Non‐Hispanic Black and Hispanic Patients Have Worse Outcomes Than White Patients Within Similar Stages of Peripheral Artery Disease

Background Racial and ethnic disparities in outcomes following lower limb revascularization for peripheral artery disease have been ascribed to disease severity at presentation for surgery. Methods and Results We calculated 1‐year risk of major adverse limb events (MALEs), major amputation, and death for patients undergoing elective revascularization for claudication or chronic limb‐threatening ischemia in the Vascular Quality Initiative data (2011–2018). We report hazard ratios according to race and ethnicity using Cox (death) or Fine and Gray subdistribution hazards models (MALE and major amputation, treating death as a competing event), adjusted for patient, treatment, and anatomic factors associated with disease severity. Among 88 599 patients (age, 69 years; 37% women), 1‐year risk of MALE (major amputation and death) was 12.8% (95% CI, 12.5–13.0) in 67 651 White patients, 16.5% (95% CI, 5.8–7.8) in 15 442 Black patients, and 17.2% (95% CI, 5.6–6.9) in 5506 Hispanic patients. Compared with White patients, we observed an increased hazard of poor limb outcomes among Black (MALE: 1.17; 95% CI, 1.12–1.22; amputation: 1.52; 95% CI, 1.39–1.65) and Hispanic (MALE: 1.22; 95% CI, 1.14–1.31; amputation: 1.45; 95% CI, 1.28–1.64) patients. However, Black and Hispanic patients had a hazard of death of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.79–0.91) and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.63–0.79) times the hazard among White patients, respectively. Worse limb outcomes were observed among Black and Hispanic patients across subcohorts of claudication and chronic limb‐threatening ischemia. Conclusions Black and Hispanic patients undergoing infrainguinal revascularization for chronic limb‐threatening ischemia and claudication had worse limb outcomes compared with White patients, even with similar disease severity at presentation. Additional investigation aimed at eliminating disparate limb outcomes is needed.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.