No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 22, 2026.
Pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons to study the microbiota in the gastrointestinal tract of carp (Cyprinus carpio L.)
Maartje AHJ van Kessel, Bas E Dutilh, Kornelia Neveling and 6 more
AMB Express · 2011
Abstract
The microbes in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract are of high importance for the health of the host. In this study, Roche 454 pyrosequencing was applied to a pooled set of different 16S rRNA gene amplicons obtained from GI content of common carp ( Cyprinus carpio ) to make an inventory of the diversity of the microbiota in the GI tract. Compared to other studies, our culture-independent investigation reveals an impressive diversity of the microbial flora of the carp GI tract. The major group of obtained sequences belonged to the phylum Fusobacteria . Bacteroidetes , Planctomycetes and Gammaproteobacteria were other well represented groups of micro-organisms. Verrucomicrobiae , Clostridia and Bacilli (the latter two belonging to the phylum Firmicutes ) had fewer representatives among the analyzed sequences. Many of these bacteria might be of high physiological relevance for carp as these groups have been implicated in vitamin production, nitrogen cycling and (cellulose) fermentation.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 22, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Introduction
The intestine is a multifunctional organ system involved in the digestion and absorption of food, electrolyte balance, endocrine regulation of food metabolism and immunity against pathogens. The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is inhabited by many different micro-organisms. As in mammals, this dynamic population of micro-organisms is of key importance for the health of the piscine host. The gut is also a potential route for pathogens to invade and infect their host. The micro-organisms in the GI tract are involved in the protection against these pathogens by the production of inhibitory compounds and competition for nutrients and space. As in mammals, the intestinal microbiota of fish can influence the expression of genes involved in epithelial proliferation, nutrient metabolism and innate immunity. Due to their importance in animal health, the investigation of the intestinal microbiota of fish is highly relevant for aquaculture practice. We investigated the diversity of the microbiota in common carp (Cyprinus carpio), one of the most cultivated freshwater fish species worldwide (FAO, 2011).
The morphology of the GI tract of fishes varies greatly among species. Common carp belong to the family of Cyprinidae, which are herbivorous, stomachless fish. These fish lack pyloric caeca, the finger-like blind sacs in the proximal intestine that increase the absorptive surface of the intestines in many fish. The composition of the gut microbiota of common carp has previously been investigated using culture-dependent methods. Most bacterial species found in these studies were aerobes and facultative anaerobes. Two studies demonstrated a high abundance of Aeromonas species. Other bacteria isolated were Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas, Bacteriodetes, Plesiomonas, Moraxella, Acinetobacter, Flavobacterium, Staphylococcus, Micrococcus, Streptococcus, Bacillus, Clostridium, Vibrio and Cetobacterium. However, these studies only reveal the microbes that can be cultured and these most likely do not reflect the complete microbial composition of the carp gut since studies on mammals have shown that most members of the microbiota in the GI tract cannot be cultured when removed from the gut. The use of culture-independent studies such as molecular screening of the 16S rRNA gene may be a more reliable method to estimate microbial diversity in the GI tract of fish. Next generation sequencing is a powerful technique to investigate the composition of complex microbial communities in different environments. The combination of 16S rRNA gene amplification using multiple primer sets and the subsequent sequencing of the PCR products by Roche 454 pyrosequencing should therefore be a powerful method to assess the diversity of the microbiota in the GI tract of common carp. Obtained 16S rRNA gene sequences were used to classify the different microorganisms present in the fish gut and here we will also discuss the possible functions of these bacteria in the carp gut.
Fish and system configuration
Common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) were kept in 140 L tanks in a closed recirculating aquaculture system with a total volume of 3000 L at the Radboud University Nijmegen (The Netherlands). Fish were fed commercial food (Trouvit, at a daily ration of 1% estimated body weight), containing 45% protein. Water quality of the system was maintained by a biofilter and a weekly water replacement of 10% of the total volume. Ten fish (male and female) weighing 60 to 158 gram were used. All experimental procedures were performed with permission of the local ethical review committee (Radboud University Nijmegen).
DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequence analysis
Ten fish were euthanized using 0.1% ethyl-m-aminobenzoate methane sulfonate salt (MS-222, MP Biomedicals, Illkirch, France, pH adjusted to 7) followed by decapitation. The body surface of the fish was washed with 70% ethanol and the GI tract was removed aseptically. The whole content of the GI tract was removed by carefully flushing with PBS and DNA was extracted from this material using a cetyltrimethylammoniumbromide (CTAB)-based extraction method. Briefly, samples were mixed with CTAB-extraction buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 100 mM EDTA, 100 mM sodium phosphate (pH 8.0), 1.5 M NaCl, 1% CTAB, 675 μl per 250 mg sample) and protease K (10 mg/ml) and incubated for 30 min at 37°C. After protease treatment 10% SDS was added, followed by incubation at 65°C for 2 h. DNA was recovered by phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation and the resulting DNA pellet was resuspended in 1 ml ultrapure water. Before additional purification, DNA was treated with RNAse. The DNA thus obtained was purified using Sephadex beads (Amersham Bioscience, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol and its integrity was checked on agarose gel. DNA concentrations were estimated spectophotometrically using NanoDrop® technology (Thermoscientific, USA).
Retrieval of 16S RNA gene sequences
Obtained DNA (20 ng) was used for amplification in 20 μl reactions using Phusion Flash enzymes (Finnzymes, Finland). In order to target as many bacterial taxa as possible, the Pla46 F primer was combined with EubI R, EubII R or EubIII R and for the 616 F primer the same set of reverse primers was used (Table 1). This resulted in 6 different combinations. All reactions were done for individual fish separately. PCR reactions were started by an initial denaturation at 98°C for 1 min followed by 35 amplification cycles (98°C for 6 s, 10 s at annealing temperature, 72°C for 20 s) and a final extension step for 1 min at 72°C. PCR products were examined for size and yield using agarose gel in TAE buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM sodium acetate, 0.5 mM Na2EDTA, pH 8.0). After successful amplification, obtained products of different reactions were pooled and 9.2 μg PCR product was used for pyrosequencing using the Roche 454 GS FLX Titanium sequencer (Roche, Switzerland). A problem with 454 pyrosequencing is 'blinding' of the camera due to flashing caused by incorporation of the same nucleotide in many spots, which can occur when many similar DNA templates are sequenced. This was circumvented by mixing 16S rRNA gene products in a 1:1 ratio with pmoA PCR products (targeting a subunit of the particulate methane monooxygenase) from a non-related experiment.
Phylogenetic analysis
A Megablast search (using default parameters) of all sequenced reads larger than 100 nt against the Silva SSURef database (version 102) was done to extract all 17,892 16S rRNA gene sequences (average length 314 nt). The taxonomic annotations available in the Silva SSURef database were used to classify the sequenced reads. Each read was assigned to the taxonomic clade of its highest scoring Megablast hit, when a sequence was assigned to more than one clade, its vote was divided equally. Furthermore, obtained sequences were processed using the Classifier tool of the RDP pyrosequencing pipeline http://pyro.cme.msu.edu/. The confidence threshold used was 50%. The sequence reads are available at the MG-Rast Metagenome analysis server http://metagenomics.anl.gov/ under Project ID 4449604.3 and from the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) at http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/ under accession number ERP000995.
Results
The use of next generation sequencing technologies for sequencing of a mixture of 16S rRNA amplicons amplified with primer sets targeting as many phyla as possible will give a much broader taxonomic overview compared to the use 16S rRNA hypervariable regions. To avoid missing a certain group of bacteria, different primer sets (Table 1) were used targeting as much species as possible. Obtained amplicons from all different reactions were mixed and sequenced using Roche 454 titanium technology and this revealed a high microbial diversity in the GI tract of common carp (Cyprinus carpio). It should be noted that the use of multiple primer sets biases the number of sequences belonging to the identified taxa. The number of obtained sequences belonging to a specific group may not be representative for their abundances in vivo; therefore no quantitative statements could be made.
