Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 18, 2026.

Co-occurrence of anaerobic bacteria in colorectal carcinomas

René L Warren, Douglas J Freeman, Stephen Pleasance and 5 more

Microbiome · 2013

doi:10.1186/2049-2618-1-16

Abstract

Background. Numerous cancers have been linked to microorganisms. Given that colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer deaths and the colon is continuously exposed to a high diversity of microbes, the relationship between gut mucosal microbiome and colorectal cancer needs to be explored. Metagenomic studies have shown an association between Fusobacterium species and colorectal carcinoma. Here, we have extended these studies with deeper sequencing of a much larger number (n = 130) of colorectal carcinoma and matched normal control tissues. We analyzed these data using co-occurrence networks in order to identify microbe-microbe and host-microbe associations specific to tumors.

Results. We confirmed tumor over-representation of Fusobacterium species and observed significant co-occurrence within individual tumors of Fusobacterium, Leptotrichia and Campylobacter species. This polymicrobial signature was associated with over-expression of numerous host genes, including the gene encoding the pro-inflammatory chemokine Interleukin-8. The tumor-associated bacteria we have identified are all Gram-negative anaerobes, recognized previously as constituents of the oral microbiome, which are capable of causing infection. We isolated a novel strain of Campylobacter showae from a colorectal tumor specimen. This strain is substantially diverged from a previously sequenced oral Campylobacter showae isolate, carries potential virulence genes, and aggregates with a previously isolated tumor strain of Fusobacterium nucleatum.

Conclusions. A polymicrobial signature of Gram-negative anaerobic bacteria is associated with colorectal carcinoma tissue.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 18, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Background

A substantial portion of the cancer burden worldwide is attributable to microbial pathogens. Certain tumor viruses, such as human papilloma virus, have the capability of initiating tumorigenesis and are well established as etiological agents. Although it is generally the case that only a minority of infected individuals progress to cancer, in principle, an overall reduction in the incidence of cancer can be achieved by reducing the incidence of infection. Likewise, a link between H. pylori infection and gastric carcinoma has been well established by more than two decades of intensive research and, although the precise mechanism of tumor induction remains unknown, it is possible to reduce the risk of gastric cancer by diagnosis and treatment of H. pylori-induced gastritis. Hence, there are strong precedents for targeting oncogenic infectious agents for the purpose of cancer control, and motivation to explore the possibility of infectious agent involvement in other cancers. Even in the absence of any etiological role, a microbe or microbial signature with tumor specificity has potential utility for diagnosis and risk assessment.

Metagenomic analysis, whereby the presence of a microbe in a sample is inferred from the presence of its sequence signature, has become a sensitive method for identifying novel tumor-associated microbes in a culture-independent manner. Previously, we used this method to evaluate 11 subjects with colorectal carcinoma and identified substantial over-representation of sequences mapping to Fusobacterium nucleatum (F. nucleatum) in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) tissue compared to adjacent non-tumor gut mucosal control tissue from the same subjects. This observation was verified in additional CRC subjects using a quantitative PCR assay, which targeted a F. nucleatum genome locus. We observed significant tumor over-abundance in the cohort as a whole, and extreme over-abundance in approximately 25% of subjects. An independent study of CRC, published at the same time as ours by another team of investigators, used a nearly identical study design and obtained nearly identical results, with a broad, significant tumor over-representation of Fusobacterium spp. and extreme tumor over-representation in a subset of subjects. Together, these reports show an association between Fusobacterium spp. and CRC, and highlight the possibility of a CRC subtype where Fusobacterium spp. may be particularly pertinent. An association between Fusobacterium spp. abundance and metastasis was also observed in the above studies, and a new study has found an association between Fusobacterium spp. and colorectal adenomas.

F. nucleatum is a known invasive and pro-inflammatory agent that can cause acute and chronic oral and gastrointestinal infections. We have isolated Fusobacterium spp. from CRC tissue and from intestinal biopsy samples taken both from healthy individuals and Crohn’s disease patients. The reason why Fusobacterium spp. may in some circumstances be pathogenic and at other times apparently benign commensal organisms is not understood. These organisms are highly adherent and will attach to host epithelial cells and certain other bacterial species, but generally not to other fusobacteria. Thus, in some circumstances, the pathogenicity of Fusobacterium spp. is thought to be related to their ability to act as a vector, whereby they facilitate host tissue infection by co-adherent bacteria.

Our initial metatranscriptomic analysis of CRC (n = 11) had limited power to detect rarer microbes represented differentially in tumor and matched normal control tissue, or to place the observed differential representation in the context of the larger diversity of the mucosal microbiome. Here, we report a metagenomic analysis of a much larger independent cohort of CRC patients (n = 65). We confirm significant tumor over-representation of Fusobacterium spp. sequences and we also observe over-representation in tumor of sequences from additional, less abundant bacteria, including members of the genera Campylobacter, Leptotrichia and Selenomonas. There is significant co-occurrence of these genera with Fusobacterium and together they define a metagenomic signature of CRC.

