No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 29, 2026.
How long do nosocomial pathogens persist on inanimate surfaces? A systematic review
Axel Kramer, Ingeborg Schwebke, Günter Kampf
BMC Infectious Diseases · 2006 · Systematic review
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inanimate surfaces have often been described as the source for outbreaks of nosocomial infections. The aim of this review is to summarize data on the persistence of different nosocomial pathogens on inanimate surfaces. METHODS: The literature was systematically reviewed in MedLine without language restrictions. In addition, cited articles in a report were assessed and standard textbooks on the topic were reviewed. All reports with experimental evidence on the duration of persistence of a nosocomial pathogen on any type of surface were included. RESULTS: Most gram-positive bacteria, such as Enterococcus spp. (including VRE), Staphylococcus aureus (including MRSA), or Streptococcus pyogenes, survive for months on dry surfaces. Many gram-negative species, such as Acinetobacter spp., Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia marcescens, or Shigella spp., can also survive for months. A few others, such as Bordetella pertussis, Haemophilus influenzae, Proteus vulgaris, or Vibrio cholerae, however, persist only for days. Mycobacteria, including Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and spore-forming bacteria, including Clostridium difficile, can also survive for months on surfaces. Candida albicans as the most important nosocomial fungal pathogen can survive up to 4 months on surfaces. Persistence of other yeasts, such as Torulopsis glabrata, was described to be similar (5 months) or shorter (Candida parapsilosis, 14 days). Most viruses from the respiratory tract, such as corona, coxsackie, influenza, SARS or rhino virus, can persist on surfaces for a few days. Viruses from the gastrointestinal tract, such as astrovirus, HAV, polio- or rota virus, persist for approximately 2 months. Blood-borne viruses, such as HBV or HIV, can persist for more than one week. Herpes viruses, such as CMV or HSV type 1 and 2, have been shown to persist from only a few hours up to 7 days. CONCLUSION: The most common nosocomial pathogens may well survive or persist on surfaces for months and can thereby be a continuous source of transmission if no regular preventive surface disinfection is performed.
References 127
- 1.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1067/mic.2002.127205
- 2.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1016/s0195-6701(01)90017-9
- 3.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1067/mic.2003.49
- 4.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1053/jhin.2002.1279
- 5.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1007/s00103-003-0752-9
- 6.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 7.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1128/cmr.17.4.863-893.2004
- 8.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1128/cmr.14.3.528-546.2001
- 9.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1128/jcm.38.2.724-726.2000
- 10.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1016/s0195-6701(97)90229-2
- 11.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1007/bf01713142
- 12.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 13.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1016/0195-6701(91)90223-u
- 14.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 15.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.4315/0362-028x-57.11.963
- 16.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 17.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02530.x
- 18.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1128/jcm.34.12.2881-2887.1996
- 19.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1016/s0195-6701(98)90263-8
- 20.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jhin.2005.12.008
- 21.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 22.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.04.021
- 23.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 24.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 25.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1128/jcm.35.6.1394-1397.1997
- 26.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2672.1993.tb01589.x
- 27.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1007/bf01969538
- 28.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1097/00004630-200021060-00009
- 29.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1086/503214
- 30.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 31.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 32.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 33.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1139/m87-136
- 34.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1139/m75-121
- 35.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1128/aem.57.5.1394-1399.1991
- 36.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1093/clinids/13.3.448
- 37.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1017/s0022172400066055
- 38.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1128/aem.67.9.3904-3907.2001
- 39.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 40.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library10.1016/s0161-6420(93)31389-8
Cited by papers we hold 23
- Assessment of dry-fogged hydrogen peroxide as an “untact” room disinfection automation system for rapid terminal decontamination of a single isolation room in a healthcare institution · 2025Not checked
- Whole Genome Multi-Locus Sequence Typing and Genomic Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Analysis for Epidemiological Typing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa From Indonesian Intensive Care Units · 2022Not checked
- Expectations and Perceptions of Healthcare Professionals for Robot Deployment in Hospital Environments During the COVID-19 Pandemic · 2021Not checked
- The Many Faces of Enterococcus spp.—Commensal, Probiotic and Opportunistic Pathogen · 2021No notice
- Sulphonamide inhibition profile of Staphylococcus aureus β-carbonic anhydrase · 2020Not checked
- Arginine Catabolic Mobile Element in Evolution and Pathogenicity of the Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Strain USA300 · 2020Not checked
- Environmental factors involved in SARS-CoV-2 transmission: effect and role of indoor environmental quality in the strategy for COVID-19 infection control · 2020No notice
- Successful implementation of infection control measure in a neonatal intensive care unit to combat the spread of pathogenic multidrug resistant Staphylococcus capitis · 2019Not checked
- Efficacy of disinfectant-impregnated wipes used for surface disinfection in hospitals: a review · 2019Not checked
- Serratia marcescens colonization in preterm neonates during their neonatal intensive care unit stay · 2019Not checked
- Prevalence rate of Klebsiella pneumoniae in the intensive care unit: epidemiology and molecular characteristics · 2018Not checked
- Postoperative infection caused by Acinetobacter baumannii misdiagnosed as a free-living amoeba species in a humeral head hemiarthroplasty patient: a case report · 2018Not checked
- Antibiotic resistance: What is so special about multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria? · 2017No notice
- Instant Typing Is Essential to Detect Transmission of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Klebsiella Species. · 2015Not checked
- Bacterial contamination of inanimate surfaces and equipment in the intensive care unit · 2015No notice
- Survival of Enveloped and Non-Enveloped Viruses on Inanimate Surfaces · 2015No notice
- Large outbreak caused by methicillin resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius ST71 in a Finnish Veterinary Teaching Hospital--from outbreak control to outbreak prevention. · 2014Not checked
- Strategies to Minimize Antibiotic Resistance · 2013No notice
- Short Term Effects of Weather on Hand, Foot and Mouth Disease · 2011No notice
- From Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Candida glabrata in a few easy steps: important adaptations for an opportunistic pathogen · 2010No notice
and 3 more
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.