Figure 1 displays the taxonomic classification derived from mapping the pyrosequencing reads to the Silva SSURef database, which classified 17,641 reads (99%). Similar results were obtained when the RDP database pyrosequencing pipeline was used, which classified 16,768 reads (94%, Additional file 1). Almost half of the obtained sequences, i.e. 46%, found belonged to the Fusobacteria (Additional file 2). Other well represented groups within the retrieved sequences were the Bacteroidetes (21%), Planctomycetes (12%), and Gammaproteobacteria (7%); less retrieved sequences belonged to the Clostridia (3%), Verrucomicrobiae (1%), and Bacilli (1%). Furthermore, a few sequences (< 1%) were identified as Opitutae, Chlamydiae. Verrucomicrobiae subdivision 3, Betaproteobacteria and Nitrospira were also detected (Additional file 2). 77 sequences were classified as cyanobacteria-like, probably these are chloroplast sequences that originate from the plant components of the food (Additional file 2). Interestingly, most of the retrieved sequences belong to bacterial taxa that are known to be involved in vitamin production and food digestion (Table 2).
Discussion
Almost all Fusobacterial 16S rRNA sequences, 8081 out of 8085, from the carp GI tract belonged to the genus Cetobacterium. Cetobacteria were not observed in most culture-dependent studies done on the GI tract microbiota of common carp, only described the isolation and characterization of Cetobacterium somerae from the GI tract of five different fresh water fish, including carp. Cetobacterium was also shown to be present in the gut of zebrafish, a cyprinid species closely related to common carp. Furthermore, Cetobacterium isolated from human faeces performed fermentation of peptides and carbohydrates. It has also been shown that Cetobacterium can produce vitamin B12. This can wel explain why carp do not have a dietary vitamin B12 requirement. The combination of a fermentative metabolism together with vitamin production may explain the relevance of Cetobacterium sp. in the GI tract of carp.
Another well represented group within the obtained sequences were the Bacteroidetes (22% of obtained sequences), a phylum known for a fermentative metabolism and degradation of oligosaccharides derived from plant material. The Bacteroidetes sequences found could be divided into 4 major groups (Additional file 1): Marinilabiaceae (or Cytophaga, 13%), Porphyromonadaceae (39%), Bacteroidaceae (15%) and Bacteroidales_incertae_sedis (33%). All Marinilabiaceae sequences belonged to the same group: the Anaerophaga. This relatively newly discovered group of bacteria includes strictly anaerobic, chemo-organotrophic, fermentative bacteria. These bacteria may play an important role in the fermentation of food in the GI tract of herbivorous carp since anaerobic fermentation is generally an important step in the digestion of plant material. Porphyromonadaceae are present in the GI tract of several organisms including human and pigs. These bacteria can be pathogens but in this niche they are most probably involved in fermentation. By using labelled glucose, it has been shown that these bacteria are involved in saccharide fermentation. Also the Sphingobacteria present could also be involved in oligosaccharide degradation since Sphingobacterium sp. TN19, an endosymbiont in insects, contains a xylanase encoding gene. Xylanases are involved in the breakdown of xylan, a polysaccharide found in plant material. The presence of fermenting microorganisms is not suprising, since it has been shown that the GI microbiota of carp is able to ferment different oligosacharides.
