Liver injury in COVID‐19: The current evidence

1Altered liver function tests are reported in up to half of the patients with COVID-19 infection.Disease severity, pre-existing liver disease and older age present a risk for liver injury.Drug-induced liver injury is an important consideration in patients with COVID-19.Hepatotoxic antiviral medications require careful monitoring of adverse effects.SARS-CoV-2 may directly bind to ACE2 positive cholangiocytes and can cause hepatic injury.Activation of the immune system and ‘cytokine storm’ may contribute to an immune-mediated process of hepatic injury in COVID-19.The control of cytokine dysregulation at an early stage could be beneficial to curb the disease progression.

2Altered liver function tests are reported in up to half of the patients with COVID-19 infection.

3Disease severity, pre-existing liver disease and older age present a risk for liver injury.

4Drug-induced liver injury is an important consideration in patients with COVID-19.

5Hepatotoxic antiviral medications require careful monitoring of adverse effects.

6SARS-CoV-2 may directly bind to ACE2 positive cholangiocytes and can cause hepatic injury.

7Activation of the immune system and ‘cytokine storm’ may contribute to an immune-mediated process of hepatic injury in COVID-19.

8The control of cytokine dysregulation at an early stage could be beneficial to curb the disease progression.

9In the current pandemic coronavirus disease (COVID-19), almost every country in the world has now registered COVID-19 cases, and the confirmed cases have exceeded one million to date. While initial clinical studies, especially from China, the USA and Italy, have highlighted the dominant clinical symptoms including fever, cough, fatigue and shortness of breath, the later research unveiled shreds of evidence on the extrapulmonary manifestations of the disease. These reports highlighted that beyond severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a complicated course of the disease or even viral infection itself can lead to involvement of other organs and multi-organ failure. The liver is the primary organ for detoxification and metabolism, and maintaining an optimal function is imperative to engage all available therapeutic modalities in the treatment of COVID-19. Abnormal liver function requires clinical evaluation, continuous surveillance and, potentially, specific therapy. To support clinical decision making and optimize the outcome in the treatment of COVID-19, it will be crucial to clearly understand the possible mechanisms involved in liver injury. The current review summarizes the pathophysiology and potentially specific role of COVID-19 in liver disease based on the available data and case series published, ahead of print and non-peer-reviewed preprints as of 2 April. The search strategy is detailed in the Supplementary Material online.

10Emerging data from small clinical case studies have proposed that liver injury in COVID-19 is frequently seen, but the extent and underlying mechanisms remain undetermined. Figure 1 summarizes the pathophysiological findings, which are discussed below.

11The liver exerts a crucial function in host defense against microbes and is involved in most systemic infections as it receives both the portal and systemic circulation. Certain viruses exert a direct cytopathic effect on hepatocytes and cholangiocytes although, in most cases, the pathogenesis seems multifactorial. Yang et al. reported that SARS-CoV could cause direct cytopathic liver injury rather than inducing cellular stress from low oxygen supplies or cytokines as seen in sepsis. Autopsy studies in patients revealed that SARS-CoV was detectable in 41% of the liver tissue, with a maximum viral load of 1.6 × 106 copies/g of tissue. The pathological findings of liver biopsy specimens from SARS patients showed hepatocellular necrosis, mitoses, cellular infiltration and fatty degeneration. In a recent autopsy analysis of liver tissue from a patient with COVID-19, moderate microvesicular steatosis and mild inflammation in the lobular and portal area was observed. However, this pattern of histological injury is not specific for one etiology but can also be observed during sepsis or drug-induced liver injury (DILI).

12Similar to SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 uses the angiotensin-2 converting enzyme (ACE2) receptor protein to attack the host system. The cell entry receptor, ACE2, is widely expressed across the human body, including the lungs (type II alveolar cells), gastrointestinal tract (esophageal epithelial cells and absorptive enterocytes of ileum and colon), hepatobiliary system (hepatocytes and cholangiocytes), cardiovascular system (myocardial cells), the renal system (proximal tubule cells and urothelial bladder cells) and the pancreas. Recent studies have observed that ACE2 expression in the cell clusters of cholangiocytes was significantly higher than that in the hepatocytes population (59.7% vs. 2.6%). The authors conclude that SARS-CoV-2 may directly bind to ACE2 positive cholangiocytes, but not hepatocytes, to exert a cytopathic effect. Cholangiocytes are involved in many aspects of liver physiology, including regeneration and adaptive immune response mechanisms, and the disruption of cholangiocyte function can cause hepatobiliary damage. This is supported by cholestatic markers, including gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), that can be found in some, but not all, case series of COVID-19.– Notably, a recent review reported unpublished data with GGT elevations in 54% of cases. In a human organoid model of liver ductal organoids, permissiveness to SARS-CoV-2 infection was observed. Here viral infection impaired the barrier and bile acid transporting functions of cholangiocytes through dysregulation of genes involved in tight junction formation and bile acid transportation, supporting the susceptibility of cholangiocytes in SARS-CoV-2-related liver injury.

