Task shifting: the answer to the human resources crisis in Africa?

Abstract

Ever since the 2006 World Health Report advocated increased community participation and the systematic delegation of tasks to less-specialized cadres, there has been a great deal of debate about the expediency, efficacy and modalities of task shifting. The delegation of tasks from one cadre to another, previously often called substitution, is not a new concept. It has been used in many countries and for many decades, either as a response to emergency needs or as a method to provide adequate care at primary and secondary levels, especially in understaffed rural facilities, to enhance quality and reduce costs. However, rapidly increasing care needs generated by the HIV/AIDS epidemic and accelerating human resource crises in many African countries have given the concept and practice of task shifting new prominence and urgency. Furthermore, the question arises as to whether task shifting and increased community participation can be more than a short-term solution to address the HIV/AIDS crisis and can contribute to a revival of the primary health care approach as an answer to health systems crises. In this commentary we argue that, while task shifting holds great promise, any long-term success of task shifting hinges on serious political and financial commitments. We reason that it requires a comprehensive and integrated reconfiguration of health teams, changed scopes of practice and regulatory frameworks and enhanced training infrastructure, as well as availability of reliable medium- to long-term funding, with time frames of 20 to 30 years instead of three to five years. The concept and practice of community participation needs to be revisited. Most importantly, task shifting strategies require leadership from national governments to ensure an enabling regulatory framework; drive the implementation of relevant policies; guide and support training institutions and ensure adequate resources; and harness the support of the multiple stakeholders. With such leadership and a willingness to learn from those with relevant experience (for example, Brazil, Ethiopia, Malawi, Mozambique and Zambia), task shifting can indeed make a vital contribution to building sustainable, cost-effective and equitable health care systems. Without it, task shifting runs the risk of being yet another unsuccessful health sector reform initiative.

References 33

1. 1.

   WHO. The world health report 2006: working together for health. 2006.

   Not in our library

2. 2.

   Dovlo D. Using mid-level cadres as substitutes for internationally mobile health professionals in Africa. A desk review. Hum Resour Health. 2004;2:7.

   Not in our library10.1186/1478-4491-2-7

3. 3.

   Samb B, Celletti F, Holloway J, Van Damme W, De Cock KM, Dybul M. Rapid expansion of the health workforce in response to the HIV epidemic. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2510-2514.

   Not in our library10.1056/nejmsb071889

4. 4.

   JLI. Human resources for health Overcoming the crisis. 2004.

   Not in our library

5. 5.

   De Maeseneer J, Willems S, De Sutter A, Geuchte I Van de, Billings M. Primary health care as a strategy for achieving equitable care: a literature review commissioned by the Health Systems Knowledge Network of CSDH. 2007.

   Not in our library

6. 6.

   Huicho L, Scherpbier RW, Nkowane AM, Victora CG. How much does quality of child care vary between health workers with differing durations of training? An observational multicountry study. Lancet. 2008;372:910-916.

   Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61401-4

7. 7.
   International medical graduates in family medicine in the United States of America: an exploration of professional characteristics and attitudes · 2006

   Not checked
8. 8.

   Kruk ME, Pereira C, Vaz F, Bergstrom S, Galea S. Economic evaluation of surgically trained assistant medical officers in performing major obstetric surgery in Mozambique. Bjog. 2007;114:1253-1260.

   Not in our library10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01443.x

9. 9.
   Postoperative outcome of caesarean sections and other major emergency obstetric surgery by clinical officers and medical officers in Malawi · 2007

   No notice
10. 10.

    Libamba E, Makombe SD, Harries AD, Schouten EJ, Yu JK, Pasulani O, Mhango E, Aberle-Grasse J, Hochgesang M, Limbambala E, et al. Malawi's contribution to "3 by 5": achievements and challenges. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85:156-160.

    Not in our library10.2471/blt.05.033688

11. 11.
    Major surgery delegation to mid-level health practitioners in Mozambique: health professionals' perceptions · 2007

    Not checked
12. 12.

    McCourt W, Awases M. Addressing the human resources crisis: a case study of the Namibian health service. Hum Resour Health. 2007;5:1.

    Not in our library10.1186/1478-4491-5-1

13. 13.

    Tache S, Chapman S. The expanding roles and occupational characteristics of medical assistants: overview of an emerging field in allied health. J Allied Health. 2006;35:233-237.

    Not in our library

14. 14.
    Use of task-shifting to rapidly scale-up HIV treatment services: experiences from Lusaka, Zambia · 2009

    No notice
15. 15.