Clinical specimens

For all cases, surgical samples were obtained with informed consent by the BC Cancer Agency Tumor Tissue Repository (BCCA-TTR) which operates as a dedicated biobank with approval from the University of British Columbia-British Columbia Cancer Agency Research Ethics Board (BCCA REB). The BCCA-TTR platform are governed by Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) that meet or exceed the recommendations of international best practice guidelines for repositories (NCI Office of Biorepositories and Biospecimen Research. NCI Best Practices for Biospecimen Resources, 2007). Specimens are handled with very close attention to maintaining integrity and isolation. Overall average collection time (time from removal from surgical field to cryopreservation in liquid nitrogen) for all CRC cases in the BCCA-TTR is 31 min. For this study biospecimens were held briefly at −20°C during frozen sectioning, using 100% ethanol to clean the blade between all samples. For each of the 65 subjects in our study, one tumor section and one matched control specimen were analyzed, totaling 130 samples.

Metatranscriptomic analysis

Library construction and Illumina sequencing were performed as previously described. Briefly, frozen tissue was homogenized in 600 μL RLT buffer (Qiagen) and passed five times through a syringe fitted with a 20 G needle. RNA was purified using the RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer's instructions. Genomic DNA contamination was reduced using an on-column DNase I treatment according to the kit protocol. RNA quality and concentration was assessed using Agilent Bioanalyzer 2000 RNA Nanochips. Ribosomal RNAs were depleted from 1 mg of total RNA using the manufacturer’s protocol for the RiboMinus Eukaryote Kit for RNA-Seq (Invitrogen). Depletion was assessed using Agilent Bioanalyzer 2000 RNA Nanochips. Samples were found to have approximately 30% residual ribosomal RNA content (Additional file 1: Table S1) and were processed as described previously for the construction of Illumina libraries, with the following modifications: each paired-end library was PCR amplified for 15 cycles using the standard Illumina PE1 PCR primer plus a modified PE2 primer including a unique six base insertion as an index sequence. Libraries prepared using indexed primers were then combined in two pools of 60 and 70 samples, respectively, with each pool containing both tumor and control libraries. Libraries were gel purified to remove residual adapter dimers and then sequenced on the Illumina HiSeqtm 2000 platform. Four paired-end 100 nt sequence lanes were run per multiplexed library for a total of 8 lanes, yielding 564.4 million raw read pairs. Reads were aligned on a per-lane basis against a sequence database of human rRNA using short read aligner BWA (v0.5.9 -o 1000). Aligned reads, reads having stretches of homopolymeric DNA bases and poor quality bases were discarded. The remaining paired reads (334.5 million or 59.3% of total sequence) were aligned using BWA with the same parameters against 155,209 transcript sequences, after which unmapped paired reads subtracted and re-aligned against the NCBI reference human genome sequence. A total of 390 million read pairs (69.1%) aligned to human sequence databases and were subtracted (Additional file 1: Table S1). The remaining unmapped read pairs were aligned against a sequence database of bacterial and viral RefSeq genome sequences from Genbank and reference bacterial genome sequence from HMP using Novoalign (http://www.novocraft.com; v2.7.9 -o SAM -r A -R 0), tracking unique alignments within genera and species. We chose to run Novoalign rather than BWA for the last step of the microbe profiling pipeline because it is a more permissive aligner that reports all high scoring alignments for a given read pair, which facilitates the unambiguous assignments of read pairs. Paired sequence reads that mapped both as top hits and as unique hits (i.e., to a single species or genus) were tallied and organized by organism at the genus or species level using the binomial nomenclature (Additional file 2: Table S2 and Additional file 3: Table S3). All pairs that satisfied these conditions and aligned within Novoalign’s allowable mismatches (≤16 per pair of reads) were tracked. Thus, all 100 nt read pairs aligning within 92% sequence identity or better were tallied. A total of 4.7 million read pairs (0.8% of total raw sequenced pairs) aligned to microbial genome sequences using the approach described here. Read pair counts were then normalized to account for the variation in the amount of raw sequence data generated per sample. Briefly, the average number of raw reads for all samples was determined. The number of raw reads from each sample, as a proportion of the average read count, was also determined and used as a correction factor. For each sample, the number of reads mapping to each microbe was divided by the correction factor specific to that sample to obtain the normalized count. Samples were further arranged by biospecimen type (i.e., normal vs. tumor) and the significance of differentially abundant microbes, as inferred from differentially abundant and uniquely mapped read pairs, using the R function of Metastats.

Microbe co-occurrence was investigated by selecting any two genera and calculating a Pearson correlation R between their sequence pair count. Read counts for the two genera were then re-assigned to sample identifiers randomly, 1,000 times, and the Pearson correlation re-assessed and the correlation R between two genera was assigned a bootstrap P value equal to the proportion of randomizations that resulted in an R value equal or greater to the initial R value calculated from the non-randomized data.

Correlations among genera were plotted as a network using Cytoscape v2.8.2, with the color intensity of each edge corresponding to the strength of the Pearson correlation, lighter to darker matching Pearson R = 0.5046 to R = 0.9909.

Principal component analysis was performed using the ade4 package in R to determine whether tumor and normal control tissue could be distinguished, globally, by microbiome content.

Host gene expression profiling

Read pairs aligning to Ensembl human transcripts that had been segregated during the filtering steps described above were analyzed further. The number of read pairs matching each Ensembl transcript were counted and then, because Ensembl transcripts are partially redundant due to alternative splicing, read-pair counts from transcripts were consolidated by Ensembl gene IDs, to provide a read-pair count for each gene. After normalizing, as above, for raw sequence depth, we calculated the Pearson correlation R between ratios (tumor/normal) of read-pairs mapping to each distinct human gene to ratios of read-pairs mapping to each distinct bacterial genus.

