Tennis Elbow—Outcome following the Garden Procedure: A Retrospective Study
VS Kumar, AA Shetty, KJ Ravikumar and 1 more
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery · 2004
doi:10.1177/230949900401200217 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Purpose. From 1993 to 1999, 17 patients (18 elbows) underwent the Garden procedure for clinically diagnosed tennis elbow. Non-operative treatment was ineffective for these patients. Methods. The study group consisted of 10 men and 7 women, with a mean age of 49.6 years. Follow-up duration ranged from 18 months to 6 years, with a mean of 37 months. Patients' pain, activity level, and hand grip strength were evaluated postoperatively. Results. 14 (77.8%) elbows had an excellent or good result, 2 elbows had a fair result, and another 2 elbows had a poor result and required revision surgery. Most patients had immediate relief of elbow pain, returned to work early, and did not notice any weakness of hand grip strength or radial wrist extension. There were no significant complications. Conclusion. The Garden procedure produced good results for tennis elbow with minimal morbidity in an unselected group of patients. This retrospective study supports the view that the underlying lesion in tennis elbow is in the origin of extensor carpi radialis brevis.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.