No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 19, 2026.

Improving basic and translational science by accounting for litter-to-litter variation in animal models

Stanley E Lazic, Laurent Essioux

BMC Neuroscience · 2013 · Meta-analysis

Abstract

Background. Animals from the same litter are often more alike compared with animals from different litters. This litter-to-litter variation, or “litter effects”, can influence the results in addition to the experimental factors of interest. Furthermore, sometimes an experimental treatment can only be applied to whole litters rather than to individual offspring. An example is the valproic acid (VPA) model of autism, where VPA is administered to pregnant females thereby inducing the disease phenotype in the offspring. With this type of experiment the sample size is the number of litters and not the total number of offspring. If such experiments are not appropriately designed and analysed, the results can be severely biased as well as extremely underpowered.

Results. A review of the VPA literature showed that only 9% (3/34) of studies correctly determined that the experimental unit (n) was the litter and therefore made valid statistical inferences. In addition, litter effects accounted for up to 61% (p <0.001) of the variation in behavioural outcomes, which was larger than the treatment effects. In addition, few studies reported using randomisation (12%) or blinding (18%), and none indicated that a sample size calculation or power analysis had been conducted.

Conclusions. Litter effects are common, large, and ignoring them can make replication of findings difficult and can contribute to the low rate of translating preclinical in vivo studies into successful therapies. Only a minority of studies reported using rigorous experimental methods, which is consistent with much of the preclinical in vivo literature.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

