No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 17, 2026.

Multiple imputation of covariates by fully conditional specification: Accommodating the substantive model

Jonathan W Bartlett, Shaun R Seaman, Ian R White and 2 more

Statistical Methods in Medical Research · 2014

Abstract

Missing covariate data commonly occur in epidemiological and clinical research, and are often dealt with using multiple imputation. Imputation of partially observed covariates is complicated if the substantive model is non-linear (e.g. Cox proportional hazards model), or contains non-linear (e.g. squared) or interaction terms, and standard software implementations of multiple imputation may impute covariates from models that are incompatible with such substantive models. We show how imputation by fully conditional specification, a popular approach for performing multiple imputation, can be modified so that covariates are imputed from models which are compatible with the substantive model. We investigate through simulation the performance of this proposal, and compare it with existing approaches. Simulation results suggest our proposal gives consistent estimates for a range of common substantive models, including models which contain non-linear covariate effects or interactions, provided data are missing at random and the assumed imputation models are correctly specified and mutually compatible. Stata software implementing the approach is freely available.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

References 25

1.
Kenward MG Carpenter JR Multiple imputation: current perspectives. Stat Methods Med Res 2007; 16: 199–218.
Not in our library10.1177/0962280206075304
2.
White IR Carlin JB Bias and efficiency of multiple imputation compared with complete-case analysis for missing covariate values. Stat Med 2010; 28: 2920–2931.
Not in our library10.1002/sim.3944
3.
Rubin DB Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys, New York, NY: Wiley, 1987.
Not in our library
4.
White IR Royston P Wood AM Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med 2011; 30: 377–399.
Not in our library10.1002/sim.4067
5.
van Buuren S Multiple imputation of discrete and continuous data by fully conditional specification. Stat Methods Med Res 2007; 16: 219–242.
Not in our library10.1177/0962280206074463
6.
Meng XL Multiple-imputation inferences with uncongenial sources of input (with discussion). Stat Sci 1994; 10: 538–573.
Not in our library
7.
Schafer JL Analysis of incomplete multivariate data, London: Chapman and Hall, 1997.
Not in our library
8.
Collins LM Schafer JL Kam C A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychol Methods 2001; 6: 330–351.
Not in our library
9.
Schafer JL Multiple imputation in multivariate problems when the imputation and analysis models differ. Stat Neerl 2003; 57: 19–35.
Not in our library
10.
Seaman SR Bartlett JW White IR Multiple imputation of missing covariates with non-linear effects and interactions: an evaluation of statistical methods. BMC Med Res Methodol 2012; 12: 46–46.
Not in our library10.1186/1471-2288-12-46
11.
Jack CR Jr Wiste HJ Vemuri P Brain beta-amyloid measures and magnetic resonance imaging atrophy both predict time-to-progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 2010; 133: 3336–3348.
Not in our library10.1093/brain/awq277
12.
Rubin DB Inference and missing data. Biometrika 1976; 63: 581–592.
Not in our library
13.
Liu J Gelman A Hill J On the stationary distribution of iterative imputations. Biometrika Epub 2013.
Not in our library
14.
Arnold BC Press SJ Compatible conditional distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 1989; 84: 152–156.
Not in our library
15.
von Hippel PT How to impute interactions, squares, and other transformed variables. Sociol Methodol 2009; 39: 265–291.
Not in our library
16.
Imputing missing covariate values for the Cox model · 2009
No notice
17.
Ibrahim JG Chen MH Lipsitz SR Monte-Carlo EM for missing covariates in parametric regression models. Biometrics 1999; 55: 591–596.
Not in our library10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.00591.x
18.
Goldstein H Carpenter JR Browne WJ Fitting multilevel multivariate models with missing data in responses and covariates that may include interactions and non-linear terms. J R Stat Soc A 2013.
Not in our library
19.
van Buuren S Brand JPL Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM Fully conditional specification in multivariate imputation. J Stat Comput Simul 2006; 76: 1049–1064.
Not in our library
20.
Hughes RA, White IR, Seaman S, et al. Joint modelling rationale for chained equations imputation (under review).
Not in our library10.1186/1471-2288-14-28
21.
Gelman A Carlin JB Stern HS Bayesian data analysis, 2nd ed Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2004.
Not in our library
22.
Rathouz PJ Identifiability assumptions for missing covariate data in failure time regression models. Biostatistics 2007; 8: 345–356.
Not in our library10.1093/biostatistics/kxl014
23.
van Buuren S Flexible imputation of missing data, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2012.
Not in our library
24.
Wood AM White IR Royston P How should variable selection be performed with multiply imputed data. Stat Med 2008; 27: 3227–3246.
Not in our library10.1002/sim.3177
25.
Little RJA Regression with missing X’s: A review. J Am Stat Assoc 1992; 87: 1227–1237.
Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 4

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.