Investor to State Dispute Cases on the NAFTA: Facts and Implications
Kwan-Ho Kim
East Asian Economic Review · 1998
doi:10.11644/kiep.jeai.1998.2.3.26 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Korea is about to take part in the MAI (Multilateral Agreement on Investment) and sign the Korea-US investment agreement and so on. One major way to testify the possible trade dissensions we might face under these agreements is to observe the dissension cases under the NAFTA investment agreement which is similar to these agreements. The problems which found in NAFTA dissension cases, such as the discordant standing points among sections, the relationship between the central government and local governments, the coherence of the policies and the unreasonable domestic regulations are also our problems. The dissensions causing by the oversea investors might blemish the image of the country which attracts investments. The most ideal way is to prevent the dissensions. If it happened, it should be solved in a friendly way. This thesis discussed the grievance machinery or trouble shooter which was recently added into the investment promotion act and the effective operation of the foreign investment committee.
Abstract licence: CC BY
References1
1 more reference, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.