Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Comparison of classification methods for detecting associations between SNPs and chick mortality

Rosa Guilherme JM, Gianola Daniel, Long Nanye and 2 more

Genetics Selection Evolution · 2009

doi:10.1186/1297-9686-41-18 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Multi-category classification methods were used to detect SNP-mortality associations in broilers. The objective was to select a subset of whole genome SNPs associated with chick mortality. This was done by categorizing mortality rates and using a filter-wrapper feature selection procedure in each of the classification methods evaluated. Different numbers of categories (2, 3, 4, 5 and 10) and three classification algorithms (naïve Bayes classifiers, Bayesian networks and neural networks) were compared, using early and late chick mortality rates in low and high hygiene environments. Evaluation of SNPs selected by each classification method was done by predicted residual sum of squares and a significance test-related metric. A naïve Bayes classifier, coupled with discretization into two or three categories generated the SNP subset with greatest predictive ability. Further, an alternative categorization scheme, which used only two extreme portions of the empirical distribution of mortality rates, was considered. This scheme selected SNPs with greater predictive ability than those chosen by the methods described previously. Use of extreme samples seems to enhance the ability of feature selection procedures to select influential SNPs in genetic association studies.</p>

Abstract licence: CC BY

References44

  1. 3.
  2. 32.

38 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

All 44 references

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.