To test significance, read-pair ratios were randomly re-assigned to sample identifiers 1,000 times and the Pearson correlations re-assessed. Each correlation was assigned a bootstrap P value equal to the proportion of randomizations that resulted in an R value equal or greater to the initial R value calculated from the non-randomized data.

HLA prediction

HLA class I alleles were predicted directly from the RNA-Seq data as described. Briefly, HLA sequence contigs were derived from the RNA-Seq data by targeted de novo assembly using TASR and assessed by reciprocal BLASTN against reference HLA allelic sequences available in the public domain (IMGT/HLA). Top scoring allele predictions for all 65 subjects are provided in Additional file 4: Table S4. For the 14 subjects with the predicted HLA class I extended haplotype A*01 B*08 C*07, the computational predictions were verified by PCR based Sanger re-sequencing as previously described.

Campylobacter showae CC57C sequencing, assembly and annotation

A strain of Campylobacter showae (C. showae), which we named CC57C, was cultured from a tumor surgical section using previously described methods. CC57C was cultured on agar media supplemented with sodium formate (0.2% w/v) and sodium fumarate (0.3%w/v), HMW genomic DNA was extracted and purified, and used to construct an Illumina whole genome shotgun sequencing library using standard methods. The library was sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq platform which generated 1.8 million paired 150 nt reads after quality filtering, providing 245.4 mean fold coverage of the approximately 2.2 Mbp genome. Read pairs were assembled with the onboard Velvet short read assembler, producing 300 contigs with an N50 length of 16.8 kbp. The contigs were aligned onto the closest known reference genome, C. showae RM3277 (NCBI Reference Sequence: NZ_ACVQ00000000.1) using cross_match (parameters -minmatch 29 -minscore 59 -masklevel 101, http://www.phrap.org) and displayed using XMatchView (http://www.bcgsc.ca/platform/bioinfo/software/xmatchview). CC57C genome annotation was inferred from BLASTX alignments between CC57C contigs and the protein database Genbank-nr.

Assessment of F. nucleatum CC53 / C. showae CC57C co-aggregation

F. nucleatum tumor isolate strain CC53 identified in a previous study by our group was cultured in tryptic soy broth supplemented with menadione (1 μg/mL) and hemin (5 μg/mL) (TSBsupp), and C. showae tumor isolate strain CC57C was cultured in TSBsupp with further supplementation of sodium formate (0.2% w/v) and sodium fumarate (0.3% w/v), under strict anaerobic conditions for 2 days at 37°C.

To assess whether CC53 and CC57C were able to co-aggregate, cells were harvested by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 10 minutes at 4°C, washed in co-aggregation buffer (0.01 M Tris–HCl adjusted to pH 8.0, 0.001 M MgCl2, 0.15 M NaCl and 2% NaN3) ref. three times and finally re-suspended in co-aggregation buffer to a turbidity of between McFarland standard 2.0 and 3.0 (~108 CFU/mL). Aliquots (0.5 mL) of each strain were mixed and vortexed for 10 s followed by incubation at 37°C for 30 min with agitation at 110 rpm. After incubation the tubes were removed and allowed to sit undisturbed for 3 min to allow aggregates to settle. Aggregate samples were immobilized on agarose-coated slides and observed by phase microscopy.

Preparation of cells for electron microscopy

CC57C cells were cultured in TSBsupp with further supplementation of sodium formate (0.2% w/v) and sodium fumarate (0.3% w/v) as above for two days as above. Cells were harvested by centrifugation, washed twice with distilled water, floated to Formvar-coated grids, and stained with 0.5% uranyl acetate prior to viewing with a Philips CM10 electron microscope.

Metatranscriptomic analysis of CRC and matched control tissue reveals differentially abundant microbes

Total RNA was isolated from frozen surgical sections of CRC and matched unaffected control tissue from 65 subjects. Following ribosomal RNA depletion, multiplexed RNA-Seq libraries were constructed as previously described, and eight paired-end lanes of sequence were obtained using the Illumina HiSeqtm 2000 platform. After quality filtering of the raw sequence data and removal of human sequences, microbial sequence diversity was assessed by counting read pairs having unique alignments to genomes of specific bacterial genera, using an in-house database populated with all microbial genome sequences available from GenBank and the Human Microbiome Project. Aligned read pairs were normalized to correct for differential yield of raw sequence data from different samples. Considering the filtered and uniquely mapped sequences of microbial origin (Table 1 and Additional file 1: Table S1 and Additional file 2: Table S2), 57 distinct genera accounted for 99% of the mapped read pairs, and this set of frequent bacteria was analyzed further. Relative microbial abundance in the tumor and normal groups was inferred from the differential abundance of uniquely mapped reads by running Metastats.

Relative abundance within the set of 57 frequent bacterial genera varied by approximately four orders of magnitude (Figure 1A; Additional file 5: Table S5). Ralstonia and Bacteroides, both of which are known constituents of the normal fecal microbiota, were of highest abundance in both tumor and control samples. Genera we found to be nominally over-represented in control samples relative to tumors (Ruminococcus, Parabacteroides, Pseudoflavonifractor, Ruminococcaceae and Holdemania) are also well-recognized members of the fecal microbiota. Fusobacterium was the most abundant genus significantly over-represented in tumor samples, as previously reported. Interestingly, however, analysis of this comprehensive metagenomic data set revealed additional genera, namely Campylobacter and Leptotrichia, which are significantly over-represented in tumor samples after accounting for multiple testing. Tumor over-representation of Selenomonas is only nominally significant (Additional file 5: Table S5). These additional genera have comparatively low representation in the tumor microbiome, but high tumor specificity. Principal component analysis did not distinguish tumor from normal control tissue on the basis of global microbiome content (Additional file 6: Figure S1).

