produced by condensation of succinic acid and 1,4-butanediol. PBS can be produced by either monomers derived from petroleum-based systems or the bacterial fermentation route. There are several processes for producing succinic acid from fossil fuels. Among them, electrochemical synthesis is a common process with high yield and low cost. However, the fermentation production of succinic acid has numerous advantages compared to the chemical process. Fermentation process uses renewable resources and consumes less energy compared to chemical process. Several companies (solely or in partnership) are now scaling bio-succinate production processes which have traditionally suffered from poor productivity and high downstream processing costs. Mitsubishi Chemical (Japan) has developed biomass-derived succinic acid in collaboration with Ajinomoto to commercialize bio-based PBS. DSM and Roquette are developing a commercially feasible fermentation process for the production of succinic acid 1,4-butanediol and subsequent production of PBS. Myriant and Bioamber have developed a fermentation technology to produce monomers. There are several companies around the world developing technologies for the production of PBS, as listed in Table 6, including North America and China (Doug; Ravenstijn ).

Conventional processes for the production of 1,4-butanediol use fossil fuel feedstocks such as acetylene and formaldehyde. The bio-based process involves the use of glucose from renewable resources to produce succinic acid followed by a chemical reduction to produce butanediol. PBS is produced by transesterification, direct polymerization, and condensation polymerization reactions. PBS copolymers can be produced by adding a third monomer such as sebacic acid, adipic acid, and succinic acid which is also produced by renewable resources (Bechthold et al. ).

PBS is a semicrystalline polyester with a melting point higher than that of PLA. Its mechanical and thermal properties depend on the crystal structure and the degree of crystallinity (Nicolas et al. ). PBS displays similar crystallization behavior and mechanical properties to those of polyolefin such as polyethylene. It has a good tensile and impact strength with moderate rigidity and hardness. The T g is approximately −32°C, and the melting temperature is approximately 115°C. In comparison with PLA, PBS is tougher in nature but with a lower rigidity and Young's modulus. By changing the monomer composition, mechanical properties can be tuned to suit the required application (Liu et al. 2009, ).

PBS and their blends have found commercial applications in agriculture, fishery, forestry, construction, and other industrial fields which are listed in Table 7. For example, PBS has been employed as mulch film, packaging, and flushable hygiene products and also used as a non-migrant plasticizer for polyvinyl chloride (PVC). In addition, it is used in foaming and food packaging application. The relatively poor mechanical flexibility of PBS limits the applications of 100% PBS-based products. However, this can be overcome by blending PBS with PLA or starch to improve the mechanical properties significantly, providing properties similar to that of polyolefin (Eslmai and Kamal; Zhao et al. ).

Bio-polyethylene

Polyethylene (PE) is an important engineering polymer traditionally produced from fossil resources. PE is produced by polymerization of ethylene under pressure, temperature, in the presence of a catalyst. Traditionally, ethylene is produced through steam cracking of naphtha or heavy oils or ethanol dehydration. With increases in oil prices, microbial PE or green PE is now being manufactured from dehydration of ethanol produced by microbial fermentation. The concept of producing PE from bioethanol is not a particularly new one. In the 1980s, Braskem made bio-PE and bio-PVC from bioethanol. However, low oil prices and the limitations of the biotechnology processes made the technology unattractive at that time (de Guzman ).

Currently, bio-PE produced on an industrial scale from bioethanol is derived from sugarcane. Bioethanol is also derived from biorenewable feedstocks, including sugar beet, starch crops such as maize, wood, wheat, corn, and other plant wastes through microbial strain and biological fermentation process. In a typical process, extracted sugarcane juice with high sucrose content is anaerobically fermented to produce ethanol. At the end of the fermentation process, ethanol is distilled in order to remove water and to yield azeotropic mixture of hydrous ethanol. Ethanol is then dehydrated at high temperatures over a solid catalyst to produce ethylene and, subsequently, polyethylene (Guangwen et al.; Luiz et al. ).

Bio-based polyethylene has exactly the same chemical, physical, and mechanical properties as petrochemical polyethylene. Braskem (Brazil) is the largest producer of bio-PE with 52% market share, and this is the first certified bio-PE in the world. Similarly, Braskem is developing other bio-based polymers such as bio-polyvinyl chloride, bio-polypropylene, and their copolymers with similar industrial technologies. The current Braskem bio-based PE grades are mainly targeted towards food packing, cosmetics, personal care, automotive parts, and toys. Dow Chemical (USA) in cooperation with Crystalsev is the second largest producer of bio-PE with 12% market share. Solvay (Belgium), another producer of bio-PE, has 10% share in the current market. However, Solvay is a leader in the production of bio-PVC with similar industrial technologies. China Petrochemical Corporation also plans to set up production facilities in China to produce bio-PE from bioethanol (Haung et al. ).

Bio-PE can replace all the applications of current fossil-based PE. It is widely used in engineering, agriculture, packaging, and many day-to-day commodity applications because of its low price and good performance. Table 8 shows applications of bio-PE in different fields where it can replace conventional PE.

Bio-based natural polymers

This group consists of naturally occurring polymers such as cellulose, starch, chitin, and various polysaccharides and proteins. These materials and their derivatives offer a wide range of properties and applications. In this section, some of the natural bio-based polymers and their applications in various fields are discussed.

Starch

Starch is a unique bio-based polymer because it occurs in nature as discrete granules. Starch is the end product of photosynthesis in plants - a natural carbohydrate-based polymer that is abundantly available in nature from various sources including wheat, rice, corn, and potato. Essentially, starch consists of the linear polysaccharide amylose and the highly branched polysaccharide amylopectin. In particular, thermoplastic starch is of growing interest within the industry. The thermal and mechanical properties of starch can vary greatly and depend upon such factors as the amount of plasticizer present. The T g varies between −50°C and 110°C, and the modulus is similar to polyolefins (Jane ). Several challenges exist in producing commercially viable starch plastics. Starch's molecular structure is complex and partly nonlinear, leading to issues with ductility. Starch and starch thermoplastics suffer from the phenomenon of retrogradation - a natural increase in crystallinity over time, leading to increased brittleness. Plasticizers need to be found to create starch plastics with mechanical properties comparable to polyolefin-derived packaging. Plasticized starch blends and composites and/or chemical modifications may overcome these issues, creating biodegradable polymers with sufficient mechanical strength, flexibility, and water barrier properties for commercial packaging and consumer products (Maurizio et al. ).

Novamont is one of the leading companies in processing starch-based products (Li et al. ). The company produces various types of starch-based products using proprietary blend formulations. There are other companies around the world producing starch-based products in a similar scale for various applications, which are listed in Table 9 (Doug; Ravenstijn ).

Applications of thermoplastic starch polymers include films, such as for shopping, bread, and fishing bait bags, overwraps, flushable sanitary product, packing materials, and special mulch films. Potential future applications could include foam loose-fill packaging and injection-molded products such as ‘take-away’ food containers. Starch and modified starches have a broad range of applications both in the food and non-food sectors. In Europe in 2002, the total consumption of starch and starch derivatives was approximately 7.9 million tons, of which 54% was used for food applications and 46% in non-food applications (Frost & Sullivan report ).