The obtained Planctomycete sequences (13% of classified sequences) could be divided into 9 groups (Additional file 1); Gemmata, Pirellula, Schlesneria and Zavarzinella were the most abundantly found groups. Gemmata and Pirellula are aerobic chemo-heterotrophs, Schlesneria are chemo-organotrophic facultative aerobes and Zavarzinella are aerobic heterotrophs. The presence of Planctomycetes has been shown before in gut microbiota of fish and other organisms. The exact function of these bacteria in the GI tract is not clear, possibly these bacteria live from products of the metabolism of other bacteria. However, the relatively high abundance of Planctomycetes in close association with other organisms such as kelp, marine sponges and prawn suggests a more important role. Possibly, these bacteria are involved in the metabolism of complex compounds. In a recent study, in which the close association of Planctomycetes with the brown seeweed kelp (Laminaria hyperborea) was investigated, it was hypothesized that these bacteria are degraders of sulfated polysacharides produced by kelp. The organisms found in the biofilm at the plant's surface were mainly members of the lineage Pirellulae (which includes Pirellula, Rhodopirellula and Blastopirellula). The genome sequence of Rhodopirellula baltica SH1 revealed many genes involved in the breakdown of sulfated polysaccharides. Possibly, the heterotrophic Planctomycetes found in carp gut confer a similar ability of polysaccharide breakdown to the host. Furthermore, a separate lineage within the Planctomycetes, the anammox bacteria, were present in the carp gut (Figure 1). These anaerobic bacteria, described before in fish gut, are involved in nitrogen cycling. Together with the Nitrosomonas and Nitrospira species (also present within the obtained sequences, Figure 1), ammonium can be converted into dinitrogen gas. The removal of nitrogenous compounds from aquaculture systems is one of the most important challenges in aquaculture. The presence of nitrogen cycling bacteria in fishes could offer new in situ solutions for the removal of nitrogen from aquaculture systems.
The Gammaproteobacteria sequences found could be classified as bacteria that are known members of the GI microbiota of many organisms including fish. Most Gammaproteobacteria (Additional file 1) found in carp belonged to the Aeromonas group. Members of the genus Aeromonas are mainly distributed in freshwater and sewage, often in association with aquatic animals. They can cause a diverse spectrum of diseases in both warm- and cold-blooded animals but they also appear to be aquatic envrionments including in fish intestines. Other abundantly present members among the Gammaproteobacterial sequences were the genera Enterobacterium and Vibrio. Enterobacterium spp. are widespread in GI tracts of various organisms, whereas Vibrio sp. are commonly found in aquaeous environments, aquaculture systems and in association with eukaryotes. This phylum also contains Plesiomonas and Acinetobacter species that have been found in carp before. Furthermore, the presence of high number Proteobacteria has also been shown for zebrafish, which is closely related to carp. Also in other fish belonging to the Cyprinidae members of the Gammaproteobacteria (Enterobacter and Citrobacter species) were found. Enterobacter and Citrobacter species isolated from the GI tract of Indian carp (Cyprinidae) were shown to produce amylase, cellulase and protease, which indicates that these bacteria can be actively involved in the digestion of food in carp guts.
Another abundant phylum within our amplicon sequences were the Verrucomicrobiae (including subdivision 3 and 4 (Optitiae)). Verrucomicrobiae species are most commonly found in aquatic environments but are also known members of the gut microbiota in different organisms including seacucumbers (Echinodermata), termites and humans. These bacteria seem to be well adapted to live with eukaryotes, since the genome of some verrucomicrobial species contain a protein secretion system which mediates interactions between eukaryotic and bacterial cells. Verrucomicrobiae usually have an aerobic or obligate anaerobic fermentative metabolism and could also play a role in the metabolism of plant beta glycans in carp GI tract. Indeed, Pedosphaera parvula Ellin514 (Verrucomicrobia subdivision 3) contains a cellulase in its genome. Ruminants and postgastric fermenters depend on bacteria containing this gene for the fermentation of plant material in which cellulose is converted to β-glucose. Various fish species do have a cellulase activity in their guts which decreases after antibiotic treatments, indicating that the GI microbiota is responsible for this activity.
Clostridia and Bacilli, both present in the microbiota of the sampled fish (Figure 1), are members of the phylum Firmicutes. Representative genera of this phylum, including Clostridium, Bacillus, Streptococcus and Staphylococcus spp., have been shown in the microbiota of fish before. Gut isolates belonging to the Firmicutes fermented various carbon sources, again implicating a role in the utilization of plant materials.
