Factors influencing psychological distress during a disease epidemic: Data from Australia's first outbreak of equine influenza

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2007 Australia experienced its first outbreak of highly infectious equine influenza. Government disease control measures were put in place to control, contain, and eradicate the disease; these measures included movement restrictions and quarantining of properties. This study was conducted to assess the psycho-social impacts of this disease, and this paper reports the prevalence of, and factors influencing, psychological distress during this outbreak. METHODS: Data were collected using an online survey, with a link directed to the affected population via a number of industry groups. Psychological distress, as determined by the Kessler 10 Psychological Distress Scale, was the main outcome measure. RESULTS: In total, 2760 people participated in this study. Extremely high levels of non-specific psychological distress were reported by respondents in this study, with 34% reporting high psychological distress (K10 > 22), compared to levels of around 12% in the Australian general population. Analysis, using backward stepwise binary logistic regression analysis, revealed that those living in high risk infection (red) zones (OR = 2.00; 95% CI: 1.57-2.55; p < 0.001) and disease buffer (amber) zones (OR = 1.83; 95% CI: 1.36-2.46; p < 0.001) were at much greater risk of high psychological distress than those living in uninfected (white zones). Although prevalence of high psychological distress was greater in infected EI zones and States, elevated levels of psychological distress were experienced in horse-owners nationally. Statistical analysis indicated that certain groups were more vulnerable to high psychological distress; specifically younger people, and those with lower levels of formal educational qualifications. Respondents whose principal source of income was from horse-related industry were more than twice as likely to have high psychological distress than those whose primary source of income was not linked to horse-related industry (OR = 2.23; 95% CI: 1.82-2.73; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although, methodologically, this study had good internal validity, it has limited generalisability because it was not possible to identify, bound, or sample the target population accurately. However, this study is the first to collect psychological distress data from an affected population during such a disease outbreak and has potential to inform those involved in assessing the potential psychological impacts of human infectious diseases, such as pandemic influenza.

References 23

1. 1.
   SARS-related Perceptions in Hong Kong · 2005

   No notice
2. 2.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

3. 3.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

4. 4.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

5. 5.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

6. 6.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

7. 7.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

8. 8.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

9. 9.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

10. 10.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

11. 11.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

12. 12.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

13. 13.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

14. 14.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

15. 15.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

16. 16.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

17. 17.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

18. 18.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

19. 19.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

20. 20.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

21. 21.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

22. 22.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

23. 23.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 23

• Psychological distress related to the emerging COVID-19 pandemic and coping strategies among general population in Egypt · 2022
  Not checked
• The effects of social isolation stress and discrimination on mental health · 2022
  No notice
• Digital Media Use and Adolescents' Mental Health During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis · 2022
  No notice
• پریشانی روان‌شناختی در طول دوره کرونا: نقش پیش‌بینی‌کننده ویژگی‌های دموگرافیک، سبک دلبستگی بزرگ‌سالان و سرشت عاطفی · 2021
  Not checked
• A Cross-Cultural Exploratory Study of Health Behaviors and Wellbeing During COVID-19 · 2021
  Not checked
• Cognitive and mental health changes and their vulnerability factors related to COVID-19 lockdown in Italy · 2021
  No notice
• Mental Health of Children and Adolescents Amidst COVID-19 and Past Pandemics: A Rapid Systematic Review · 2021
  No notice
• Gender Differences in Fear and Risk Perception During the COVID-19 Pandemic · 2021
  No notice
• The Impact of Coping Strategies and Perceived Family Support on Depressive and Anxious Symptomatology During the Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19) Lockdown · 2020
  Not checked
• A Nationwide Survey of Psychological Distress among Italian People during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors · 2020
  No notice
• Psychosocial Correlates of Mental Health and Well-Being During the COVID-19: The Spanish Case · 2020
  Not checked
• Related Health Factors of Psychological Distress During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Spain · 2020
  No notice
• The psychological distress and coping styles in the early stages of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic in the general mainland Chinese population: A web-based survey · 2020
  No notice
• The Psychological Impact of ‘Mild Lockdown’ in Japan during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Nationwide Survey under a Declared State of Emergency · 2020
  No notice
• Mental health effects of infection containment strategies: quarantine and isolation—a systematic review and meta-analysis · 2020
  No notice
• Factors Associated With Mental Health Disorders Among University Students in France Confined During the COVID-19 Pandemic · 2020
  No notice
• COVID-19 Confinement and Health Risk Behaviors in Spain · 2020
  Corrected
• Psychological Impact of COVID-19 and Lockdown among University Students in Malaysia: Implications and Policy Recommendations · 2020
  No notice
• Psychological Symptoms During the Two Stages of Lockdown in Response to the COVID-19 Outbreak: An Investigation in a Sample of Citizens in Northern Spain · 2020
  Corrected
• Effects of Covid-19 Lockdown on Mental Health and Sleep Disturbances in Italy · 2020
  No notice

and 3 more

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.