The largest users of starch in the European Union (30%) are the paper, cardboard, and corrugating industries (Frost & Sullivan report ). Other important fields of starch application are textiles, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, construction, and paints, which are listed in Table 10. In the medium and long term, starch will play an increasing role in the field of ‘renewable raw materials’ for the production of biodegradable plastics, packaging material, and molded products.

Cellulose

Cellulose is the predominant constituent in cell walls of all plants. Cellulose is a complex polysaccharide with crystalline morphology. Cellulose differs from starch where glucose units are linked by β-1,4-glycosidic bonds, whereas the bonds in starch are predominantly α-1,4 linkages. The most important raw material sources for the production of cellulosic plastics are cotton fibers and wood. Plant fiber is dissolved in alkali and carbon disulfide to create viscose, which is then reconverted to cellulose in cellophane form following a sulfuric acid and sodium sulfate bath. There are currently two processes used to separate cellulose from the other wood constituents (Yan et al. ). These methods, sulfite and pre-hydrolysis kraft pulping, use high pressure and chemicals to separate cellulose from lignin and hemicellulose, attaining greater than 97% cellulose purity. The main derivatives of cellulose for industrial purposes are cellulose acetate, cellulose esters (molding, extrusion, and films), and regenerated cellulose for fibers.

Cellulose is a hard polymer and has a high tensile strength of 62 to 500 MPa and elongation of 4% (Bisanda and Ansell; Eichhorn et al. ). In order to overcome the inherent processing problems of cellulose, it is necessary to modify, plasticize, and blend with other polymers. The mechanical and thermal properties vary from blend to blend depending on the composition. The T g of cellulosic derivatives ranged between 53°C and 180°C (Picker and Hoag ).

Eastman Chemical is a major producer of cellulosic polymers. FKuR launched a biopolymer business in the year 2000 and has a capacity of 2,800 metric ton/year of various cellulosic compounds for different applications (Doug ). The major producers of cellulose-based compounds are listed in Table 11 (Doug; Ravenstijn ).

There are three main groups of cellulosic polymers that are produced by chemical modification of cellulose for various applications. Cellulose esters, namely cellulose nitrate and cellulose acetate, are mainly developed for film and fiber applications. Cellulose ethers, such as carboxymethyl cellulose and hydroxyethyl cellulose, are widely used in construction, food, personal care, pharmaceuticals, paint, and other pharmaceutical applications (Kamel et al. ). Finally, regenerated cellulose is the largest bio-based polymer produced globally for fiber and film applications. Regenerated cellulose fibers are used in textiles, hygienic disposables, and home furnishing fabrics because of its thermal stability and modulus (Kevin et al. ).

Chemically pure cellulose can be produced using a certain type of bacteria. Bacterial cellulose is characterized by its purity and high strength. It can be used to produce articles with relatively high strength. Currently, applications for bacterial cellulose outside food and biomedical fields are rather limited because of its high price. The other applications include acoustic diaphragms, mining, paints, oil gas recovery, and adhesives. However, the low yields and high costs of bacterial cellulose represent barriers to large-scale industrial applications (Prashant et al. ). Table 12 summarizes the applications of cellulose and their compounds in different fields.

Chitin and chitosan

Chitin and chitosan are the most abundant natural amino polysaccharide and valuable bio-based natural polymers derived from shells of prawns and crabs. Currently, chitin and chitosan are produced commercially by chemical extraction process from crab, shrimp, and prawn wastes (Roberts ). The chemical extraction of chitin is quite an aggressive process based on demineralization by acid and deproteination by the action of alkali followed by deacetylated into chitosan (Roberts ). Chitin can also be produced by using enzyme hydrolysis or fermentation process, but these processes are not economically feasible on an industrial scale (Win and Stevens ). Currently, there are few industrial-scale plants of chitin and chitosan worldwide located in the USA, Canada, Scandinavia, and Asia (Ravi Kumar ).

Chitosan displays interesting characteristics including biodegradability, biocompatibility, chemical inertness, high mechanical strength, good film-forming properties, and low cost (Marguerite; Virginia et al.; Liu et al. ). Chitosan is being used in a vast array of widely varying products and applications ranging from pharmaceutical and cosmetic products to water treatment and plant protection. For each application, different properties of chitosan are required, which changes with the degree of acetylation and molecular weight. Chitosan is compatible with many biologically active components incorporated in cosmetic product composition (Ravi Kumar ). Due to its low toxicity, biocompatibility, and bioactivity, chitosan has become a very attractive material in such diverse applications as biomaterials in medical devices and as a pharmaceutical ingredient (Bae and Moo-Moo; Ramya et al. ). Chitosan has application in shampoos, rinses, and permanent hair-coloring agents. Chitosan and its derivatives also have applications in the skin care industry. Chitosan can function as a moisturizer for the skin, and because of its lower costs, it might compete with hyaluronic acid in this application (Bansal et al.; Valerie and Vinod; Hafdani and Sadeghinia ).

Pullulan

Pullulan is a linear water-soluble polysaccharide mainly consisting of maltotriose units connected by α-1,6 glycosidic units. Pullulan was first reported by Bauer and is obtained from the fermentation broth of Aureobasidium pullulans. Pullulan is produced by a simple fermentation process using a number of feedstocks containing simple sugars (Bernier; Catley; Sena et al. ). Pullulan can be chemically modified to produce a polymer that is either less soluble or completely insoluble in water. The unique properties of this polysaccharide are due to its characteristic glycosidic linking. Pullulan is easily chemically modified to reduce the water solubility or to develop pH sensitivity, by introducing functional reactive groups, etc. Due to its high water solubility and low viscosity, pullulan has numerous commercial applications including use as a food additive, a flocculant, a blood plasma substitute, an adhesive, and a film (Zajic and LeDuy; Singh et al.; Cheng et al. ). Pullulan can be formed into molding articles which can resemble conventional polymers such as polystyrene in their transparency, strength, and toughness (Leathers ).

Pullulan is extensively used in the food industry. It is a slow-digesting macromolecule which is tasteless as well as odorless, hence its application as a low-calorie food additive providing bulk and texture. Pullulan possesses oxygen barrier property and good moisture retention, and also, it inhibits fungal growth. These properties make it an excellent material for food preservation, and it is used extensively in the food industry (Conca and Yang ). In recent years, pullulan has also been studied for biomedical applications in various aspects, including targeted drug and gene delivery, tissue engineering, wound healing, and even in diagnostic imaging medium (Rekha and Chrndra ). Other emerging markets for pullulan include oral care products (Barkalow et al. ) and formulations of capsules for dietary supplements and pharmaceuticals (Leathers ), leading to increased demand for this unique biopolymer.

Collagen and gelatin

Collagen is the major insoluble fibrous protein in the extracellular matrix and in connective tissue. In fact, it is the single most abundant protein in the animal kingdom. There are at least 27 types of collagens, and the structures all serve the same purpose: to help tissues withstand stretching. The most abundant sources of collagen are pig skin, bovine hide, and pork and cattle bones. However, the industrial use of collagen is obtained from nonmammalian species (Gomez-Guille et al. ). Gelatin is obtained through the hydrolysis of collagen. The degree of conversion of collagen into gelatin depends on the pretreatment, function of temperature, pH, and extraction time (Johnston-Banks ).

