Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 17, 2026.

The South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust Biomedical Research Centre (SLAM BRC) case register: development and descriptive data

Robert Stewart, Mishael Soremekun, Gayan Perera and 6 more

BMC Psychiatry · 2009

doi:10.1186/1471-244x-9-51

Abstract

Background. Case registers have been used extensively in mental health research. Recent developments in electronic medical records, and in computer software to search and analyse these in anonymised format, have the potential to revolutionise this research tool.

Methods. We describe the development of the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLAM) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) Case Register Interactive Search tool (CRIS) which allows research-accessible datasets to be derived from SLAM, the largest provider of secondary mental healthcare in Europe. All clinical data, including free text, are available for analysis in the form of anonymised datasets. Development involved both the building of the system and setting in place the necessary security (with both functional and procedural elements).

Results. Descriptive data are presented for the Register database as of October 2008. The database at that point included 122,440 cases, 35,396 of whom were receiving active case management under the Care Programme Approach. In terms of gender and ethnicity, the database was reasonably representative of the source population. The most common assigned primary diagnoses were within the ICD mood disorders (n = 12,756) category followed by schizophrenia and related disorders (8158), substance misuse (7749), neuroses (7105) and organic disorders (6414).

Conclusion. The SLAM BRC Case Register represents a 'new generation' of this research design, built on a long-running system of fully electronic clinical records and allowing in-depth secondary analysis of both numerical, string and free text data, whilst preserving anonymity through technical and procedural safeguards.

References 11

  1. 1.

    World Health Organisation. Psychiatric case registers. Report on a Working Group. 1983.

    Not in our library

  2. 2.

    Joyce PR. Changing trends in first admissions and readmissions for mania and schizophrenia in New Zealand, 1974 to 1984. Aus NZ JMed. 1987;21:82-6.

    Not in our library10.3109/00048678709160903

  3. 3.

    Lichtenberg P, Kaplan Z, Grinshpoon A, Feldman D, Nahoon D. The goals and limitations of Israel's Psychiatric Case Register. Psychiatric Services. 1999;50:1043-8.

    Not in our library10.1176/ps.50.8.1043

  4. 4.

    Munk-Jorgensen P, Mortensen PB. The Danish PsychiatricCase Register. Danish Medical Bulletin. 1997;44:82-4.

    Not in our library

  5. 5.

    Amaddeo F, Beecham J, Bonizzato P, Fenyo A, Knapp M, Tansella M. The use of a case register to evaluate the costs of psychiatric care. Acta Psych Scand. 1997;95:189-98.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1600-0447.1997.tb09619.x

  6. 6.

    Pijl YJ, Kluiter H, Wiersma D. Change in Dutch mental health care: an evaluation. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2000;35:402-7.

    Not in our library10.1007/s001270050257

  7. 7.

    Richards T. Court sanctions use of anonymised patientdata. BMJ. 2000;320:77B.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmj.320.7227.77

  8. 8.

    Kalra D, Gertz R, Singleton P, Inskip HM. Confidentiality of personal health information used for research. BMJ. 2006;333:196-8.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmj.333.7560.196

  9. 9.

    Armstrong V, Barnett J, Cooper H, et al. Public perspectives on the governance of biomedical research: a qualitative study in a deliberative context. 2007.

    Not in our library

  10. 10.

    Callard F, Wykes T. Mental health and perceptions of biomarker research: possible effects on participation. Journal of Mental Health. 2008;17:1-7.

    Not in our library10.1080/09638230801931944

  11. 11.

    Munk-Jorgensen P. The schizophrenia diagnosis in Denmark. Acta Psych Scand. 1985;72:266-73.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1600-0447.1985.tb02605.x

Cited by papers we hold 15

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.