To our knowledge, this is the first detailed analysis of the microbiota of common carp by high throughput sequencing. Our culture independent investigation of the microbial flora of the GI tract gives a more reliable and more complete characterization of the diversity of compared to other studies. Furthermore, great similarities between the microbiota in carp and zebrafish (a closely related fish species) were shown. The GI microbiota is important for the health of the animal and therefore this study could be relevant for aquaculture. Furthermore, the presence of different nitrogen cycling bacteria in the GI tract of fish could offer new possibilities in the removal of nitrogen compounds in aquaculture. The microbiota of the GI tract plays an important role in the digestion and chemical processing of the food as exemplified by the large number of bacteria involved in vitamin production and fermentation of saccharides and beta-glycans (cellulose, hemicellulose) (Table 2). The presence of many different types of bacteria in the herbivorous carp could be predicted since it has been shown that eukaryotes with an herbivorous diet have a higher microbial diversity. However, the carp in our study were fed commercially available food with high protein and low plant content. According to their GI microbiota, these fish are very well able to adapt to a more herbivorous diet and this is probably also the case for other cultured fish. Therefore it could be possible to lower the amount of fish meal, one of the major components of fish food, in the food for these fish. Furthermore, it shows that the gut microbes are probably important in the protection of the host against pathogens which should be taken into consideration in aquaculture where a lot of antibiotics are used. It is known that antibiotics have a negative effect on the microbial community in the gut of human and this is possibly also the case for fish. The routinely use of antibiotics may be harmful for the animal. A better knowledge about the microbiota in fish guts is important; it can lead to a better health of cultured fish and therefore to a more efficient fish culture.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References 58
- 1.
Amann RI Binder BJ Olson RJ Chisholm SW Devereux R Stahl DA Combination of 16S Ribosomal-RNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes with flow-cytometry for analyzing mixed microbial populationsAppl Environ Microbiol1990 5619191925
Not in our library10.1128/aem.56.6.1919-1925.1990
- 2.
- 3.
Buddington RK Diamond JM Pyloric ceca of fish - a new absorptive organAm J Physiol1987 252G65G76
Not in our library10.1152/ajpgi.1987.252.1.g65
- 4.
Cabello FC Heavy use of prophylactic antibiotics in aquaculture: a growing problem for human and animal health and for the environmentEnviron Micobiol2006 811371144
Not in our library10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01054.x
- 5.
Cahill MM Bacterial flora of fishes - a reviewMicrob Ecol1990 192141
Not in our library10.1007/bf02015051
- 6.
Daims H Bruhl A Amann R Schleifer KH Wagner M The domain-specific probe EUB338 is insufficient for the detection of all Bacteria: development and evaluation of a more comprehensive probe setSyst Appl Microbiol1999 22434444
Not in our library10.1016/s0723-2020(99)80053-8
- 7.
Denger K Warthmann R Ludwig W Schink B Anaerophaga thermohalophila gen. nov., sp nov., a moderately thermohalophilic, strictly anaerobic fermentative bacteriumInt J Syst Evol Microbiol2002 52173178
Not in our library10.1099/00207713-52-1-173
- 8.
- 9.
Detkova EN Zaichikova MV Kevbrin VV Physiological and biochemical properties of the alkaliphilic anaerobic hydrolytic bacterium Alkaliflexus imshenetskiiMicrobiol2009 78273279
Not in our library10.1134/s0026261709030035
- 10.
Finegold SM Vaisanen ML Molitoris DR Tomzynski TJ Song Y Liu C Collins MD Lawson PA Cetobacterium somerae sp nov from human feces and emended description of the genus CetobacteriumSyst Appl Microbiol2003 26177181
Not in our library10.1078/072320203322346010
- 11.
Flint HJ Bayer EA Rincon MT Lamed R White BA Polysaccharide utilization by gut bacteria: potential for new insights from genomic analysisNature Rev Microbiol2008 6121131
Not in our library10.1038/nrmicro1817
- 12.
Fuerst JA Gwilliam HG Lindsay M Lichanska A Belcher C Vickers JE Hugenholtz JE Isolation and molecular identification of planctomycete bacteria from postlarvae of the giant tiger prawn. Penaeus monodonAppl Environ Microbiol1997 63254262
Not in our library10.1128/aem.63.1.254-262.1997
- 13.
Glockner FO Kube M Bauer M Teeling H Lombardot T Ludwig W Gade D Beck A Borzym K Heitmann K Rabus R Schlesner H Amann R Reinhardt R Complete genome sequence of the marine Planctomycete Pirellula sp strain 1Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2003 10082988303
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1431443100
- 14.