References 55

1.
Geerts H Of mice and men: bridging the translational disconnect in CNS drug discoveryCNS Drugs2009 2311915926[http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/11310890-000000000-00000]
Not in our library10.2165/11310890-000000000-00000
2.
Haseman JK Hogan MD Selection of the experimental unit in teratology studiesTeratol1975 122165171
Not in our library10.1002/tera.1420120209
3.
Hughes CW Outcome of early experience studies as affected by between-litter varianceJ Nutr1979 1094642645
Not in our library10.1093/jn/109.4.642
4.
Holson RR Pearce B Principles and pitfalls in the analysis of prenatal treatment effects in multiparous speciesNeurotoxicol Teratol1992 143221228
Not in our library10.1016/0892-0362(92)90020-b
5.
Zorrilla EP Multiparous species present problems (and possibilities) to developmentalistsDev Psychobiol1997 302141150
Not in our library10.1002/(sici)1098-2302(199703)30:2<141::aid-dev5>3.0.co;2-q
6.
Wainwright PE Issues of design and analysis relating to the use of multiparous species in developmental nutritional studiesJ Nutr1998 1283661663
Not in our library10.1093/jn/128.3.661
7.
Festing MFW Altman DG Guidelines for the design and statistical analysis of experiments using laboratory animalsILAR J2002 434244258
Not in our library10.1093/ilar.43.4.244
8.
Festing MFW Principles: the need for better experimental designTrends Pharmacol Sci2003 247341345
Not in our library10.1016/s0165-6147(03)00159-7
9.
Festing MFW Design and statistical methods in studies using animal models of developmentILAR J2006 47514
Not in our library10.1093/ilar.47.1.5
10.
Casella G Statistical Design2008 New York: Springer
Not in our library
11.
Maurissen J Practical considerations on the design, execution and analysis of developmental neurotoxicity studies to be published in Neurotoxicology and TeratologyNeurotoxicol Teratol2010 322121123[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ntt.2009.09.002]
Not in our library10.1016/j.ntt.2009.09.002
12.
The problem of pseudoreplication in neuroscientific studies: is it affecting your analysis? · 2010
No notice
13.
International Conference on HarmonisationDetection of toxicity to reproduction for medicinal products and toxicity to male fertility1993 S5(R2)123[http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/safety/safety-single/article/detection-of-toxicity-to-reproduction-for-medicinal-products-toxicity-to-male-fertility.html]
Not in our library
14.
OECDGuideline for the testing of chemicals: developmental neurotoxicity study2007 426126[http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/test-no-426-developmental-neurotoxicity-study_5l4fg25mnkxs.pdf;jsessionid=12ic71yg7bopl.delta?contentType=/ns/Book&itemId=/content/book/9789264067394-en&containerItemId=/content/serial/ 20745788&accessItemIds=&mimeType=application/pdf]
Not in our library
15.
Hurlbert SH Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experimentsEcol Monogr1984 542187211
Not in our library10.2307/1942661
16.
Schnabel J Neuroscience: Standard modelNature2008 4547205682685[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/454682a]
Not in our library10.1038/454682a
17.
Scott S Kranz JE Cole J Lincecum JM Thompson K Kelly N Bostrom A Theodoss J Al-Nakhala BM Vieira FG Ramasubbu J Heywood JA Design, power, and interpretation of studies in the standard murine model of ALSAmyotroph Lateral Scler2008 9415[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482960701856300]
Not in our library10.1080/17482960701856300
18.
Benatar M Lost in translation: treatment trials in the SOD1 mouse and in human ALSNeurobiol Dis2007 26113[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2006.12.015]
Not in our library10.1016/j.nbd.2006.12.015
19.
Bebarta V Luyten D Heard K Emergency medicine animal research: does use of randomization and blinding affect the results?Acad Emerg Med2003 106684687
Not in our library10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00056.x
20.
Crossley NA Sena E Goehler J Horn J van der Worp B Bath PMW Macleod M Dirnagl U Empirical evidence of bias in the design of experimental stroke studies: a metaepidemiologic approachStroke2008 393929934[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.498725]
Not in our library10.1161/strokeaha.107.498725
21.
Survey of the Quality of Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Reporting of Research Using Animals · 2009
No notice
22.
Publication Bias in Reports of Animal Stroke Studies Leads to Major Overstatement of Efficacy · 2010
No notice
23.
Vesterinen HM Sena ES ffrench Constant C Williams A Chandran S Macleod MR Improving the translational hit of experimental treatments in multiple sclerosisMult Scler2010 16910441055[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1352458510379612]
Not in our library10.1177/1352458510379612
24.
Hackam DG Redelmeier DA Translation of research evidence from animals to humansJAMA2006 2961417311732[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.14.1731]
Not in our library10.1001/jama.296.14.1731
25.
Dirnagl U Bench to bedside: the quest for quality in experimental stroke researchJ Cereb Blood Flow Metab2006 261214651478[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600298]
Not in our library10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600298
26.
Philip M Benatar M Fisher M Savitz SI Methodological quality of animal studies of neuroprotective agents currently in phase II/III, acute ischemic stroke trialsStroke2009 402577581[http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.524330]
Not in our library10.1161/strokeaha.108.524330
27.
Can Animal Models of Disease Reliably Inform Human Studies? · 2010
No notice
28.
Shineman DW Basi GS Bizon JL Colton CA Greenberg BD Hollister BA Lincecum J Leblanc GG Lee LBH Luo F Morgan D Morse I Refolo LM Riddell DR Scearce-Levie K Sweeney P Yrjanheikki J Fillit HM Accelerating drug discovery for Alzheimer’s disease: best practices for preclinical animal studiesAlzheimers Res Ther2011 3528http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/alzrt90
Not in our library10.1186/alzrt90
29.
Rooke EDM Vesterinen HM Sena ES Egan KJ Macleod MR Dopamine agonists in animal models of Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysisParkinsonism Relat Disord2011 175313320[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2011.02.010]
Not in our library10.1016/j.parkreldis.2011.02.010
30.
Sarewitz D Beware the creeping cracks of biasNature2012 4857397149[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/485149a]
Not in our library10.1038/485149a
31.
Nieuwenhuis S Forstmann BU Wagenmakers EJ Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significanceNat Neurosci2011 14911051107[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886]
Not in our library10.1038/nn.2886
32.
Cumming G Fidler F Vaux DL Error bars in experimental biologyJ Cell Biol2007 177711
Not in our library10.1083/jcb.200611141
33.
Lazic SE Relating hippocampal neurogenesis to behavior: the dangers of ignoring confounding variablesNeurobiol Aging2010 311221692171[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.04.037]
Not in our library10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.04.037
34.
Lazic SE Using causal models to distinguish between neurogenesis-dependent and -independent effects on behaviourJ R Soc Interface2011 e-pub ahead of print 28 Sep 2011 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2011.0510] [http://dx.doi.org/101098/rsif20110510 ]
Not in our library10.1098/rsif.2011.0510
35.
Simmons JP Nelson LD Simonsohn U False-positive psychology undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significantPsychol Sci2011 221113591366[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632]
Not in our library10.1177/0956797611417632
36.
Mullard A Reliability of ’new drug target’ claims called into questionNat Rev Drug Discov2011 109643644[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrd3545]
Not in our library10.1038/nrd3545
37.
Prinz F Schlange T Asadullah K Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?Nat Rev Drug Discov2011 109712[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrd3439-c1]
Not in our library10.1038/nrd3439-c1
38.
Ledford H Drug candidates derailed in case of mistaken identityNature2012 4837391519[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/483519a]
Not in our library10.1038/483519a
39.
Begley CG Ellis LM Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer researchNature2012 4837391531533[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/483531a]
Not in our library10.1038/483531a
40.
Rinaldi T Silberberg G Markram H Hyperconnectivity of local neocortical microcircuitry induced by prenatal exposure to valproic acidCereb Cortex2008 184763770[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhm117]
Not in our library10.1093/cercor/bhm117

All 55 references

Cited by papers we hold 3

Pesticides and transgenerational inheritance of pathologies: Designing, analysing and reporting rodent studies. · 2020
Not checked
What exactly is ‘N’ in cell culture and animal experiments? · 2018
No notice
Skeletal development of mice lacking bone sialoprotein (BSP)--impairment of long bone growth and progressive establishment of high trabecular bone mass. · 2014
Not checked

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.