Prediction model for cytomegalovirus infection following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with β-thalassemia major
Lin Pan, Zhenbin Wei, Yanni Xie and 13 more
SAGE Open Medicine · 2025
doi:10.1177/20503121251360132 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Background: Cytomegalovirus infection is a common complication following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation that significantly influences clinical outcomes. Objectives: To develop and validate a predictive model for cytomegalovirus infection risk in patients with β-thalassemia major undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: Clinical data from 291 β-thalassemia major patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation were retrospectively analyzed. Independent risk factors identified via univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses formed the basis of a predictive nomogram. The model’s performance was evaluated by the concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis. Internal validation was performed using bootstrap resampling, and external validation was conducted with an independent cohort of 84 patients from another center. Results: Three independent predictors of cytomegalovirus infection were identified: serum albumin levels, donor type, and grade III–IV acute graft-versus-host disease. A nomogram incorporating these predictors was established, demonstrating good discriminative ability (C-index: 0.745; 95% CI: 0.684–0.807). Internal and external validations yielded C-indices of 0.746 and 0.649, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.745 in the training cohort and 0.649 in the validation cohort. Conclusion: We developed and validated a reliable predictive model for assessing cytomegalovirus infection risk after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in β-thalassemia major patients. This scoring system offers clinicians a practical tool for early risk stratification and intervention.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
References33
- 12.
32 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.