Hong PY Hwang C Ling F Andersen GL Lechevallier MW Liu WT Pyrosequencing analysis of bacterial biofilm communities in water meters of a drinking water distribution systemAppl Environ Microbiol2010 7656315635
Not in our library10.1128/aem.00281-10
- 15.
Huber I Spanggaard B Appel KF Rossen L Nielsen T Gram L Phylogenetic analysis and in situ identification of the intestinal microbial community of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum)J Appl Microbiol2004 96117132
Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.02109.x
- 16.
Jiang Y Xie CX Yang GG Gong XL Chen XJ Xu LX Bao BL Cellulase-producing bacteria of Aeromonas are dominant and indigenous in the gut of Ctenopharyngodon idellus (Valenciennes)Aquac Res2011 42499505
Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2109.2010.02645.x
- 17.
Juretschko S Timmermann G Schmid M Schleifer KH Pommerening-Roser A Koops HP Wagner M Combined molecular and conventional analyses of nitrifying bacterium diversity in activated sludge Nitrosococcus mobilis and Nitrospira-like bacteria as dominant populationsAppl Environ Microbiol1998 6430423051
Not in our library10.1128/aem.64.8.3042-3051.1998
- 18.
Kant R Van Passel MWJ Sangwan P Palva A Lucas S Copeland A Lapidus A Glavina Del Rio T Dalin E Tice H Bruce D Goodwin L Pitluck S Chertkov O Larimer FW Land ML Hauser L Brettin TS Detter JC Han S de Vos WM Janssen PH Smidt H Genome sequence of 'Pedosphaera parvula' Ellin514, an aerobic verrucomicrobial isolate from pasture soilJ Bacteriol2011 19329002901
Not in our library10.1128/jb.00299-11
- 19.
Kihara M Sakata T Production of short-chain fatty acids and gas from various oligosaccharides by gut microbes of carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). in micro-scale batch cultureComp Biochem Phys A2002 132333340
Not in our library10.1016/s1095-6433(02)00029-6
- 20.
Kip N Dutilh BE Pan Y Bodrossy L Neveling K Kwint MP Jetten MSM Op den Camp HJM Ultra deep pyrosequencing of pmoA amplicons confirms the prevalence of Methylomonas and Methylocystis in Sphagnum mosses from a Dutch peat bogEnviron Microbiol Reports2011
Not in our library10.1111/j.1758-2229.2011.00260.x
- 21.
Kulichevskaya IS Baulina OI Bodelier PLE Rijpstra WIC Sinninghe Damste JS Dedysh SN Zavarzinella formosa gen. nov., a novel stalked, Gemmata-like planctomycete from a Siberian peat bogInt J Syst Evol Microbiol2009 59357364
Not in our library10.1099/ijs.0.002378-0
- 22.
Kulichevskaya IS Ivanova AO Belova SE Baulina OI Bodelier PLE Rijpstra WIC Damste JSS Zavarzin GA Dedysh SN Schlesneria paludicola gen. nov., sp nov., the first acidophilic member of the order Planctomycetales, from Sphagnum-dominated boreal wetlandsInt J Syst Evol Microbiol2007 5726802687
Not in our library10.1099/ijs.0.65157-0
- 23.
Kysela DT Palacios C Sogin ML Serial analysis of V6 ribosomal sequence tags (SARST-V6): a method for efficient, high-throughput analysis of microbial community compositionEnviron Microbiol2005 7356364
Not in our library10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00712.x
- 24.
Lahav O Bar Massada I Yackoubov D Zelikson R Mozes N Tal Y Tarre S Quantification of anammox activity in a denitrification reactor for a recirculating aquaculture systemAquaculture2009 2887682
Not in our library10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.11.020
- 25.
Lee C Kim J Hwang K Hwang S Fermentation and growth kinetic study of Aeromonas caviae under anaerobic conditionsAppl Microbiol Biotechnol2009 83767773
Not in our library10.1007/s00253-009-1983-y
- 26.