Collagen is one of the most useful biomaterials due to its biocompatibility, biodegradability, and weak antigenicity (Maeda et al. ). The main application of collagen films in ophthalmology is as drug delivery systems for slow release of incorporated drugs (Rubin et al. ). It was also used for tissue engineering including skin replacement, bone substitutes, and artificial blood vessels and valves (Lee et al. ).

The classical food, photographic, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical applications of gelatin is based mainly on its gel-forming properties. Recently in the food industry, an increasing number of new applications have been found for gelatin in products in line with the growing trend to replace synthetic agents with more natural ones (Gomez-Guille et al. ). These include emulsifiers, foaming agents, colloid stabilizers, biodegradable film-forming materials, and microencapsulating agents.

Alginates

Alginate is a linear polysaccharide that is abundant in nature as it is synthesized by brown seaweeds and by soil bacteria (Draget et al. ). Sodium alginate is the most commonly used alginate form in the industry since it is the first by-product of algal purification (Draget ). Sodium alginate consists of α-l-guluronic acid residues (G blocks) and β-d-mannuronic acid residues (M blocks), as well as segments of alternating guluronic and mannuronic acids.

Although alginates are a heterogeneous family of polymers with varying content of G and M blocks depending on the source of extraction, alginates with high G content have far more industrial importance (Siddhesh and Edgar ). The acid or alkali treatment processes used to make sodium alginate from brown seaweeds are relatively simple. The difficulties in processing arise mainly from the separation of sodium alginate from slimy residues (Black and Woodward ). It is estimated that the annual production of alginates is approximately 38,000 tons worldwide (Helgerud et al. ).

Alginates have various industrial uses as viscosifiers, stabilizers, and gel-forming, film-forming, or water-binding agents (Helga and Svein ). These applications range from textile printing and manufacturing of ceramics to production of welding rods and water treatment (Teli and Chiplunkar; Qin et al.; Xie et al. ). The polymer is soluble in cold water and forms thermostable gels. These properties are utilized in the food industry in products such as custard creams and restructured food. The polymer is also used as a stabilizer and thickener in a variety of beverages, ice creams, emulsions, and sauces (Iain et al. ).

Alginates are widely used as a gelling agent in pharmaceutical and food applications. Studies into their positive effects on human health have broadened recently with the recognition that they have a number of potentially beneficial physiological effects in the gastrointestinal tract (Peter et al.; Mandel et al. ). Alginate-containing wound dressings are commonly used, especially in making hydrophilic gels over wounds which can produce comfortable, localized hydrophilic environments in healing wounds (Onsoyen ). Alginates are used in controlled drug delivery, where the rate of drug release depends on the type and molecular weight of alginates used (Alexnader et al.; Goh et al. ). Additionally, dental impressions made with alginates are easy to handle for both dentist and patient as they fast set at room temperature and are cost-effective (Onsoyen ). Recent studies show that alginates can be effective in treating obesity, and currently, various functional alginates are being evaluated in human clinical trials (Georg et al. ).

Current status and future trends

The use of bio-based feedstocks in the chemical sector is not a novel concept. They have been industrially feasible on a large scale for more than a decade. However, the price of oil was so cost-effective, and the development of oil-based products created so many opportunities that bio-based products were not prioritized at the time. Several factors, such as the limitations and uncertainty in supplies of fossil fuels, environmental considerations, and technological developments, accelerated the advancement of bio-based polymers and products. It took more than a century to evolve the fossil fuel-based chemical industry; however, the bio-based polymer industry is already catching up with fossil fuel-based chemical industry, which has augmented in the last 20 years. Thanks to advancements in white biotechnology, the production of bio-based polymers and other chemicals from renewable resources has become a reality. The first-generation technologies mainly focused on food resources such as corn, starch, rice, etc. to produce bio-based polymers. As the food-versus-fuel debate ascended, the focus of technologies diverted to cellulose-based feedstocks, focusing on waste from wood and paper, food industries, and even stems and leaves and solid municipal waste streams. More and more of these technologies are already in the pipeline to align with the abovementioned waste streams; however, it may take another 20 years to develop the full spectrum of chemicals based on these technologies (Michael et al. ).

Challenges that need to be addressed in the coming years include management of raw materials, performance of bio-based materials, and their cost for production. Economy of scale will be one of the main challenges for production of bio-based monomers and bio-based polymers from renewable sources. Building large-scale plants can be difficult due to the lack of experience in new technologies and estimation of supply/demand balance. In order to make these technologies economically viable, it is very important to develop (1) logistics for biomass feedstocks, (2) new manufacturing routes by replacing existing methods with high yields, (3) new microbial strains/enzymes, and (4) efficient downstream processing methods for recovery of bio-based products.

The current bio-based industry focus is mainly on making bio-versions of existing monomers and polymers. Performance of these products is well known, and it is relatively easy to replace the existing product with similar performance of bio-versions. All the polymers mentioned above often display similar properties of current fossil-based polymers. Recently, many efforts are seen towards introducing new bio-based polymers with higher performance and value. For example, Nature Works LLC has introduced new grades of PLA with higher thermal and mechanical properties. New PLA-tri block copolymers have been reported to behave like thermoplastic elastomer. Many developments are currently underway to develop various polyamides, polyesters, polyhydroxyaloknates, etc. with a high differentiation in their final properties for use in automotive, electronics, and biomedical applications.

The disadvantage of some of the new bio-based polymers is that they cannot be processed in all current processing equipment. There is vast knowledge on additive-based chemistry developed for improving the performance and processing of fossil fuel-based polymers, and this knowledge can be used to develop new additive chemistry to improve the performance and properties of bio-based polymers (Ray and Bousmina ). For bio-based polymers like PLA and PHA, additives are being developed to improve their performance, by blending with other polymers or making new copolymers. However, the additive market for bio-based polymers is still very small, which makes it difficult to justify major development efforts according to some key additive supplier companies.

The use of nanoparticles as additives to enhance polymer performance has long been established for petroleum-based polymers. Various nano-reinforcements currently being developed include carbon nanotubes, graphene, nanoclays, 2-D layered materials, and cellulose nanowhiskers. Combining these nanofillers with bio-based polymers could enhance a large number of physical properties, including barrier, flame resistance, thermal stability, solvent uptake, and rate of biodegradability, relative to unmodified polymer resin. These improvements are generally attained at low filler content, and this nano-reinforcement is a very attractive route to generate new functional biomaterials for various applications.

Even though new bio-based polymers are produced on an industrial scale, there are still several factors which need to be determined for the long-term viability of bio-based polymers. It is expected that there will be feedstock competition as global demand for food and energy increases over time. Currently, renewable feedstocks used for manufacturing bio-based monomers and polymers often compete with requirements for food-based products. The expansion of first-generation bio-based fuel production will place unsustainable demands on biomass resources and is as much a threat to the sustainability of biochemical and biopolymer production as it is to food production (Michael et al. ). Indeed the European commission has altered its targets downwards for first-generation biofuels since October 2012, indicating its preference for non-food sources of sugar for biofuel production (EurActiv.com ). Several initiatives are underway to use cellulose-based feedstocks for the production of usable sugars for biofuels, biochemicals, and biopolymers (Jong et al. ).

