Not checked for notices yet.

Responsiveness of five condition-specific and generic outcome assessment instruments for chronic pain

Verra Martin L, Angst Felix, Lehmann Susanne and 1 more

BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2008

doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-26

References 45

1.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
2.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
3.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
4.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
5.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
6.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
7.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
8.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
9.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
10.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
11.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
12.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
13.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
14.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
15.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
16.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
17.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
18.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
19.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
20.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
21.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
22.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
23.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
24.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
25.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
26.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
27.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
28.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
29.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
30.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
31.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
32.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
33.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
34.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
35.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
36.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
37.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
38.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
39.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
40.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library

All 45 references

Cited by papers we hold 1

Improving the interpretation of quality of life evidence in meta-analyses: the application of minimal important difference units · 2010
No notice

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.