To explore species-level representation of the tumor-associated genera, we counted read pairs mapping uniquely to genome accessions of member species (Figure 1B). The species showing greatest number of unique and unambiguous read pair alignments were F. nucleatum, C. showae, L. hofstadii and S. sputigena. For each of these species, there was an over-representation of mapped read pairs that were of tumor origin. Within each genus, additional species showed unique read pair matches, but the matches were generally fewer and showed less tumor specificity. We have restricted our analysis to sequence pairs that map as best hits, uniquely to the reference genomes shown because this is the most tractable approach, however, this approach cannot yield complete genome information for tumor microbes. Therefore, we cannot state with certainty that these are the precise species present. It is possible that regions of individual genomes we have not sampled would, if available, match best to reference genomes from different species. Likewise, the sequences we have obtained from tumor microbes might best match species that are not yet represented in microbial genome databases. It is expected that precision in microbial identification at the finer taxonomic levels will improve as microbial genome resources improve.

Fusobacterium, Campylobacter and Leptotrichia show patterns of co-occurrence in CRC

Next, we asked if the bacteria showing mean differential abundance between the tumor and control samples showed a tendency toward co-occurrence. That is, we were interested to determine if these bacteria tended to be differentially abundant in the same samples. Using read count data, we calculated correlation coefficients for all possible pairwise combinations of genera and assessed the significance of these correlations by iterative retesting after randomization of the association between genus abundance and sample identifier. The resulting co-occurrence network is illustrated in Figure 2A and shows very distinct clustering of the tumor-enriched genera, indicating a tendency of these genera to co-occur within the same specific samples. Conversely, genera initially found to be nominally over-represented in control tissue did not specifically cluster, but rather grouped with the majority of the other non-differentially abundant genera that represent the commensal microbiota.

Correlation between host factors and microbial abundance

Our RNA-Seq data provided only light coverage of the human transcriptome, but nonetheless this allowed the opportunity to explore patterns of host gene expression in relation to differentially abundant bacteria. We aligned the RNA-Seq data to Ensembl transcripts (consolidated by Ensembl gene ID), and identified a total of 12,963 distinct expressed human genes and these varied widely in expression level (Additional file 7: Figure S2). Across all 130 tissue samples 5,384 genes were matched by an average of ten read pairs or more. Read counts for each of the nine bacterial genera showing at least nominally significant mean differential abundance between tumor and control samples (Figure 1A) were correlated with read counts for each of the 12,963 human genes. As above, significance was assessed by iterative randomization and retesting of the association between sample identifier and gene expression level. As illustrated in the network diagram presented in Figure 2B and Additional file 8: Table S6, genera over-represented in tumor tissue were associated with eight differentially expressed host genes, including known oncogenes and immune response genes. Genera under-represented in tumor tissue were associated with 28 differentially expressed host genes, including numerous housekeeping genes but no genes that have obvious, well established implications in cancer, infection, or immunity.

To further explore host immunity we predicted the HLA class I alleles for all subjects using a computational approach that involved targeted assembly of RNA-Seq reads matching HLA-A, -B and -C genes followed by identification of the most likely allele calls as best reciprocal BLASTN matches to reference allele sequences from the IMGT/HLA database (Additional file 4: Table S4). We did not observe an association between any individual HLA allele and genus with differential tumor abundance. Interestingly, however, 14 subjects were predicted to carry the extended ancestral haplotype A*01 B*08 C*07 and showed a tendency toward tumor enrichment of Fusobacterium (tumor ratio of 126 ± 344 in A*01 B*08 C*07 subjects versus 30 ± 91 in other subjects), although this difference was not statistically significant (Student’s t-test).

Characterization of a novel C. showae tumor isolate

The tissue specimens interrogated in the present study were biobank specimens and were not initially collected or stored with the intention of facilitating the subsequent culture of anaerobic bacteria. Nonetheless, given the observation from our metatranscriptomic analysis of over-representation of certain anaerobes, culture was attempted, and we were able to obtain a single Campylobacter spp. isolate, CC57C. Phenotypically, on agar plates, colonies of C. showae CC57C appear circular, small, extremely flat and opaque/translucent. By electron microscopy (Additional file 9: Figure S3) cells generally possess a single polar flagellum. This is in contrast to the description of the type strain for C. showae, ATCC 51146T, which has 2 to 4 unipolar flagella per cell, but similar to the phenotype for C. rectus and C. concisus, both of which are reported as having 1 polar flagella per cell.