Conclusions

Bio-based polymers are closer to the reality of replacing conventional polymers than ever before. Nowadays, bio-based polymers are commonly found in many applications from commodity to hi-tech applications due to advancement in biotechnologies and public awareness. However, despite these advancements, there are still some drawbacks which prevent the wider commercialization of bio-based polymers in many applications. This is mainly due to performance and price when compared with their conventional counterparts, which remains a significant challenge for bio-based polymers.

References 159

  1. 1.

    Aamer AS, Fariha H, Abdul H, Safia A. Biological degradation of plastics: a comprehensive review. Biotechnol Adv. 2008;26:246-265.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.12.005

  2. 2.

    Abdelrahman T, Newton H. Wound dressings: principles and practice. Surgery. 2011;29:491-495.

    Not in our library

  3. 3.

    Alexnader DA, Kong HJ, Mooney DJ. Alginate hydrogels as biomaterials. Macromolecular Biosciences. 2006;6:623-633.

    Not in our library10.1002/mabi.200600069

  4. 4.

    Amass W, Amass A, Tighe B. A review of biodegradable polymers: uses, current developments in the synthesis and characterization of biodegradable polyesters, blends of biodegradable polymers and recent advances in biodegradation studies. Polymer International. 1998;47:89-144.

    Not in our library

  5. 5.

    Amit S, Ragauskas AJ. Water transmission barrier properties of biodegradable films based on cellulosic whiskers and xylan. Carbohydr Polym. 2009;78(2):357-360.

    Not in our library

  6. 6.

    Arshady R. Beaded polymer supports and gels: 2. Physicochemical criteria and functionalization. J Chromatogr. 1991;586:199-219.

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    Arshady R. Beaded polymer supports and gels: 1. Manufacturing techniques. J Chromatogr. 1991;586:181-197.

    Not in our library

  8. 8.

    Asha R, Martins E. Recent applications of starch derivatives in nanodrug delivery. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;87(2):987-994.

    Not in our library

  9. 9.

    Ashammakhi N, Rokkanen P. Absorbable polyglycolide devices in trauma and bone surgery. Biomaterials. 1997;18(1):3-9.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0142-9612(96)00107-x

  10. 10.

    Avinc A, Akbar K. Overview of poly (lactic acid) fibres. Part I: production, properties, performance, environmental impact, and end-use applications of poly (lactic acid) fibres. Fiber Chemistry. 2009;41(6):391-401.

    Not in our library

  11. 11.
  12. 12.

    Bansal V, Pramod KS, Nitin S, Omprakask P, Malviya R. Applications of chitosan and chitosan derivatives for drug delivery. Adva Biol Res. 2011;5:28-37.

    Not in our library

  13. 13.

    Barkalow DG, Chapedelaine AH, Dzija MJ. Improved pullulan free edible film compositions and methods of making same. PCT International Application WO 02/43657, US 01/43397, 21 Nov. 2002.

    Not in our library

  14. 14.

    Bauer R. Physiology of Dematium pullulans de Bary. Zentralbl Bacteriol Parasitenkd Infektionskr Hyg Abt2. 1938;98:133-167.

    Not in our library

  15. 15.

    Bayram C, Denbas EB. Preparation and characterization of triamcinolone acetonide-loaded poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) (PHBHx) microspheres. J Bioactive and Compatible Polymer. 2008;23:334-347.

    Not in our library

  16. 16.

    Bechthold I, Bretz K, Kabasci S, Kopitzky R, Springer A. Succinic acid: a new platform chemical from biobased polymers from renewable resources. Chemical Engg Technol. 2008;31:647-654.

    Not in our library

  17. 17.

    Bernier B. The production of polysaccharides by fungi active in the decomposition of wood and forest litter. Can J Microbiol. 1958;4:195-204.

    Not in our library10.1139/m58-020

  18. 18.

    Bhatia A, Gupta RK, Bhattacharaya SN, Choi HJ. Compatibility of biodegradable PLA and PBS blends for packaging applications. Korea Aust Rheol J. 2007;19:125-131.

    Not in our library

  19. 19.

    Bisanda ETN, Ansell MP. Properties of sisal-CNSL composites. J Mater Sci. 1992;27:1690-1700.

    Not in our library

  20. 20.

    Black WAP, Woodward FN. Alginates from common British brown marine algae. In Natural plant hydrocolloids. Adv Chem Ser Am Chem Soc. 1954;11:83-91.

    Not in our library

  21. 21.

    Catley BJ. Utilization of carbon sources by Pullularia pullulans for the elaboration of extracellular polysaccharides. Appl Microbiol. 1971;22:641-649.

    Not in our library10.1128/am.22.4.641-649.1971

  22. 22.

    Chambin DC, Debray C, Rochat-Gonthier MH, Le MM, Pourcelot M. Effects of different cellulose derivatives on drug release mechanism studied at a pre-formulation stage. J Controll Release. 2004;95(1):101-108.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jconrel.2003.11.009

  23. 23.

    Chandy T, Das GS, Rao GH. 5-Fluorouracil-loaded chitosan coated polylactic acid microspheres as biodegradable drug carriers for cerebral tumours. J Microencapsul. 2000;5:625-631.

    Not in our library10.1080/026520400417676

  24. 24.

    Chen GQ, Qiong W. The application of polyhydroxyalkanoates as tissue engineering materials. Biomaterials. 2005;26:6565-6578.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.036

  25. 25.

    Chen GQ, Martin KP. Plastics derived from biological sources: present and future: a technical and environmental review. Chem Rev. 2012;112:2082-2099.

    Not in our library10.1021/cr200162d

  26. 26.

    Chen QZ, Harding SE, Ali NN, Lyon AR, Boccaccini AR. Biomaterials in cardiac tissue engineering: ten years of research survey. Materials Sci Eng: Reports. 2008;59:1-37.

    Not in our library

  27. 27.

    Cheng KC, Demirci A, Catchmark JM. Pullulan: biosynthesis, production, and applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;92:29-44.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00253-011-3477-y

  28. 28.

    Cheng Y, Deng S, Chen P, Ruan R. Polylactic acid (PLA) synthesis and modifications: a review. Front Chem China. 2009;4:259-264.

    Not in our library

  29. 29.

    Clarinval AM, Halleux J, Smith R. Classification of biodegradable polymers. Biodegradable polymers for industrial applications. 2005.

    Not in our library

  30. 30.

    Conca KR, Yang TCS, Ching C, Kaplan DL, Thomas EL. Edible food barrier coatings. Biodegradable polymers and packaging. 1993;357-369.

    Not in our library

  31. 31.

    Cornelia TB, Erkan TB, Elisabete DP, Rui LR, Nuno MN. Performance of biodegradable microcapsules of poly(butylene succinate), poly(butylene succinate-co-adipate) and poly(butylene terephthalate-co-adipate) as drug encapsulation systems. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2011;84:498-507.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.02.005

  32. 32.

    Coutu DL, Yousefi AM, Galipeau J. Three-dimensional porous scaffolds at the crossroads of tissue engineering and cell-based gene therapy. J Cell Biochem. 2009;108:537-546.

