Validation of the English and French versions of the Brief Health Care Climate Questionnaire
Zofia Czajkowska, Hui Wang, Nathan C Hall and 2 more
Health Psychology Open · 2017
doi:10.1177/2055102917730675 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Patient autonomy is a central value in medicine and critical component of adherence to medical advice. This article reports on a validation of the 6-item version of the Health Care Climate Questionnaire (HCCQ), a measure of autonomy support in health care settings, in a sample of 242 melanoma patients. The HCCQ showed excellent internal consistency ( α = .91), structural validity (Tucker–Lewis index = .99; comparative fit index = .99; root mean square error of approximation = .06, 90 per cent confidence interval (.00, .11); standardized root mean square residual = .02; χ 2 (8, N = 235) = 13.99, p = .08) and construct validity (92.31% of hypothesized correlations with other measures confirmed). Acceptable 3-month test–retest reliability was observed ( r = .55, p < .001; intraclass correlation coefficient ( A, 1) = .54, p < .001). The French version was found equivalent to the English version.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.