Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Differences in the Contribution of CD4+ T Cells to Proislet and Islet Allograft Rejection Correlate with Constitutive Class II MHC Alloantigen Expression

Charmaine J. Simeonovic, Debra J. Brown, Michelle J. Townsend and 1 more

Cell Transplantation · 1996

doi:10.1177/096368979600500503 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Allografts of BALB/c (H-2d) fetal proislets facilitated long-term (>100 days) reversal of streptozotocin-induced diabetes in CBA/H (H-2k) mice treated with a combination of anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 mAbs. Anti-CD8 monotherapy was partially effective in restoring normoglycemia but anti-CD4 mAb treatment of host animals failed to promote allograft function. In contrast, allografts of BALB/c adult islets demonstrated indefinite reversal of diabetes in recipient mice treated only with anti-CD8 mAb. Anti-CD4 monotherapy resulted in only transient restoration of normoglycemia. These findings clearly demonstrate (1) a critical role for CD8 T cells in the acute rejection of pancreatic islet tissue allografts and (2) tissue-specific differences in the participation of CD4 T cells as primary effectors in the rejection reaction. Immunohistochemical studies showed that the capacity for CD4 T cells to initiate the rejection of proislet but not adult islet allografts correlates with the presence/absence, respectively, of graft parenchymal cells that constitutively express Class II MHC alloantigens. Proislet grafts, unlike transplants of purified adult islets, contain heterogeneous tissue components including Class II MHC+ve duct epithelium. Thus, the participation of CD8 and CD4 T cells as primary effectors of graft rejection depends on which class or classes of MHC antigens are constitutively expressed on graft parenchymal cells and are available for recognition. Islet tissue in both rejecting proislet and islet allografts showed de novo induction of Class II MHC alloantigens only after severe disruption to islet architecture had been achieved by infiltrating mononuclear cells. Thus, at this stage of advanced allograft injury, CD4 T cells have the potential to act as secondary effectors, possibly by amplifying the inflammatory reaction and thus accelerating graft destruction. The capacity for antirejection mAb therapy to establish transplant tolerance was facilitated in the islet allograft model where it was necessary to target only the CD8 T cell subpopulation.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

References50

    40 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

    All 50 references

    Reads

    Read by people on this page

    None yet.

    Checked or read by AI through naulon

    None yet.

    A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

    Are you an author?

    Is this your paper?

    Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.