The genome of the C. showae CC57C isolate was sequenced using the Illumina MiSeqtm platform and the resulting genome assembly showed highest DNA sequence homology with that of the HMP reference C. showae RM3277. However, whole-genome alignments show that these two genomes (C. showae CC57C and C. showae RM3277) are actually fairly substantially diverged, with only 92.5% average nucleotide sequence identity. Further, 15% of the C. showae RM3277 genome is not represented by contigs of the C. showae CC57C assembly and, although there is inherent difficulty in comparing draft genome assemblies, the two genomes appear to show significant local rearrangement (Figure 3A). Interestingly, there are C. showae CC57C sequence contigs that harbor predicted genes that have no equivalent in C. showae RM3277. One such contig captures VirB4/D10 operon homologs, components of a Type IV Secretion System (T4SS) specific to anaerobes, which was first described in the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens. T4SS are used by pathogenic anaerobic bacteria to translocate DNA and protein substrates across their membranes and into recipient cells. The configuration of the Vir operon of C. showae CC57C (Figure 3B) shows strong similarity to that of C. rectus RM3267 and also similarity to that present within the cag pathogenicity island of H. pylori. In H. pylori this system is used to introduce the CagA oncoprotein into host stomach epithelium cells and, although we do not observe a cagA equivalent in C. showae CC57C, the function of this secretion system in C. showae CC57C deserves further scrutiny, due to its potential association with virulence. The presence of Relaxase and Nucleotidyl transferase genes in the C. showae CC57C operon suggests a nucleic acid transport function. Annotation of the C. showae CC57C genome reveals additional genes of interest regarding potential pathogenicity, including genes encoding various adhesion, motility, chemotaxis and secretion functions (Additional file 10: Table S7). Numerous antibiotic resistance genes are also observed, including those coding for beta-lactamase and the multidrug resistance protein MEXB, suggesting that antibiotic treatment for this particular strain of C. showae may be problematic. Of note, our BLASTX-based annotation of the draft C. showae CC57C genome is very conservative, and we expect that many additional genes will be revealed upon further curation.

The availability of F. nucleatum CC53 from our previously published study and the availability of C. showae CC57C from the present study allowed us to test whether these strains interact (aggregate) with each other in vitro using a simple aggregation test. Using phase microscopy we found that these two strains aggregated readily with each other, indicating the presence of compatible adhesins/receptors on the bacterial cell surfaces (Figure 4).

Discussion

Using deep metatranscriptomic sequencing and analysis we have determined that in addition to Fusobacterium, there are Leptotrichia and Campylobacter spp. co-enriched in CRC tissue. These bacteria are all Gram-negative anaerobes that are known commensal members of the oral microbiome, typically the subgingival plaque, and they have pathogenic potential. Fusobacterium and Leptotrichia are relatively closely-related organisms. The order Fusobacteriales contains three families, of which Leptotrichiaceae and Fusobacteriaceae are two. Leptotrichia spp. have been isolated from periodontal lesions and from a diversity of other cardiovascular, genitourinary and gastrointestinal abscesses and from systemic infections, and have been suggested to be potential emerging pathogens. In our study the Leptotrichia spp. showing the largest number of unique read-pair alignments from our data is L. hofstadii, followed closely by L. buccalis. Previous case studies have reported L. buccalis bacteremia in patients with cancer, however, the cancers in question were mainly lymphomas and leukemias, and thus bacteremia was likely related to the immuno-compromised state of the patients, rather than to the malignancy directly.

The Campylobacter spp. showing the largest number of unique read-pair alignments from our data set was C. showae. This is a relatively new member of the Campylobacter genus, first described in 1993 after isolation from subgingival plaque. C. showae and originally distinguished from other Campylobacter based on number of flagella. The presence of flagella also distinguishes C. showae from the other tumor-associated bacteria in our study, Fusobacterium and Leptotrichia, which are non-flagellated. Interestingly, we did not observe any unique sequence matches to Campylobacter jejuni, which is a well-characterized human pathogen that is a leading cause of acute, food-borne gastroenteritis. Previous studies have not found epidemiological evidence for a link between C. jejuni infection and cancer, which is consistent with our observation of the absence of C. jejuni from the CRC tumor microbiome. Importantly, however, no data are available regarding the possible involvement of other Campylobacter species in cancer. The possibility that Campylobacter, Leptotrichia, or Fusobacterium spp. associated with CRC may have an etiological role in carcinogenesis remains an open and difficult question that requires further study.

The metatranscriptomic data presented here indicate that in the samples we analyzed, Fusobacterium, Leptotrichia and Campylobacter spp. tend to be found together. This is not unexpected given that all are anaerobic microbes known to inhabit the same niche in the oral cavity. In general, F. nucleatum strains are remarkable in their abilities to co-aggregate with a wide variety of bacterial species. In line with this, we demonstrate here that, in vitro, aggregation of tumor isolates C. showae CC57C with F. nucleatum CC53 is evident (Figure 4). Co-aggregation of Streptococcus cristatus with F. nucleatum has previously been shown to facilitate invasion of the former into cultured host cells, and to alter the host response to F. nucleatum invasion. Whether co-aggregation of F. nucleatum and C. showae is relevant to disease etiology remains to be tested and the influence of this co-aggregation on bacterial virulence in vitro is currently being investigated by our group.

The strong association between what are typically considered oral anaerobic bacteria and colorectal carcinoma is intriguing. These species together may provide a set of parsimonious predictors with potential utility in CRC detection and risk assessment. An important question is whether these tumor bacteria are of oral origin, or if they represent distinct colonic strains or even, possibly, distinct tumor strains. Comparative analysis of large numbers of tumor isolates will be needed to address this question. Towards this goal, we describe a novel C. showae strain, CC57C, isolated from colorectal carcinoma tissue which shows considerable divergence from its closest known relative, C. showae RM3277, an oral strain. CC57C carries genes implicated previously in pathogenicity, including a virB10/D4 type IV secretion system that is present in CC57C but absent from RM3277.