    Not in our library10.1002/jcb.22296

  33. 33.

    Dave AM, Mehta MH, Aminabhavi TM, Kulkarni AR, Soppimath KS. A review on controlled release of nitrogen fertilizers through polymeric membrane devices. Polymer- Plastics Technol Eng. 1999;38:675-711.

    Not in our library

  34. 34.

    de Roo G, Kellerhals MB, Ren Q, Witholt B, Kessler B. Production of chiral R-3-hydroxyalkanoic acids and R-3-hydroxyalkanoic acid methylesters via hydrolytic degradation of polyhydroxyalkanoate synthesized by pseudomonads. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2002;77:717-722.

    Not in our library10.1002/bit.10139

  35. 35.

    de Guzman D. Bioplastic development increases with new applications. 2010.

    Not in our library

  36. 36.

    Dorozhkin SV. Calcium orthophosphate-based biocomposites and hybrid biomaterials. J Mater Sci. 2009;44:2343-2387.

    Not in our library

  37. 37.

    Doug S. Bioplastics: technologies and global markets. BCC research reports PLS050A. 2010.

    Not in our library

  38. 38.

    Draget KI, Philips O, Williams A. Alginates. Handbook of hydrocolloids. 2000;379.

    Not in our library

  39. 39.

    Draget KI, Skjåk-Braek G, Smidsrød O. Alginate based new materials. Int J Biol Macromol. 1997;21:47-55.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0141-8130(97)00040-8

  40. 40.

    DSM press release. DSM invests in development of bio-based materials. 2008.

    Not in our library

  41. 41.

    Eichhorn SJ, Baillie CA, Zaferiropouls N, Mwaikambo LY, Ansell MP, Dufresne A, Entwistle KM, Herrera-Franco PJ, Escamilla GC, Groom L, Hughes M, Hill C, Rials TG, Wild PM. Review: current international research into cellulosic fibres and composites. J Material Sc. 2001;36:2107-2131.

    Not in our library

  42. 42.

    Erwin TH, David AG, Jeffrey JK, Robert JW, Ryan PO. The eco-profiles for current and near-future NatureWorks® polylactide (PLA) production. Industrial Biotechnology. 2007;3:58-81.

    Not in our library

  43. 43.

    Eslmai H, Kamal RM. Elongational rheology of biodegradable poly(lactic acid)/poly[(butylene succinate)-co-adipate] binary blends and poly(lactic acid)/poly[(butylene succinate)-co-adipate]/clay ternary nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci. 2013;127:2290-2306.

    Not in our library

  44. 44.

    Espigares I, Elvira C, Mano JF, Vlazquez B, Roman JS, Reis RL. New partially degradable and bioactive acrylic bone cements based on starch blends and ceramic fillers. Biomaterials. 2002;23(8):1883-1895.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00315-5

  45. 45.

    EurActiv.com. EU calls time on first-generation biofuels. 2012.

    Not in our library

  46. 46.

    Frost & Sullivan report. Global bio-based plastic market, M4AI-39. Chapter 5. 2009.

    Not in our library

  47. 47.

    Freier T, Kunze C, Nischan C. In vitro and in vivo degradation studies for development of a biodegradable patch based on poly(3-hydroxybutyrate). Biomaterials. 2002;23:2649-2657.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00405-7

  48. 48.

    Fuentes Z, Riquelme MJN, Sánchez-Zapata E, Pérez JAÁ. Resistant starch as functional ingredient: a review. Food Res Int. 2010;43:931-942.

    Not in our library

  49. 49.

    Garlotta D. A literature review of poly (lactic acid). J Polyms and the Envir. 2001;9(2):63-84.

    Not in our library

  50. 50.

    Georg JM, Kristensen M, Astrup A. Effect of alginate supplementation on weight loss in obese subjects completing a 12-week energy restricted diet: a randomized controlled trail. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;96:5-13.

    Not in our library10.3945/ajcn.111.025312

  51. 51.

    Goh GH, Heng PWS, Chan LW. Alginates as a useful natural polymer for microencapsulation and therapeutic applications. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;88:1-12.

    Not in our library

  52. 52.

    Gomez-Guille MC, Gimenez B, Lopez CME, Montero MP. Functional bioactive properties of collagen and gelatin from alternative sources: a review. Food Hydrocolloids. 2011;25:1813-1827.

    Not in our library

  53. 53.

    Guangwen C, Shulian L, Fengjun J, Quan Y. Catalytic dehydration of bioethanol to ethylene over TiO2/γ-Al2O3 catalyst in microchannel reactors. Catal today. 2007;125:111-119.

    Not in our library

  54. 54.

    Guo M, Liu M, Zhan F, Wu L. Preparation and properties of a slow-release membrane-encapsulated urea fertilizer with superabsorbent and moisture preservation. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2005;44:4206-4211.

    Not in our library

  55. 55.

    Gupta B, Revagade N, Hilborn J. Poly(lactic acid) fiber: an overview. Prog Polym Sci. 2007;34:455-482.

    Not in our library

  56. 56.

    Hafdani FN, Sadeghinia N. A review on applications of chitosan as a natural antimicrobial. World Academy of Sci Engg Technol. 2011;50:252-256.

    Not in our library

  57. 57.

    Hanggi JU. Requirements on bacterial polyesters as future substitute for conventional plastics for consumer goods. FEMS Microbioly Rev. 1995;16:213-220.

    Not in our library

  58. 58.

    Haung YM, Li H, Huang XJ, Hu YC, Hu Y. Advances of bio-ethylene. Chin J Bioprocess Eng. 2008;6:1-6.

    Not in our library

  59. 59.

    Helga E, Svein V. Biosynthesis and applications of alginates. Polym Degradation and Stability. 1998;59:85-91.

    Not in our library

  60. 60.

    Helgerud T, Gaserød O, Fjreide T, Andresen PO, Larsen CK, Imeson A. Alginates. Food stabilisers, thickeners and gelling agents. 2009;50-72.

    Not in our library

  61. 61.

    Hirosawa E, Danjo K, Sunada H. Influence of granulating method on physical and mechanical properties, compression behavior, and compactibility of lactose and microcrystalline cellulose granules. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2000;26:583-593.

    Not in our library10.1081/ddc-100101273

  62. 62.

    Hori K, Nojiri H, Nonomura M, Okuda F, Yanagida H. Allergen inactivator. 2005.

    Not in our library

  63. 63.

    Huan Z, Joseph GL, Sarit BB. Fabrication aspects of PLA-CaP/PLGA-CaP composites for orthopedic applications: a review. Acta Biomater. 2012;8(6):1999-2016.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.actbio.2012.01.031

  64. 64.

    Iain AB, Seal CJ, Wilcox M, Dettmar PW, Pearson PJ, Brend HAR. Applications of alginates in food. Alginates: biology and applications. Microbiology monographs 13. 2009;211-228.

    Not in our library

  65. 65.

    Jane J. Starch properties, modifications and applications. J Macromolecular Sci. 1995;32:751-757.

    Not in our library

  66. 66.