    Haines A, Sanders D, Lehmann U, Rowe AK, Lawn JE, Jan S, Walker DG, Bhutta Z. Achieving child survival goals: potential contribution of community health workers. Lancet. 2007;369:2121-2131.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60325-0

16. 16.

    Lehmann U, Sanders D, Health DoHRf. Community health workers: What do we know about them? The state of the evidence on programmes, activities, costs and impact on health outcomes of using community health workers. Evidence and Information for Policy. 2007.

    Not in our library

17. 17.

    Lewin SA, Dick J, Pond P, Zwarenstein M, Aja G, van Wyk B, Bosch-Capblanch X, Patrick M. Lay health workers in primary and community health care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;CD004015.

    Not in our library10.1002/14651858.cd004015.pub2

18. 18.

    Walker DG, Jan S. How do we determine whether community health workers are cost-effective? Some core methodological issues. J Community Health. 2005;30:221-229.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10900-004-1960-4

19. 19.

    Marchal B, De Brouwere V, Kegels G. Viewpoint: HIV/AIDS and the health workforce crisis: what are the next steps? Trop Med Int Health. 2005;10:300-304.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01397.x

20. 20.

    Macinko J, Guanais FC, de Fatima M, de Souza M. Evaluation of the impact of the Family Health Program on infant mortality in Brazil, 1990–2002. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60:13-19.

    Not in our library10.1136/jech.2005.038323

21. 21.

    Campbell C, Gibbs A, Maimane S, Nair Y. Hearing community voices: grassroots perceptions of an intervention to support health volunteers in South Africa. Sahara J. 2008;5:162-177.

    Not in our library10.1080/17290376.2008.9724916

22. 22.

    Cohen J, Uphoff N. Rural development Participation: concepts and measures for project design, implementation and evaluation. 1977.

    Not in our library

23. 23.

    Rifkin SB. Paradigms lost: toward a new understanding of community participation in health programmes. Acta Trop. 1996;61:79-92.

    Not in our library10.1016/0001-706x(95)00105-n

24. 24.

    Mathews C, Walt H van der, Barron P. A shotgun marriage – community health workers and government health services. Qualitative evaluation of a community health worker project in Khayelitsha. S Afr Med J. 1994;84:659-663.

    Not in our library

25. 25.

    Quillian JP. Community health workers and primary health care in Honduras. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 1993;5:219-225.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1745-7599.1993.tb00875.x

26. 26.

    Bhattacharyya K, Winch P, LeBan K, Tien M. Community Health Worker incentives and disincentives: how they affect motivation, retention and sustainability. 2001.

    Not in our library

27. 27.

    Gilson L, Walt G, Heggenhougen K, Owuor-Omondi L, Perera M, Ross D, Salazar L. National community health worker programs: how can they be strengthened? J Public Health Policy. 1989;10:518-532.

    Not in our library10.2307/3342522

28. 28.

    Fawcett B, South J. Community involvement and Primary Care Trusts: The case for social entrepreneurship. Critical Public Health. 2005;15:191-204.

    Not in our library10.1080/09581590500144660

29. 29.

    Sanders D, Frankel S. The State and Democratisation in Primary Health Care: Community Participation in Zimbabwe's village health workers' programme. The Community Health Worker. 1992;178-219.

    Not in our library

30. 30.

    Bracht N, Tsouros A. Principles and strategies of effective participation. Health Promotion International. 1990;5:199-208.

    Not in our library10.1093/heapro/5.3.199

31. 31.

    Barnes M. Researching public participation. Local Government Studies. 1999;25:60-75.

    Not in our library

32. 32.

    Foster G. Community development and primary health care: Their conceptual similarities. Medical Anthropology. 1982;6:183-195.

    Not in our library

33. 33.

    McPake B, Mensah K. Task shifting in health care in resource-poor countries. Lancet. 2008;372:870-871.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61375-6

Cited by papers we hold 8

• Strengthening and expanding the capacity of health worker education in Zambia · 2017
  Not checked
• The impact of the advanced practice nursing role on quality of care, clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and cost in the emergency and critical care settings: a systematic review · 2017
  No notice
• Costs and cost-effectiveness of community health workers: evidence from a literature review · 2015
  No notice
• Role and outcomes of community health workers in HIV care in sub‐Saharan Africa: a systematic review · 2013
  No notice
• Policy and programmatic implications of task shifting in Uganda: a case study · 2012
  Not checked
• Impact of community-based support services on antiretroviral treatment programme delivery and outcomes in resource-limited countries: a synthetic review · 2012
  No notice
• Health workforce skill mix and task shifting in low income countries: a review of recent evidence · 2011
  No notice
• A systematic review of task- shifting for HIV treatment and care in Africa · 2010
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.