An advantage of our approach of using RNA-Seq to interrogate surgical tissue for the presence of associated microbes is that it also provided the opportunity to explore possible links of the microbiota to host genetic factors. We were able to predict HLA class I alleles for most subjects by directly mining the RNA-Seq data using a new tool, HLAminer, which avoided the extra time and cost that would otherwise be required for conventional typing. Although we do not see a significant association between HLA class I type and the abundance of specific microbes, we anticipate that in future this approach will be amenable to the analysis of larger microbiome datasets that are more appropriately powered for the detection of HLA associations. We also asked if differentially abundant bacteria were associated with any differentially expressed host genes. Notably, within the small set of genes associated with tumor-enriched bacterial signatures, we observed cathepsin Z, a tumor associated protease, and interleukin-8, an inflammatory cytokine and mediator of innate immunity secreted by activated macrophages. We expect that further definition of the interaction between host cells and the anaerobic bacteria identified in this study will be an important focus of ongoing investigation.

Conclusions

A high-throughput sequence screen of Metatranscriptome data from CRC and matched control tissues has revealed differently abundant microbial genome sequence signatures of significance in tumor samples, including those belonging to the Fusobacterium, Campylobacter and Leptotrichia genera. These Gram-negative anaerobes are typically considered to be oral bacteria. However, tumor isolates for Fusobacterium and Campylobacter are genetically diverged from their oral counterparts and carry potential virulence genes. Interestingly, we observe that sequence signatures from Fusobacterium co-occur with those from Leptotrichia and Campylobacter and that Fusobacterium and Campylobacter strains isolated from tumor tissue co-adhere in culture. A non-invasive assay to detect this polymicrobial signature of CRC may have utility in screening and risk assessment. It remains unknown whether there is any etiological link between microorganisms and CRC. In principle, any such link could provide a point of intervention.

Availability of supporting data

The data sets supporting the results of this article are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive repository, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/sra/sra.cgi under accession no. SRP010181. These include human CRC RNA-Seq as well as C. showae CC57C WGS reads. The whole genome shotgun project for the C. showae CC57C tumor isolate has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession AOTD00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, AOTD01000000.

A file containing patient ID, sample ID and sequencing library names is available at http://ftp.bcgsc.ca/supplementary/CRC2012/SRP0010181_CRC_info.txt. Other data sets supporting the results of this article are included within the article and its Additional files.

Abbreviations

CRC: Colorectal carcinoma; HLA: Human leukocyte antigen; HMP: Human microbiome project; IA: Infectious agents; T4SS: Type IV secretion system.

Competing interests

Submitted patent CA2011/001108.

Authors’ contributions

RAH conceived and designed the study; PW arranged the sample collection and preparation; DJF extracted RNA and constructed the sequencing libraries; RAM contributed to conception of the research project and coordinated the sequencing; KC cultured CC57C, extracted DNA for genome sequencing, and carried out aggregation assays and microscopy. SP extracted gDNA, constructed and sequenced the CC57C genome library. EAV contributed to data interpretation. RLW and RAH analyzed the data and made the figures; RLW and RAH prepared the draft manuscript. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the preparation of the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References 48

  1. 1.

    Parkin DM The global health burden of infection-associated cancers in the year 2002Int J Cancer2006 130303044

    Not in our library10.1002/ijc.21731

  2. 2.

    Moore RA Warren RL Freeman JD Gustavsen JA Chénard C Friedman JM Suttle CA Zhao Y Holt RA The sensitivity of massively parallel sequencing for detecting candidate infectious agents associated with human tissuePLoS One2011 1e19838

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0019838

  3. 3.

    Feng H Shuda M Chang Y Moore PS Clonal integration of a polyomavirus in human Merkel cell carcinomaScience2008 110961100

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1152586

  4. 4.

    Castellarin M Warren RL Freeman JD Dreolini L Krzywinski M Strauss J Barnes R Watson P Allen-Vercoe E Moore RA Holt RA Fusobacterium nucleatum infection is prevalent in human colorectal carcinomaGenome Res2012 1299306

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.126516.111

  5. 5.

    Kostic AD Gevers D Pedamallu CS Michaud M Duke F Earl AM Ojesina AI Jung J Bass AJ Tabernero J Baselga J Liu C Shivdasani RA Ogino S Birren BW Huttenhower C Garrett WS Meyerson M Genomic analysis identifies association of Fusobacterium with colorectal carcinomaGenome Res2012 1292298

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.126573.111

  6. 6.
  7. 7.

    Han YW Shi W Huang GT Kinder Haake S Park NH Kuramitsu H Genco RJ Interactions between periodontal bacteria and human oral epithelial cells: Fusobacterium nucleatum adheres to and invades epithelial cellsInfect Immun2000 131403146

    Not in our library10.1128/iai.68.6.3140-3146.2000

  8. 8.

    Krisanaprakornkit S Kimball JR Weinberg A Darveau RP Bainbridge BW Dale BA Inducible expression of human beta-defensin 2 by Fusobacterium nucleatum in oral epithelial cells: multiple signaling pathways and role of commensal bacteria in innate immunity and the epithelial barrierInfect Immun2000 129072915

    Not in our library10.1128/iai.68.5.2907-2915.2000

  9. 9.

    Peyret-Lacombe A Brunel G Watts M Charveron M Duplan H TLR2 sensing of F. nucleatum and S. sanguinis distinctly triggered gingival innate responseCytokine2009 1201210

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cyto.2009.01.006

  10. 10.