    Jaspreet S, Lovedeep K, McCarthy OJ. Factors influencing the physico-chemical, morphological, thermal and rheological properties of some chemically modified starches for food applications—a review. Food Hydrocolloids. 2007;21:1-22.

    Not in our library

  67. 67.

    Jayanth P, Vinod L. Biodegradable nanoparticles for drug and gene delivery to cells and tissue. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64:61-71.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0169-409x(02)00228-4

  68. 68.

    Jeevitha D, Kanchana A. Chitosan/PLA nanoparticles as a novel carrier for the delivery of anthraquinone: synthesis, characterization and in vitro cytotoxicity evaluation. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2013;101(1):126-134.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.06.019

  69. 69.

    Jian-Bing Z, Ling J, Yi-Dong L, Madhusudhan S, Tao L, Yu-Zhong W. Bio-based blends of starch and poly(butylene succinate) with improved miscibility, mechanical properties, and reduced water absorption. Carbohydr Polym. 2011;83:762-768.

    Not in our library

  70. 70.

    Johnston-Banks FA, Harris P. Gelatin. Food gels. 1990;233-289.

    Not in our library

  71. 71.

    Jong ED, Higson A, Walsh P, Maria W. Bio-based chemicals: value added products from biorefineries. IEA Bioenergy Task 42 Biorefinery. 2010;1-34.

    Not in our library

  72. 72.

    Jun X, Bao-Hua G. Microbial succinic acid, its polymer poly(butylene succinate), and applications. Microbiology Monographs. 2010;14:347-388.

    Not in our library

  73. 73.

    Jun X, Bao-Hua G. Poly(butylene succinate) and its copolymers: research, development and industrialization. Biotechnol J. 2010;5:1149-1163.

    Not in our library10.1002/biot.201000136

  74. 74.

    Jung S, Lim E, Jong HK. New application of poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) based ionomer as biopolymer: a role of ion group for hydroxyapatite (HAp) crystal formation. J Mater Sci. 2009;44:6398-6403.

    Not in our library

  75. 75.

    Jung-Ju K, Guang-Zhen J, Hye-Sun Y, Seong-Jun C, Hae-Won K, Ivan BW. Providing osteogenesis conditions to mesenchymal stem cells using bioactive nanocomposite bone scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C. 2012;32:2545-2551.

    Not in our library

  76. 76.

    Kamel S, Ali N, Jahangir K, Shah SM, El-Gendy. Pharmaceutical significance of cellulose: a review. Express polymer Letters. 2008;2:758-778.

    Not in our library

  77. 77.

    Kasirajan S, Ngouajio M. Polyethylene and biodegradable mulches for agricultural applications: a review. Agronomy Sustainable Dev. 2012;32(2):501-529.

    Not in our library

  78. 78.

    Kathiraser Y, Aroua MK, Ramachandran KB, Tan IKP. Chemical characterization of medium-chain-length polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) recovered by enzymatic treatment and ultrafiltration. J Chem Tech Biotech. 2007;82:847-855.

    Not in our library

  79. 79.

    Kellomaki M, Niiranen H, Puumanen K, Ashammakhi N, Waris T, Tormala P. Bioabsorbable scaffolds for guided bone regeneration and generation. Biomaterials. 2000;21:2495-2505.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00117-4

  80. 80.

    Kevin JE, Charles MB, John DS, Paul AR, Brian DS, Michael CS, Debra T. Advances in cellulose eater performance and applications. Progress in Polymer Sci. 2001;26:1605-1688.

    Not in our library

  81. 81.

    Kumano A, Fujiwara N, Normam AGF, Li N, Winston Ho WS, Matsuura T. Cellulose triacetate membranes for reverse osmosis. Advanced membrane technology and application. 2008;21-43.

    Not in our library

  82. 82.

    Kumbar SG, Kulkarni AR, Dave AM, Aminabha TM. Encapsulation efficiency and release kinetics of solid and liquid pesticides through urea formaldehyde cross-linked starch, guar gum, and starch + guar gum matrices. J Appli Polym Sci. 2001;82:2863-2866.

    Not in our library

  83. 83.

    Kunze C, Edgar Bernd H, Androsch R. In vitro and in vivo studies on blends of isotactic and atactic poly (3-hydroxybutyrate) for development of a dura substitute material. Biomaterials. 2006;27:192-201.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.095

  84. 84.

    Leathers TD. Biotechnological production and applications of pullulan. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003;62:468-473.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00253-003-1386-4

  85. 85.

    Lee SH, Wang S. Biodegradable polymers/bamboo fiber composite with bio-based coupling agent. Compos Part. 2006;A37:80-91.

    Not in our library

  86. 86.

    Lee HC, Anuj S, Lee Y. Biomedical applications of collagen. International J of Pharmaceutics. 2001;221:1-22.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0378-5173(01)00691-3

  87. 87.

    Lemoigne M. Production d'acide β-oxybutyrique par certaines bact’eries du groupe du Bacillus subtilis. CR. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. 1923;176:1761.

    Not in our library

  88. 88.

    Levison PR, Kennedy JF, Phillips GO, Williams PA. Cellulosics as ion-exchange materials. Cellulosics: materials for selective separations and other technologies. 1993;25-36.

    Not in our library

  89. 89.

    Li G, Yong H, Chen C. Discussion on application prospect of starch-based adhesives on architectural gel materials. Adv Materials Res. 2011;250:800-803.

    Not in our library

  90. 90.

    Li S, Juliane H, Martin KP. Product overview and market projection of emerging biobased products. PRo-BIP. 2009;1:1-245.

    Not in our library

  91. 91.

    Liu L, Yu J, Cheng L, Qu W. Mechanical properties of poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) biocomposites reinforced with surface modified jute fibre. Composites Part A: Appl Sci Manufacturing. 2009;40:669-674.

    Not in our library

  92. 92.

    Liu LF, Yu JY, Cheng LD, Yang XJ. Biodegradability of PBS composite reinforced with jute. Polym Degrade Stab. 2009;94:90-94.

    Not in our library

  93. 93.

    Liu M, Zhang Y, Wu C, Xiong S, Zhou C. Chitosan/halloysite nanotubes bionanocomposites: structure, mechanical properties and biocompatibility. Int J Biological Macromol. 2012;51:566-575.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.06.022

  94. 94.

    Luc A, Eric P. Biodegradable polymers. Environmental silicate nano-biocomposites. Green energy and technology. 2012;13-39.

    Not in our library

  95. 95.

    Luiz A, De Castro R, Morschbacker. A method for the production of one or more olefins, an olefin, and a polymer. 2010.

    Not in our library

  96. 96.

    Maeda M, Tani S, Sano A, Fujioka K. Microstructure and release characteristics of the minipellet, a collagen based drug delivery system for controlled release of protein drugs. J Controlled Rel. 1999;62:313-324.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0168-3659(99)00156-x

  97. 97.

    Mainil V, Rahn B, Gogolewski S. Long-term in vivo degradation and bone reaction to various polylactides: 1. One-year results. Biomaterials. 1997;18:257-266.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0142-9612(96)00126-3

  98. 98.

    McChalicher CW, Srienc F. Investigating the structure–property relationship of bacterial PHA block copolymers. J Biotechnology. 2007;132:296-302.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jbiotec.2007.04.014

  99. 99.

