Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 15, 2026.

Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range

Xiang Wan, Wenqian Wang, Jiming Liu and 1 more

BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2014

doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-135

Abstract

Background. In systematic reviews and meta-analysis, researchers often pool the results of the sample mean and standard deviation from a set of similar clinical trials. A number of the trials, however, reported the study using the median, the minimum and maximum values, and/or the first and third quartiles. Hence, in order to combine results, one may have to estimate the sample mean and standard deviation for such trials.

Methods. In this paper, we propose to improve the existing literature in several directions. First, we show that the sample standard deviation estimation in Hozo et al.’s method (BMC Med Res Methodol 5:13, 2005) has some serious limitations and is always less satisfactory in practice. Inspired by this, we propose a new estimation method by incorporating the sample size. Second, we systematically study the sample mean and standard deviation estimation problem under several other interesting settings where the interquartile range is also available for the trials.

Results. We demonstrate the performance of the proposed methods through simulation studies for the three frequently encountered scenarios, respectively. For the first two scenarios, our method greatly improves existing methods and provides a nearly unbiased estimate of the true sample standard deviation for normal data and a slightly biased estimate for skewed data. For the third scenario, our method still performs very well for both normal data and skewed data. Furthermore, we compare the estimators of the sample mean and standard deviation under all three scenarios and present some suggestions on which scenario is preferred in real-world applications.

Conclusions. In this paper, we discuss different approximation methods in the estimation of the sample mean and standard deviation and propose some new estimation methods to improve the existing literature. We conclude our work with a summary table (an Excel spread sheet including all formulas) that serves as a comprehensive guidance for performing meta-analysis in different situations.

Electronic supplementary material. The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-135) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

Read at PubMed Central

References 14

  1. 1.

    Antman EM, Lau J, Kupelnick B, Mosteller F, Chalmers TC. A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts: treatments for myocardial infarction. J Am Med Assoc. 1992;268:240-248.

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.1992.03490020088036

  2. 2.

    Cipriani A, Geddes J. Comparison of systematic and narrative reviews: the example of the atypical antipsychotics. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2003;12:146-153.

    Not in our library10.1017/s1121189x00002918

  3. 3.
  4. 4.

    Triola M. F. Elementary Statistics, 11th Ed. 2009.

    Not in our library

  5. 5.

    Hogg RV, Craig AT. Introduction to Mathematical Statistics. 1995.

    Not in our library

  6. 6.

    David HA, Nagaraja HN. Order Statistics, 3rd Ed. 2003.

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    Blom G. Statistical Estimates and Transformed Beta Variables. 1958.

    Not in our library

  8. 8.

    Harter HL. Expected values of normal order statistics. Biometrika. 1961;48:151-165.

    Not in our library10.1093/biomet/48.1-2.151

  9. 9.

    Cramér H. Mathematical Methods of Statistics. 1999.

    Not in our library

  10. 10.

    Bland M. Estimating mean and standard deviation from the sample size, three quartiles, minimum, and maximum. International Journal of Statistics in Medical Research, in press. 2014.

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    Liu T, Li G, Li L, Korantzopoulos P. Association between c-reactive protein and recurrence of atrial fibrillation after successful electrical cardioversion: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1642-1648.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jacc.2006.12.042

  12. 12.

    Zhu A, Ge D, Zhang J, Teng Y, Yuan C, Huang M, Adcock IM, Barnes PJ, Yao X. Sputum myeloperoxidase in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur J Med Res. 2014;19:12.

    Not in our library10.1186/2047-783x-19-12

  13. 13.

    Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2008.

    Not in our library

  14. 14.

    The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/14/135/prepub

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 81

and 61 more

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.