    Signat B Roques C Poulet P Duffaut D Fusobacterium nucleatum in Periodontal Health and DiseaseCurr Issues Mol Biol2011 12536

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    Swidsinski A Dörffel Y Loening-Baucke V Theissig F Rückert JC Ismail M Rau WA Gaschler D Weizenegger M Kühn S Schilling J Dörffel WV Acute appendicitis is characterised by local invasion with Fusobacterium nucleatum/necrophorumGut2011 13440

    Not in our library10.1136/gut.2009.191320

  12. 12.

    Strauss J White A Ambrose C McDonald J Allen-Vercoe E Phenotypic and genotypic analyses of clinical Fusobacterium nucleatum and Fusobacterium periodonticum isolates from the human gutAnaerobe2008 1301309

    Not in our library10.1016/j.anaerobe.2008.12.003

  13. 13.

    Strauss J Kaplan GG Beck PL Rioux K Panaccione R Devinney R Lynch T Allen-Vercoe E Invasive potential of gut mucosa-derived Fusobacterium nucleatum positively correlates with IBD status of the hostInflamm Bowel Dis2011 119711978

    Not in our library10.1002/ibd.21606

  14. 14.

    Zilm PS Rogers AH Co-adhesion and biofilm formation by Fusobacterium nucleatum in response to growth pHAnaerobe2007 1146152

    Not in our library10.1016/j.anaerobe.2007.04.005

  15. 15.

    Fardini Y Wang X Témoin S Nithianantham S Lee D Shoham M Han YW Fusobacterium nucleatum adhesin FadA binds vascular endothelial cadherin and alters endothelial integrityMol Microbiol2011 114681480

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07905.x

  16. 16.

    Watson PH Wilson-McManus JE Barnes RO Giesz SC Png A Hegele RG Brinkman JN Mackenzie IR Huntsman DG Junker A Gilks B Skarsgard E Burgess M Aparicio S McManus BM Evolutionary concepts in biobanking - the BC BioLibraryJ Transl Med2009 195

    Not in our library10.1186/1479-5876-7-95

  17. 17.

    Shah SP Morin RD Khattra J Prentice L Pugh T Burleigh A Delaney A Gelmon K Guliany R Senz J Steidl C Holt RA Jones S Sun M Leung G Moore R Severson T Taylor GA Teschendorff AE Tse K Turashvili G Varhol R Warren RL Watson P Zhao Y Caldas C Huntsman D Hirst M Marra MA Aparicio S Mutational evolution in a lobular breast tumour profiled at single nucleotide resolutionNature2009 1809813

    Not in our library10.1038/nature08489

  18. 18.

    Morin RD Johnson NA Severson TM Mungall AJ An J Goya R Paul JE Boyle M Woolcock BW Kuchenbauer F Yap D Humphries RK Griffith OL Shah S Zhu H Kimbara M Shashkin P Charlot JF Tcherpakov M Corbett R Tam A Varhol R Smailus D Moksa M Zhao Y Delaney A Qian H Birol I Schein J Moore R Holt R Horsman DE Connors JM Jones S Aparicio S Hirst M Gascoyne RD Marra MA Somatic mutations altering EZH2 (Tyr641) in follicular and diffuse large B-cell lymphomas of germinal-center originNat Genet2010 1181185

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.518

  19. 19.

    Flicek P Amode MR Barrell D Beal K Brent S Chen Y Clapham P Coates G Fairley S Fitzgerald S Gordon L Hendrix M Hourlier T Johnson N Kähäri A Keefe D Keenan S Kinsella R Kokocinski F Kulesha E Larsson P Longden I McLaren W Overduin B Pritchard B Riat HS Rios D Ritchie GR Ruffier M Schuster M Ensembl 2011Nucleic Acids Res2011 1D800D806

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkq1064

  20. 20.

    Li H Durbin R Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transformBioinformatics2010 1589595

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698

  21. 21.

    International Human Genome Sequencing ConsortiumFinishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genomeNature2004 1931945

    Not in our library10.1038/nature03001

  22. 22.

    Benson DA Karsch-Mizrachi I Lipman DJ Ostell J Wheeler DL GenBankNucleic Acids Res2008 1D25D30

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkn320

  23. 23.

    Human Microbiome Jumpstart Reference Strains C Nelson KE Weinstock GM Highlander SK Worley KC Creasy HH Wortman JR Rusch DB Mitreva M Sodergren E Chinwalla AT Feldgarden M Gevers D Haas BJ Madupu R Ward DV Birren BW Gibbs RA Methe B Petrosino JF Strausberg RL Sutton GG White OR Wilson RK Durkin S Giglio MG Gujja S Howarth C Kodira CD Kyrpides N A catalog of reference genomes from the human microbiomeScience2010 1994999

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1183605

  24. 24.
  25. 25.

    Cline MS Smoot M Cerami E Kuchinsky A Landys N Workman C Christmas R Avila-Campilo I Creech M Gross B Hanspers K Isserlin R Kelley R Killcoyne S Lotia S Maere S Morris J Ono K Pavlovic V Pico AR Vailaya A Wang PL Adler A Conklin BR Hood L Kuiper M Sander C Schmulevich I Schwikowski B Warner GJ Integration of biological networks and gene expression data using CytoscapeNat Protoc2007 123662382

    Not in our library10.1038/nprot.2007.324

  26. 26.

    Chessel D Dufour AB Thioulouse J The ade4 package-I – One-table methodsR News2004 1510

    Not in our library

  27. 27.
  28. 28.