Ley RE Hamady M Lozupone C Turnbaugh PJ Ramey RR Bircher JS Schleger ML Tucker TA Schrenzel MD Knight R Gordon JI Evolution of mammals and their gut microbesScience2008 32016471651
Not in our library10.1126/science.1155725
- 27.
Li TL Mazeas L Sghir A Leblon G Bouchez T Insights into networks of functional microbes catalysing methanization of cellulose under mesophilic conditionsEnviron Microbiol2009 11889904
Not in our library10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01810.x
- 28.
Moya A Pereto J Gil R Latorre A Learning how to live together: genomic insights into prokaryote-animal symbiosesNat Rev Genet2008 9218229
Not in our library10.1038/nrg2319
- 29.
- 30.
Namba A Mano N Hirose H Phylogenetic analysis of intestinal bacteria and their adhesive capability in relation to the intestinal mucus of carpJ Appl Microbiol2007 10213071317
Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03204.x
- 31.
Navarrete P Espejo RT Romero J Molecular analysis of microbiota along the digestive tract of juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.)Microb Ecol2009 57550561
Not in our library10.1007/s00248-008-9448-x
- 32.
Neef A Amann R Schlesner H Schleifer KH Monitoring a widespread bacterial group: in situ detection of planctomycetes with 16S rRNA-targeted probesMicrobiol1998 14432573266
Not in our library10.1099/00221287-144-12-3257
- 33.
Pimental-Elardo S Wehrl M Friedrich AB Jensen PR Hentschel U Isolation from Planctomycetes from Aplysina spongesAquat Microb Ecol2003 33239243
Not in our library
- 34.
Qin J Li R Raes J Arumugam M Burgdorf KS Manichanh C Nielsen T Pons N Levenez F Yamada T Mende DR Li J Xu J Li S Li D Cao J Wang B Liang H Zheng H Xie Y Tap J Lepage P Bertalan M Batto J-M Hansen T Le Paslier D Linneberg A Nielsen HB Pelletier E Renault P A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencingNature2010 4645965
Not in our library10.1038/nature08821
- 35.
Rawls JF Mahowald MA Ley RE Gordon JI Reciprocal gut microbiota transplants from zebrafish and mice to germ-free recipients reveal host habitat selectionCell2006 127423433
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.043
- 36.
Rawls JF Samuel BS Gordon JI Gnotobiotic zebrafish reveal evolutionarily conserved responses to the gut microbiotaProc Natl Aca Sci USA2004 10145964601
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0400706101
- 37.
Ray AK Roy T Mondal S Ringo E Identification of gut-associated amylase, cellulase and protease-producing bacteria in three species of Indian major carpsAquac Res2010 4114621469
Not in our library
- 38.
Ringo E Gatesoupe FJ Lactic acid bacteria in fish: a reviewAquaculture1998 160177203
Not in our library10.1016/s0044-8486(97)00299-8
- 39.
Ringo E Olsen RE Mayhew TM Myklebust R Electron microscopy of the intestinal microflora of fishAquaculture2003 227395415
Not in our library10.1016/j.aquaculture.2003.05.001
- 40.
Mittge EK Stephens WZ Parichy DM Cavanaugh CM Guillemin K Rawls JF Evidence for a core gut microbiota in the zebrafishISME J2011 114
Not in our library10.1038/ismej.2011.38
Cited by papers we hold 6
- Intestinal Cetobacterium and acetate modify glucose homeostasis via parasympathetic activation in zebrafish · 2021No notice
- Environmental and physiological factors shape the gut microbiota of Atlantic salmon parr (Salmo salar L.) · 2017No notice
- Environment shapes the fecal microbiome of invasive carp species · 2016No notice
- Impact of Fishmeal Replacement in Diets for Gilthead Sea Bream (Sparus aurata) on the Gastrointestinal Microbiota Determined by Pyrosequencing the 16S rRNA Gene · 2015No notice
- The impact of rearing environment on the development of gut microbiota in tilapia larvae · 2015No notice
- Analysis of Stomach and Gut Microbiomes of the Eastern Oyster (Crassostrea virginica) from Coastal Louisiana, USA · 2012No notice
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.