13Dysregulation of the innate immune response can be one aspect of liver injury in COVID-19. Patients with COVID-19 exhibit marked activation of inflammatory markers, including abnormal levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), lymphocytes, neutrophils and cytokines, in particular interleukin-6 (IL-6).,– These mechanisms may contribute to pulmonary and extrapulmonary injuries, and the control of cytokine dysregulation at an early stage could be beneficial to curb the disease progression.

14Hepatic inflammation involving activation of innate immune cells and the release of cytokines is a well-established driver of liver injury from various causes. In some of the available case series of COVID-19, a correlation between lymphopenia and liver injury was observed and CRP ≥20 mg/L and a lymphocyte count <1.1 × 109/L were independent risk factors for liver injury. Notably, lymphopenia in COVID-19 studies was reportedly observed in 63% to 70.3% of patients and those with lower lymphocyte counts more susceptible to fatal outcomes.

15More than 20 publications to date reported abnormal levels of aminotransferases in patients with COVID-19.--,–,--19,21,23--27,–,, A recent systematic review and meta-analysis on LFT abnormalities provided a pooled elevation of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) in 33.3% and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in 24.1% of cases. Various investigators across different studies reported a correlation between the severity of COVID-19 and the degree of liver dysfunction.,, In one retrospective study, one patient experienced severe hepatitis with ALT of 7590 U/L and AST of 1445 U/L. In a report from Shanghai, 50.7% of patients presented with elevated LFTs at the time of hospitalization. Interestingly, these were more likely to have a moderate-to-high-grade fever when compared with the patients with normal LFT (44% vs. 27.4%; p = 0.035). On the other hand, mild and moderate cases experienced only discrete abnormal LFT values. These reports support the concept that the disease severity and an older age predispose to more severe liver injury from COVID-19. Based on these case series, patients with severe COVID-19 and pre-existing liver conditions – but also elderly patients – should undergo surveillance and individually tailored therapeutic approaches for potential liver injury.

16A recently published article by Bangash et al. argues after careful review of seven relevant studies that elevated ALT and AST may not necessarily be of hepatic origin alone. The authors have given a timely reminder that it is common for other respiratory viruses to create similar LFT elevations and thus more prospective data related to the clinical relevance COVID-19 and liver injury is required.

17The previous pathogenic coronaviruses, such as SARS-CoV and the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), were also reported to manifest with elevated levels of ALT and AST. More generally, non-hepatotropic viral infections may affect the liver and induce hepatitis or fulminant acute liver failure. However, in the majority of cases, recovery from viral illness is often sufficient to resolve liver injury.

18Like in SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV infections, abnormal levels of albumin and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were also reported in SARS-CoV-2 infection, with the maximum of 98% and 76% of the patients affected as reported in the study by Chen et al. It is important to remember that LDH and AST elevation could be from muscle damage and not necessarily reflect liver injury.

19The current armory of therapeutic agents explored against SARS-CoV-2 includes several antiviral agents, supportive therapy and trials of alternative medicines in many regions of the world. Given the fact that the liver is involved in the metabolism of many drugs, including nucleoside analogs and protease inhibitors that are currently used to treat COVID-19, hepatotoxicity from these drugs can arise.

20A recent randomized controlled trial of lopinavir and ritonavir in severe COVID-19 reported that elevated levels of AST, ALT and total bilirubin occurred as adverse effects in a few patients. Another case series from Wuhan reported that 55.4% of patients experienced liver injuries after treatment with lopinavir and ritonavir. Fan et al. published a retrospective study on COVID-19 and observed that the utilization rate of this drug combination was significantly higher in patients with abnormal LFTs compared with patients without LFT elevations (56.1% vs. 25%, p = 0.009). In this study, 47.3% of the discharged patients showed elevated LFTs at baseline, and 23.7% developed abnormalities during hospitalization, suggesting emerging liver injury from drugs or during the course of the infection. Importantly, LFT elevation during the hospital stay was associated with prolonged length of hospitalization.