    Ravi Kumar MNV. A review of chitin and chitosan applications. Reactive Functional Polym. 2000;46:1-27.

    Not in our library

  100. 100.

    Majid J, Elmira AT, Muhammad I, Muriel J, St'ephane D. Poly-lactic acid: production, applications, nanocomposites, and release studies. Comprehensive Rev Food Sci Safety. 2010;9(5):552-571.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00126.x

  101. 101.

    Mandel KG, Daggy BP, Brodie DA, Jacoby HI. Review article: alginate-raft formulations in the treatment of heartburn and acid reflux. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000;14:669-690.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-2036.2000.00759.x

  102. 102.

    Marguerite R. Chitin and chitosan: properties and applications. Progress in Polym Sci. 2006;31:603-632.

    Not in our library

  103. 103.

    Marques AP, Reis RL. Hydroxyapatite reinforcement of different starch-based polymers affect osteoblast-like cells adhesion/spreading and proliferation. Mater Sci Engg. 2005;25(2):215-229.

    Not in our library

  104. 104.

    Maurizio A, Jan JDV, Maria EE, Sabine F, Paolo V, Maria GV. Biodegradable starch/clay nanocomposite films for food packaging applications. Food Chem. 2005;93(3):467-474.

    Not in our library

  105. 105.

    Mendes RL, Reis YP, Bovell AM, Cunha CA, Blitterswijk V, de Bruijn JD. Biocompatibility testing of novel starch-based materials with potential application in orthopedic surgery: a preliminary study. Biomaterials. 2001;22:2057-2064.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00395-1

  106. 106.

    Michael C, Dirk C, Harald K, Jan R, Joachim V. Policy paper on bio-based economy in the EU: level playing field for bio-based chemistry and materials. 2011.

    Not in our library

  107. 107.

    Nagarwal RC, Singh PN, Kant S, Maiti P, Pandit JK. Chitosan coated PLA nanoparticles for ophthalmic delivery: characterization, in-vitro and in-vivo study in rabbit eye. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2010;6:648-656.

    Not in our library10.1166/jbn.2010.1168

  108. 108.

    Nicolas J, Floriane F, Francoise F, Alan R, Jean PP, Patrick F, Rene SL. Synthesis and properties of poly(butylene succinate): efficiency of different transesterfication catalysts. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem. 2011;49:5301-5312.

    Not in our library

  109. 109.

    Obae HI, Imada K. Morphological effect of microcrystalline cellulose particles on tablet tensile strength. Int J Pharm. 1999;182:155-164.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0378-5173(99)00057-5

  110. 110.

    Onsoyen E. Commercial applications of alginates. Carbohydrates in Europe. 1996;14:26-31.

    Not in our library

  111. 111.

    Orawan S, Uracha R, Pitt S. Electrospun cellulose acetate fiber mats containing asiaticoside or Centella asiatica crude extract and the release characteristics of asiaticoside. Polymer. 2008;49(19):4239-4247.

    Not in our library

  112. 112.

    Ozdemir M, Floros JD. Active food packaging technologies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2004;44:185-193.

    Not in our library10.1080/10408690490441578

  113. 113.

    Papenburg BJ, Liu J, Higuera G, Barradas AMC, Boer J, Blitterswijk VCA, Wessling M, Stamatialis D. Development and analysis of multi-layer scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2009;30:6228-6239.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.057

  114. 114.

    Peter WD, Vicki S, Richardson JC. The key role alginates play in health. Food Hydrocolloids. 2011;25:263-266.

    Not in our library

  115. 115.

    Philip S, Keshavarz T, Roy I. Polyhydroxyalkanoates: biodegradable polymers with a range of applications. J Chemical Tech Biotech. 2007;2(3):233-247.

    Not in our library

  116. 116.

    Picker KM, Hoag SW. Characterization of the thermal properties of microcrystalline cellulose by modulated temperature differential scanning calorimetry. J Pharmaceutical Sci. 2002;91:342-349.

    Not in our library10.1002/jps.10018

  117. 117.

    Prashant RC, Ishwar BB, Shrikant AS, Rekha SS. Microbial cellulose: fermentive production and applications. Food Technol Biotechnol. 2009;47:107-124.

    Not in our library

  118. 118.

    Qin Y, Cai L, Feng D, Shi B, Liu J, Zhang W, Shen Y. Combined use of chitosan and alginate in the treatment of waste water. J Appl Polym Sci. 2007;104:3181-3587.

    Not in our library

  119. 119.

    Rafael A, Loong TL, Susan EM, Selke HT. Poly(lactic acid): synthesis, structures, properties, processing and applications. Chapter. 2010;28:457-467.

    Not in our library

  120. 120.

    Rajev AJ. The manufacturing techniques of various drug loaded biodegradable poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) devices. Biomaterials. 2000;21:2475-2490.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00115-0

  121. 121.

    Ramya R, Venkatesan, Jayachanndran Kim S, Sudha PN. Biomedical applications of chitosan: an overview. J Biomaterial Tissue Engg. 2012;2:100-111.

    Not in our library

  122. 122.

    Ravenstijn JTJ. The state-of-the art on bioplastics: products, markets, trends and technologies. 2010.

    Not in our library

  123. 123.

    Ray SS, Bousmina M. Biodegradable polymers and their layered silicate nanocomposites: in greening the 21st century materials world. Progress Material Sci. 2005;50:962-1079.

    Not in our library

  124. 124.

    Reis KC, Pereira J, Smith AC, Carvalho CWP, Wellner N, Yakimets I. Characterization of polyhydroxybutyrate-hydroxyvalerate (PHB-HV)/maize starch blend films. J Food Engg. 2008;89:361-369.

    Not in our library

  125. 125.

    Rekha MR, Chrndra PS. Pullulan as a promising biomaterial for biomedical applications: a perspective. Trends in Biomaterials and Artificial Organs. 2007;20:21-45.

    Not in our library

  126. 126.

    Roberts GAF, Domard M, Roberts AF, Vårum KM. Chitosan production routes and their role in determining the structure and properties of the product. Advances in Chitin Science, vol. 2, National Taiwan Ocean University, Taiwan. 1997;22-31.

    Not in our library

  127. 127.

    Rubin AL, Stenzel KH, Miyata T, White MJ, Dune M. Collagen as a vehicle for drug delivery: preliminary report. J of Clinical Pharmacology. 1973;13:309-312.

    Not in our library10.1002/j.1552-4604.1973.tb00217.x

  128. 128.

    Ruth KG, Hartmann R, Egli T, Zinn M, Ren Q. Efficient production of (R)-3-hydroxycarboxylic acids by biotechnological conversion of polyhydroxyalkanoates and their purification. Biomacromolecules. 2007;8:279-286.

    Not in our library10.1021/bm060585a

  129. 129.

    Savenkova L, Gercberga Z, Nikolaeva V, Dzene A, Bibers I, Kalina M. Mechanical properties and biodegradation characteristics of PHB-based films. Process Biochem. 2000;35:537-579.

    Not in our library

  130. 130.

    Schmidmaier G, Wildemann A, Stemberger A, Has MR. Biodegradable poly(D, L-lactide) coating of implants for continuous release of growth factors. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;58:449-455.