    Warren RL Holt RA Targeted assembly of short sequence readsPLoS One2011 1e19816

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0019816

  29. 29.

    Altschul SF Gish W Miller W Myers EW Lipman DJ Basic local alignment search toolJ Mol Biol1990 1403410

    Not in our library10.1016/s0022-2836(05)80360-2

  30. 30.

    Robinson J Mistry K McWilliam H Lopez R Parham P Marsh SG The IMGT/HLA databaseNucleic Acids Res2011 1D1171D1176

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkq998

  31. 31.

    Gonzalez-Galarza FF Christmas S Middleton D Jones AR Allele frequency net: a database and online repository for immune gene frequencies in worldwide populationsNucleic Acid Res2011 1D913D919

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkq1128

  32. 32.

    Warren RL Freeman JD Zeng T Choe G Munro S Moore R Webb JR Holt RA Exhaustive T-cell repertoire sequencing of human peripheral blood samples reveals signatures of antigen selection and a directly measured repertoire size of at least 1 million clonotypesGenome Res2011 1790797

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.115428.110

  33. 33.

    Etoh Y Dewhirst FE Paster BJ Yamamoto A Goto N Campylobacter showae sp. nov., isolated from the human oral cavityInt J Syst Bacteriol1993 1631639

    Not in our library10.1099/00207713-43-4-631

  34. 34.

    Zerbino DR Birney E Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphsGenome Res2008 1821829

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.074492.107

  35. 35.

    Peterson J Garges S Giovanni M McInnes P Wang L Schloss JA Bonazzi V McEwen JE Wetterstrand KA Deal C Baker CC Di Francesco V Howcroft TK Karp RW Lunsford RD Wellington CR Belachew T Wright M Giblin C David H Mills M Salomon R Mullins C Akolkar B Begg L Davis C Grandison L Humble M Khalsa J NIH HMP Working GroupThe NIH Human Microbiome ProjectGenome Res2009 123172323

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.096651.109

  36. 36.

    Qin J Li R Raes J Arumugam M Burgdorf KS Manichanh C Nielsen T Pons N Levenez F Yamada T Mende DR Li J Xu J Li S Li D Cao J Wang B Liang H Zheng H Xie Y Tap J Lepage P Bertalan M Batto JM Hansen T Le Paslier D Linneberg A Nielsen HB Pelletier E Renault P A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencingNature2010 15965

    Not in our library10.1038/nature08821

  37. 37.

    Iyer VN Klee HJ Nester EW Units of genetic expression in the virulence region of plant tumor-inducing plasmid of Agrobacterium tumefaciensMol Gen Genet1982 1418424

    Not in our library10.1007/bf00330043

  38. 38.

    Alvarez-Martinez CE Christie PJ Biological diversity of prokaryotic type IV secretion systemsMicrobiol Mol Biol Rev2009 1775808

    Not in our library10.1128/mmbr.00023-09

  39. 39.

    Censini S Lange C Xiang Z Crabtree JE Ghiara P Borodovsky M Rappuoli R Covacci A Cag, a pathogenicity island of Helicobacter pylori, encodes type I-specific and disease-associated virulence factorsProc Natl Acad Sci USA1996 11464814653

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.93.25.14648

  40. 40.

    Suerbaum S Josenhans C Helicobacter pylori evolution and phenotypic diversification in a changing hostNat Rev Microbiol2007 1441452

    Not in our library10.1038/nrmicro1658

  41. 41.

    Macuch PJ Tanner AC Campylobacter species in health, gingivitis, and periodontitisJ Dent Res2000 1785792

    Not in our library10.1177/00220345000790021301

  42. 42.

    Eribe ER Olsen I Leptotrichia species in human infectionsAnaerobe2008 1131137

    Not in our library10.1016/j.anaerobe.2008.04.004

  43. 43.

    Weinberger M Wu T Rubin M Gill VJ Pizzo PA Leptotrichia buccalis bacteremia in patients with cancer: report of four cases and reviewRev Infect Dis1991 1201206

    Not in our library10.1093/clinids/13.2.201

  44. 44.

    Brauner A Brandt L Frisan T Thelestam M Ekbom A Is there a risk of cancer development after Campylobacter infection?Scand J Gastroenterol2010 1893897

    Not in our library10.3109/00365521003734133

  45. 45.

    Kolenbrander PE Andersen RN Moore LV Coaggregation of Fusobacterium nucleatum, Selenomonas flueggei, Selenomonas infelix, Selenomonas noxia, and Selenomonas sputigena with strains from 11 genera of oral bacteriaInfect Immun1989 131943203

    Not in our library10.1128/iai.57.10.3194-3203.1989

  46. 46.

    Bolstad AI Jensen HB Bakken V Taxonomy, biology, and periodontal aspects of Fusobacterium nucleatumClin Microbiol Rev1996 15571

    Not in our library10.1128/cmr.9.1.55

  47. 47.

    Edwards AM Grossman TJ Rudney JD Fusobacterium nucleatum transports noninvasive Streptococcus cristatus into human epithelial cellsInfect Immun2006 1654662

    Not in our library10.1128/iai.74.1.654-662.2006

  48. 48.

    Zhang G Chen R Rudney JD Streptococcus cristatus modulates the Fusobacterium nucleatum-induced epithelial interleukin-8 response through the nuclear factor-kappa B pathwayJ Periodontal Res2011 1558567

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1600-0765.2011.01373.x

Cited by papers we hold 23

and 3 more

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.