21Chloroquine, an old drug with a potential of repositioning for new treatment indications, has recently been tried in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. After a profound success in inhibiting viral replication in vitro, concurrent clinical trials (>20) on chloroquine conducted at 10 hospitals across China have demonstrated superior efficacy in viral control. The pharmacodynamic activity of this drug in COVID-19 may involve the arresting of cytokine storms or the activation of CD8+ cells or by preventing endocytosis-mediated uptake of the virus. Importantly, hepatotoxicity related to chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine has rarely been reported.

22In severe cases of COVID-19 with cytokine release, tocilizumab, an IL-6 antagonist, which is humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody to the IL-6 receptor, has been used as a potential therapy for SARS-CoV-2. In previous clinical trials for other indications tocilizumab was reported to cause mild elevations of LFTs which were usually transient and commonly resolved within 2–6 weeks from exposure.

23Remdesivir is an experimental antiviral nucleotide analog with broad activity against coronaviruses that is currently being trialed for SARS-Cov-2 infection. Safety data from ongoing studies will guide on its use in patients, but so far no reports of liver toxicity have emerged.

24Scare data has been published for COVID-19 infection in patients with pre-existing liver disease. Experience from previous episodes of coronavirus infection can guide on the extent of hepatic involvement and on the management of patients with pre-existing liver disease. In SARS, the highest mortality rates were observed in the elderly and adults with underlying liver disease. Therefore, it has to be expected that the patients with COVID-19 are also more vulnerable to hepatic injury. In a case series from the Zhejiang province, a prevalence of 11% of underlying liver disease was reported. About half of them experienced symptoms for more than 10 days after the illness onset. In another study from Wuhan, 9% of patients had the underlying liver disease of cirrhosis or hepatitis. Li et al., who investigated risk factors involved with hepatic injury, stated that two patients had presented with alcoholic liver disease at baseline. One of them had a moderate elevation of ALT (120 U/L) within a week of hospitalization, while the other showed no such abnormalities. In the initial cohort described from China, 2.7% exhibited hepatitis B virus infection with no mention of worsening outcomes. Therefore, the association of the pre-existing liver conditions with disease prognosis and outcomes in COVID-19 will have to be evaluated by comprehensive data registries which recently started enrolling patients (e.g. COVID-Hep Registry and SECURE-Cirrhosis Registry).

25Management of post liver transplant recipients during the COVID-19 pandemic presents a special challenge for clinicians because of the limited data available and the crucial need to continue immunosuppressive drugs in these patients, which puts them at risk for more severe courses of COVID-19 infection and possible prolonged viral shedding. Case reports from China did not reveal an increased mortality in organ transplant recipients. Qin et al. reported the first case of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent liver transplantation. Lowering immunosuppression to the most acceptable level appears reasonable in infected liver transplant patients, in particular, in the setting of lymphopenia or clinical worsening of infection.

26In addition clinicians have to be aware of drug–drug interactions in the transplant setting. In particular immunosuppressive drugs and ritonavir-boosted antiviral therapies exhibit relevant interactions through CYP34A which lead to increased levels of calcineurin and mTOR inhibitors. Accordingly, chloroquine-based regimes or remdesivir (compassionate use program only) appear to be safe, while boosted protease inhibitors should be avoided (see Table 2). Additionally, preventive strategies in those vulnerable patients include early and prolonged screening with polymerase chain reaction-based testing for patients with early symptoms, a contact history or infection. Personal protective equipment in high risk settings can help to protect this vulnerable patient group.

27Liver function abnormalities – predominantly AST elevation – in COVID-19 appear to be frequent but not severe in most cases. Direct viral hepatotoxicity, DILI, ‘bystander effects’ during a systemic viral infection and potentially sepsis, or exacerbation of an underlying liver disease have to be considered. Ex vivo studies offer that SARS-CoV-2 can selectively target the liver, in particular cholangiocytes through ACE2, and thus hepatobiliary injury appears plausible. Irrespective of the mechanisms involved in the hepatic injury of patients with COVID-19, activation of the immune-mediated pathway seems to be critical. Special high risk populations require close monitoring. These include the elderly population, patients with end-stage liver disease and liver transplant recipients. Symptomatic treatment with acetaminophen and avoidance of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in cirrhosis is recommended. Cautious use of antiviral agents in patients with decompensated liver disease and drug–drug interactions in post liver transplant patients has to be considered. As emphasized by a recent position paper of the European Study of Liver Disease, elective procedures and routine tests should be postponed according to the risk–benefit at the given time. On the other hand, emergency medical care needs to be done with appropriate measures to prevent infection.