    Not in our library10.1002/jbm.1040

  131. 131.

    Sena RF, Costelli MC, Gibson LH, Coughlin RW. Enhanced production of pullulan by two strains of A. pullulans with different concentrations of soybean oil in sucrose solution in batch fermentations. Brazilian J Chem Eng. 2006;2:507-515.

    Not in our library

  132. 132.

    Siddhesh NP, Edgar KJ. Alginate derivatization: a review chemistry, properties and applications. Biomaterials. 2012;33:3279-3305.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.007

  133. 133.

    Singh RS, Saini GK, Kennedy JF. Pullulan: microbial sources, production and applications. Carbohydr Polym. 2008;73:515-531.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.01.003

  134. 134.

    Sodian R, Hoerstrup SP, Sperling JS, Daebritz S, Martin DP, Moran AM, Kim BS, Schoen FJ, Vacanti JP, Mayer JE. Early in vivo experience with tissue engineered trileaflet heart valves. Circulation. 2000;102:22-29.

    Not in our library10.1161/01.cir.102.suppl_3.iii-22

  135. 135.

    Sodian R, Sperling JS, Martin DP. Tissue engineering of a trileaflet heart valve-early in vitro experiences with a combined polymer. Tissue Engg. 1999;5:489-494.

    Not in our library10.1089/ten.1999.5.489

  136. 136.

    Steinbüchel A, Valentin HE. Diversity of bacterial polyhydroxyalkanoic acids. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1995;128:219-228.

    Not in our library

  137. 137.

    Tang H, Ishii D, Mahara A, Murakami S, Yamaoka T, Sudesh K, Samian R, Fujita M, Maeda M, Iwata T. Scaffolds from electrospun polyhydroxyalkanoate copolymers: fabrication, characterization, bio absorption and tissue response. Biomaterials. 2008;29:1307-1317.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.11.031

  138. 138.

    Teli MD, Chiplunkar V. Role of thickeners in final performance of reactive prints. Textile Dyer Printer. 1986;19:13-19.

    Not in our library

  139. 139.

    Türesin F, Gürsel I, Hasirci V. Biodegradable polyhydroxyalkanoate implants for osteomyelitis therapy: in vitro antibiotic release. J Biomaterials Sci. 2001;12(2):195-207.

    Not in our library10.1163/156856201750180924

  140. 140.

    Valantin MA, Aubron-Olivier C, Ghosn J, Laglenne E, Pauchard M, Schoen H. Polylactic acid implants to correct facial lipoatrophy in HIV-infected patients: results of the open-label study. Vega Aids. 2003;17:2471-2477.

    Not in our library10.1097/00002030-200311210-00009

  141. 141.

    Valappil S, Misra S, Boccaccini A, Roy I. Biomedical applications of polyhydroxyalkanoates, an overview of animal testing an in vivo responses. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2006;3:853-868.

    Not in our library10.1586/17434440.3.6.853

  142. 142.

    Valerie D, Vinod DV. Pharmaceutical applications of chitosan. Pharmaceutical Sci Technol Today. 1998;1:246-253.

    Not in our library

  143. 143.

    Virginia E, Marie G, Eric P, Luc A. Structure and properties of glycerol plasticized chitosan obtained by mechanical kneading. Carbohydrate Polym. 2011;83:947-952.

    Not in our library

  144. 144.

    Volova T, Shishatskaya E, Sevastianov V, Efremov S, Mogilnaya O. Results of biomedical investigations of PHB and PHB/PHV fibers. Biochem Eng J. 2003;16:125-133.

    Not in our library

  145. 145.

    Vona IA, Costanza JR, Cantor HA, Robert WJ. Manufacture of plastics, vol 1. 1965;141-142.

    Not in our library

  146. 146.

    Walle GAM, de Koning GJM, Weusthuis RA, Eggink G. Properties, modifications and applications of biopolyesters. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2001;71:264-291.

    Not in our library10.1007/3-540-40021-4_9

  147. 147.

    Wang Z, Itoh Y, Hosaka Y, Kobayashi I, Nakano Y, Maeda I, Umeda F, Yamakawa J, Kawase M, Yagi K. Novel transdermal drug delivery system with polyhydroxyalkanoate and starburst polyamidoamine dendrimer. J Biosci and Bioengg. 2003;95(5):541-543.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1389-1723(03)80059-2

  148. 148.

    Weraporn PA, Sorapong P, Narongchai OC, Ubon I, Puritud J, Sommai PA. Preparation of polymer blends between poly (L-lactic acid), poly (butylene succinate-co-adipate) and poly (butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) for blown film industrial application. Energy Procedia. 2011;9:581-588.

    Not in our library

  149. 149.

    Westermark S, Juppo AM, Kervinen L, Yliruusi J. Microcrystalline cellulose and its microstructure in pharmaceutical processing. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 1999;48:199-206.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0939-6411(99)00051-x

  150. 150.

    Williams SF, Martin DP, Horowitz DM, Peoples OP. PHA applications: addressing the price performance issue I. Tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromolecules. 1999;25:111-121.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0141-8130(99)00022-7

  151. 151.

    Win NN, Stevens WF. Shrimp chitin as substrate for fungal chitin deacetylase. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001;57:334-341.

    Not in our library10.1007/s002530100741

  152. 152.

    Xie ZP, Huang Y, Chen YL, Jia Y. A new gel casting of ceramics by reaction of sodium alginate and calcium iodate at increased temperature. J Mat Sci Lett. 2001;20:1255-1257.

    Not in our library

  153. 153.

    Yan YF, Krishnaiah D, Rajin M, Bono A. Cellulose extraction from palm kernel cake using liquid phase oxidation. J Engg Sci Tech. 2009;4:57-68.

    Not in our library

  154. 154.

    Yang F, Li X, Li G, Zhao N, Zhang X. Study on chitosan and PHBHHx used as nerve regeneration conduit material. J Biomedical Engg. 2002;19:25-29.

    Not in our library

  155. 155.

    Zajic JE, LeDuy A. Flocculant and chemical properties of a polysaccharide from Pullularia pullulans. Appl Microbiol. 1973;25:628-635.

    Not in our library10.1128/am.25.4.628-635.1973

  156. 156.

    Zeeshan K, Gopiraman M, Yuichi H, Kai W, Kim IS. Cationic-cellulose nanofibers: preparation and dyeability with anionic reactive dyes for apparel application. Carbohydrate. 2013;91:434-443.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.08.046

  157. 157.

    Zhao RX, Torley P, Halley PJ. Emerging biodegradable materials: starch- and protein-based bio-nanocomposites. J Mat Sci. 2008;43:3058-3071.

    Not in our library

  158. 158.

    Zhao K, Tian G, Zheng Z, Chen JC, Chen GQ. Production of d-(−)-3-hydroxyalkanoic acid by recombinant Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003;218:59-64.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1574-6968.2003.tb11498.x

  159. 159.

    Zhao P, Liu W, Wu Q, Ren J. Preparation, mechanical, and thermal properties of biodegradable polyesters/poly(lactic acid) blends. J of Nanomaterials. 2010;2010:1-8.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 7

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.